Intel needs to step up its game

Jan 5, 2018 2:33 PM

earthchanisacutie

Views

121290

Likes

2238

Dislikes

113

this is yes

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Tatsumaki <3

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Intel is on Hiatus?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She's 28.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They make basic graphic calculations in the processor so you can at least have a visual computer instead of command line.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel just started shipping AMD's Vega as on-board graphics on higher end chips.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who is this sassy child?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That ass upgrade

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

FBI, OPEN UP

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And what about that dara leak I'm hearing about

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol why no ones going to buy it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel hired the AMD graphics head. Interesting stuff coming.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Probably to compete against Nvidia on HPC market and maybe ln few years have plan to improve their dGpu

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Given that intel graphics are squeezed onto the same small die as the CPU I'm always amazed at how good they are.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reminded me to check if Nvidia Had any updates...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you've been playing on Intel graphics for years, stepping into Nvidia territory is like entering another dimension.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel needs to step up more than just its graphics game...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I always upvote one punch man

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It has. It's working with AMD.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But they don't intend to compete with AMD and Nvidia main series graphics cards.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Still. Good guy intel. The first pc game tat i played was Project IGI on a fuckin intel machine. Fuck u intel haters

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Hahaha, you're assuming intel graphics actually work without crashing

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not like you're meant to run heavy games on iGPUs...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nvidia fu**s with the market & patents, that's why it's so hard for Intel, Intel is kind of the "good guys"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel isnt as interested in Graphics as Nvidia. Its not their market. Poor AMD though.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah! it was probably AMD i was thinking about.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's because it's an Integrated GPU, comparable to AMD's APU graphics. I look at them as the bar for consumer standard rather than gaming.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When in the flying fuck is One Man Punch season 2 coming out? I demand answers?!!

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Summer this year probably, the production started in late spring last year. And I think the production usually takes about a year.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This year, not sure when. Different studio but not necessarily a major drop in quality from the first season.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Reading all the comments I come to realise that you misunderstood their intention. They include a graphics chip in their processed and are..

8 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 1

.. therefore lowering the price of e.g. laptops arrive no additional graphics card needs to be installed, and it's enough for basic display.

8 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

Yeah, 'tis true. But I love gaming and I lament the waste of silicon on every Intel CPU that could've given me more CPU grunt.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah, and before then, there were equally shitty dedicated graphics cards.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Its not to lower prices. They have to otherwise you wouldnt be able to see anything on your display. Maybe the bios at most.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 17

Intel doesn't have to do it. Dedicated GPUs perform the same function better, but why include it if the chip set is enough for an office PC.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

...because other companies already provided onboard GPUs (Intel processors with Nvidia sets). Intel wanted that slice of the pie.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel has had by far the largest share of graphics market long before they started including it on CPU. It's sufficient for office PCs.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I meant if you dont have a dedicated chip you need one in the CPU.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Nope. Intel used to put it in the chipset, the on CPU gpu is relatively new in the history of cpus/etc

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ur gonna have to pixilate that top picture of u’re gonna compare their graphics cards to nvidia.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn’t even know intel made graphics cards , either way I’m always gonna use nvidia

8 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

They plan to make them. Read the news - they got some AMD designer guy, i think. Let's hope they won't make Larrabe 2.0. That would be awful

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Dec 26, 2019 5:30 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

We're gonna need a source on that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An integrated chip set sharing between audio, visual, and everything else does not a graphics card make

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The audio chipset isn't into the CPU die

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It dosent do audio. Just visuals. Audio is by the sound card.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh not "graphics cards" more like built in graphics (part of the CPU is dedicated to graphics). Thats how laptops do it.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

Oh ok well my laptop has an nvidia gpu in it so I was think that intel made a separate card for graphics

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah your Nvidia deals with games. The intel HD deals with movies and other visuals like the image. I used to have one with an nvidia too.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Fun fact: I have to disable the Intel display adapter for Doom's Vulkan engine to use my Nvidia GPU on my MSI laptop.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So sad. Get a radeon laptop then you don't have to do it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Has Intel really ever been in the game?

8 years ago | Likes 582 Dislikes 4

they optimize APU concept which AMD have. Basically, and integrated gpu that shares resources with the CPU.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the best cards I ever owned was an Intel740 back in GLQuake days.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Savage

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I lost the game.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Apparently they work on dedicated GPU range.

8 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 1

They -almost- were. They even had an exclusive Skyrim-like (but with MP and better physics) game for their hardware. Neither ever released.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're even less in the game now that it's been revealed their fucking processors for the last decade + have a fucking security hole in em.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Their main capabilities are in CPUs. Have yet to see Nvidia manufacture a CPU

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They make mobile chips

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel is good with CPUs, Nvidia is good with GPUs, and they basically work together agaist AMD, who is decent in both

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

those are the only "2" Companies we have for the major PC parts....

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Kek

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'd say that Ryzen is more than decent.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, but EA sports has.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I could be wrong/having a fever dream, but wasn’t there a rumor that they were considering getting into discrete GPUs?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, a few years ago. Never really panned out, can't remember why

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're going at it again soon. Starting with Data center type stuff then hopefully bringing it into the gaming market

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 to work on both into the low-end, integrated graphics .... and high-end, discrete GPUs.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If they ever did, it would more than likely be designed for work computers rather than gaming.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 This past November it was announced that Raja Koduri (of AMD and formerly Apple) was going to Intel as SVP of Core and Visual Computing

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only EA Sports has..

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

it used to be in the game, now it's not unless you pay extra

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

EA sports were in your wallet.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bahahaha

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They have the largest slice of the gpu market since there are far more computers not being used for gaming.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

That's funny, since a fuckton of their CPUs ship with integrated GPUs, of course they'll have the largest slice. Few are actually using them

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

That's like saying very few people don't modify their cars for racing

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Most use them. Gamers are a tiny niche compared to corporate, school, laptop and low tier consumer PC's.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Intel built in GPUs (they are part of the intel CPUs) really suck

8 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 19

i had to wait a mo th for my GPU (built my rig the day 10th gen nvidia came out) and integrated was still console-level

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Feb 13, 2018 1:46 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No shit that’s what he was acknowledging

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They aren't made for gaming. They are made for efficiency. You get to do some GPU tasks without obliterating your battery.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Often the drivers are shit as well - further handicapping chips that don't need any help being in the basement of benchmark lists...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

dude, since sandy bridge and HD3000, intel's iGPUs have been pretty great and then there's iris graphics which is freaking amazing.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Fuck off, they're perfectly fine for what they're made for. Hell, I've even done a fair share of gaming on them.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not really a GPU though

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

More like IGPs but you get the point.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How is it not a "Graphics Processing Unit"? These are dedicated circuits for graphics.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They're good at what they do, which is provide graphics processing for non-intensive computing. They're not for 3D gaming.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

I know i know but complaining is fun

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

Part of Intel's CPU? I thought they are part of motherboard on North bridge. CPU die is a separate unit which is fixed on motherboard

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Those are dedicated chips. Nowadays a part of the CPU handles graphics unless stated otherwise

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks dude

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. Since some time ago Intel CPU's have the IGP inside them, except for the K models.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ah. Thank you

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are fine for everything except running a game lol. If you wanna watch YouTube shit, people underestimate the CPU.

8 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 1

You need a GPU for almost everything graphical, that's why they are found in almost every device now (from computers to coffee makers).

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Mine can handle overwatch

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've had pretty good luck with my laptops i3 7th gen.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You'd actually be surprised how much a dedicated GPU will improve General use performance, it frees up RAM and processing power

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Even a cheap $20 card would make a performance difference.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, to an extent, some of the really REALLY cheap cards (usually previous gen) actually perform worse than integrated graphics.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can watch youtube on an expensive calculator

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

Not in hd. Youtube needed a high end cpu to play hd videos a while back, before the igpus got better.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Psh... In a monochrome 128x64. I'll stick with my phone that's literally millions of times better at 5.3850 x the cost.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Calm down there lad

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean 5.3850 times better at millions of times the cost?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

AMD/Radeon fan myself. Never had had many issues with em.

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 8

Used to be a Radeon guy since it was ATI. The poor drivers before and after their AMD acquisition turned me away from them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just built a new rig, wanted to stay AMD but the 11gb vram on the 1080ti won me over.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So excited when the Ryzen and Threadripper stuff hit the market. Made everybody step up their game

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I never had issues with them up until 2013ish. Got 2 bum cards in a row, sw8tched to nvidia and never looked back.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Amd doesnt build their cards unless it is AMD branded, there is always a percent of AIB which have higher failure rate for certain batches

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My Ryzen 1600X is a beast

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's a good day to be an AMD fan boy after intel screwed up on their CPUs

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

My Ryzen 7 rocks

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Thanks for keeping my cpu cooled

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Which one do you recommend?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Matrox.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on what you play and the resolution and the budget you have

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I used to be a Radeon user until they stop competing after the 7900 series cards. Now I use a 1080 Ti and deal with endless driver issues.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

290*

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nvidia is sometimes optimized better by game devs. But whether it's because of money going around or just them being lazy, I dunno.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Path of Exile for example runs smoothly with a low end Nvidia card but even a high end AMD tends to get a little twitching at times.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is the point a lot of people forget especially AMD fanboys. Yeah their products aren't complete trash anymore but their specs means

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nothing if games aren't being optimized for them. So now you got worse specs and no optimization it just puts you so far behind.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

always preferred intel. my new build is using a ryzen 7 1700k though. can't simply argue with the current ryzen line up. it's so good.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i meant 1700x ofc... lol still biased towards nVidea though. radeon uses too much power under load for me...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've been perfectly happy with my 290X ... except when I want to play CEMU games. Fuck AMD and their shitty OpenGL Windows drivers.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which is why intel is moving towards on die amd.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Moreso that AMDs Vega architecture is extremely power efficiency at lower clocks, however to get it up the level of their Vega 56 cards 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It takes a hell of a lot of power to achieve those clocks

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like amd. I don't have to worry about having the heater on during winter.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 4

So is kepler then?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

which is funny when you consider how cool the ryzen processors are with their low TDP, you can even overclock on the stock coolers

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Well their stock coolers are really good compared to Intels and even so most ryzen CPUs are that highly overclockable unfortunately.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Aren't*

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel stock cooler throttles in stock settings while browsing.... I had to use it when aio died for a week.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Intel just uses extremely shitty TIM on their CPUs to save a penny, AMD spends a penny and solders the lid to the die

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, fx line had major heat problems though.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

tell me about it, a simple tower cooler could easily put them under control and overclock, but stock coolers from AMD back then were horrid

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1