IWantToLiveInUSA
92814
2088
59
Dec 28, 2019 3:38 PM
IWantToLiveInUSA
92814
2088
59
expfarrer
that will be 500 bucks for you reading it pal
Josesharlo
I used to negotiate cell tower leases with attorneys. These redlines are SPOT. ON.
DaisyfromDownunder
That'll be $440 bucks, invoice enclosed.
HEWHOTYPESINALLCAPS
FAKE. NEVER SEEN A LAWYER USE AND/OR
Eiladar
It's more used in business contracts than criminal cases. Check out some EULAs.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
ROBOTvsMAN
@UP
30Jonseredi
Username checks out
Gilgamech
Butitisnotthisday
Why hello there
brandsilven
12 months from the date? That's amazing, when "New year" is just basically a single day holiday. What a bonus!
PandaPie
"New Year" is one day (Jan 1). When you say "new year," you mean the whole upcoming year. I always thought it miserly when somebody only 1/2
PandaPie
wished me a happy New Year. 2/2
ringneckphotography4
The card presumably would have been sent before the 25th December therefore, the new year effective date seems invalid. Bad lawyering..
IlCastradore
It was corrected to 12 months from the date hereof - good lawyering
ringneckphotography4
date hereof and “date of this Agreement” means the date first written above.
IlCastradore
Agreement isn’t defined ; hereof will be date of the letter
ringneckphotography4
Exactly.. that was my defence.. case dismissed..
TheDreadLordOfDownvotes
You can just put “Including” without the rest. In legal writing, using “includ-“ does not mean what follows is an exhaustive list....cont.
TheDreadLordOfDownvotes
...using “but not limited to” is redundant.
scuba7jb
I've been told lawyers are likely to be the first ones replaced by computer A.I......
Orionsdick
Unlikely
purdhapley
Ya because robot lawyers sound better than human ones?
SlightlyDodgy
They already have in some cases. appealnow.com (not real A.I. but a dynamic letter generator but it's close enough as a starting point).
srlfish
scroobiusgav
I heard it was truckers.
vipe650r
That would depend so wildly on who wrote the programming, their biases and interpretations, which are both individual and subjective.
Berethian
Judges interpret the law, lawyers argue it.
vipe650r
Good correction. A better way to put it might be lawyers attempt to pitch their interpretation.
alitquar
Once true AI is achieved it’ll happen so fast “first” will have little relevance.
arek314
Legal support staff, all the people that research cases, do prep work, etc.
gaaaaalavant
Paralegals, yes. Lawyers - probably not. Too much critical thinking required.
ShadeFawks
And besides the non-AI lawyer, most likely being of fae decent, could cause the AI to glitch out
iusedtodream
You mean lying. Too much lying required.
SephiRothIRA
Truth bending**
Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyznowyouknowyourabcscomealongandsing
Big difference between bending the rules and breaking the rules
SephiRothIRA
That bald girl in The Matrix bent the spoon to the max. Same with the law, man. There is no law!