Say no to this BS in games!

Nov 22, 2017 4:25 AM

DiveBomber87

Views

105279

Likes

1500

Dislikes

78

https://gizmodo.com/belgian-gaming-commission-decides-battlefront-ii-style-1820663366

Link to the story. I hope this sends a message to all companys that if they pull this crap, people will not go for it.

Don't forget Belgium even won a privacy case against Facebook. Be afraid, be very afraid.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Counterstrike...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This has been fought about by legal experts in other games (csgo) and generally: isnt gambling because you cant "lose" you always "win"

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Best thing we can do is stop buying and playing this shit! Just fucking stop. They wont make any money off of it then....

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Apparently Hawaii is going after this shit now. ITS IN THE USA!! ITS HAPPENING MOTHER FUCKERS WE WERE LOUD ENOUGH!!!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Ban lootcrates and say hello to 15$ DLC for pretty much EVERY single peice of the game short of a "main menu".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Belgium, fuck yeah!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I bet it won't get banned in the US.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This all goes back to Clash Royale, which is *insanely* profitable for Supercell. Major publishers have been watching it very closely.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a friend in the industry said, it's not surprising that 2017 is the year of the loot box, given that CR released 2 years ago.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Companies like EA and Ubi have been looking to mimic Clash's monetization model in AAA PC/console games to try and duplicate those profits.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People these days... Back on my first years of Gaming a game cost sth like what is equivalent today of 100-120€. Nowadays you pay40-60...

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

And you got no dev support or updates/expansions at those prices.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Also those games didn't maintain servers and shit, so they had no continued costs after release so no reason to have continued revenue

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Now THIS I can get behind, the battlefront 2 lootboxes, that gives an advantage while playing, that should be banned, not all lootboxes.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

paying money for a chance to get ingame currency to unlock something Should be illegal. If they want to keep it all ingame like OW fine.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I LIKE THE LOOT BOXES, I dont like that they make your own play better, but i like loot boxes and have no issue with EA

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate lootboxes, but I don't think they should be illegal. Thats whack

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

FALSE. the article has a mistranslation.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now if only mass discontent online can also solve real problems #netneutrality

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 8

Well this is the first 'lootbox' post on Imgur I've seen for two days amongst the literal 100's of netnuetrality ones

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

3. Only working to fullfil their own + their buddies interests. You need to press your governors, they work FOR YOU, fir the nation/citizens

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2. But better than in America in relation to health care for example. This is a problem stemming from a bigger issue of authority figures

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1.Well in EU we still see the government doing good for its people and not just neglect+trying to exploit everyone to the brink. Not perfect

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How appropriate that the add showing below this post was for "Cashman casino"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They just need lootboxes regulated. I love the lootbox system on Overwatch. It's something extra for leveling up.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The game is for 16 and over so maybe parents should do a bit of research before buying the game. And everything in the loot box's can

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Agreed. Ea2weekboycott.org is getting big support. Well close lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Be unlock through playing the game. You don't have to pay any money for the loot box's if you don't want to.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

If there was stuff that you could only buy that gave you advantage then I would understand the hate but that's not how it is

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I dont get it... Pay to win is nothing new?????? How come only now and only battlefield 2 is getting attacked?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's the combo of the game being a AAA Western game instead of an Asian MMO and how much of the content was locked behind the paywall/grind.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Games like fifa packs, nhl and so on are much more like gambling, hearthstone packs is also gambling i dont like pay to win but its not new

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The wide appeal of Star Wars means this is the first time many players have been confronted by microtransactions or even heard of them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And EA hate is always popular, esp. when BF2's progression is very obviously designed to encourage in-game purchases.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Belgium has considered it gambling because there is no way to know what's in the lootboxes before you buy them. In order to actually ban 1/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it, the European Commission needs to make a ruling, which can take time. It's not specifically pay to win that's being questioned, but 2/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

rather the randomness of boxes that you're paying real money for. Source, saw it on the news. Am Belgian. 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks for the information! And you have good beer in Belgium ;)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So they say! ;)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Small victories. Take them where you can, and build on them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm with you. I hate microtransactions as much as the next guy, but lootboxes have been around for years. Why now?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

The confluence of EA+Star Wars. Incredibly popular IP, incredibly unpopular publisher, and a design that blatantly favors in-game purchases.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People have raging hate boners for EA

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

P2W was bad in F2P games. But in a full priced competitive game? Thats an insult.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Agreed

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah this is not good news, this means that now the government can get involved in the gaming industry on a larger scale

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

There's already rating regulations, and this is about monetization practices. I don't think either case will become a free-for-all.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you. I, for one, don't want the government anywhere near deciding what does and does not go into my videogames

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Lootboxes in general must be banned. as long as underaged kids are playing these games, no form of gambling whatsoever can be allowed.

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 13

Since the lootboxes aren't essential to the playing of the game, an alternative is to have parental controls over whether they are enabled

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

But that would allow some people to still buy lootboxes oh no government save us

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Could indeed be a solution, as long as they are disabled by default.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Usually you have to input some sort of payment, without which they are disabled

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Apologies for coming back on my own answer, parental approval should not be the solution. Because you can’t allow kids in any way to gamble

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So have them check a box that says "I'm an adult." Thats how we keep kids from seeing porn, which is also a big no-no

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That is the parents fault that underage kids are playing it then it has a age rating of 16

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Because gambling is 18+ and gambling restrictions are FAR stronger than media restrictions, which are merely about the sale of materials.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

League of legends has no age restriction.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I don't play but isn't that only skins you buy so its not gambling

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

You can buy skins directly, but they recently introduced a lootbox system where you can gamble to get high pricing items.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well I don't play it so I don't know about that

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There's no sure way whatsoever to keep a kid from playing or going to see a movie that's 16 or over 18 age requirement.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

So we should just not make games or films with those age requirements to protect kids

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like cigarettes and alcohol, little shits will find a way, I know because was one of them. How about we teach responsibility?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. But people don't want to be responsible for themselves and want to blame the game for giving them the option to get loot box's

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It doesn’t matter if there is no sure way. Doing something that prevents it (even if it’s a little bit) is better doing nothing

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like digging a hole in the ground, dumping toxic waste in it, lay some dirt on it and let the future generation deal with it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, i don’t think that this comparison applies here. Here we would tackle the problem and not lay some dirt over it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No. No. No. This is a dangerous way of thinking. e.g. Terrorism is bad, so doing anything that prevents it even a bit is good?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Have fun getting strip searched at the airport and don't forget to say hi to the friendly NSA agent next time you're on the phone

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember the good old days when you bought a game and that was it? No overpriced dlc or micro transactions. I miss those day

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Member guys

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Oh I member!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah, when games were $100 and you got no dev support or updates. It was so much better.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

To be honest, you also couldn't really play a game for free, either. But we're talking Battlefront here, so that bit's slightly irreelvant.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They still make those games. Stop buying the ones with microtransactions.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tbh this is all been a response to the growing cost of game development (though a poor and unethical one imo)

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Costs of development are because of studios hiring more people than are actually needed, not because they're releasing a quality product.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why you were downvoted I have no idea, because its true. Games today cost way more to make than they used to.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If you don't want to gamble, don't go to the casino.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

Except you can't bring kids to casinos.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Kids also can't own credit cards or paypal.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No but they can steal their parent's cards.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How would you like it if all places of leisure slowly became casinos?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Its the online multiplayer games that have continued costs (servers and support) that are switching to MTX to maintain revenue over time.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is all there is in your life video games?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But that's not whats happening. Plenty of games w/o lootboxes. You're just playing the ones that have them

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What's the difference between Battlefront 2 lootboxes and all the other lootboxes on other games?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

There isn't. People wanna defend other games because they have cosmetic items. Doesn't matter. Still loot boxes. Still gambling.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Both gambling, but both are not PTW. And most gamers can accept gambling (part of the game/our nature), but not PTW.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dota has lootboxes where you get every item (except if the box contains ultra rare bonus drop) but if the box contains 5 sets and you buy 1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 boxes you will get all those sets. Once you open one the set you get is removed from the drop pool.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I want non-game play altering things to be in the crates. New skins, colors, armor patterns, but nothing that gives anyone an edge in MP.

8 years ago | Likes 364 Dislikes 23

Hot rod red Vader!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I don't want the crates. At all. Give me the ability to buy exactly what I want, stop this random number fucking bullshit.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yeah, this is used in many games and is a system I like. Purely cosmetics.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Same for R6S, but you can get legacy skins no longer available in store. Take this away and it will be a lose-lose for Ubi and the players

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, fuck loot boxes in every variety in full price games. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLDid1UNyg8&t=2s well worth the 18min imo.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don't want lootboxes period. Random drops suck. I want to be able to either work for something specific or buy it outright. No bullshit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TBH I think overwatch have done a fantastic job with how to implement loot boxes . And you get 5-6 boxes in a session

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You also don't want EA to use a version of Activisions player-matching algorithm to encourage sale of lottery tickets (loot boxes).

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That would be the one that does this: ?1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was arguements like this that allowed this shit to spiral out of control to what we're facing now. It should have been killed on day one

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Dota 2?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Path of Exile lootbox stuff will eventually come available normally, it's always just the new stuff in them. And it's visuals only.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i think thats partly what they were planning given all the different legion schemes found in the files, apparantly the skins arent ready tho

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, absolutely not. It’s a form of gambling which is highly addictive. Games for underaged kids shouldn’t have any form of gambling in them

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Then please also ban sweets, because they are addictive to and targeted at children and you can buy then for money.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I was going to ask about M rated games but those are age limited at 17 and Im pretty sure gambling age is 18 nationwide right?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why do you want crates at all? Why do you want to pay money for the CHANCE of obtaining something you want?

8 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 9

I don't see the issue in randomized prizes. Its the need to fork money over for them and being the only way to access certain content.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They could learn from R6Siege. Lootpacks for gold or by chance, but also buy the skin straight up (gold). And elite uniforms for irl money.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

For the rush of it probably, because it's gambling. They just don't want others to be able to beat them with better luck.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This. I brought up this very same argument on another post, but it appears to have fallen on deaf ears.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

I think the feeling of uniqueness loot boxes can create with rare cosmetic items is appealing to so people.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Absolutely. Which is why Titanfall 2's system was awesome. You got exactly what you paid for. Not a CHANCE of getting what you wanted.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

To sate people's gambling addictions.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I really like what Overwatch and now Destiny 2 do with loot boxes, it’s all purely cosmetic and you get them through just playing.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

In Destiny 2 you get consumable color packs and each one has 3 uses. To color your whole armor you need 4 uses. That's pretty scummy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

From what i've been hearing from friends your be up to your ears with color packs by the time you finish the game

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's true, without even trying, you get more shaders than you know what to do with.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What worries me is that this is designed to be addictive and children play these games. It should be impossible to buy with real money.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So no more hearthstone in Belgium, eh?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Or Counterstrike, DotA, PUBG, H1Z1, or any other game where you buy packs/boxes/crates/etc

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its more likely that the boxes will simply not be available in belgium.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But... Hearthstone's only method of card purchase / delivery is randomised packs.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

theyll find a way. A lot of it is about psychology and presentation, which is why a pack of trading cards is seen differently iirc.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A pack of physical trading cards you buy at a store I mean.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hearthstone is the digital card game developed by Blizzard

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know. I was just pointing out that the act of receiving cards itself isnt neccessarily problematic.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is this true? Cause Mass Effect 3 did this years ago... same policy. Or can u not buy the SWBF boxes with in game creds?

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

You can, but it's a very very loud minority that is pinning this on loot boxes. I don't see a problem with lootboxes at all.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 22

The bans are especially for children & people vulnerable to gambling or compulsiveness. Not well balanced, controlled, healthy adults

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Username checks out

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I do but I'm just saying it isn't a first.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You dont see a problem with people being able to buy objectively better equipment in a competitive game?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That's not what loot boxes are, at all.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 19

That is exactly what the SWBF2 Lootbox system allows you to do. And its why everybody is so upset about it.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I didn't say anything about battlefront 2. I'm talking about loot boxes. Instead of downvoting me, read the thread first.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

The thing with ME3 Loot crates was that it's just PvE so no one cared that much. And you got credits fast enough...

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Exactly. I never felt urged to buy them, once you reached platinum level you could buy box every game.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I miss ME3 MP. Getting multiple ultra-rares from a single box was always a nice treat. And the N7 Destroyer was a beast...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Na

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

wasnt investigated before. If this goes through all loot box systems, including overwatch etc. will be illegal.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

So with their system you were gambling for something you could otherwise buy, but games like overwatch only use in game currency 2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Even Overwatch? I thought this was considered gambling because EA put a monetary value on the items anyway 1

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

They wouldn't be gambling if you couldn't buy them, but recieved them only as in-game rewards.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

With no real world value to otherwise purchase those purely aesthetic pieces 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

and they are way better optimized for it than, say, trading cards, so they pose a greater risk. Well see how it turns out.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In Overwatch you can buy additional loot boxes with real $ to get additional chances. Still much better than EA's strategy though.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Its still up in the air, but it might happen. Problem is that with the way that the systems are set up the could lead to gambling addiction.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, people saying "I don't mind this&that". Don't understand that there are kids & people vulnerable to gambling who buy games. Isn't fair

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't want lootboxes banned, I want them regulated. Specifically, with published probability tables.

8 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 30

nah, banning them is better

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Lootboxes themselves aren't the issue. It's having to pay real money for a *chance* to get something that does in fact affect gameplay.

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 5

They are very much the issue. They are lottery tickets that you're manipulated into wanting.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

And age restricted.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I just want full price games that aren't built on af2p economy. Loot boxes aren't the problem, it's that games are based on their temptation

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I want them gone, loot boxes is a horrible system. It stems from greed

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

And what good it will do to people with self-control issues? It's still gambling, they will still do it without even looking at these tables

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

lootboxes belong in f2p games

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Like China does? That'd certainly help, but it's still a shitty gimmick.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

It took blizzard a week to circumvent that law

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How ?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Algorithm based probability. No specific numbers to publish.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How does that even work? How do you convert a hard number equation to a not-hard number equation without affection the end chances?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't that mean there's still an equation at work? They could be...requested to publish that, no?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’d just rather banning them tbh, its a shitty mechanic and tactic

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

Belgium and EU have regulations about banning, such as a +18 rating. They will NOT throw the game out the window the will likely change it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't favor government banning much anything, I prefer users boycotting. Too many blind consumers tho

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don't favor gambling bans in general. If one DOES ban gambling though, lootboxes should be banned as such, or at least restricted to 18+.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

About as enforceable as porn is, I would think.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I remember when all porn sites used to have a "Click this to prove you're 18" or "Enter your birthday" page to enter.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Of course, if lootboxes ARE regulated as gambling, the videogame industry is in for some nasty shocks as to how deep that goes. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If it does end up that way, lootboxes will go. Pay to win is here to stay, however, just without randomness

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For starters, gaming commissions are going to want to audit their lootbox code, and probably even mandate the PRNG it uses. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They'll probably want to partner with existing video-slot developers who already are familiar with the regulatory colonoscopy involved. 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Players are in for one too when instead of giving people a choice to buy dlc/boxes, they have to pay what they should be charging for games

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If thats how it needs to be. Still better than playing on addiction mechanisms to get people to pay more.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A return to where games are $100+ and we get no support after release.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I will pay $100 for a high quality, AAA title that is complete in its own right. Granted, the most wildly successful games out there did

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Fine at $60-70 with no microtransactions (BOTW, Witcher III, skyrim, etc)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If Belgium bans it there's pretty much a 100% guarantee that the ban goes European as well. This is going to be very interesting.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

Dumbass! This is why people, this is why, f*cking ignorant Imgur

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

This is why what, people write sentence fragments? I mean, it's why you did, I guess, though I wouldn't blame them for your bad grammar.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

wouldnt say 100% but I can see germany going along with it. So its at least likely.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Belgium is known to be very harsh and restrictive on gambling, moreso than most other EU countries.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am fucking excited.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So people can't protect themselves from spending their own money they need the government to do it for them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty much. Same as alcohol, really.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank you. Yes it is

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, it would mostly be their parents money as the concerns are about teenagers, but yeah.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is not true at all

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

How is that guaranteed?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Because he thinks Belgium IS the EU parliament and forgot that it is just located in Belgium

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Belgium said they want to push that to EU level, not national level (where it would just punish Belgians with little effect on publishers)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

BUT, it's easier said than done. Pushing a regulation like that to EU will take time and sweat and nothing guarantee it will pass.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Belgiums capital houses the EU.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's like saying the UK government will align to whatever policy pursued by London's mayor

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

UN is in America so everything America wants is automatically UN supported?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

As a European I m asking you not to try to compare our systems.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Huh?? I'm comparing the EU to the UN. The UN is your system too. The comparison is apt - both coalitions of countries forming common rules.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As a European that seems a more than fair comparison, considering the US has a distinctive influence on the UN

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0