Shocking Magazine Photo Retouches

Sep 27, 2017 7:26 AM

JIFonmyGIF

Views

228544

Likes

3637

Dislikes

305

So... LA is California's cootchie?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1st one uplifted them titties too

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You missed that they made her tits perkier

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Copy, I need to Smooth myself

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't buy #1, because they didn't touch (up) the boobies.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Having lived in Atlanta, yes please replace with sexy cleavage!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone else sad this was a joke? I was legit interested in photoshop retouches.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So that's how they do it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean...that cleavage does make the state kinda sexy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Remove shit hole" cracked me up.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Remove shit hole" killed me

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#1 Good before. Awful after. Welcome to the Uncanny Valley!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

dislexic "after" placement

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@iseenipple

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's it, I'm never buying another Cosmo magazine again!

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

As a professional photo retoucher, this made me lol.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"HUGE DEER NOW" I thought that was satire at first

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's almost like magazines want to make their images as eyecatching and beautiful as possible to sell...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Doesn't mean its right. Fucks up entire generations of people's idea of beauty and what's realistic.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This post is catastrophic. +1

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

is... is 4 actually the same photo but retouched? the groundline matches and the clouds are pretty much the same...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Before on the left, after on the right surely? Or is that just me?

8 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 3

Yes, and don't call me Shirley.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the idea is you look at what was on the magazine first and then how they did it second but idk

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a professional cg/photo artist i'm not shocked at all...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean... have you ever tried to work with some art director?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"And make sky happier. Jesus Christ."

8 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 3

Is that why Kim Kardashian looks good in magazine and like shit in real life and videos?

8 years ago | Likes 267 Dislikes 4

Well, that's because they're shit people.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, looking real is the same as looking shit. People complain but are also the first to complain if they don't look perfect. Hypocritical.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

Bitch are you sure you ain't a Hobbit?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

She looks like shit in both, tbqh

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Her butt don't look real and that sure is butters

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She is shit in real life, doest she?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Honestly she doesn't even look good in magazines. That infamous butt picture, wtf

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Not a good look. At all.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've seen mannequins radiate more life.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"Break the internet" I recall the response more like "ew what the fuck"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can't be it. On the last pic, it says “remove shit hole“ There would be no pics of her at all.

8 years ago | Likes 202 Dislikes 0

The ultimate zing!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

savage

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

She better design some burn ointment next

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

ローストされた

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I work as a retoucher, I mean #1 is pretty close to what I get

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

It's missing red for the shoulder, skin, and breasts.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good work removing all that red text and lines! :D

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What is the strangest image you've ever retouched?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A photographer once asked be to retouch his art-series or portrait. It was breasts, v-jayjays and portraits of women. Sounds bad when 1/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I put it like this but it was acually quite, classy although wierd. The cool part was that everything was shot on sheet film and a really 2/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

camera, the 'cloth over the head' kind of camera

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm really curious: what is your opinion on the work you (have to) do? Does it at all affect how you look at the world or no?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't have any ethical problems with it, but once you know the tricks, you can't unsee it. Easy to pick out flaws on everything.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Haha yeah, been retouching professionally for about 5 years now. I cringe so hard when I see real bad retouch on high-end magazines or such

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Alongside being a retoucher I also work as a photographers and photo-assisstant. One thing I've learned about commercial images 1/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is that it's never what it seems. Being a photographer / retoucher is hard work and noway as 'flashy' as it seems. Same with the portraits2/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

of like famous people on magazine-covers or w/e. They're almost always heavily retouched. Even if its not "visible". You can still retouch3/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

a portrait greatly and it still looks "natrual". TL;DR = Yes, everything is a lie ;) 4/4

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The adjustment to the hair (labeled slat) looks way to obvious; not be that high if a quality edit; have i just been oblivious?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it looks way too "flat" need to have hair ends in some way. Ought to look more natural imo

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Also, did they even add color to the hair? Looks like they just bumped saturation and contrast on the whole thing and that happened

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Missing hair was added to the bangs.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That isn't what I asked, I was askin about it saying that color was added

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looks like contrast curve and a touch of hue/saturation and/or colorbalance :D

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm mostly disturbed that the "afters" are on the left

8 years ago | Likes 2239 Dislikes 5

if you are japanese like me you will read fomr right to left

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah, I downvoted it for that

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Quick! Retouch this thread into a more desired order.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

از چی حرف میزنی؟

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Gesundheit.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

it took me a little while to realize that even though i had read the headers, my brain refused to apply it to what i was looking at

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fits for this I think because the "afters" are always what we see first.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Become comes after after since after is before before

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

תתמודד עם זה

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 3

"Deal with it" Quite witty response, since Hebrew is written and read right to left!

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Alternatively, you also read Japanese from right to left.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

לא באלי

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Lol!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hebrew for deal with it

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

I was gonna, but you did. +1

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Maybe it's Japanese

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

乇乂ㄒ尺卂 ㄒ卄丨匚匚

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

いいえ、その日本人ではありません。

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

No, that's just Bendydick Cuminhersnatch

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2