The Bern

Jul 27, 2022 10:13 PM

mfrybeasley

Views

92102

Likes

1577

Dislikes

24

#politics #mildly_interesting #berniesanders #vote

I s2g if I’m ever president I will GLADLY be a puppet for Bernie. He’s the only one who knows what the little people want and need.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It would be nice if the US could improve itself because Canadian politicians like to follow it's lead, especially in Alberta.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Steppenwolf’s monster

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Universal Health Care companies should hire lob- oh wait, there are no UHC companies to pay bribes for Congressional support.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, Doritos has enough money already

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Healthcare care for all and I mean all. The only way to ensure this is ban the government from the healthcare choices.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

The US would actually make a huge savings by having universal healthcare.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately voters have no interest in making America better for all when it can make America better for the few lobbyists.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean, he's not wrong, as someone who works for a company that directly benefits from this, my bonus last year was... large

3 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

But, if you see what China is dumping into the industry, it dwarfs what this bill provides.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

But how would we keep the poors sick and drowning in medical debt???

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Bernie finds your lack of medicare disturbing

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Funding intel is 100% important if you know anything about TSMC and Taiwan. I feel like there is a 90% chance of China invading by 2030.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

However, look at my last post ... Merica should have universal healthcare like we have here in the UK. 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love Bernie Sanders!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We don’t deserve Bernie.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

In my country the cost for healthcare is split almost 50/50 for employer and employee. Wouldn't be a hard thing to implement in the US

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I want those who vote yes to be primaried.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

There's always money to do shit that some rich asshole wants done.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wonder if you could pay for medicare for all just by letting the coordinating agency negotiate prices with pharma and healthcare providers

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The prices you guys pay for pretty much anything health-related are way beyond ridiculous, from an outsider's perspective.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bernie has been saying the same thing about lots of thing the govt spends money on but somehow claims not enough money for UHC. It's b.s.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Most US secondary schools and colleges are weak. So don't expect much progress.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I just know Intel will manage to fuck this up.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Of course we can. But we won't.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If the US keeps a source of chips is what will determine if it has a chance at remaining leading world power in the coming years.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Universal health care would be cheaper, irrelevant comparison

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No it wouldn't we spend more than 10x that amount already on medicare and medicaid at the federal level. Total health care spending public/1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And private is 4.1 trillion in 2020, even if you cut the costs by 50% it would still be 1 trillion a year. We should have a single payer /2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

System but do not just spout BS like that its disingenuous and dilutes the truth of the issue.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bernie is right. But why does the US need to subsidise chip manufacturing anyway? A robot is the same price in the US as in China. 1/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And that's all chip manufacturers are. Assembly lines of robots. It won't bring factory jobs back.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

This isn't a worker thing. This is a technical superiority thing. China is on the verge of passing the US, this is instrumental in the race

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fabs employ a lot of humans, but that isn't the point of the bill. It's a national security issue - look it up.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

An amendment was added that "Cannot use for stock buybacks, outsourcing, or union busting." How was this not part of the original bill?

3 years ago | Likes 136 Dislikes 0

They'll just use their other money for that and use the free money for normal business.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Hahahahahahaha... Really? Because the lobbyists wrote the bill.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Stock buybacks are what all major companies do when they get a handout. Happens every single godamn time and it’s fucking infuriating

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

And laying off employees, of course. Which is imo far more despicable

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lobbyi$ts.

3 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 1

Anonymous be donations campaign requiring by this of lot a curb can we like feel I. Altogether lobbying corporate eliminate and.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Briberists

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would I, a wealthy oligarch, pay my senators to introduce a bill that stops me from doing what I want to do?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the stock market wasn't invented till 1792, first union 1794

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 20

So it'd be worse if not for that. Thanks mate!

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

it's hard to put something that hasn't been widey known or even invented yet into law.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Amendment to the bill, not the US constitution.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

100% Bernie is right, but this chip subsidy is a very good thing, especially if China decides to turn up the heat with Taiwan.

3 years ago | Likes 204 Dislikes 7

Right, I appreciate the spirit of your message Bernsie. However, don't touch my chips man.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Came to say this. I want both.

3 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

Glad it was brought up. People don't realize how devastating it could be to us should Taiwan be invaded.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Duuude!? It's about priorities, let the Corp capitolists figure it out since there's room for profits. We Need healthcare subsidies.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bernie is the hero this county needs. Always has been.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Agreed. Needs to be done but they're still "behind the 8 ball" a bit as no one can touch Taiwan's manufacturing process and ability...Yet.

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

For sure, apparently some Fabs are opening in the states but only the last Gen in terms of nanometers.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Losing access to the smallest process node isn't a disaster. The more important chips are on much higher nodes.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is a subsidy better than nationalizing the industry? If taxpayers need to collectively fund them, we should collective own them.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Universal healthcare is a MUST... But so is computer chips and China is eyeing Taiwan pretty heavily and if Bernie stands in front

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Of this, it will give republicans a HUGE talking point if our tech falls apart bc of a lack of chips

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yeah, one is nice to have and the other is a security issue for our economy.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is only a small dent compared to what China is investing in the semiconductor industry.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

China might not have the money to do this. They have a recession coming, and I think this time they might not be able to hide it because /1

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

/2 they have been using quantitive easing through giving land to developers, allowing buildings to be put up for a fraction of real cost.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

/3 however China has run out of land they normally would give away, and property sales has plummeted.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I've been trying to get my hands on a Sabrent DS4-RSS (the RAID one) since beginning of pandemic and can't due to chips and imports.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've wanted decent healthcare, dental, eyewear coverage for *far* longer but ...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel's already said they're going ahead with building the manufacturing plant regardless

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

This! And then hold up your grand because why not right? How many R senators are stock holders for semi conduct makers?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But why the subsidy. It's just a robot assembly line. It's not bringing jobs. Just pass a law stating "if they're sold here, they're made 1/

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Because in current day, capitalist America that would never, ever happen.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's not just an assembly line. they're trying to reshore chip fab here instead of places like Taiwan (TSMC makes better chips atm)

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's not about the jobs, it's about the chips. US doesn't want to be entirely dependent on a foreign supply of a critical technology.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I work for a precision machine shop that makes parts for ASML, the largest non-chinese chip machine maker. I've learned a lot and still >

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here." The USA is still the world's largest tech market. Use that leverage.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

You don't understand how bad the chip shortage is and how impactful it is to US economics and security

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In what way? What tech is made in the USA anymore other than weapons and vehicles?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Over simplifying. Chips are much more complicated to produce and the US does still manufacture quite a bit of chips. It’s the complexity 2/

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Of Taiwanese chips that the US and china struggle with. We can’t easily replicate them. You can’t just say to be used here made here. 2/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That’s a gross underestimation of the complexity and cost/time it takes to develop manufactured items. I am in manufacturing importing. If3/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You go to usitc.gov you can review anti dumping cases. You can even go to my prior comments in 2015-2016 for long thread explanations 4/

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

From their perspective, it's not about jobs, it's about securing an independent source of a strategic commodity.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But Taiwan is a an American ally.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think the expectation is that Taiwan will be conquered by China soon. Even if that doesn't happen, American nationalists have always ...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

... hated seeing strategic resources in foreign lands. It's a self-defeating attitude, but they're not clever people.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 6

She sold it (25k shares of invidia) and took a 341k loss today didn't she?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nvidia isn't getting anything from it. Intel, their competitor, is.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

To be clear, many in congress did this. Not just Nancy.

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

And it's been public knowledge for 18 months.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah, and they're all dirtbags for it. It should be illegal for senators to get away with this crap. The loophole needs to close.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

It is illegal and it's not a loophole. It's a law that's not enforced

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

It's insider trading, no? Buying or selling stock before announcing something that effects the price

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah he sold stock at a loss. $350k worth of loss to be exact. This isn't what insider trading is.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Been different if he made millions. But he didn't.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

So...he sold it after they got caught?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Probably.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I agree with your assessment to a point. Technically, both things could be true. If I were going to be wise about cheating a system, 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I would be sure to build in some public, calculated loss so it doesn't look as shady.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying what they did was by any means good. Just saying he took a loss. Definitely looks shady and it probably is.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0