why are girls so mean

May 11, 2016 2:15 AM

Jdt103

Views

270889

Likes

14682

Dislikes

675

why are girls so mean

It must be easy being under 130 when your young and your skeleton hasn't even fully developed

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

141 healths on the healthometer?! I've never seen so many healths

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

At first i thought this was about age...

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

https://imgur.com/ey1l7PC

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I want to test this out now...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

goodness.. when are you all going to convert to standard metric system?

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

As soon as the UK stops measuring people with stones.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And move away from Freedom Units? I don't think so...

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

The US, do something that makes sense? NEVER!!!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Twitter Rule #1: You can always find 4 or more detestable tweets for any one issue

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Judgemental Fuckleberries.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is that a band?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I had a lot of exes with the same mentality. Don't just blame girls. Blame childish people.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

thank god they are exes

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My fiance is well worth the heartache I went through to find him. I learned from my exes who I wanted to spend the future with!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you're very luck to have found a nice guy, apparently they are pretty rare

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There are plenty. I was attracted to people with narrow mind sets because I'm stubborn and have had low self-esteem. It's better now though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

how did you get better?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree with all of those girls. She shouldn't wear anything.

10 years ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted May 11, 2016 4:12 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

...wrong post bro

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Haha +1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

wubalubadubdub!

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Simple weight is a terrible metric here. You have to account for height too.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That Trevor Manes is such a bitch

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

130 is banging unless you're like 4'5"

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

so true

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How do we know thats the same girl?

10 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 8

All white basic bitches are technically the same person.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

We don't. And it probably isn't.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

I was actually about to say. That girl is very fit and the legs shown in those socks are very straight. A girl of her body type would 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

have some killer calves. The whole 'girls shouldnt wear X' is still dumb either way though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Backwards check the image

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Image size: 794 × 3573 No other sizes of this image found. Best guess for this image: furniture. Seems legit...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol furniture. Nah there's a Twitter and Instagram linked when I searched. Don't want to spread her info though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That brought up furniture for some reason. At least for me

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ENHANCE

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It is.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

and she's vegan.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Something tells me the scales person is not the girl in the other pictures..

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

This would be the thing people focus on... yaaaaay.... *sigh*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, first of all, the message isn't a bad thing, but this string of images is just a pile of misleading bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I understand what you're getting at, OP, but those feet definitely don't belong to the girl in rhe pictures.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

If you're over 130 years old you should just stay dead.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

They clearly don't understand bmi or that muscle is ≈3x more dence than fat

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Judging from the size of the ankles. Those legs don't belong to the girl in the selfies.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah that's not the same chick

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Women put these oppressive standards on each other. Source: Mother and sister are my harshest critics.

10 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 10

Buh..but shoe0nhead says that internalized misogyny doesn't exist! /s

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

And she's right

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Weight is just a number without context. Worry more about body fat %. No one is telling this girl to lose weight.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Their looks. "Look at her hair , her clothes, her skin, slut, you'll never find a boyfriend, that's not feminine...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry that they are...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I hate women sometimes. They are always complaining about how patriarchal society is but they are the ones who judge other women based on

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

but its because of the patriarchy, right.... right?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Now go explain THAT to Feminists. Like men (heterosexual men) care about what women dress. We want yall naked!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

My grandmother is worst than both my mother and sister combined, she tried convincing me anorexic beauty is the only true beauty.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

well is she anorexic?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She was as a teen, and she still had disordered eating but I don't know if it would be classified as anorexia nervosa currently.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My grandmother loves to say: "You can never be too skinny or too rich." I kind of agree with the latter.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Most people would probably disagree with the latter too

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would agree that other people can be too rich, and that people can be too rich in theory/general but me...? Nope. I can never be too rich.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Rules for thee but not for me"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Found the democrat *dons downdoot umbrella*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Her lack of ankles from the first photo disturb me.

10 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 7

Fluffy socks

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats because they arent her feet.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Actually they are! Read farther up, someone reverse image searched her, and those are her feet :D

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No. They arent. Trust me on that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Like I said, guy up top reverse image searched, if you still think not, then maybe try doing the same? I'm just tryna help ^^;

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well if an image is shopped to seem like this, u can understand, but trust me no one is that attractive from the knees up only. Not her feet

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cankles?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I think it's the angle of the camera.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Those feet don't even look like they would be on that girl...

10 years ago | Likes 382 Dislikes 14

Yeah, skin tones don't even come close to matching.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Thats cause they arent.

10 years ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 6

They don't, but they are. Backwards checked the image and it is her. She's got big calves and is a vegan.

10 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 6

I have definitely seen at least a handful of girls of that body type with ankles/feet such as those. Source: I am picky about ankles/feet.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 5

Im tiny up top like her and have cankles. I feel her.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The socks are fun

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

KANKLES!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Those look like fat ankles. And the socks are suspicious.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Those are definitely not her feet, but I enjoy the overall message.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

why isn't this the top comment?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

We can cut people's feet of and attach them to other people, so you never know.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

Nicolas Cage... John Travolta... in.... FOOT/OFF

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um I'm 6' and I'm 160lbs.. I wear leggings, short shorts, bikinis etc!! Fuck these bitches

10 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 13

How you doing shorty?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

the rules are different for men.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Hey gurl nice genetics wana make some beautiful athletic baby's

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Sexy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

If you weigh 160 then honestly you really probably shouldn't. /sns

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 46

Lmao I'm actually really skinny .. Most of my weight is in my boobs.. But that's cool.. You have your opinion

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is a thing called height to weight distribution.. 160lb at 6 ft is a perfectly normal weight.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

People can wear what they want you twerp

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

At 6 feet tall, 160lbs really isn't very much, man. Granted, that would make for a tall woman, but not fat.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

I am a tall woman but I own it!!! Lol

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My ex was a smidge taller than I am, and she was still cute as a button. One of my lady cousins is like 6'2", so It wasn't totally foreign.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But are you a woman?

10 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 1

Lmao yes I'm a woman

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It took a week for you to figure it out?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No I started a new work section so I haven't been on

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

oh, you caught me

10 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

Wait, you're not the same person I asked before?

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Simple, it's because he WAIT A MINUTE, NEITHER ARE YOU

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Well, this was a trippy comment thread.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'm 6'4 and 185 but I don't think any of those would look good on me. Mainly because I'm a man, but the comments these girls made fuel it.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

6'4 185 must be bean skinny

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm 190 and 6'2 and I'm pretty fuckin skinny, so yeah.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6'2 220. Nah man. We kill it with our lean legs. Bitches be jealous.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I am pretty lean, but I am working on my chub and tuck currently. Gotta get into shape for summer, even if that shape is a pear.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

6'4" and 185 sounds lean as hell to me. Im 6'6" and was 195 about 10 years ago, hit the weight room and float around 270 now.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah,don't really work out much. I think I would be in way worse shape if I wasn't so tall, but being tall allows you to spread the fat

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Me (woman) and my 2 best guy friends have "stretchy pant parties" lmao we all wear leggings and get drunk as fuck

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're over 130 years old, you probably shouldn't be wearing booty shorts, or going to Trevor's party.

10 years ago | Likes 7505 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jul 13, 2016 10:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

My name is Trevor!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I honestly thought they were talking about age at first

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This was my first and immediate thought.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://twitter.com/tmanes22 Bummer I'm 185 can't make it to this wild man's party :(

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if you're over 130 years old you're most likely gandalf.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My comment, and it happens to be top comment. Dammit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

fuck if you're over 130 years old lets meet up!...what sword? Oh THIS sword? Oh haha no it's just decorative! Nothing to do with Quickening!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a 130 year old, you can't tell me what to do

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Am I invited to trevors party

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah! Come to my party instead. Everyone except them four are invitef

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Gonna need the address again, yo

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm gonna ding dong ditch him and leave a mummy in booty shorts on his front porch.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ifeel

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yip thought was a big ageist! If you're alive at 130 wear what ever you bloody want!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck dam you killed this shit. 5k points

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Still trying to decide what I'm going to do with all the profits. Private island or personal jet?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would definitely buy a cat or somethin

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

EXACTLY what I actually thought they meant.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

dude, she looks great. Stop age shaming her

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh the less I know the betterrr

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I've always hated Trevor.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Please... Don't tempt the internet... Someone will respond.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I def thought thesewere sarcastic tweets about ages, until the last one finally mentioned pounds.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fuck you, I can do whatever I want! *climbs into booty shorts* *rides zimmoframe to Trev's party*

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No one ever comes to my partys

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I thought the same. I was like, if someone's lived to 125 they can wear whatever the fuck they want.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter how much you weigh. Just be over 18 years of age.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't realize they were taking about weight until the last tweet.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How does Trevor do it? to find out more... https://youtu.be/6jzsr7ja-pM

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I'm over 130 I'm going to do whatever the fuck I want Cowboy. YOLO

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You probably didn't make it to 130 saying YOLO...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea I think they are just being catty bitches

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is my exact thoughts...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think if you're over 65 you've kind of earned the right to wear whatever the fuck you want. Honey badger don't give a shit.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I guess 130 is better than tree fiddy in this case.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought lbs too and had a violent image of an old grandma lady in leggings doing keg stands with kids (which kinda fun)

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

[IMAGERY VIOLENCIFIES]

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lbs is weight, not age. So why would you think of a grandmother when someone said 130 lbs?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Because it wasn't specified as lbs (first). It just said 129. 129 what? Kilo? 129 kilo is roughly 284 lbs. Thats too extreme. Must be age..

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I dunno, then i would find it fair to say "ummm if you're over 130kg maybe you SHOULDN'T wear spandex/leggings/short shorts"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes. Unless you are very very very tall. With dense muscle mass ;)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because I actually meant to type age and not lbs haha....this post confused my brain

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Try and tell her that!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Scoooter buddy!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless it's Melissandre. She's over 130 and she can rock whatever she damn well pleases. The night is dark and fuck off Trevor

10 years ago | Likes 337 Dislikes 0

You made me laugh out loud for the first time today. Thank you. Have a random .gif:

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So long as she promises to leave her necklace on

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

It's implied the necklace wasn't what fueled the illusion as she's been seen without it on.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ha! You made me spill my wine =)

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Hahaha! Take my +1.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Shit.. Im Trevor.

10 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

Well then fuck off.

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

Fuck you, Dan. And now Fuck off, Trevor. Why isn't there one for Rodney?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Rodney never gets any respect.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No respect, no respect...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We don't talk about Rodney .... not since the accident

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

If your over 130 years old, what the hell is your secret?!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Living on Venus.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doctors hate her.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

formaldehyde

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lots of science

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm glad I'm not the only one that thought this

10 years ago | Likes 759 Dislikes 0

I also though this

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ditto

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fourth tweet said "pounds" and I still didn't get it!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

In the beginning I was thinking about age. Then I read pounds and I thought "130 GBP? That makes no sense!"

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

SAme thoughts hEre

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me too. I'm from Metric city

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'd still think it was in years (even more so) if they would be referring to kg.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

130 pounds = 59 kilograms

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm from Canada i think I'm 1005kgs??? Wait lemme do the math and get back to ya...

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

i'm sorry.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

130 imperial years = 47 Kilodays

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha you're not alone. Geezus

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Remember to pronounce it with a hard G, like GIF

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Well that would be why it's an improper way to spell Jesus ;-)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thems sound like fightin' words

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Relax, Gesus

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

lol I thought this was a Tame Impala reference until I looked at the top again, I just completely skipped those messages to look at her.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Try your luck with heather :3

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NOT THE GREATEST FEELING EVERRR

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But you dont see a lot of tame impala round here huh

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not even the same legs...look how tan the girls legs are on the bottom two photos compared to the top one.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 13

not to mention it says posted via android and the mirror selfie pics were taken on an iphone

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Perspective and lighting

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

It's not the same person.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

NO IT'S WHITE AND GOLD

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Unless there's some medical condition that causes cankles on otherwise fit people I'm gunna call bullshit.

10 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 14

I definitely agree.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I weigh 20 pounds less than OP but my feet/ankles always look fat in picture when I'm wearing socks because I don't have defined ankles...

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

I'm like 30 lbs heavier than my skinny best friend & have slender feet/ankles and she has wide/fat feet with cankles. Happens.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

There are conditions, but I can see why you're sceptical.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I see it quite a lot. I think its pretty common to be slim but have less shapely ankles and calves.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

64kg is considered fat? ... -_-

10 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 2

No, that's why the title specifies that the people tweeting are mean. It's 100% Mean Girl bullshit. Who cares?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends entirely on height. if you are 200cm tall, no, if you are 100cm tall, yes.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

It shouldn't be, everything depends on type of body you have. I'm 1,80 tall and have always been around 64 to 70 kilos with weight, and ...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

...everyone was making fun of me cause I looked too thin! Some girls my height have more, some less kilos, and they all look normal.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 166cm tall and when I was around 62-65kg people kept asking me if I was sick because I looked too thin to be okay. O_o

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it really depends what kind of body you have. Same height and weight don't look the same on everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. :)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you are 5'0" you are probably a bit overwieght. But not if you are 5'10"

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

considered fat by fucked up people maybe. its a very normal weight

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Not if you're 6yo. Just sayin.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the majority of the population is overweight, doesn't that mean that "normal weight" can also be "fat"? Just saying...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah you have a point. But even so only fucked up people would use body types to exclude people

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It shouldn't be. That girl has a decent amount of muscle mass.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

She does?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Look at her butt

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"muscle mass"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Ass mass

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you think people get those nice butts? Lots and lots of squats

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Am I the only one who immediately thought they were talking about age? Almost left the house as a 210 lbs male in leggings and belly shirt

10 years ago | Likes 678 Dislikes 4

I thought age as well

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

do it assert dominance over legging and belly shirt wearing women we shall claim them as our own

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was pondering the stupidity of their rants at 125 year olds in leggings.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dude I'm a 205 and I wear leggings and crop tops almost every day

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

205lb male*

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I like the way you were going with it, thought

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same here. I am like you'll probably be dead before you ever reach 130 wtf are these girls talking about. Then I saw the scale

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look at the bright side - at least you are not a girl, so you are still invited to Trevor's party!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Close call bro

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hi I am also 210 lbs male let us rejoice and be friends.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bitch, you rock that shit, man

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

phew

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They said nothing about men not being able to wear it, already got on leggings and a belly shirt ready to start the day.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Maybe they meant kgs

10 years ago | Likes 3623 Dislikes 23

The could have, only one even bothered to mention pounds....

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe the first 3, but the last specifically noted pounds

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

pretty sure they ment IQ ... no!?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's 9 stone to you, pal

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

False it says lbs

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Says LB on scale and pounds in comments

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You may not understand metric weights... 130kgs is about 300lbs.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the 4th person said "POUNDS" tho

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nah its lbs - a lot of girls have a misconception about what is "lightwieght". Hell i just watched the end of the office and at one point 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Literally says "130 pounds" in one of the tweets, haha.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

that would be legit tho

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or tons. It was gonna be a WHALE of a party

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unit symbols must not use the plural.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jesus, I'm 1.85 m and around 80 kgs, but you'll never see me wearing leggings. 130 is pretty lenient if you ask me.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

dudes shouldn't wear leggings

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't tell me how to live my life!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably since this is America and quite a few people weigh that much

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Or stones

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or maybe they mean upvotes. YOU ARE NOT INVITED !

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pam refers to herself as 110lbs or something. Shes a beautiful woman but theres no way shes 110. Its sad that over 130 is "chubby" 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It took me a while before I realized they meant lbs...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or stone....

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly! Which renders the poor girl as, well, stupid...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an American, how many kgs would 141 lbs be?

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

As other have said 1 kg = 2.2LBS, the easy way is to say about half, its off a bit, but easy to do with out a calculator.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Google it, lazy american

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

#lazyamerican

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

About 64kgs?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1 kg equals 2.2 lbs

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We really should get on learning the conversions. Would be good.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think we should gradually switch to the metric system. It would be much quicker to learn and help more in high school science classes

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yeah but here's the thing. it starts by introducing proper conversions to existing trades and industries, and then going backwards from that

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I may be wrong, but don't most us-based international businesses already do that? Or is it just scientists, I can't remember

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

about 10 stone

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

when i was 180 cm tall and 65 kg, my school nurse told me i was on the verge of being underweight... 141 lbs aint shit mayn

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

you still growing height? dayyuum XD

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

stopped 6 years ago at a lovely 196 cm B-)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

\0/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Keep in mind girls are in general lower than 180. But yes, 141lbs aint shit.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

64kg, try to google "lbs to kg" ;)

10 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 4

Wtf, why would anyone think 64kg is "too big to wear revealing clothes"? Is that an american thing? Sounds like those people 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

are making up arbitrary numbers. Obese people get judged here (Europe) too, but not people that are a healthy weight like 64kg.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I clock in at 1.85m and 127.2kgs/20 stone... That is 6'1" and 280lbs for my American counterparts. But I carry it well - wide frame.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for someone around 170cm (5 feet?) that's prolly underweight. Well body types are different so these statements are pretty void.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They should be thankful they're not underweight, like me, at 45 kg (99.208 lbs). I am a legal adult male who can vote, that's lightweight.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah that's insane...

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You metric motherfucker +1

10 years ago | Likes 1076 Dislikes 13

I like my bitches no more than 5 stone

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You sliperry nipple you!

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Dirty Imperial Scum

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I WANT TO FUCK METERS OF MOTHERS TOO!!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MWHAHAHAHA

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+1 for "metric motherfucker"

10 years ago | Likes 208 Dislikes 8

+1 for +1

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Just happy about metric +1

10 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 0

Just happy for motherfucker

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just happy about +1. +1

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Just happy about 1. +1

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Just happy about motherfucker

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

130kgs... Jesus. The cutoff should land somewhere below 300lbs+ for leggings, unless the person is 8 feet tall

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 8

not ok. Got it

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

So it's ok to be an asshole like the girls above as long as the person is actually fat. But if it's hurting the feelings thin people that's

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 9

I don't think it's okay to be an asshole about it but I also don't think it's okay to let yourself get to be over 300+ pounds

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, unless you plan on doing the exercise for me it doesn't really matter what you think.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Have fun being looked down upon, having difficulty performing basic tasks, and dying young as an alternative then!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well it's definately inappropriate and they should shut the fuck up, but i could see the point they make with 300lbs of belly hanging out.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

My point exactly. There is a certain point where some styles of clothing become a little absurd. If it still works then go for it

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People will have negative opinions on how you look, only assholes make them known to the world via social media.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dress for the body you have, not the body you want. Skinny or fat, makes no difference.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

Well yea.. I mean I have my opinions about bellies flopping and asscracks showing etc. but I do not voice them over. It's in my head.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was thinking in kg and then I saw the pictures. She'd have to be 1,90m at the very least...

10 years ago | Likes 193 Dislikes 8

tree fiddy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

Snoo snoo

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wayy more than that. I'm 180cm around 60kg and I still have some of dat fat around

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup, male 193cm, 78kg currently, still stuck at that 12%.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im 1,94 and im 73

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'm 1.95 and I'm 170. I'm also a man, though, so it's probably a tiny bit less disgusting.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I am also a man

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 1,70 and I'm 73, welcome to the club

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

190cm and 130kg is practically obese levels of fat, even for men.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My roommate (male) is 10-20 kg lighter than than that, is probably obese, aniway he's waaay overweight

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is he 190cm+ tall? If so it'd probably not be classified as obese.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It all depends on build, but 100 is about the upper limit for good weight when you're in 190+ territory - at least for a man.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well obviously, you won't go up to the world's strongest man and tell him he's a fatty, but for 99/100 people it's true.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am over 100kg, at 183cm. But muscle is 3x as heavy as fat, so breaking the hundy club is easy enough if you aren't a slob

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2.50m at least.

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

I'd even say almost 3m

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

40 acres and a mule?

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Which as we all know is roughly equal to 2 fortnights and a 4 barleycorn.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

84 bellyflops and 2 jaggles

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

130lb for any girl over 5'6" is pretty light. Either those posts are coming from anorexics or midgets.

10 years ago | Likes 1164 Dislikes 21

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted May 11, 2016 6:12 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

or teenagers?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:42 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I love how gifted some of you people really are I'm just saying!!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or they're not, and they are just projecting their own body image issues.

10 years ago | Likes 293 Dislikes 6

Not to mention muscle mass

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Or (crazy theory here, bear with me) teenagers. I've heard they can be slightly unpleasant every so often.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

My wife is 5'5" (164 cm) and 115lb, that's not anorexic. But coupling weight with appearance is stupid in itself, there are hot girls >150lb

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

Those midgets get so damn judgmental.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

More likely they're 15 years old and it hasn't accorded to them yet that teenagers generally don't have normal human bodies yet.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Average height for girls is~5'3" so they're probably just dumb and not taking that into account (no excuse for being mean though)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The average height for American women is about 5'5.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Dammit, all these years I thought I was average...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'7 at 120 lbs and honestly my ideal weight is about 140 lbs. I find it incredibly hard to gain weight, though :(

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But people will still call you anorexic in order to make them feel better about their own bodies, even on imgur. smh.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah. I've heard "You need to eat more burgers" more times than I can count haha

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck off mate I'm five foot one and three quarters

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Isn't that the average height for women?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or just call tall women under 130 lbs anorexic as it that isn't a huge insult to anorexics AND women. Y'know, whatever,.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My best friend used to say this kind of stuff. She's 5'4 and 90lbs, so what she pictures as 130lbs is much bigger than it actually looks.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Jesus christ, is she healthy? Because that's SUPER light for her height.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I know. She's always been really tiny. She's vegetarian and a dancer, so it's hard for her to gain weight.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or they're all pre-pubescent

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 3

In my experience, the most vitriolic pro-anorexia bloggers/vloggers are actually goddamn fucking adults. It's horrifying.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Comparing your weight with 14 year olds is not healthy. Even if you are 14 year old. And if the fashion industry use that young models.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

it's high school kids comparing their weight to freshman. and a number in high school isn't the same 10 years later. they'll figure it out

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've recently met several young women over 5'4 who are upset that they are 'so tall'

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

130 pounds and 5'6" is a BMI of 21.15. Skinny, unless you have no muscle mass whatsoever.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ooorrrrrr assholes.

10 years ago | Likes 253 Dislikes 1

To be fair, it's also young women regurgitating the standards and pressure put upon them by a society that values unrealistic thinness.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

They're women, not protozoa. They make the concious effort to regurgitate that nonsense.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

As a woman, I tend to disagree. I didn't realize the negative ideas society has impressed upon me until probably after age 25. But who knows

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, I mean, there is no arguing intent. People choose to say what they do. The influenc behind the feeling expressed is a different matter

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ding-ding-ding! We have the correct answer!

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

Or idiots

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Look like kids

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both I suppose

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or midgets killed me

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or bitches

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or they are 110 years old

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'1" and weight 130lb, i'm not skinny but I don't feel FAT

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm slightly heavier (133) at 5'1'm. I'm perfectly fine with my body and curves. And I'm very active. I count ran miles in terms of tacos.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

me too, kinda sucks to be "small"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or it is in kgs - now for 5'6" girl having 130 kg is serious overweight

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or cunts

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But how about if they're 12 yrs old?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Then they're just prepubescent assholes.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'7 and I weighed 135 when I was 22!! (I lost 30 lbs during my first trimester due to morning sickness.)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

That's how much my friend weighs. I used to be heavier than him...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My gf is exactly the same and her figure is admirable. Maybe Trevor & co. live among midgets resulting from all that inbreeding.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was underweight. I looked fantastic, (pregnancy tits), but I was NOT healthy.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm those exact measurments!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or anorexic midgets

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 3

Racist anorexic midgets are the worst

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"If you're over 5 pounds don't wear booty shorts" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luc%C3%ADa_Z%C3%A1rate

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Im a dude and I used to weigh 137 at 5'10.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Glad to hear your weight/height imbalance corrected after puberty.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope, till I was 24.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes that about the right timing for finishing up puberty and transitioning into your mature metabolism. Congrats on maturity.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am a 36 year old guy, 5'9" I weigh 130 pounds. So?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

According to the ladies above, you may wear leggings, short shorts and crop tops.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So, I got that going for me.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That sounds unhealthy.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

You can't say that without seeing him. Some people just have smaller cores.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I have weighed the same (130 - 140) since I was 15. I have thru hiked the AT, was an outdooor adventure instructor for 5 years, and run. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Does that sound unhealthy still?

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Where you doing bath salts when doing these activities? That would be unhealthy

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Based on your age, gender, weight and level of exercise, you do seem a bit malnourished. You sound the type to get unexpected heart attacks.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you said you weighed over 140lbs at that activity level, that would be normal but 130 is concerning for a middle aged dude.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or skinnyfats who don't have a lot of muscle mass

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'5" I'm not sure I'd look healthy any lower than 140. My lowest I was 150 and I felt very healthy at that weight :)

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 14

meanwhile I am sitting here 6' 157 lb in perfect health

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So, you don't look healthy unless you're overweight? Or just making excuses?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Overweight!? Hahaha at 150 I was fit, I'm lucky in that when I gain, I gain pretty much head to toe. So for ME 130 would look really thin

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now at my current weight yes I could stand to lose some, I've been struggling since I had my baby last year but I'm not unhappy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same. I don't like being stick skinny. When I was 130, I was a size 2 and had the figure of a preteen boy. Not how I want to look

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'11" and male, and once went down to 155 lbs. Not a nice look.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'10" and generally sit around 195lbs. But I play in the front row in rugby, so should really be heavier....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm 6'2" and 150 lbs, this is my normal weight, due to stress and lack of exercise I was down to 135 when I graduated college. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't quite look like a holocaust survivor, but it was pretty bad. There is quite a variety in builds, weight is not a great metric. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im 5'9" and typically weigh between 130 and 140. I also run and rock climb so I am not frail by any means. Peoples bodies are different.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm just over 6'4" and have weighed under 150 pounds. Really not a nice look, unless I want to look like a meth addict.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

meanwhile I am over here 6' 157 and perfectly healthy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

wow, really? I'm 5'10, 152lbs with muscles and I still have a lot of belly fat.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some family thought I was anorexic. I really do have big bones and more than average musculature but nothing to write home about.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or people that use kg.

10 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 7

Well, one of em says 130 pounds in all caps.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They would say 80/90 kg, not 130, + one of them actually mentions pounds

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As an American I can confirm that that no one uses that.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 17

I was kidding guys! Damn the written word and its inability to convey sarcasm!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

In America, maybe.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was joking. Yep we're stuck with our units of measure that make absolutely no sense. I mean, 12 inches in a foot and 5280 feet in mile??

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even saying that now I'm not sure if it's correct because it's such a weird number.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, 130kg is A LOT. Like 275lbs off the top of my head.

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

You kinda start siding with them at that point.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm a fairly large, overweight guy, who's probably slightly above average height and have decent muscle mass. I weigh like 110.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

So yes, for a girl, 130 probably means they're obese.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

..and you shouldn't wear belly shirts or leggings. Maybe they have a point

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're goddamn right they have a point, no one likes that look :P

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For a quick calculation, multiply by 2 to get ponds. It's closer to 2.2 in reality, but fractions take a few seconds to do on high numbers.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I fucked up, meant to say 285, I knew the conversion was 2.2lbs per kilo =)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

308ib give or take.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I actually fucked it up a bit in my head, it's more like 285 I think. 2.2lbs per kilo is the conversion I think.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it was 140kg for some reason

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

286 pounds

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Apparently those girls don't understand the concept of height effecting weight.

10 years ago | Likes 3046 Dislikes 18

Or minding their own business

10 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 1

Or the difference between fat and muscle weight

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Exactly....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Or just proportions in general

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2

I'm 160ish and a size 4-6... I swear, all my weight is in my Peggy Hill sized feet.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

with the kind of girls who'd make these kinds of comments I'd find it more surprising if they understood how to tie their shoes.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Does anyone know how tall she might be? That's a pretty slim look for someone who weighs that much. (No, 140 pounds isn't much but still..)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I have no clue, but I'm 5'2 and no bathroom counter has ever looked that low to me. I would guess at least 5'5

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Maybe more like 5'6 or 5'7

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

http://m.imgur.com/exxlUuK Average Aussie women

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

130 is well inside the healthy range for even average height women.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're teenagers. Do you really expect them to know anything of use?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or just not being cunts thats just me though.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

or things in general

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or fuck you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6'4ft 90kg coz I love them jump squats ????

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

6'4" 140kg. Love powerlifting.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That's awesome! Nice work! I'm a chick tho that's why my gains are sloooow

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just keep at it! That's the important part! Don't see many 6'4" girls in fitness.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's my goal! Haha looking good but mainly being fit in general :)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same except I love to shotgun pizzas

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who doesn't. On some big lifting days I will eat two large x4 cheese pizzas with other toppings and a stuffed cheese bread after.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or muscle. Or the fact anybody can wear what they want (shrug emoji)

10 years ago | Likes 342 Dislikes 7

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted May 12, 2016 4:57 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

What about 290 lbs? Or 227 lbs? Or 130 lbs? Where is the exact limit ? Who sets it?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

10 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 0

Or muscle compared to fat

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This comment is as bad as the post. I think the point is don't be an asshole.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Or muscle weighing more than fat

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yeah, I knew I was gonna get it wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I guess I'm "that" person. Sorrybut it's *affecting

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like it's the difference between skinny fat and fit skinny

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but, "If you're over 20% BF" just doesn't have the same ring to it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also it's somehow reversed for guys, people assume i weigh a lot more than i do just because of my height/proportions. nope i'm a measly 150

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the fact that big asses are awesome

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or muscle.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About 7lbs per inch in height

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm guessing there is much that these idiots don't understand

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

or muscle

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a woman, women are women's own worst enemy. The feminazis believe men are awful when it's really women like them who are bullies

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or muscle. This girl is muscular

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

those girls *and trevor

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Girls of that maturity don't understand anything.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or a penis effecting weight

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or the concept of being a nice person either.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, also people are fucking cunts.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not always relating to height. If a 5'2 girl is 130 of solid muscle and a good butt and chest, is the 5'10 girl same weight better?

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

I'm a 5'2" woman, I'm quite petite, but I'm about 130 from muscle. Weight doesn't mean very much

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Are you pretty active I take it? Weight and height mean nothing if it's healthy, but even a 5't bodybuilder at 270lbs isn't always healthy

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I have a very physical job. When I'm not built up i don't even hit 115, and then I'm soft

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definitely not.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That pretty much describes my wife, and she does fret about weight even though she has abs. It's all bodaciousness.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If a girl is 5'2" and weighs 130 of muscle she's the She Hulk, or a professional body builder. Either way, that's an outlier.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

That's hilarious. I'm very petite, but I'm very densely packed and 130lbs. I have no idea what women you've seen.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha 130lbs on a 5'2 girl isn't going to look like She-Hulk. Most female bodybuilders push 180-200lbs.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And most of them are much taller.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I'm 5'2 and 120 lbs and am no where near a she-hulk

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I remember some comment thread where someone was flipping out saying 150 lb was obese. Individuals carry that weight differently.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

although I don't really believe to its relevance for everyone 150lbs is clinically obese for someone 4'11" (I'm overweight but have <8% BF)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

150 for a 5'2" girl is pretty up there

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 24, 2016 7:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

150 lbs would make me a sickly skeleton man.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How you "carry that weight" is irrelevant in regards to obesity. 150lb IS obese for the average person (regarding activity) at 5' tall.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

If you're 150 at 5'7" it's not as big a deal. I didn't specify a height, neither did the OP here. We can't judge solely on the "150" figure.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But height is what matters when determining whether a certain weight is obese not how they "carry that weight".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is the point the comment you replied to was making.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup, as long as you're 5'5" or taller then 141 isn't overweight, under 5'8" may look chubby though unless you have a lot of muscle.

10 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 1

If I were 5'3" and weighed 141 pounds, I would dance half naked in the street until the cops came and arrested me for indecent exposure.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not saying someone can't be happy at that, just acknowledging that it is technically overweight.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only in your eyes. Age is also a factor to be considered.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Mar 25, 2017 3:24 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

5'6" 120lb MALE and sick of being told that I'm too thin. Why is that acceptable but I can't tell an overweight person how fat they are?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'10 and 139lbs, but in my best days (when I had much more time to excercise) I were around 160lbs and got only compliments.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry that happens, that sucks.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm 5'7 and 120lbs. Im really skinny. Whenever I tell people my weight hey think I'm lying.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or muscle. 2x more dense than fat

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Stop quoting made up facts. Skeletal muscle is 1.06 g/cm^3, adipose tissue is 0.92 g/cm^3. That's 15% denser. It IS firm and shapely though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Finally someone with a brain

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Or boobs or butt affecting weight.

10 years ago | Likes 1157 Dislikes 8

Gotta love when boobs and butt affect weight

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or brain.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Pretty sure they're all white skinny bitches

10 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 14

Oh saying that is fine. But if you said "stupid black how's" then that's not OK? Their both not OK to say

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

I think they should both be the same level of ok which means this is the Internet no on cares.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They would need to have those to know how they work. These skinny white chicks flatter than Kansas.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or muscle

10 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

Even the BMI doesn't take that into consideration. My sister's listed as "overweight" even though she's skinny as can be,

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pro-ana blogs/sites like SkinnyGossip seem to be of the opinion that those should be starved off as well, genetic predispositions be damned

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I keep telling my doctor that, but he keeps telling me no sir you shouldn't have boobs, you're just fat

10 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Or, you know, muscle is 3 times heavier than fat because of density.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Have extremely muscular friends. BMI says they're obese....

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

BMI cannot be applied to athletes.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In terms of area, yes. But that statement is garbage without describing it in terms of area occupied. 2lbs of anything is 2lbs.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Its not though, 2lbs fat and 2lb muscle is very different.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Unless it's on the moon

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

so we can conclude "those girls" dont understand concept of height, having boobs,or a butt effecting weight. Their experience is their life.

10 years ago | Likes 274 Dislikes 4

So this party is being hosted by flat chested, flat assed midgets?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And with that experience they choose to be shallow, petty, and so plainly insecure that it takes trying to hurt others for them to be happy

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

And their life consists of being petty ignorant prick-picklers.

10 years ago | Likes 124 Dislikes 2

"Prick-pickler" now added to my dictionary.. +1

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My first thought was something that rhymes with blunt, but I decided otherwise. I'm glad I did.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

probably because they don't have the booty

10 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 1

Yes. Butts are wonderful things.

10 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

or Mammaries

10 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Affecting*

10 years ago | Likes 361 Dislikes 10

No, effecting works too. Height effects weight = Height causes weight. It's fine, guys.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

maybe in Freedom-English, but not in Original-English

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Not even in freedom-english

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Just like the Butterfly Affect.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

*bufferfly Affleck

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Beat me to it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Boom! Grammar nazi

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 24

Actually that's, Buum Grammer Notsi.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Boom! No

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Affleck*

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 5

MAAAAAAAAAAAAAATT DAAAAMON

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Benedong Cumberslang*

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually, effect works well here too.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 48

Added weight is the effect of height, boobs, butt... Height, boobs, and butt affect weight.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's poor usage, but it technically works.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

No. It doesn't.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It means something different, but only slightly. It's a bad way to say it, not something that you can't say based on our grammatical rules.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

http://grammarist.com/usage/affect-effect/ http://www.quickanddi">-effect/">http://grammarist.com/usage/affect-effect/ http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/affect-versus-effect?page=1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No it doesn't affect is verb effect is noun. Know your shit.

10 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 10

Sorry you got down-voted, dude. From the OED: Cause (something) to happen; bring about: "the prime minister effected many policy changes" :)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well, crap. I meant to reply to @Leithreas :P

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Affect and effect can both either be used as a verb or a noun, each with a different meaning. @Leithreas is correct.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

Your source literally backs up the opposite argument that they aren't used interchangeably except for a couple of specific exceptions

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They are correct that both can be used as verb/noun, but wrong that it works well here. Example 3 under the rules for 'Effect' in [2]

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, both are both a verb and a noun. Know your shit. Effect means "to bring about" and since increased height causes increased weight...

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 24

First up, thanks for discussing. You are arguing against people who obviously didn't take their time to double-check. BUT I believe your 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Downvoted for being right? Ah well. Affect is a noun, too. Blowing minds!

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 16

I have but one upvote to give. ;_;

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Effect is brought about by a cause. The cause is affected by the variables involved. Using "effect" here would not be appropriate.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2