dnweg2
71504
983
56
Aug 10, 2023 9:08 PM
dnweg2
71504
983
56
iamretired
upvoted for the dog
shyriath
#9 This is beautiful.
WB4DAD
3. AMEN !!
zqwzzle
#2 Auto brewery syndrome does exist. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auto-brewery_syndrome
WhyWeDoThis
#1 as always fuck churchill! The savior of Europe who got tgere by fucking up India.
StephenDaniels
#6 Look at those ears, I think Biden is a Skrull.
ThailandExpress
Telechair1
Quality dump @op
14367
#5 The sad thing is, this is what being conservative means. The term's been coopted by idiots.
jerusalemspider
No, re-arming nazi troops to pre-emptively attack the soviets when you just had come out of a world war is absurd, Churchill, you mad lad.
NotaCPA
#10 sweet jesus, that's a butt load of wine.
urrugtheorc
It's not even 1/2 a buttload. A buttload is 384 gallons
walnutbreath
#1 see the anti-PC crowd. They want to use slurs, but cry victimhood when a target of their abuse says that language is degrading and demeaning. They're not free speech advocates, they're totalitarian dickbags.
SilkyAvenger
#9 I don't know if it's just my aging body becoming less able to sense things. But Brown Listerine feels weaker than in university about 20 odd years back. I remember that shit setting fire to my mouth.
idiotsonfire
Could have also been a formula change at some point.
OneBabyOneHamburgerBun
Ah, Winston “The starvation of underfed Bengalis is less serious than that of sturdy Greeks” Churchill. Directly responsible the deaths of some 3 to 4 million Bengali citizens. Not out of a lack of having spare resources to provide, oh no, the UK's empire absolutely had spare, Churchill just loathed people of Indian descent. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/29/winston-churchill-policies-contributed-to-1943-bengal-famine-study He intentionally bled the subcontinent.
idiotsonfire
Nobody said he wasn't a racist shitstain. Pretty much everyone knows that.
BodgeandScarper
These mostly seem like sh t posted by an angry, "edgy", mature white guy. And I highly doubt that Churchill said that... Imgur: sometimes ya win, sometimes ya don't
Username62611
He did though https://quoteinvestigator.com/2016/10/14/outrage/
BodgeandScarper
Well done, and thanks!!
TheCANADIANmadhatter
#1
idiotsonfire
Nobody said he wasn't a racist shitstain. Pretty much everyone knows that.
Tmissfrizzle
Okay so say Biden gets reelected will he be called the president elect while also being the president, or is he just the president?
InkyBlinkyPinkyAndClyde
He'll technically be both but they'll just call him the president.
AtLeastImWearingUnderwear
#1 my favourite Churchill quote is not "we shall fight them on the beaches" etc etc but that time a woman accused him of being drunk and without missing a beat he replied "I may be drunk, but in the morning I shall be sober, and you will still be ugly"
DukeDarkwood
Don't forget "If I were married to you, I'd drink it.", in a reply to the same individual, who said she would poison his drink if they were married.
AtLeastImWearingUnderwear
Yes!
pullingsixty
#2 The right to bear arms is inherent in you? Like from birth, by the great Cosmic Muffin?
idiotsonfire
If you talk to a GOPer, they think having that makes all the others sacrosanct, but they voted for the guy who signed the Patriot Act.
JohnWickdidnothingwrong
Yup. The only thing the 2nd amendment gives is a restriction on what the government can do regarding that right. You may well think it's dumb and/or a bad idea, but regardless of qualifiers "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" really isn't ambiguous. It notes the existence of the right as well as its bounds, but the right itself is something you're born with, yes. Per the document, anyway.
cadesama
Yeah, that one is 100% made up. I also quite like freedom of speech, but have no problem with hate speech being forbidden.
LiterallyAWizard
T'weren't anything stopping your ancestor's caveman ass from picking up a stick and clubbing a fucker with it, was there?
lozeldatkm
t'weren't indeed
Danack
Blah. That's one bit of the US constitution that is just shitely written. It should have said something like "The right of the people to form a well regulated, armed militia will not be infringed". But there is (currently) no edit button.
Ironbunny
Every other right in the bill of rights is individual, there is no reason to assume that somehow the second is different.
anotherdickat
There IS however a "stop ignoring half the damn amendment" button.
vanishing
There totally is. It's Article V. It's how the 2nd amendment became part of the constitution in the first place. It was edited in.
Danack
Good to know. Any particular reason why it's not been used recently?
wailbait
Mostly a shift in political strategy. Politicians today don't actually want to get anything done, because if they resolve an issue then it's no longer a campaign platform. I don't know why, but you get more votes by making empty promises than you do by actually fixing things.
vanishing
Because it requires super-majorities of house, senate, and states to push something through fully. Both sides need to work together, which ain't happening right now.
TheCANADIANmadhatter
#1
idiotsonfire
Nobody said he wasn't a racist shitstain. Pretty much everyone knows that.
BrokenAnimal
He also saw no problem with using poison gas on the 'lesser races' and wanted to invade Russia after WWII. So, maybe we shouldn't take everything he said as wisdom.
NoNameFred
Ah, yes. You refer to the speech where he talked about how much more humane it would be to use Tear Gas on enemy combatants or rioters, rather than continuing to use explosive artillery shells on them.
StenYngve
That man was not some paragon of truth
FakeFlagger
We call them "men of their time" nowadays
jostnick
Bigotry neither needs nor deserves an excuse. Fuck Churchill and fuck Washington while we're at it.
FakeFlagger
Odd to compare Washington to Churchill, they're quite far apart. Either way, I get your point. But at the same time, there are a lot of "great" people throughout history that would need to get fucked aswell then. Like, most of em actually. At least if we talk 1900s.
NotTheDevilYouKnow
Idk ive pretty much accepted damn near everyone before the 1900s with rare exception was racist, homophobic or something else equally awful.
jostnick
Only used him as an example. He's usually lionized like Churchill.