Sep 28, 2018 1:54 PM
BenjaminKrygsheld
3455
208
92
And let the down votes roll
ryunwould
So many red snowflakes.
Chereazi
He's making himself look worse and worse, guilty or not... terrible choice
snorch1
https://imgur.com/WRZMGF1
iwarthan59
That’s not even close to what he said
ThisIsNoCave
Pre-hearing Kavanaugh: "I'm calm, objective, and nonpartisan", Mid-hearing Kavanaugh: "Fuck all the Democrats! CLINTON DID THIS" *cries*
Cryolith
Regardless of the allegations- any person who comports themselves like that in an official capacity is not fit for SCOTUS. Or ANY office.
[deleted]
AnnieBahde
I think maybe he does‘t remember. I think he was super drunk and it wasn’t a big deal to him at the time so why would it linger?
JudgementalChair
Bruh, everybody knows rapists always keep written records of their assaults. How do you think we catch these people?
DadBodThor
Everyone knows Victims keep their assaults on the DL and save them for a day were it will fit their political agenda.
6gunglenn5772
somerandomusernameee
I really don’t see how the colander helps at all. He acted like a jackass and he blatantly lied under oath. To hell with him.
BugOutReady1
What did he lie about? You call him a liar because he denied the allegations or because he didn’t say what you wanted to hear?
Really? He lied about his drunken behavior. He lied about ever having lapses in memory. He’s QUOTED saying he’s had to piece shit together.
Into ALL the claims of sexual misconduct. He’s lying. That’s why no one wants the actual investigation this deserves.
He can’t answer simple yes or no questions. He’s angry and defiant. If he was as innocent as he claims why not request an FBI investigation
Senator Harris asked misleading questions that has no right yes/no answer. “Did you talk to anyone from X law firm? I think you know who.”
2)”Don’t you think you should be investigated by the FBI?” No= you’re hiding something! Yes=So! You’ve done something worth investigating?!
if I was wrongly accused of something serious I’d demand an investigation into my innocence.
Sandobyone
Pushing moderate judge further right. Smh
Decitron
IF that's all it took to make him into a conspiracy theory spouting loon, it'd be wise to keep him off the bench.
You've misunderstood me but you'll see what I mean.
gayerthanacavscout
$10 says you didn’t listen to his testimony, but waited for CNN to tell you what it said in selected sound bites.
How do I collect my ten dollars?
I'll take it!
Yes. He clearly laid out his defense in a compelling, convincing way, and pointed out how weak the case was against him. Watch it again.
By hysterically declaring the matter to be a leftist conspiracy theory orchestrated by the Clintons? That's pretty insane.
By crying and berating people? He behaved like a spoiled brat.
I listened to the entire thing. Whether you believe him or not his temperament and objectivity is seriously compromised.
Oh, you wouldn’t have righteous indignation if you were being accused of sexual assault & you & your family being threatened?
It’s going to keep happening, of course. The Democrats are getting their delay, and the anonymous threats and accusations will keep coming.
lucyandatlas1416
Calling out the downvotes because this shit has gotten ridiculous, we all just want the old imgur back that isn't affiliated with politics.
TESDfan
SMH that's exactly what a democratic, republican, centrist with libertarian leanings would say.
Or someone who thought they could escape the nightmare of politics on imgur and laugh for a moment...
I don't really like any. Just most of them are about fuck nut in office or the other asshole accused of rape
Where is the transparency about me not liking anti Republican stuff?
Is there a way to make it so you can't see anything political?
Nah I would probably do that same to the others. Just see more of these type of posts and I am tired of them all. I miss funny posts
HalfOpenSkies
He doesn’t, he has zero chance of proving himself innocent. He did his best to provided all the evidence of that time frame.
Scaramucci
"That never happened. Also, those guys weren't there."
Well considering that NO ONE who was claimed to be there corroborated Ford’s account, yeah.
deadguyshadow
Dude he didn't rape her. Go look at her testimony. She can't answer shit. So many fucking holes in her story. So obviously a smear tactic.
Her testimony was poised, informative, and reflected on her professionalism. He raved like a lunatic about a conspiracy like a mad fool.
Broham, go read the meme. All rape is sexual assault but all sexual assault is not rape. Attempted rape is still sexual assault.
A statement through your lawyer isnt the same as being interviewed by law enforcement. He also left plenty of wiggle room with 'didnt see'
He made a SWORN statement. That IS under oath.
Grassley. He entered them into the record at the hearing.
I've never heard penalty under felony used. There's penalty of perjury or lying under oath but these don't apply to basic letters to congres
You can’t ask follow up questions of a sworn statement, you can’t judge a person’s credibility from a piece of paper.
Do I like him? No. But my fucking god what the DNC is doing right now is an insult to the Senate and judicial hearings.
BeenthereDonesome
It shouldn't come as a surprise with what they did to Bernie and all.
KartFnocker
do you guys just knee-jerk 'DNC' for anything? They have nothing to do with this hearing or nomination
Insisting the matter be investigated properly by a neutral party (the FBI) is in keeping with the good faith of the process.
Republicans holding up Merric Garland's nomination without a single hearing, however, was a perversion of the process.
Guilty until proven innocent.
I wasn't aware that public opinion and failing to end up as a SCOTUS would put him in prison. Pretty sure that's not how it works.
But then, if he's assumed not guilty, is not Ford also not guilty of lying? Maybe an FBI investigation into the allegations is in order.
The FBI will find what? All persons there claimed to be at the party refute the account. The investigation has been done by the senate.
No one has refuted the account. At MOST the few who've made statements said they didn't see the event take place. Link below.
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/09/22/us/politics/ap-us-fact-check-week.html
And again: https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/pj-smyth-brett-kavanaugh/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
Yes there are: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/22/kavanaugh-ford-woman-party-letter-836913
This whole trail by angry mob with no evidence to back anything that has been said ruins lives, destroying a man because dissenting opinions
1. Testimony is evidence that is used in courts of law, so, actually, there is factually evidence.
2. Given the circumstances, Kavanaugh would almost certainly not face prison time. He'd only lose the SCOTUS seat. Hardly ruining his life.
3. But that assumes the allegation is correct, which means he SHOULD be denied the seat.
ryunwould
So many red snowflakes.
Chereazi
He's making himself look worse and worse, guilty or not... terrible choice
snorch1
https://imgur.com/WRZMGF1
iwarthan59
That’s not even close to what he said
ThisIsNoCave
Pre-hearing Kavanaugh: "I'm calm, objective, and nonpartisan", Mid-hearing Kavanaugh: "Fuck all the Democrats! CLINTON DID THIS" *cries*
Cryolith
Regardless of the allegations- any person who comports themselves like that in an official capacity is not fit for SCOTUS. Or ANY office.
[deleted]
[deleted]
AnnieBahde
I think maybe he does‘t remember. I think he was super drunk and it wasn’t a big deal to him at the time so why would it linger?
JudgementalChair
Bruh, everybody knows rapists always keep written records of their assaults. How do you think we catch these people?
DadBodThor
Everyone knows Victims keep their assaults on the DL and save them for a day were it will fit their political agenda.
6gunglenn5772
somerandomusernameee
I really don’t see how the colander helps at all. He acted like a jackass and he blatantly lied under oath. To hell with him.
BugOutReady1
What did he lie about? You call him a liar because he denied the allegations or because he didn’t say what you wanted to hear?
somerandomusernameee
Really? He lied about his drunken behavior. He lied about ever having lapses in memory. He’s QUOTED saying he’s had to piece shit together.
somerandomusernameee
Into ALL the claims of sexual misconduct. He’s lying. That’s why no one wants the actual investigation this deserves.
somerandomusernameee
He can’t answer simple yes or no questions. He’s angry and defiant. If he was as innocent as he claims why not request an FBI investigation
BugOutReady1
Senator Harris asked misleading questions that has no right yes/no answer. “Did you talk to anyone from X law firm? I think you know who.”
BugOutReady1
2)”Don’t you think you should be investigated by the FBI?” No= you’re hiding something! Yes=So! You’ve done something worth investigating?!
somerandomusernameee
Sandobyone
Pushing moderate judge further right. Smh
Decitron
IF that's all it took to make him into a conspiracy theory spouting loon, it'd be wise to keep him off the bench.
Sandobyone
You've misunderstood me but you'll see what I mean.
gayerthanacavscout
$10 says you didn’t listen to his testimony, but waited for CNN to tell you what it said in selected sound bites.
BenjaminKrygsheld
How do I collect my ten dollars?
gayerthanacavscout
BenjaminKrygsheld
I'll take it!
[deleted]
[deleted]
gayerthanacavscout
Yes. He clearly laid out his defense in a compelling, convincing way, and pointed out how weak the case was against him. Watch it again.
Decitron
By hysterically declaring the matter to be a leftist conspiracy theory orchestrated by the Clintons? That's pretty insane.
Cryolith
By crying and berating people? He behaved like a spoiled brat.
AnnieBahde
I listened to the entire thing. Whether you believe him or not his temperament and objectivity is seriously compromised.
BugOutReady1
Oh, you wouldn’t have righteous indignation if you were being accused of sexual assault & you & your family being threatened?
gayerthanacavscout
It’s going to keep happening, of course. The Democrats are getting their delay, and the anonymous threats and accusations will keep coming.
lucyandatlas1416
Calling out the downvotes because this shit has gotten ridiculous, we all just want the old imgur back that isn't affiliated with politics.
TESDfan
SMH that's exactly what a democratic, republican, centrist with libertarian leanings would say.
lucyandatlas1416
Or someone who thought they could escape the nightmare of politics on imgur and laugh for a moment...
[deleted]
[deleted]
lucyandatlas1416
I don't really like any. Just most of them are about fuck nut in office or the other asshole accused of rape
lucyandatlas1416
Where is the transparency about me not liking anti Republican stuff?
[deleted]
[deleted]
lucyandatlas1416
Is there a way to make it so you can't see anything political?
lucyandatlas1416
Nah I would probably do that same to the others. Just see more of these type of posts and I am tired of them all. I miss funny posts
[deleted]
[deleted]
HalfOpenSkies
He doesn’t, he has zero chance of proving himself innocent. He did his best to provided all the evidence of that time frame.
Scaramucci
"That never happened. Also, those guys weren't there."
HalfOpenSkies
Well considering that NO ONE who was claimed to be there corroborated Ford’s account, yeah.
deadguyshadow
Dude he didn't rape her. Go look at her testimony. She can't answer shit. So many fucking holes in her story. So obviously a smear tactic.
Decitron
Her testimony was poised, informative, and reflected on her professionalism. He raved like a lunatic about a conspiracy like a mad fool.
BenjaminKrygsheld
Broham, go read the meme. All rape is sexual assault but all sexual assault is not rape. Attempted rape is still sexual assault.
[deleted]
[deleted]
BenjaminKrygsheld
A statement through your lawyer isnt the same as being interviewed by law enforcement. He also left plenty of wiggle room with 'didnt see'
gayerthanacavscout
He made a SWORN statement. That IS under oath.
[deleted]
[deleted]
gayerthanacavscout
Grassley. He entered them into the record at the hearing.
BenjaminKrygsheld
I've never heard penalty under felony used. There's penalty of perjury or lying under oath but these don't apply to basic letters to congres
AnnieBahde
You can’t ask follow up questions of a sworn statement, you can’t judge a person’s credibility from a piece of paper.
deadguyshadow
Do I like him? No. But my fucking god what the DNC is doing right now is an insult to the Senate and judicial hearings.
BeenthereDonesome
It shouldn't come as a surprise with what they did to Bernie and all.
KartFnocker
do you guys just knee-jerk 'DNC' for anything? They have nothing to do with this hearing or nomination
Decitron
Insisting the matter be investigated properly by a neutral party (the FBI) is in keeping with the good faith of the process.
Decitron
Republicans holding up Merric Garland's nomination without a single hearing, however, was a perversion of the process.
DadBodThor
Guilty until proven innocent.
Decitron
I wasn't aware that public opinion and failing to end up as a SCOTUS would put him in prison. Pretty sure that's not how it works.
Decitron
But then, if he's assumed not guilty, is not Ford also not guilty of lying? Maybe an FBI investigation into the allegations is in order.
HalfOpenSkies
The FBI will find what? All persons there claimed to be at the party refute the account. The investigation has been done by the senate.
Decitron
No one has refuted the account. At MOST the few who've made statements said they didn't see the event take place. Link below.
Decitron
https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/09/22/us/politics/ap-us-fact-check-week.html
HalfOpenSkies
And again: https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/pj-smyth-brett-kavanaugh/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
HalfOpenSkies
Yes there are: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/22/kavanaugh-ford-woman-party-letter-836913
DadBodThor
This whole trail by angry mob with no evidence to back anything that has been said ruins lives, destroying a man because dissenting opinions
Decitron
1. Testimony is evidence that is used in courts of law, so, actually, there is factually evidence.
Decitron
2. Given the circumstances, Kavanaugh would almost certainly not face prison time. He'd only lose the SCOTUS seat. Hardly ruining his life.
Decitron
3. But that assumes the allegation is correct, which means he SHOULD be denied the seat.