Ignoring the phat elephant siphoning away

Dec 20, 2022 1:06 PM

Lanhdanan

Views

110994

Likes

2589

Dislikes

37

Tip of the iceberg baby. Read Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky and Ed Herman. Or check out the vids on YouTube.

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Putting up with a little inconvenience so your fellow man can live decently is what the christmas spirit really is!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Goes to show you that press is bought and paid for. You won't get the truth delivered by your paper boy.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Revenue isn't the correct measuring stick though, what percentage of that is going to the workers? What percent is profit?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's worse than that, the railroads are the cause of a lot of the inflation and fuel price increases. Proof: https://youtu.be/P7EFCIOwexg

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's simply barely in the news cycle at all

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like to remember this period as the f*ck around period. The find out period is where there is a massive walkout and 1/3 of good stop movin

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The economy is billionaires. They just don’t say that.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Biden fucked up on this. Should have told the rail companies "You can afford this - or we can raise taxes on your profits."

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Won't somebody please think of the economy?!!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 168 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 0

Maybe it’s poor word choice but revenue includes the money used to pay workers etc. I assume they mean profits?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yep

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*oligarchy.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s ‘we raked in’ the whole network is publicly owned but run by ‘private companies so we’re the shareholders. Coordinated strikes?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Our culture has a very messed up definition of "hero." Someone who was volunteered without their consent, forced to suffer and endure, then>

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

abandoned and ignored by those who benefited. "Heroes! They're HEROES! Praise them... then ignore them so we can get back to business."

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The Rich need their new Yachts…

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only argument I have with that statement, is it doesn't tell us how much profit. Revenue means nothing if they're breaking even.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Yeah, this is super important. The revenue is irrelevant if they didn't make money, and framing it this way is deliberately misleading.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

1885 NYPD 1st Superintendent became a millionaire, US back to oligarchy https://time.com/4384963/nypd-scandal-history/ 1/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

What rail strike? Nobody's striking.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 27

This is the UK. Rail workers ARE striking over Xmas. Support striking workers ✊️✊️

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Ah ok, US rail strike was averted.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 12

*made illegal by corporate millionaires. Fixed it for u

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

That's not what happened.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

So millions of dollars didn't pour into elected officials accounts as they prepared to vote on wether the workers are allowed to strike?

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Reminder that Biden and the Dems passed a law making striking illegal for rail workers and gave them LITERALLY NONE of their demands.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 16

I thought this as well, but it is def more complicated than that, congress/biden forced the 4/12 unions that had not agreed to the contract

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

the 4/12 unions represent 86% of the union employees. So yes, Biden and the Dems literally fucked over workers.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

To accept the contract. So 8/12 unions had already agreed. So the strikes would have happened with 2/3s majority against striking.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not saying it is good or bad (I hate it) but biden didn't make striking illegal, they made 2/3 majority enough for the contract to go throug

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

If I explained that badly or incorrectly, please correct me! <3

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don't disagree with the sentiment, but $27b in revenue is meaningless and therefore deceptive. The right metric to look at is profits.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

To get a proper look we'd need to see all of their books in that light. The whole picture is important when they're saying there's no room >

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To pay labor fairly. Expenditures typically cooked for tax purposes etc. Revenue is important for "you had it where'd it go?"

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because the laborers are the ones who made it for you.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If my roommate says they can't pay rent, but they had it and spent it on drugs, their profits are meaningless in my argument.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think imgur comments is a good place to talk through this but I agree with the general sentiment of prioritizing workers, although /

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) Rich people know unions work, because they're all in a union to tilt tax and employment law in their favor. That's why they and their

3 years ago | Likes 404 Dislikes 1

2) companies want to squish unions as hard as possible, the last thing they need is the poors using methods that work against them.

3 years ago | Likes 191 Dislikes 0

Yes what we need is to form more unions run by educated people, organize strikes and protests

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

When they frame it as "if they strike, it'll ruin the economy" I'm thinking, they're THAT crucial and your fighting them on paid sick days?

3 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

The answer is don't let them strike. If they're that important to the economy, give them what they want and you won't have a problem.

3 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

But what about rich peoples yacht money?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or have the president reclassify them as slaves.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

This. I'm genuinely curious to see what will happen if they do strike. Will the Biden administration send in the military like before?

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

"I'll take plutocracy for $100, ALEC."

3 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 1

Could there be more smarmy hubris in the radical financial theory posed by a bank that the wealthy should run the economy..

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"The earth is being held up by the muscular arms of its entrepreneur-plutocrats, like it, or not."

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In the US, the rail lines get special status pretty much across the board because of how essential the system is. While most people would

3 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 0

See that as a good reason to expand said system as much as nessasary, the powers that be like being the powers that be so ?‍♂️

3 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Every service this essential is basically a utility and should be run by the government.

3 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 2

Don't you bring rationality into this, there are profits to be made!

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Internet, energy, medical care + insurance, housing, rails, etc.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My proposal: nationalise one of everything. Others are free to compete, but there should be a gov run one to set a baseline.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Not a great idea. There's multiple conflicts of interest there, and the private ones will always violate laws to increase short term profit.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Pretty good idea of implemented well. It's why France has had decent internet connectivity everywhere for decades.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Private ones getting away with law breaking is an entirely different issue - one that is rampant under the current system anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

humans are the problem unfortunately. Set bounties to reduce invasive wildlife. Humans create farms to breed the wildlife for money 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Politicians' that own corporations have been kneecapping government services to lie that privatization reduces cost for decades 2/?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A government baseline? Too easy to setup for failure. 3/3

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Possible, but I'd imagine "experts" they hire would kneecap the gov one so the private looks more appealing. Gov can't pay leadership $$$$$

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Step 1 of any planned improvement is "keep conservative pyschos away", preferably by jail or execution, but settle for conviscation of power

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's right wing talk, my friend. Any calls for execution puts you in risk of convincing people like me to go against you.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0