holy shit they made the pope catholic

Feb 6, 2024 2:59 AM

TheChunguskaEvent

Views

60738

Likes

928

Dislikes

20

big if true

like ya do

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

v

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

I just always assumed it was part of the culture he was In and didn’t judge him for any of it. He did kill a lot of people though…

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean that was also part of the culture he was in.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A lot of historical figures we gay as fuck. Tchaikovsky, Andy Warhol, and many others.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Alexander the Great: “I’m not gay, but my boyfriend is.”

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

But he said, "No homo!"

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

“Which was the style at the time.”
Abe Simpson

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Did Reign: The Conqueror not teach people anything?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The thing I took away from Reign: The Conqueror is that being able to measure triangles literally gives you magic powers.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Do these chumps not know what classical Greek sexuality was like?

2 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

Any holes a goal

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They took notes from Zeus, clearly

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"It's just like what my 'I Am A Western Chauvinist And I Refuse To Apologise For Creating The Modern World' boyfriends told me, right?"

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, they don't. The Greeks were the epitome of manly men. I mean look at those manly men of their military! SOOOOOOOOOO manly! And they definitely didn't have sex with each other!

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He was bi actually

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

So he was gay and at the same time gayn't. He was gaybe.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I've seen Netflix. I don't think anyone's turning gay for Netflix.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Next they will be telling me the Spartans took on young male companions… damn you factual history!

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Spartiates also had one of the most horrible societies in the world ever, with the percentage and treatment of slaves rivaled only by the American South. Also their military prowess is all bullshit, Sparta was very average in terms of win/loss ratio. Their fabled agoge was far less military training facility and far more a child soldier indoctrination camp.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's nice that they acknowledge identity was an evolving thing. Alexander had a *lot* of lovers, male and female.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wasn't he bi? And didn't we have this discussion 20 years ago already when the Oliver Stone movie came out?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

It's my understanding everyone f-d everyone at the same time back in those days

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

It was just sex to them. Looking at history through modern world glasses will always shock you.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sven.. I miss my wife...
Well, you can have a go at me if I can have a go at you.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Greeks invented oragies. The Romans improved on the concept by inviting women.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No actually. They had toxic masculinity too. Fucking was manly, and being manly was good. Fuck a woman, fuck a man, fuck a teenage boy, whatever, it was all good. If you wanted to be fucked by a man, you were inferior and worthy of ridicule. Of course Greece and Rome were around for a LONG time and their ideas shifted. Plus culture varies by location too. Some times and places were actually totally cool with bottoming, and some were not cool with gay sex even if you were the top.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Alexander the Gay.

2 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 3

I hear he also walked funny and was called Alexander The Gait.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Grayt

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Likely more accurately; Alexander the Bi

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I don't care BUT get out of my sun

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Son

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

so few will understand this reference :9

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"Oh my..."

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alexander's sexuality is a matter of debate among historians: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great#Personal_relationships. Overall, it looks like he miiight have been bisexual, but it's hard to apply modern ideas to people in the ancient world.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

As a Bisexual myself, I've noticed that when it comes to debates over a historic persons sexuality comes up... it's always either Gay or Straight. It's like they forget that we exist lol.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"'Hard to Apply' or 'Why They Called Him 'The Great''"

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Remember kids, everyone throughout history was cis:het according to lying cis:het assholes who've worked hard to erase actual human history

2 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 7

Can you be cis:het without being an asshole?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope, it's the law.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*male. History sure is cis:het but it also is male.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

for thousands of years dudes be puttin' the pat into patriarchy, then acting all "What? How dare you point our institutional misogyny it out, you're the REAL sexist!"

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There are plenty of history books about Alex being gay and the isle of lesbos.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

sure, but they're overwhelmed by the majority which supress queerness. Same happens in biology. Suppressing queer behaviour among animals

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

& that suppression is used by bigots to this very day to claim "being queer is not natural!" when it always has been, but it was suppressed

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not just Alexander but the ancient Greek in general had some not so straight habits like if you look into the Olympics. Although some others were kinda fucked up too: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pederasty_in_ancient_Greece

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The same Alexander who was described as never being the same after his best friend and general Hephaestion died? The friend Alexander was still planning huge monuments to when he died less than a year later? That guy? Oh yeah, totally. No same sex relationships.

2 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

(To be clear here: I'm not gonna dispute that Ol' Al was or wasn't gay. He definitely fucked dudes. I'm just gonna point out a trend that irks me:)

Hey fellas, is it gay to be upset when your friends die?

If my closest, most trusted friend died, I'd be pretty broken up about it. And we ain't fuckin'.

I just kinda wish largely left leaning places like Tumblr or here didn't keep going "That Andrew Tate guy is right, if you show any degree of care or compassion for a friend, you're totally gay!"

2 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

And while, obviously, there's a major difference between how filth like him and people with basic decency Regard being gay, I still think it'd be a great thing if we, as a society, started promoting care for our platonic friends as a normal, healthy thing, that doesn't imply anything about your sexuality.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You do have a point- It is very possible to have incredibly close, and platonic relationships with other people, be they same sex or opposite. It's also very reasonable to be deeply affected and mourn their passing. I think there is a tendency for historians to "roommates" same sex relationships though and that's why it crops up in these contexts.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

True, certainly. I'd like to see that hiding of history undone.
But I'd also like to recognise that we're a long way from stopping children, and man-children, from calling emotions "Gay" to make them seem like something to be reviled.
And that's something I feel should be fought, culturally.

Alexander was gay not because he wept at his closest friend's passing, but because he was attracted to that man while he lived.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

(Also: This happens constantly with fictional characters, and while I have nothing against people having fun with them, I've enjoyed Plenty of fanfiction myself, arguing that they Must be gay because they show empathy or concern for someone is the same issue.)
(Also also: I see a similar thing in regards to being trans, though that's far less common among historical figures.)

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I dont think there was really a designation for it back then because it wasnt as big of a deal because there were no christians to make shit up about whats right or wrong yet. He loved a person, and that person just happened to have a dick too.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Wow, what a deep thinker you are

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

your ass must be pretty wide with how deep yer head is up there.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There were Romans to make shit up instead. A man fucking a man was okay. A man being fucked by a man was not.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

To be fair, the Greeks thought that as well. Tops = good. Bottoms = bad.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He hadkids right? Ensuring his heterosexuality and masculinity that conservatives crave?

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

He did have a son that was born after he died https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_IV_of_Macedon

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

TIL thanks.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Feb 6, 2024 10:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

For anyone wondering, no he didnt have kids

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 7

2 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

They were roommates, of course. Such good, GOOOOOD friends.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Crying in bed over a friend's death is not evidence of homosexuality. We have much better evidence of his queerness. Being sad someone died is not the gayest thing he did.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

For weeks though. It takes a special person in your life to get that sad.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

You can have a deep, intimate relationship with someone and not be fucking them. Some friends become like family members. Many Greek men did have sex with other men (usually young boys, actually), but being devastated at the death of a close friend does not mean you were doing the horizontal cordax.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, but also he was a soldier and a conqueror. He would be familiar with friends and compatriats dying... yet this one devastated him immensly. You're assessment is correct, but also I don't think it's a reach to infer that there may have been something more to their relationship.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Conservatives can’t even wrap their feeble brains around the fact that homosexuality existed before the modern era.

2 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 2

well, when you believe the beginning of time was about 1000 years after the Sumerians invented glue, you'll have that.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It especially kills them that one of, if not the most successful Emperor, General, Warrior, and Politician of the era wasn't 100% straight.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, someone the other day commented that homosexuality didn't exist until the 20th century. Like, oh really? Then why does the King James version of the bible say that homosexuality is a sin, punishable by death? Which, btw, from what I remember, was deliberately put there because King James liked to lay with the pretty, pretty boys, and the church wanted him to stop that.

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of the things that I find most ironic is that modern day conservatives like to compare themselves to ancient Spartans… Without realizing that the agoge of ancient Sparta had extreme amounts of a homosexuality baked right into that ritual. I mean come on, there is a very specific reason that the wives of Spartan soldiers had to shave their heads before the night of their wedding… Because Spartan men were used to fucking dudes.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

The comparison is hilarious for several reasons (baked in homosexuality aside); the first being they're the antithesis of Spartans, the second being that the Spartans were actually defeated by a bunch of homosexuals (Leuctra 371BCE), third is that they were a military state held hostage by their own system of governance: they couldn't leave their large slave population for very long without them getting uppity, so they had limited ability to do the one thing they were good at.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

i'm split with this interpretation, i think it's more like the church wanted to keep abusing kids so they removed the kid molester part and added homosexuality. And history tend to agree with that, seeing how priest love to touch children

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

When the Bible was written in its different parts, there was no "the church" to remove parts of the Bible. If you want to say that they waited until the canon was being formally defined, you would literally change the face of history... if you could prove to the contrary of what both secular and religious historians have been saying for centuries.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whichever version of the event you believe (and who's to say they can't BOTH be reasons the text was changed?), it still gives lie to the claim that men weren't fucking other men until the 1920s.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The text was not changed.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ah, so the original scriptures were written in English, gotcha.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Homosexuality as a construct of innate preference of medical relevance didn't exist until the 20th century. Sex between people of the same sex is older than humanity. I don't know which the commenter you reference meant but it's likely it was the former.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Since the commenter had been making some other conservative points, I feel they were trying to claim same-sex romances didn't exist until the 20th. You'd be amazed how many people think that people didn't lust after their own gender until fairly recently. Like, NO, it isn't something that only started 100 years ago, it's just that people didn't TALK about it.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well, they did. It just didn't get published or when it did, did not enter into the curriculum.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, people were a LOT less open about it before then. And a lot of people tried to pretend it didn't exist, at least until AIDS came around and they could say that yes, it exists, and look, God created a disease to punish those people. In the 1920s through the early '40s, there were people who didn't make a point of hiding they were gay or lesbian, but by the 1950s, most were firmly back in the closet, because being gay could get you arrested, and cost you your job and your family as well.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Next you'll tell me that King David was gay or Alan Turing was gay or Freddie Mercury was gay.

2 years ago | Likes 383 Dislikes 4

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 years ago (deleted Mar 31, 2025 7:40 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Fabulously bi

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or Liberace

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He just like capes and little dogs. He wasn’t trying to say anything at all, nope, just a normal musician in a mansion with a walk in closet full of capes and a pomeranian

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Whoa, whoa, whoa... easy on King David.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This king david? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCeCmZud3SU

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who's king David?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

King David was bi

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or me!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Or Barry Manilow or Elton John!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Your love for me was more wonderful than the love of a woman." ---- King David to Jonathan.

2 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

there are 4 or 5 words in greek that can roughly translate to "love". one of them is romantic sexual love. the others are not, which is why word for word translation from hebrew to greek, then further to modern languages, without care for sentence structure and context can be problematic. but i guess its just easier to infer gay when you see the word love to describe the relationship between 2 men in a book that's been translated twice AT LEAST before reaching you.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That actually doesn't mean he was gay. Do you have any additional references?

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

“The soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David.” “Jonathan made a covenant with David, because he loved him as his own soul.”“David rose... and prostrated himself with his face to the ground. He bowed three times and they kissed each other and wept with each other; David wept the more. Then Jonathan said to David, ‘Go in peace, since both of us have sworn in the name of the Lord, saying, The Lord shall be between me and you, and between my descendants and your descendants, forever.”

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I seem to remember that according to the stories david had a close relationship with king saul after declining to marry saul's daughter as a reward for killing goliath. When he finally did marry saul's other daughter (who is said to have loved david not other way around) saul became jealous and tried to kill david. Also there is the later story of him establishing a elite unit of left handed male soldiers who train, eat, and sleep together in dedicated pairs... but it's just old stories...

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

There was that one part of the bible where it turns into a hardcore gay pornographic film ... wait, did I just imagine that while I was bored in seminary?

2 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

I am curious which one that was.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's Song of Solomon

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

The Song of Solomon talks about the lover being lubricated (Song of Solomon 7, talking of their lover's thighs, then their "navel" that "lacks not for wine" then carrying on to their hips). There's some arguably gay stuff in the Bible but that one is very hetero.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Freddie Mercury was Bisexual. He did have a female lover named Mary Austin.

2 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 2

When he passed he left her his cats, iirc.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And himself.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Which is fine, because wasn't Alexander also bi? Or did I just misremember reading that?

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

From what i read a while back, it was assumed he was super gay because he never got anyone preggers. Although, he could've just been infertile?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's also what I remember. People read about someone being queer and immediately assume that must mean 100% gay, it's frustrating.

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

The true answer is that we don't really know. He had wives, but apparently to some extent he was pushed into those marriages for political reasons. Hard to say

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

With respect, I don't agree. You could certainly make that case for Darius' daughters, but the sources agree Alexander was deeply infatuated with Roxana. There's no real divide on that. He also took on a lover that brought no political gain at all: Barsine. You can't skirt those.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

What a Bicycle Race, this.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My satire sensor no longer works. I'm just going to take everyone at their word and assume everyone is fucking stupid...

2 years ago | Likes 280 Dislikes 1

I do the opposite, i just assume they are joking.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not satire, the endwokness account is run by a fucking moron.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like people with your pov have been blessed to have never worked retail. People are fucking morons. Covid just made it worse and flagrantly obvious

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah... At this point, it's a toss-up between satire, ignorance, malice, and ragebait because Elmo supposedly pays subscribed accounts a cut of the ad revenue in relation to their engagement numbers, so... fuck knows. Probably best to play it safe and block and move on at this point.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"End Wokeness" is a heinous dogshit group on social media that spreads a bunch of hate. I've had their trash algorithmically plopped onto my feed a few times.

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Satire and Irony died the day they brought the literal Golden Calf of Trump to CPAC. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/this-cpac-golden-calf-trump-statue-is-spurring-backlash-of-biblical-proportions-11614360507

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Poe's Law is a thing of great power.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right? It's become really difficult...

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Safer and easier that way.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I’ve gotten way too much stick in the past 5 years in Imgur comments going like “ugh, it was obviously sarcasm, can’t you tell based on how over the top it was?” Like, no, of course I couldn’t. The other day I was talking to a guy who thought that giants made bread out of dinosaur bones and the only reason we don’t have skeletal evidence is because they were all abducted by the aliens that built the pyramids. As far as I’m concerned, satire is dead

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

What, you don't believe that? There's tons of evidence, check out this youtube video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybVb3t560oY

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Converted. Embrace the alien giant theory

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I really do envy those people innocent or naive enough to have not been exposed to the level of crazy we've seen.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I usually do the opposite. Until proven otherwise, I assume joke.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This is less realistic but better for your mental health.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Poe's Law. But this account (EndWokeness) is a douchenoozle Right Winger.

2 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 2

I agreed until I looked really close at the icon and it looks so memey that I'm not sure again. But I only have that to go on, as I do not do the twittering.

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Dude, just trust.

It's a fucking fascist.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I googled the account. He's posted some real Right Wing BS that doesn't fall on the "is it parody?" line like this one. He's actually serious.

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

See? Just look at all the time I saved assuming he was a piece of shit!! :D

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

He wasn't gay, he just liked sex with other men

2 years ago | Likes 950 Dislikes 3

It's ok when you said "no Dareios III" which was the style at the time.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He had relationships with WOMEN. And sex with men.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No homo. Serious

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

He made sure to say no homo first

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He was on the DL?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol this dude slid into my DMs on MySpace once. He offered to go down on me. I said i appreciated the compliment, but unfortunately i'm not gay. He said "I'm not gay either, I'm just a little freaky."

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Dwight?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

John?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

OMG, they were battle buddy!!!

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Sacred Band of Thebes has entered the agora.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Like Deniro in angels in America

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think you mean Pacino.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or De Nero in Stardust.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 2

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wait wait wait! Did they high five after?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably during as well

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are you saying it doesn't count as gay if you high five after?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly, that makes it Bromosexual

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Is that… Kevin Sorbo?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ew, Jerkules.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I think we should spam his TwiX account with this clip.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who the F is playing Leonidas in this? I super recognize him from somewhere and cannot place where I know him from. I'm now realizing there wave been a few parodies this could be from. Hmmm, clearly not getting any work done today, this is important!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh fuck me, it's Krod Mandoon! Haven't seen that in ages, wonder if it holds up...

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He couldn’t be gay because if he were, he would’ve made a word for it.

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Isn’t that “the Great”? 😜

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Perhaps he did, but it was a Greek word.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, what would he have called it? Alexandria position?

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

If you were the adult top in a paiderastic relationship (from whence comes the modern word "pederasty"), you were the erastes. If you were the youth bottom, you were the eromenos. If you were an adult bottom, you were at best a peasant (in which case they didn't expect any better of you) or if noble, you were practically making a woman of yourself at best, a horrific insult in the heavily patriarchal ancient Greek society.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"He's a real Macedonian, if you know what I mean..."

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

To be entirely fair, it's hard to classify ancient people based on modern understandings of gender and sexuality. The cultural differences are so substantial, in so many ways, that it can be extremely difficult to interpret things, and things are often very subjective. Identifying gay characters in Greek stories, in particular, is difficult because many things that we read as coded suggestions of a gay relationship, or non-standard gender roles, just weren't meant that way. (1/IDK)

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

"You sound wokeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Alexander the Great and Achilles are often interpreted as being gay. There are plenty of reputable historians on both sides of either debate, so it doesn't feel right to me to take a side. However, one piece of evidence often mentioned is that their stories both include them passionately weeping for hours or days as they mourned the death of their best friends. It seems reasonable to interpret this as coding that the pairs were lovers, but it probably shouldn't really be taken so far. (2/idk)

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Not for nothing, but I cried for longer than that when my dog died.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The depictions should probably be interpreted more as being mentioned for the sake of demonstrating the personality of the hero rather than a suggestion of an unusually close relationship with the deceased person, because other heroes of similar ancient Greek stories are also frequently depicted in similar ways, even when there's no other reason to suspect that particular character is gay. The Odyssey often depicts Odysseus crying in long, extremely passionate bouts. It's a cultural thing. (3/?)

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

This points to the culture regarding men being extremely passionate and emotional as positive, heroic traits. Their image of a manly, heroic figure just isn't the quit, stoic sort frequently seen today. The heroes in ancient Greek stories were often strongly caring and passionate, and would openly express those emotions. In the end, to me those stories read more as "Look how great of a guy they are, caring so deeply for others" not "Look at how much they cared about this particular person"

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I dunno, something about craving the "holy honor between his thighs" feels pretty gay to me, especially since people have been arguing about who the top/bottom was since Plato and Socrates, so I'm pretty sold on the Achilles loves Patrocles train. Especially given the heteronormative nature of post victorian historians.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I'm definitely not an expert on the literature here. I have no problem with either of them being gay, I just defer to the actual experts, and their opinions are at least to some extent mixed on both.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

neither the greeks nor the romans really had the kind of straight/gay concepts that we do today.

2 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 1

mentality of old days was: is it a hole

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

It was more about dominance and submission. A citizen (man active in society and politics) was free to top anyone, man or woman, as that is the dominant role. However, it was seen as degrading to bottom as that was the submissive role. Bottoms were typically lower-class men and slaves, and calling someone a bottom was a pretty good insult.

2 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 0

how the times have changed. Now we have to pay good money to get degraded and railed up the butt

2 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

They just were all bi?

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

They didn't have the concept of straight/bi/gay. People just had intercourse with other people, and the nature and social implications of that were different because the social implications of gender itself were very different. It's not so easily quantifiable to say they were all bi.

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1