The border, once again, is a Constitution-free zone.

Jun 8, 2022 10:25 PM

JanieKarmaSmith

Views

107946

Likes

1388

Dislikes

22

In a 6-to-3 vote, the Supreme Court ruled that border agents may unconstitutionally enter a person's home without a warrant and assault him and ... federal courts are powerless to do anything about it.

https://twitter.com/cristianafarias/status/1534539839529525251

Just a reminder of where border agents are allowed to operate.
An area that covers about 200 milllion people.  

The GOP is a terrorist organization.

Post 01 https://imgur.com/gallery/5bBTj2v
Post 02 https://imgur.com/gallery/n8JV9jo
Post 03 https://imgur.com/gallery/upKqc1G
Post 04 https://imgur.com/gallery/5rKI2N0
Post 05 https://imgur.com/gallery/0A0N86C
Post 06 https://imgur.com/gallery/Fzk2pO0
Post 07 https://imgur.com/gallery/CsV38DW
Post 08 https://imgur.com/gallery/7FuPnTz
Post 09 https://imgur.com/gallery/VwRIyHE
Post 10 https://imgur.com/gallery/jicpwr2

Post 11 https://imgur.com/gallery/ryA30SN
Post 12 https://imgur.com/gallery/paAa3TE
Post 13 https://imgur.com/gallery/gfOSeav
Post 14 https://imgur.com/gallery/KwLSFo1
Post 15 https://imgur.com/gallery/DHXo3Sl
Post 16 https://imgur.com/gallery/VxoamoW
Post 17 https://imgur.com/gallery/RgDS5et
Post 18 https://imgur.com/gallery/mYq4JnW
Post 19 https://imgur.com/gallery/pTao9my
Post 20 https://imgur.com/gallery/Umkbt1k

Post 21 https://imgur.com/gallery/lft5kjl
Post 22 https://imgur.com/gallery/2sGvpSU
Post 23 https://imgur.com/gallery/ObejHYS
Post 24 https://imgur.com/gallery/ZssQEoC
Post 25 https://imgur.com/gallery/2HMWzub
Post 26 https://imgur.com/gallery/40X1toW
Post 27 https://imgur.com/gallery/kWwSW8m
Post 28 https://imgur.com/gallery/0L3SU3e
Post 29 https://imgur.com/gallery/6ARYf8X
Post 30 https://imgur.com/gallery/hoS7FqI

Post 31 https://imgur.com/gallery/wsER9Oo
Post 32 https://imgur.com/gallery/YS6RAae
Post 33 https://imgur.com/gallery/yJJuSwx
Post 34 https://imgur.com/gallery/iRe6Jml
Post 35 https://imgur.com/gallery/oT4NVHt
Post 36 https://imgur.com/gallery/QpOz3R8
Post 37 https://imgur.com/gallery/oe7D58e
Post 38 https://imgur.com/gallery/sA6OirV
Post 39 https://imgur.com/gallery/CvbkQJN
Post 40 https://imgur.com/gallery/Ncm5BO2

Post 41 https://imgur.com/gallery/jnGMXKE
Post 42 https://imgur.com/gallery/JUCfRMw
Post 43 https://imgur.com/gallery/8Zclg3m
Post 44 https://imgur.com/gallery/HNyjS2W
Post 45 https://imgur.com/gallery/OpBYYJY
Post 46 https://imgur.com/gallery/oeUS1M4

America has hit the brakes and is now in reverse. Look out!

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh fun, my city is within the border zone. Good thing I have a shotgun and little respect for anyone who tries to break into my home

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

So republicans are basically like "fuck the whole constitution except the second half of the second amendment"

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As if No Knock warrants weren't bad enough!

3 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 0

Something something police state

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Conservatives REALLY HATE brown people

3 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Yet they pass laws/rulings that impact them...and have the gall to cry when the leopards eat their face(s).

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How the fuck does HAWAII have borders? OCEAN BRUH.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Point of entry into the US"

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, Fascism then? Will nothing be done? I mean, I vote, but I feel so hopeless. I'm also in Texas, so that doesn't help. I'm tired

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

This kind of news makes me tired too... like the kind of tired that I want to go into a coma and only awaken when everything is groovy again

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

#2 Really under-estimates the coverage. Border law also applies to all airports and air fields that accept international flights. And any

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

port navigable by marine shipping.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Page 3 of the majority decision has some genuinely scary assertions on the nature of the Supreme Court, and on courts in general.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MFing Supreme Court! Most of the justices need to be flushed back into their traitorous/ religious cesspool. They’re destroying our country!

3 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

Yes, and can only be removed if they DIE. Trump fucked up the US for decades by appointing so many supreme Court judges

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is the type of content I like.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fed agents are shielded against state courts. Fed agents in performance of duties are shielded for most any act in federal courts.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey, about that map: any river with a seaport at the end also counts. Lewiston, Idaho is 465 miles inland.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That'd include the Mississippi and Missouri?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The International Port of Memphis and The Port of Kansas City...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not that they're allowed to, it's just that the victim can't hold them accountable by suing them. But Congress can pass a law to change

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

this, and indeed, there's already a federal law that allows you to sue state and local officials. Congress must act... for once.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Interesting that most coastal cities are more liberal leaning.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wtf border are they defending in Sacramento, the fuckin’ Pacific mermaid country?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's the US border, a "point of entry".

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And all the more so it guys all the way to Lake Tahoe.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

everyone in power are corrupt pos either for abiding this crap, enforcing it or not calling it out. TRIPE

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The question becomes how much of a Civil War and how many years after is it going to take to correct the damage these guys are doing?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Considering that roughly 1/2 of the country is pretty much in favor of a civil war? Probably a full war. Length of time? Unknown

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Didn't I read somewhere that the "border" also includes airports? So basically anywhere is free game?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not just international airports, recently videos surfaced showing CBP agents checking papers on Greyhound buses, Amtrak trains, & airports

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

This isn't updated yet but here is some history on the 100 miles from the border rule that existed since 1953

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well, that’s slightly terrifying.

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

"The inquiry here is whether a court is competent to authorize a damages action against Border Patrol agents generally. The answer is no."

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's terrifying is most people don't know it's been like that since 1953 & now the supreme court officially took away protections.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Any chances we might of had in federal courts for civil penalties against law enforcement agencies is officially gone.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Don't airports constitute borders, too?

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"CBP Officers are located across the country and work at airports and ports of entry to keep the American people safe."

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, in recent years videos surfaced showing CBP agents checking papers on Greyhound buses, Amtrak trains, & airports

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Atleast Fairbanks (AK) is safe.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are you within 100 miles of the Fairbanks International Airport?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh shit.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm gonna take that as a yes...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Too much text, can you sum it up in 140 characters?

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Cops allowed to break down doors without warrants and with no repercussions where 60% of US population lives. Fun times in shithole country.

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

"The inquiry here is whether a court is competent to authorize a damages action against Border Patrol agents generally. The answer is no."

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"The answer is yes, by a two question process, but we're now reducing it down to one question - can we pass the buck to congress?"

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The border, once again, is a Constitution-free zone.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

We fucked

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Informant for BP invited BP to his property regularly, didn't like how they acted one time, and tried to sue. Congress' problem, not SCOTUS.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where Congress hasn’t created a cause of action, the Supreme Court generally shouldn’t try to do their job for them.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That’s really it. The context in this case was violations of the 1st and 4th amendments by a border patrol agent.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People who sit around crying about fascism have this weird contradictory notion that the gov't shouldn't follow rules when it suits them

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually, the Justices said, "This isn't our job, Congress is supposed to make laws, we're not supposed to tell police what to do."

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Yes but if the SC says, "Well...the 4th amendment doesn't apply here."

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why make laws when you can use the court to achieve your goals? Laws take time and compromise.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

"The inquiry here is whether a court is competent to authorize a damages action against Border Patrol agents generally. The answer is no."

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Seems like they're telling a federal branch of the police exactly what they can/cannot do.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

God, i hate to agree with you, but yeah. Even the winners of Roe V Wade said to not depend on the courts for your rights, pass laws.

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Like it felt bad to type because I want the courts to side the other way on this, but... IDK the intricacies of the relationships b/c I'm--

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

--an American and therefor wasn't taught civics properly except for propaganda.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Hey, with civil forfeiture and the inability to hold police accountable for their actions, you could argue that the US is constitution-free.

3 years ago | Likes 410 Dislikes 1

How is the supreme court even able to decide this? They aren't lawmakers or am I missing something?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Note on door: "We searched your home while you were at work and confiscated all the money we found in the house." - Border Police

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

"PS The door was broke when we got here, no clue how it happened"

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"PSS You should fix your door, criminals might gain entry to your house and steal stuff!"

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Isn't that a state-by-state thing? I could be very wrong, though.

3 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 0

Federal Civil Asset Forfeiture does occur, just not as often as local Civil Asset Forfeiture.

3 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 0

Thanks! Still depressing, but I appreciate the clarification.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Sorry

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Never apologize for telling the truth.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

How exactly do Chicago and Milwaukee qualify? They don't border international waters.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Border Patrol considers the boundary of the Great Lakes to be the “functional equivalent” of the border

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

So thrilled to live in Michigan right now

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No one messes with our border. It’s all water. BIG water. But there was a drug smuggling submarine a few years ago

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

CBP considers the shores of the great lakes to be a functional international boundary for the purpose of the 100 mile buffer.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I just meant people typically don’t try to smuggle stuff across the Great Lakes.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That doesn't really matter in the context of what this decision means. Just ask those snatch teams that were active in Portland.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So basically covering what, 80% of the country's population? More?

3 years ago | Likes 223 Dislikes 0

60%. Time to start reporting SCOTUS homes as being used as heavily armed undocumented immigrant safe houses.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not a math major, but I think that 200 divided by 330 is just under 61%.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh man, you totally could be a math major!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's some fascist shit.

3 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

No, just Republican shit. Although I can see how you'd confuse them as the venn diagram is just a circle at this point.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Technically the Border Patrol considers any international airport a "point of entry" and so...100 miles around any IATA?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For the uninformed: IATA = International Air Transport Association (in this context, any international airport) www.iata.org

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup, nearly 2/3 of people live within the border range enacted in 1953 https://www.aclu.org/other/constitution-100-mile-border-zone

3 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 0

Actually, I think international airports are also counted as borders for this purpose...?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not just international airports, recently videos surfaced showing CBP agents checking papers on Greyhound buses, Amtrak trains, & airports

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

in 2020 DHS / BORTAC was operating within 100 miles of any international port, so there should be yellow circles on every major city.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

While they were only 80 miles from the coast when snaching people into unmarked vans in Portland...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Are there also mostly non-republican voters living there? Sorry if that's a stupid question. Non-american here

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Considering a large majority of the country isn't republican, yes. Republicans only make up, I think, around 30%of the population.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nevermind, I was way off. As of 12/17/2020, Gallup polling found 31% of are Democrats, 25% are Republicans, and 41% are independent.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's a range of DEMs & REPs populations in cities run by DEMs & REPs. Not an even mix but both exist alongside each other.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Thanks! My prejudice days dems are in cities and reps in rural areas, 's why I asked.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Even though there are plenty of Republicans in there that area includes nearly all the left leaning progressive cities in the US

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most cities tend to be Dems but there is a heavy Rep population intermixed within them.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0