And then they ask why we don't trust tue gouvernment...

May 22, 2020 12:36 PM

diogobap

Views

126542

Likes

5617

Dislikes

156

And then they ask why we don't trust the government...

Or we could just start taxing billionaires again.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aren't red light cameras and photo radar often contracted out to private companies? That makes this even scarier.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Revenue-based law enforcement is the fastest way to destroy a free society.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

They can suck his

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Some people will go to extremes if you screw with how they steal from the he middle and lower classes.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That is the smile of a man who is guilty as fuck and trying to make his mugshot photogenic

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Everything after the camera in his house is hearsay. Means nothing. Sounds like every single conspiracy theory out there. Dude just

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Sounds paranoid.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Doesn’t sound like a government conspiracy, more like a corporate scheme with usual legal lobbying. Still shitty but not surprising

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Maybe try stopping at red lights. That will show them.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Question. The part mentioned about 3 seconds and 5 seconds. Are the speed limits the same? Yellow light is shorter for slower speeds

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thats nothing compared to gerrymandering!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That was a random comment to insert here

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a tip. if you are trying to assassinate someone, driving head on into them is not a sustainable model

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Red light cameras capture the actual light being “run”.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*the government

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Anyone else notice that it doxxed the guy in the same sentence that it says he’s had attempts on his life.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This would have been a good story without the classic symptoms of paranoia mental disorder.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Or, and hear me out... Don't gun it (pun intended) through a yellow light. Crazy story though.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Livin in the red-light district

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

If you are in the intersection when the light turns red, you have the right of way to continue through. Just an FYI for those that need it.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Greed and politics...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I know a lineman for the city, he's told me they pretend to fix lights but instead install cameras pointed at potential drug dealing houses

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The cops

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm on this guy's side 100%. But if he's crazy enough to fuck with cameras twice, he might be crazy enough to believe people are after him.

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

He’s a bit of an oddball. Posts strange things all the time. He was acting like COVID 19 was a hoax for a bit. Seems to believe it now tho.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm actually friends with him on FB. He's isn't crazy just a huge risk taker with a slight sense of pragmatism when he ran for office.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You see his recent Mexico posts? That was weird AF

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't actually out to get you.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

That's a really good point

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also I don't think being annoyed at stop light cameras automatically makes you paranoid

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Should probably see if you're wrong before fully believing your instinct though. It's better to be paranoid & wrong than paranoid & right.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

or in this case, Paranoid and Light.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ba dum tssss

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stop light fuckery is nothing, unjustified civil forfeiture, now that's where the REAL money is.

5 years ago | Likes 1320 Dislikes 4

Whynotboth.gif?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Every penny counts.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Police seize more cash and property than is reported stolen each year.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Wait till yall find out about sentinel surveillance

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agree, just wanted to show an example or how even at the most PETTY things you still get put on a watchlist and they try to shut you down

5 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 0

Last Week Tonight did a great bit on civil forfeiture a few years back. Definitely worth a watch https://youtu.be/3kEpZWGgJks

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well we could just go full Technocracy and make smart devices mandatory and intitute a direct democracy on a level undreamed of. But yeah...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I tend to get funny looks when I seriously advocate for the dissolusion of the republic in favor of individual parity.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I live around there on Long Island. NY government is extremely corrupt and fucked up. Especially Govenor Cuomo(D) and NYC mayor De Blasio(D)

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

More money and property were taken due to civil forfeiture then was stolen from all thefts and robberies. Who are the real criminals here?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last year SCOTUS ruled 9-0 that excessive civil forfeiture is unconstitutional. https://nyti.ms/2XmoU0A

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

wow... when they got mr Ilikebeer along for that, you KNOW that shit is fucked up.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

It's a good step, still have to go to court to prove a civil forfeiture was "excessive" though. Many won't have the time/money for that.

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

How about the one where sheriffs have a food budget for prisoners and any unused budget they get to keep and feed the cheapest food possible

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the main reasons I'm hesitant on ever visiting the states.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For those who don't know about this, John Oliver explains it well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yogurt told me it was in merchandising...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Question, this only applies to cash right? they can't bs themselves into your bank account because even the banks themselves review were

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

your money comes from before approving your account. At least they did to me.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Civil forfeiture can apply to things other than money (vehicles, property), and can apply to money in bank accounts (IRS does it routinely).

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Happened to me. Deferred my payment, set up savings for payoff, woke up one morning to overdraft alerts. Nearly shut me down financially.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i thought they only could under suspicious of illegally attained money? if they know were i get it i hope its not a problem

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

While true, the operative word is "suspect" not "prove" meaning the police can give just about any justification to take your property.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Look up the crazy speed traps they had in New Orleans. You’d drive through a small town where the speed limit would suddenly drop.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Then they’d throw you in jail for speeding, impound and search your car for valuables. You’d get out but without your cash and jewels.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Paranoid, and the shit in the article is BS. Different lights in different areas are different lengths due to speed limit and road types.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Cite a source?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do you drive? Check any light that is at a 25/35/45mph zone. Should be self evident.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

While I'm driving I'm paying more attention to navigation and control that I am about how many seconds the light is yellow. Cite a source.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it takes longer to stop for 55mph than 25mph, so logic it with the source I attached.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Literally 3 seconds of googling, and some common sense. http://www.shortyellowlights.com/standards/

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

..provides guidance that the yellow interval be between three and six seconds without tying the requirement to specific approach velocities.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree that's the way it should be. But... there isn't an enforced standard.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not all heroes wear capes.

5 years ago | Likes 110 Dislikes 5

This guy and the story is mostly just made up the real story id the dude is a mentally unstable dick

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

At least the smart ones don't.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is ancient...

5 years ago | Likes 344 Dislikes 26

But it's good! And it's been a while since it was reposted...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"I knew this already, I don't care about it" - people who let the pandemic slip under the radar

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe people should be reminded of these things?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sry... Just saw it first today. Posted it here to link it to reddit for a discussion since the sub doesn't allow direct image postings

5 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 2

Hey, first time I ever saw it. Thank you.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You do you buddy I still love reading it no matter how many times its posted. Don't apologize for a damn thing.

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Do t tou dare apologise. Thank you for sharing!

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Reposting something good every ONCE in a while is perfectly good. It's 3 times a day which is horrible.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 6

I mean... it's four years old at this point, and has been reposted incessantly.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I mean, you're more than four years old and no-one wants to see you again, either.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yeah whats so hard to grasp about this concept. I spend all day on here I don't want to see the same stuff ever. /S

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Hey, it’s user sub’s fault. Go explain it to them. Or, better, everyone who complains: go police user sub.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Ah, there it is. "You object to endless repetition, therefore you are inferior in every way."

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

VesslOfHate's feelings towards a repost

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

The government is out to kill him because he challenges their red light policies? Bullshit conspiracy theory.

5 years ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 21

Oh look. Another retard who think he knows his government

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Of course. No one has ever tried to kill for profit. And we all know that governments are beyond reproach.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Mafia

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The state put speed cameras on a major road here and simultaneously dropped the speed limit 10mph in that spot

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who said it was government? The red light cameras are usually a private-government partnership. But yea, still pretty unlikely.

5 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 1

*A private company

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shhh! Wouldn’t want to ruin a good story with facts.

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 9

Stating disbelief is not a fact. It's reasonable to assume it's false, but it's not a fact.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The driver that was surveilling and tried to crash into him could have been someone not part of the government.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

but wait there is more! when he went to go pee he could feel someone watching him! he found wires in his electrical outlets! #tinfoilhat

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Was there a camera in his peehole?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Its 29 million dollar a year red light policy. I'm confident people have been killed for way less than that.

5 years ago | Likes 115 Dislikes 7

You mean it's fines that go into the general fund. Unless you can prove it's also being looted, there isn't much merit in killing for

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What about salaries?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What about them? Is there any proof that these people will be eliminated? Even if so, how often do you hear about middle managers hiring

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

hitman over 80K a year jobs?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

more social services or paved roads.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Except most of that money goes to a private company. Gov gets 40% or less.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they wanted to kill him they wouldn't use a head on collision. Usually both parties die in that situation.

5 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

That’s why they use brain washed assassins. Kinda obvious if you ask me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Usually the one expecting the collision gets out in better shape

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

[citation needed]

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless it's a train

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Random mugging. Plane crash. Gas mains explosion. Stroke. Heart attack. The best ways of disposing of a nuisance without drawing too much1)

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

A plane crash doesn't attract much attention?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Misdirection. As a method of assassination it is a little overkill, but even if the authorities rule out accident the most likely 1)

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

attention to the reasons someone is being ganked. I never bought the whole Soviet poisoning with radioactive element thing.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Why would Russia want to hide that they'll overtly kill dissidents? They'd be giving up a proud history of overtly killing dissidents. 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Russian. It was to send a clear message to other expats and would-be expats.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This article was from.2016. Heres an update! https://www.newsday.com/long-island/politics/stephen-ruth-red-light-cameras-1.20877886

5 years ago | Likes 526 Dislikes 4

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think it is very sketchy when people block news based on location.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Woah a source I never heard of before. Interesting. Would sure like to see them have a reputation for being credible before I believe it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

It's been around since 1940 and has 19 Pulitzers to its name. What's your metric for credibility?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh WTF. I was hoping he'd stick it to the fucking Man.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

By reposting, the poor guy keeps getting arrested again. He must have racked up a 100 year sentence

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Is it bad I was expecting a tombstone?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.[tldr Stephen Ruth- Red Light Camera Vigilante /a/tiQLv7f]

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“Majority Democrats have has resisted Ruth’s push against the cameras”

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I came here to point that out. Who is paying this person to write anything?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because the Suffolk Democrats using it for funding for excess crap. Vote the Democrats out.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Has to be fake news/Right wing crazy stuff. He blames democrats.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thx mate :)! I just found about it now :/

5 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 1

No criticism, just wanted to add the rest of the story! Some things need to be told over and over!

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

weird that an article stating that Republicans support something for the good and Democrats don't gets upvoted on imgur

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Its the second highest comment...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...I know...that's what I'm saying. Typically only things with democratic views get upvoted on imgur. That's why it's odd

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Misread a bit. Maybe it has to do with actual good? Strange how that happens

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

/a/hCNGhbB

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks for adding this!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Republicans supported him? Did i read that right?

5 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 3

Things can get funky when you get down to local levels.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah removing these things is dead on with party platform. Cutting govmt regulations and programs etc etc.

5 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 1

People get so entrenched in the good vs evil on their political views, they forget that the roles are more often reversed than they believe

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

People blindly buying into the "party X is good" propaganda is what pisses me off so much about politics.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I subscribe to a more conservative point of view but I’m never obtuse to hear out the other side and admit when my own is wrong

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes you did. It’s not unusual.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Smaller government, brah. Not all GOP are crazy religious folk.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not surprised, New York is very blue so Republicans will support measures that stop Dems from making money.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Don’t forget the part of the story where the shortened yellow lights were in lower income areas.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Democrats can be evil too. Most people in power are trying to get money, and their opponents want them to have less money

5 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 2

Since 9/11 Dems on board w surveillance. Repubs monopolies lie with, Corruption, Evangelical child rape,

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And Domestic terroism. ......FFS

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Chicago is a cesspool of Democrat politics.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Historically Dems are the evil ones. Slavery, suppressing Indians, imprisoning Japanese Americans... All done by Dems

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah. They're both bad, but Reps have majority bad, and mostly higher up. Dems have a lot of bad in the lower, local scale. Most of NY 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

is dead economically; more people flee than any other state. Taxes hike, but no improvement. Cuomo banned weed unless his friends got to 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

grow it, for instance. Mayor Warren fires hundreds of teachers, gives millions away to friends, then blames the suburbs for 'racism'. 3/4

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Democrats were literally plotting and carrying out coups and race wars a couple decades earlier before they switched their support base.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Coups and race wars ON AMERICAN SOIL in towns and counties against minorities and their supporters*

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not ALL Republicans are scum. At least not until they get a federal seat, anyways

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

No they are pretty fking crazy at the state level too. But yea there is crazy on both sides.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

THANK. YOU. I have lost so many friends because I choose to be a part of the R party. Like, they blocked me on social media and all platform

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You deserve it

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And you're a piece of shit for that comment.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, do you vocally support Trump or any Republican Senators that aren't generally publicly attacked by Trump?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because I'd still probably disagree with blocking you, but these kinds of things could start to explain why at least.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

My ex is a republican and said I should vote trump. I send her news articles now, from a wide verity of sources...

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I don’t think republican voters are bad per say. But are mostly misinformed by Fox News propaganda. I welcome her to make a point but only..

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Because I'm from the EU, this news is not available to me...... what the actual, living, breathing fuck is this

5 years ago | Likes 244 Dislikes 1

I was able to open the link & read the article from Norway

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because I'm in the US. I can only read it if I subscribe. I do have adblock on.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me too. It says I don't have enough "FREEDUMS" and linked me to a website where I can buy bald eagles and Bud Light.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

News 12 is a SUPER local long Island news channel and source... Not really breaking world news

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GDPR, but it worked for me

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ruth has stopped going to lawmaker meetings or whatever but GOP lawmakers have pressed for a review of the camera program and maybe lawsuit.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Says that same thing and it's not even technically true any more in the UK! I guess we're still in the transition period though.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Due to Brexit? I think the rules instated before are in place until we say otherwise I believe... I want cookie banners TO FUCK RIGHT OFF

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I honestly don't know. The whole thing is frankly an endless boring nightmare.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Instead of dealing with GDPR a lot of US based websites chose the easy way out and decided to just geoblock all EU based IP addreses.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

But I dont understand why? And what's the gdpr

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GDPR is EU's data protection directive. It limits what websites can do with your data and how they can handle it. It's not a bad idea, 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it requires any website available to the EU to comply with its much-stricter-in-most-areas privacy regulations, and it costs a lot 2/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GDPR is a very consumer focused privacy law. It puts us in full control of any identifiable data held on us. 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We have the ability to demand any and all data that a company holds on us, including but not limited to photos, video, documents. 2/?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fought for three years, went to every gov. Meeting, ran for elected official, now a lawsuit is in the works and he has stopped fighting!

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Legal BS is exhausting and expensive

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes indeed! Three years is a LONG time to keep.at it! I hope he is happy and doing well!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Basically, he gave up the fight due to opposition from the local dem party. However the local rep party is trying to remove the cameras too.

5 years ago | Likes 172 Dislikes 2

Doesn't that sound backwards to you?

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 31

Both parties suck. They tend to be polar opposites to sway the majority of people. People who can compromise are stuck between bad choices

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Theeeers ya praaablem! Thinking it’s two parties that can be ‘back and forth’. Yes. But in a system that’s built for corruption? What hope?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Any system that relies on the decency of human beings is a fucking terrible system! Nothing changes until the system does.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. Sounds normal. If you ever stepped out your dem bubble your parents put you in, you would realize most reps are for the people.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Then why do they vote people in that fuck them so hard?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Laughs in VPN... Here you go: /a/tiQLv7f

5 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 1

How do you screenshot a whole article like that on mobile?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My phone has a function called Rolling Screenshot. It makes a continuous screenshot until you tap the screen, or it reaches the bottom.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'm very curious how a laugh in VPN would sound... "1010101010"

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

It would sound like a normal laugh, but played in an echo chamber through a walkie talkie in a room you aren't even in.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

what your referring to would be binary

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Oh... ah well you get it ;)

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0