Science or Engineering ?

Aug 6, 2016 7:02 AM

sehnaoui

Views

62769

Likes

1457

Dislikes

68

What about both? Sciencineering.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Idk shouldnt the science one be physics instead?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Isn't it more like physics versus engineering, both sciences?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Engineering: out these three bolts out in the open. Put that 4th bolt behind this thing so you have to take THAT off too.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think you know what science means.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I never understood this. Design, approval, fabrication, installation, O&Ms, As-Builts, etc..... all part of engineering in my world.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The difference between science and engineering is possibility and feasibility.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Those pictures are horrible representations of science and engineering

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Why did you crop out architecture?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 3

Is there a photo shop?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

slam the table and see which one falls

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Science looks cooler.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's just a hack job! A real engineer would design and machine a modular fork retention system out of a solid block of titanium

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

And his machinist would hate him for choosing titanium

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Without scince there is no engineering.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

scince when?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Engineering has to safe guard against users. Science doesn't

9 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 0

haha BOOM! That was electricity bitch! Science! *she's dead*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bingo

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Oppenheimer disagrees

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

First, science to figure out how the thing works. Then, if that turns out to be impractical, make it practical, by force if necessary.

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 1

"Calculations say it should work. Make it so." - scientist to engineer

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Manufacturing to engineer "what kinda crack are these scientists smoking that will never hold up"

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Project Management to all: Client asked us if you could make it with 2 lines that are parallel to each other and intersect.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Result: Warp engines.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Engineering is the profession where the lazier you are, the better you'll be at figure out the fastest and easiest way to get it done

9 years ago | Likes 450 Dislikes 7

I think you have grossly underestimated my laziness.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like to think of it as efficacy rather than laziness haha

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Necessity is the mother of invention, but laziness is definitely the father.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Laziness breeds efficiency... or is it the other way around? I don't know.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I should've been an engineer. I constantly get compliments at work for this..

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As an engineer turned scientist, laziness will serve you well in science too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

According to my dad, "an engineer is someone who does for 100,000 what any idiot could do for 1,000,000"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an engineer, yes. +1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I will always choose a lazy person to do a difficult job, because he will find an easy way to do it. -Bill Gates

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then I guess I'm becoming an engineer

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an engineer, I'd never bothered to figure this out for myself

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"It's not laziness, it's *efficiency*."

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're not an engineer lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I am, actually.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No way, same!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

As an engineer, this is 100% correct. Have my upvote!

9 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 2

Under-engineered comment. 0 pts

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a failed engineer, there is such a thing as too lazy

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Work smart, not hard!

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Don't work when you can build/program something else to do it for you.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Work smart, and hard

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's the same for IT

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Not really, you may find out the fastest way to do it once, but often doing the hard work means saving time later (tools/automation etc)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends, I build / design really complex infrastructures, the clients usually want to try to save money though.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

False. My lazy coworkers are just lazy, and the lazy way is usually half assed

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In my experience there's two kinds of lazy in IT. The ingenious, find the most efficient way to solve a problem type, and the normal kind.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've only met the normal kind, but I'm just starting my career

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"We're having DNS issues." "eh, just add this into the hosts file." Laziness can be dangerous.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0