Who could have seen that coming?

Feb 16, 2025 1:21 AM

lydecker17

Views

11646

Likes

860

Dislikes

5

WHAAAAAAAAT!?! REEEAAALLLLLLLLYYYYY!!!!!!!!?????? NOOOOO WAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean Trump lied? Surely not? /s

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Are you telling me the guy that’s NOTORIOUS for stiffing his employees stiffed his employees?

Who could have fucking seen THAT coming?

1 year ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 0

I believe it, but please provide a source. I want to spread this so badly, but need to see an official announcement.

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That is exactly what i assumed would happen, sadly

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

v

1 year ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 1

Everyone. Literally everyone saw this coming. And those who didn't see it, were told it was coming.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a Fed I saw this for the scam it was and notified everyone I could not to take it

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

...

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Yeah I was kind of confused how folks figured Trump was going to pay his bills suddenly.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How stupid do you have to be to believe a word that pig and his Nazi piglets say at this point? Duh.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Friend of mine is an inmate at a federal facility. He told me today that earlier this week they were notified they'd likely be put into indefinite lockdown due to staffing cuts and not having enough COs to ensure order. Seems nobody is immune from mango mussolini and elongated muskrat's guillotine.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But the leopards won't eat my face

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

There's no allocated money for these buyouts. I don't know why a single person thinks there is.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I feel that the way things are going, angering a very well armed population may backfire on the fascists.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only thing this administration knows how to do is not pay its debts.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Called it!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Sauce?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The account that posted this is run by federal employees.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Gee... Who could POSSIBLY have seen this coming, from the man who is famous for never paying people what they're owed? SUCH a COMPLETE shock!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They've been firing people who didn't sign it too. So it doesnt really matter to them.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's almost as though they..... lied...?

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do we have a sauce yet besides this twitter profile? So far they've been right

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is an account run by federal employees.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This is really sinister from the trumpies. Resign in good faith and get stabbed in the back

1 year ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 2

Agreed, but this is always how this was going to end.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They fell for it. It was all a ploy which is why many of us said to resist!

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

It was so obvious a coma patient would have seen it coming.

1 year ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Even Helen Keller could see that shit coming.

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

There is no such thing as “good faith” when dealing with Trump. Ever.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Sinister? Seems pretty on par honestly.

1 year ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

Maybe sinister is the wrong word. Duplicitous yes, maybe treacherous, malicious

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I smell incoming lawsuits.

1 year ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Accepting the buyout waived all right to sue.
The scam was pretty obvious.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Which I, as an American Taxpayer, will have to pay for.

1 year ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Well, if it costs $170 million, $1 is from you.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Last I heard, 75k took the buyout. That's 75k per citizen. Likely more, as the wealthy won't have to pitch in.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't sue the federal government for monetary damages. It can't spend money in ways not written into law by the budget. Unless Congress funds your lawsuit, you get nothing.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well, believe or not, some people just wants to keep their jobs, they aren't after compensation money.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is what he's done with contractors for decades, Trump banks on them becoming lawsuits because then it's just one person who needs side

1 year ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

with him and he gets off without having to pay.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

He even stiffed the lawyers that were defending him when he was being sued for not paying his contractors

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I can't understand why anyone was stupid enough to think Trump and Musk wouldn't do this.

1 year ago | Likes 210 Dislikes 0

Weeeell, you guys elected that shithead TWICE

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nope. Both times a majority of people voted for someone else.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That does unfortunately not change the fact that the US with their System of voting did vote this guy (unless fraud is proven)

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It does change the presence of a mandate and the base percentage of people who may support this fascism.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But does it stop the guy from doing what fuckall he wants now? Doesn't look like it

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

same reason folks say a deer's not a horse.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I didn't realize trump & musk walked on an even number of toes. TIL.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Very timely idiom

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

:) Chinese idioms spark interest where more mundane statements like failed a loyalty test don't.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

yo

1 year ago | Likes 421 Dislikes 1

I remember you posting that.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whaaaaaaaaat? You mean the guy who's infamous for not paying people lied about this obviously sketchy buy-out? Say it ain't so.

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I’m not a lawyer, but I got some good leopards eating the faces laughs when I saw an article about a fellow social worker who got screwed. Lmfao.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

paragraph 12 of their email "contract":

Employee forever waives, and will not pursue through any judicial, administrative, or other process, any action against [Agency] that is based on, arising from, or related to Employee’s employment at [Agency] or the deferred resignation offer, including any and all claims that were or could have been brought concerning said matters. Employee unconditionally releases [Agency] and its present and former employees, officers, agents, representatives, and →

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

all persons acting by, through, or in concert with any of those individuals, either in their official or individual capacities, from any and all liability based on, arising from, or relating to the matters that Employee may have against them, including any and all claims that were or could have been brought. Consistent with applicable law, Employee similarly waives any claim that could be brought on Employee’s behalf by another entity, including Employee’s labor union.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I read that back when you posted it. The entire thing reeked to high heaven, there's no money to just pay folks not to come to work for 8 months. I was pretty sure they'd just terminate anyone who believed this for not meeting performance metrics about a month in.

When the full deal came out... yep. You called it. Section 9.

1 year ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

The sole purpose of the document was to get them to sign away any potential severance benefits. Anything else they happen to get is a mercy.

1 year ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

What is section 9?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The reading comprehension section.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The full contract was posted here a few weeks ago. @TheChunguskaEvent is a lawyer who pointed out that Section 9 is the "gotcha".

As in, anyone who signed the "Voluntary Retirement" contract can be terminated at any time without any recourse.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Literally every contract he's ever been a part of for half a century. He was famous for these lawsuits before anything else, and still they

1 year ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 0

fall for it.

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

There is a *very tiny* group - feds who were planning to quit in the very near term anyway - for whom it could, theoretically, have made sense to accept the offer on the slim possibility it was not a bullshit bait-and-switch. Because the downside cost would be essentially zero, with some potential upside. Everybody else? Absolutely not.

1 year ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Oh no doubt

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0