Why kids learn to hate math

Feb 3, 2016 3:21 AM

meadowgreene

Views

109675

Likes

4179

Dislikes

160

Why kids learn to hate math

I fear for our future

The assignment isn't even correct English. "Tell" needs an indirect object.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

From UK. And the way my kids are getting taught math is just as bad.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is how I taught myself to do math, people who dislike it tend to be the types that only memorized math and have no real understanding.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Funny thing is, growing up in the 90s, I could never do basic math well. and the the way I do math in my head is essentially Common Core.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even with all the explanations being given, this is still a stupid-ass way of teaching addition. count up 5 more from 8, kid.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Fuck that. Nothing irritates me more than watching grown ass adults counting on their fingers to do addition.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck that teacher.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Guys you're over reacting a bit. Yes the education system is shit but what if the teacher is just stupid?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The plus kinda fucks it up. If you have 8 apples and there is a pile of 5 apples, how do you get 10 apples

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I had a teacher cross out one of my words as a spelling mistake. I had mis-spelled 'dial' (which she insisted was dail). This was IT class.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's about teaching the kids to complete one number to 10 so that the addition is easier. It's just really badly written.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

as a recent college graduate, our whole education system in the United States needs to be made over

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 15

It was and this is the result.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Tear the whole thing down and start over

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Serious- my math tutor taught me this in 4th grade. It has been beneficial my whole life.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

There is a correct answer: use base 13.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

You asked a question wrong...

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The point is to aid in addition. If you have 7+3+9, you're obviously gonna add the 7 and 3 to get 10, then 10 + 9 is cake.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It quite clearly stated 8+5. Not 8+2. Not 8+(5-3). 8 plus fucking 5. If you want to get 10 in that case, convert the answer to base 13.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I learned this method in Russian school 13 years ago. It's pretty useful and makes calculations easier.

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

I don't understand what you did before. I don't recall primary school but I've always did this automatically. What other way is there?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was a little kid and did nothing. They just told me "look, you can calculate that way" and that's it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You must mean "take 2 from 5 and add it to 8 and then add 3" years. Now I understand.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think you mean 10 years ago

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Wow I can't believe this comment has ten whole points

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bravo!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is actually how people tend to do math in their head. It doesn't make sense at first because people don't see the method's explanation

10 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 10

I have done this for as long as I can remember. It allows you to add or subtract fairly quickly with little error. However, I don't (1)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

believe this is the way it should be taught and is only beneficial after a solid foundation with math is established. (2)

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

What, incorrectly? Because 8+5 isn't 10.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Its a different way of teaching math that provides greater flexibility. You have to be taught young though. We're raising Guild Navigators.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People are weird, this is nothing like how i do math in my head. not for small or big numbers o_O

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

If you want to add 85 to 99 you don't do 85+9=94+90=184?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes, but i dont do 99 + 1 = 100 leaves 85 - 1 to be 84 100+84 = 184 which would be how example above wants it

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No it had 8+5 or 8+2= 10+3=13

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah that's exactly how I do it. I hadn't thought about it till now but that's the way I've always done it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The question doesn't even use correct grammar for fucks sake.

10 years ago | Likes 892 Dislikes 14

This is why I gave up on being an Astronaut

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*fuck's

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's okay they can just use MyMathLab...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For the sake of fuck, therefore for fuck's sake. Grammar's fun.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

And so's my nan.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My math teachers always hated English and vice versa

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

That's because teachers are just idiots in general

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

The question is ambiguous but would actually make sense if worded better. It's teaching how to add numbers greater than single digits.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No it's not.

10 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 2

No it's not.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

No it's not.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Common core actually has a lot of empirical evidence to back it up but it's so different from the way most people were taught that it (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

scares them (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

I'm kinda shocked that this has to be taught. Started doing this on my own in grade school.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Standing on the shoulders of giants and whatnot. I figured this out too, but many kids won't on their own, and it's a damn good method.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's how I do large number basic math in my head. 4234x754 is 4000x100x7 to start out, etc. But this question is VERY poorly worded

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My guess is the answer is 8+5=10+3 but the question is still ridiculous.

10 years ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 1

I get the whole tens table method and use it regularly but that is not what this is. Learning table is done with sheets held over one anther

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A sane response. +1

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Agreed, unless there's a heck of a lot of context cut out...and as long as we don't dramatically overinterpret it for political reasons.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

No way! All the context we need is here in this small photo, and the internet would never ever politicize something like this!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You... I like you.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Where would this apply in life? JOHNSON! GET IN HERE!.. TAKE THIS PROBLEM AND GIVE ME THE SAME PROBLEM... BUT DIFFERENT.. OR YOU'RE FIRED!!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fun fact, I've worked in corporate america for the last five years...haven't met a single person named Johnson. I feel lied to.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What!?! THAT'S IT! I'm hiring the first Johnson I meet... once I own a company and get out of student loa- I'm never hiring anyone am I? :(

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

99+10=100+9

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Making 10s" is about place values. 8+5 makes 10 and 3, so you write 1 in the 10s place and 3 in the units. Math teachers aren't insane.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Thats what I thought too. The problem seems to be geared towards teaching kids how to break up a more difficult equation and make it easier

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so that a 1st grade question then

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, but the question is still poorly worded. Also students learn to add using 5s and 10s, ex. another answer could have been 5+5=10+3=13.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But in colloquial English for math, "make" equals... well, "equal". The terminology should be "USE 10s to solve this problem", not "make".

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

"Making 10's" is the phrase used for this method, not "using 10's". It is confusing if you haven't worked with this method.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"make 10" is the the phrase.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

wouldn't "how many units of 10 are in 8+5" have been the best way to ask this question? I mean thats how i learned this methord as a kid.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, unless the students had learned about "making 10" as a technique.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As an Eastern European, how are you being thought addition in the USA? Is it all memory? Cause this is pre-school level math...

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

No wonder you lost the Cold War.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of Americans have a difficulty telling 10 from 13, "your" from "you're" and other basic things.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ITS NOT HOW I LEARNED AS A KID ITS SCARY! /sarcasm. This is literally how I taught myself. It WORKS. It prepares you for more complex stuff.

10 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 10

It doesn't work because it's objectively wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't need the exact number, I just need a reasonable estimate to work with. -common core.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Never seen anything in common core that doesn't get the exact answer, it teaches concepts that makes math make sense instead of memorization

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The redundancy of the question is what gets to people. Math has rules, and to bend those rules in a contrived way isn't helping anybody.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is no redundancy. Its asking how to "make 10" and I guarantee make 10 is a method they learned. You make 10, then add the remainder.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I can see how the question would have no redundancy to a kid without grasp on counting, but to a smarter kid it's entirely redundant.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's contrived, thus redundant to finding the answer. The question has no point. 8+5=?+3 would have worked better to actually teaching math.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its teaching a method to doing math. We all do it. It feels pointless with small numbers, but 5593+2939=5600+2932=6000+2532=8532 much faster

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or 5593+2939=5592+2940=5532+3000=8532. By learning the METHOD on something easier, they can extend it later. Its building a foundation.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I get it, 10's in the process. 8+1+1(=10)+1+1+1=13 but is it really that important? Just add 5 to 8. 13. 3 away from 10. The kid gets that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its teaching a method to doing math. We all do it. It feels pointless with small numbers, but 5593+2939=5600+2932=6000+2532=8532 much faster

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like many things in life, it seems wrong when taken out of context. The question is perfectly appropriate for a 4rd grader learning to add.

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 16

Perfectly appropriate =/= Efficient.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bullshit, it's poorly and ambiguously worded and does nothing to further their math skills.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

Read any number of comments above

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Bloody fourd graders..

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fird grader

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

4rd? Aside from that typo you are absolutely correct.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

Common core strikes again!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It's...it's literally what you do in your head when you add complex numbers together. I do it all the time, but not with single digits.

10 years ago | Likes 309 Dislikes 27

^^ Thank you. People bitch about the declining education and instead of creating a solution, they just want money thrown at the issue

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do too. Wasn't taught to do it, either. It just made things easier.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, exactly. The core (ha!) of Common Core is legit. It's just taught in a fucking stupid way.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Another good way of explaining it is with time since it is base 60. If it's 4:48 what time is it 15 minutes later? 15=12+3, 4:48+12min=5:00

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

With 3 min remainder, so it's 5:03

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Thank you. I agree that not every kid thinks that way, but it IS a logical way to think about math problems.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think the issue is that the question was worded in such a way as to imply the end result was supposed to be 10, not that the (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

(2/2) answer would have a 10 somewhere in the equation, but that the end result could ultimately be a different number. Misleading as fuck.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This.... this makes sense. Thanks you

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

This is not addition of "complex numbers". It's addition of "real numbers".

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:43 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Ah roger that. Wasn't meant to call you out :-) These teachers....third math related post with this type of terrible/tricky teaching. Sad...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do this too, but 10 shouldn't be the final answer it should be 13. 10 just confuses people

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You never add 8+5 to get 10. I don't know what kind of math you are doing.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You find the 10 and add the remainder. 8+5 = 10+3.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thanks for the explanation, couldn't figure out what everyone was talking about. :D

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 2, 2017 12:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

the directions might have been more clear. they are conveniently left out of the picture

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah... Otherwise the question is meaningless.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'm willing to bet the full page starts with something exactly like that. Showing a single problem takes away a lot of context here.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

taught*. Now you've learned something. I like this thread. We're learning things.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 2, 2017 12:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Good on you for learning so many languages! I'm pretty much stuck at one.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your name is perfect for this comment

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope sorry but the wording is complete bullshit. You can't say it makes sense when the language fails to convey the meaning....

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

the directions are conveniently left off the picture. it might have explained it there.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

357 + 193 = 357 + 3 + 190 = 360 + 190 = 360 +90 +100 = 450 + 100 = 550. It's the same process written for first graders.

10 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 7

Yeah idk what kind of slow crazy business this is but I don't like it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

(Never had CC properly explained to me, only heard the internet bitch about it.)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, but were you specifically taught that method? I've talked with a lot of people who break numbers down in vastly different ways.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

357 + 193 = 360 + 190 -3 + 3 = 360 + 190 = 360 + 200 - 10 = 560 - 10 = 550. Seems easier that way.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or 357 + 193 = 357 + 200 -7 = 557 - 7 = 550.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I just add 357 + 193 without breaking it down

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I only break down large numbers into simpler ones if multiplying

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd argue that at least up to twenty simply adding is the easier operation regardless of age. The subtraction is unneccesarily complicated.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The problem with this is that it confuses students that don't use it intentionally. It's an intuitive way to do math, not a method

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

thank you. i dont know why people think this is the devil or something. its supposed to teach number sense

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

None of these are complex numbers.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

To you. First grade is a little different.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

First grade isnt first grade. To you. hurrrrrr

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let me see if I've got this. CC is asking kid to find numbers they can more easily work with to complete the equations. In this case, [+]

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

the kids are trying to find 10 because addition from ten is simple. So you take the two from the 5 to make 8, 10; leaving 10 + 3 = 13?

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Yes. Mental math instead of blanket memorization.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

that was my understanding too. Only i would naturally take 3 from the 8 to add 5 + 5 and then put the 3 back in, but whatever

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Thank you! This right here is what's wrong with forcing a method like this. Not everyone will break numbers down the same way.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

The problem with this is that not all students think this way so it ends up confusing the ones who use different processes.

10 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 3

thats why common core teaches multiple ways of doing the same problem... instead of just procedural math that everyone is SO GOOD at

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The common core aims to teach this type of thinking. Most adults find it confusing because they were taught differently

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

So, common core is putting round heads into square boxes?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

common core teaches the way you probably learned if, and teaches others like this to help understand why it works

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If this specific method was being forced on adults your analogy might be on the mark. But as an adult, this is how I always did math.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, guess you have a square head then. :P The analogy still works.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

be able to use the type of thinking that comes most naturally to them. (2/2)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're trying to teach round thinking and square thinking and triangle thinking to all groups, so eventually the students will (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hi! First grade teacher here. SO the idea behind this is that it makes double digit numbers easier for younger students. Making a group of

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 10

Thank you so much! I'm omw to becoming a teacher and I had a psych major challenge me on the methods used in math today, song there's only 1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

stage. In addition to this kids can use ten stick and circles, counting up, groups of 10, etc. All of these things lead to the idea of

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

There should be classes on just maths tricks.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The idea is good in essence but it's applied horribly. I teach maths too at GCSE level and I recommend reviewing this exercise.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

its probably an assessment where they have to check for understanding.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

They told a 7 year old to solve it that way? Why make it so weird for a young child? (Only added to by the poor wording)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Again, I think its an assessment. I agree, the wording is odd. Also, remember, kids are just learning how to add, they are a fresh slate.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 first and then add in the remaining balance. This is only a part of the way it is taught and it makes sense to kids at this developmental

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

This is how I taught myself to do math in my head but a lot of people don't learn this way. Unfortunately I think it's not for everyone.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

HOW ELSE DO PEOPLE ADD SHIT IM LOSING MY MIND?!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is how a lot of people do math, often without realizing it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

number sense. Ones, tens, hundreds, etc. At the end of the day, adding 10+5 is easier than 8+7.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

Of course learning 10 +5 is easier than 8+7, yet it still dumbs the children down. Why can't they be taught the straight forward way?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Kids should learn the different styles and see what works for them, we are required however, to make sure that they are learning both.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

oh and in my mind, I would rather have a process that I understand rather than worry about remembering math facts. so chunk thinks

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

things* so that they make sense, rather than remember 8+7=15 8+6= 14... Now if you dont like this you'll really hate, doubles +/- 1.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Another way to approach 8+7 is to do 8+8=16-1= 15. All of this is done in the hopes that a kid finds out their best learning method.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

They are taught both. In a class of 25 6yo's you have people that learn differently. So you teach a variety of styles.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

1) That makes sense, I think the question was just worded in an unusual way. My brother is working part time as a substitute teacher and he

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) told me that he was subbing for a 1st grade class that had a strange method where they would draw circles in order to do simple addition

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So in order to teach number placement you might use circles for ones and lines for tens. 52 would be IIIII oo. It helps differentiate and

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

so you would start at 7 and then draw ooo and just count them up. 7,8,9,10.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

52-10 goes from IIIII oo to IIII oo oh its 42. All of this is done so that kids can prove that 52 - 10 = 42. Another might be 7 + 3

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

give value to things in the ones place and things in the tens place. Also if you want to subtract ten you would just erase 1 I and recount.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They want the student to make the numbers easier to add. 10+3 is easier to conceptualize than 8+5. Ffs it's not hard.

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 20

Alternatively, you can substitute 8 = 5+3 , Then you have (5+3) + 5. Rearrange. 5+5+3. Sum to make ten. 10+3 = 13.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's just that the way the question is phrased and the explanation given is confusing.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck off with your logic and raise your pitchfork back up

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

Onward with the witch hunt!!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Since when was addition a concept that required extra convoluted ways to conceptualize? Its fucking addition.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

It's not convoluted, just worded badly. We use regrouping in everyday life. 10 + 5 is easier than 9 + 6. https://youtu.be/8mcTsyV56jI

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Since the day we want to teach kids to solve problems with logic rather than teaching kids to memorize things a computer can do faster.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If that "logic" you want to push is doing simple things in convoluted, inefficient ways, then no wonder your economy's shit.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's pretty much a fundamental framework for algebra, only with rearranging tangible numbers rather than abstract letters.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not convoluted, just worded badly. We use regrouping in everyday life. 10 + 5 is easier than 9 + 6. https://youtu.be/8mcTsyV56jI

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

61+19 or 70+10. Which is easier to solve?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

They both are. I think the point is, most people who can break numbers down like that, weren't force fed the info. They found what worked.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

And this method is attempting to teach what works, the first go-around. So kids don't have to go find it themselves.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that makes sense.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the time it takes to figure out what to take from 19 to put to 61, you could just add them.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

The question is not "8+5=10". It is simply asking how to get the 10 out of 8+5. You do that by taking 2 away from 5, leaving 3 leftover.

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 11

Or you can take 3 from 8; take 1 from 5; then add the 1 or the original equation and there you have it! 10! Then add the rem 3 and divide!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ain't no "leftovers" in addition.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In the traditional sense, no. Again, its just a different way of solving 8+5. But that wasn't what the test question was anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Considering the student couldn't spell "with" correctly I doubt they would have caught that bit. Kids can be incredibly literal.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You add the 2 to the 8 to get 10 (the answer). Then add the leftover 3 to 10 and you have the answer, which is 13.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

why couldn't the question be this?? it makes no sense to have a question that requires a half-way math answer!

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It technically is. "Tell me how to make 10 when adding 8+5". 5-3=2. 2+8=10. We're not used to seeing it this way, but my brain so gets this.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Its halfway because it is only to help teach one particular step.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I grew up in Eastern Europe and that's how we were always thought. Find the closest round number and add the rest

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Its just a different way of thinking. It took me a good 10 minutes to figure it out, but I've never understood math as easily as right now.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I was going to say, "Relevant username," but I see that you literally just made your account! Sweet

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Lol, yeah, thanks! ^^ I've always struggled with math and this post just made it a thousand times easier for me. Pretty silly, but cool!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem is that there are some kids who will only understand traditional methods, and others like me who could have used this more :/

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I'm the opposite! I enjoy the traditional methods and I look at my cousin-in-laws homework and just want to scream!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am inordinately happy that *this* was the post that got you to join.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Haha, ikr? This post actually made me feel super empowered because I was able to finally grasp the foundation. I've been practicing all day!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 Math teacher signing in. This isn't common core, this is how math is learned using compliments of 10. If you don't understand this then

10 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 55

I thought you were saying you were "half a math teacher signing in" at first.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't trust you though, because you are only 1/2 of a math teacher. :D

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The issue I think is the wording.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Except the question is written very poorly.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But... but... I want to have knee-jerk negative reactions to things I don't want to understand! Why must you ruin my fun?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yay, glad someone else said it. Engineer here. Memorization won't get you far if you can't THINK using the underlying relational principles.

10 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Yup, lots of people in here went through math the wrong way and are now too stubborn to accept the reality that a better way exists.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

I read through some other comments and I'm beginning to grasp the meaning. Maybe this is why I've hated math all my life. I'd get in 1/

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

trouble in school for using what made sense for me, and not what they taught me. So I'd memorize things for tests then forget. I'm 2/

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

completely useless at math now, considering it's so easy to just use a calculator rather than figure it out myself. /3

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Other math teacher here, I've had to explain countless of these "common core" things to my relatives.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Perfect SAT Math Score chiming in here. Learned math the asian way. Memorization is faster. Conceptually, I understand this, but it's slower

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I never took the SAT, but my degree is in math and I can assure you that memorization did very, very little to help.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish we never called it anything and just rolled it out. Then nobody would be looking for a punching bag.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

God yes. And then you try to explain it but they're shit at math so they don't understand.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

There are better ways to teach addition using compliments of ten. For instance, not every lesson was handed out on a paper.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So you have to be good at math to understand? Now thats an odd approach to learning.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's a math teacher for you. "You don't know math so you don't understand" OK.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Theyre talking about parents and you fine folks who have a poor grasp on math and don't understand why we are doing what we are doing.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What I'm saying is that since they probably weren't very good at math, trying to explain this to an adult who's learned it another way 1/?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 you never really understood math. Anyone can memorize that 8+5=13, but a student needs to understand WHY.

10 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 52

The "why" is very important in every aspect of our lives, but this question is all kinds of confusing. I'd go with multiple choice,TBH

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"You never really understood math"? Oh, fuck off you tit. The question is shit and teacher's explanation is shit.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Which was the real failure of education when I was a kid, you were expected to memorize thinking it made you understand.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't learn it in school, I taught myself this stuff when I was making change as a waitress.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Teachers/systems that blame students for not understanding "easy" concepts when those concepts get taught poorly, well, it makes me weep

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

but WHY would we need to calculate it in sets of 10? Why not just do proper addition and make 8+5=13?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because it is a concept of splitting additions into simpler parts that make the whole thing easier.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Never really understood math" Oh that's definitely completely true...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The phrasing of your comment makes me think you're the teacher from that pic up there.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

THANK YOU! I was taught "speed math" by my piano teacher, and it's this. This is basically teaching kids how to use the map instead of GPS.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Now, if you'd only be taught to find the direct route on said map instead of driving the other way around the globe...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can get East by traveling West long enough. No one criticizes Physics teachers for teaching with that kind of thought process. Why math?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand it the way YOU said it. That question is a poorly worded trap whose only result is to make a student feel shame and hate math.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

We're only seeing 1 problem. There was [hopefully] a full lesson behind this that the problem was quizzing on.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

You don't "make" 10, you say "USE 10 to get the answer to 8+5". Easy enough change.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure, I won't defend the wording. I'm here giving insight as to what the lesson is trying to convey.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

True, but that terrifyingly means there's a lesson plan that makes math students learn bad sentence structure to get a test question right.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but if a kid innately can get past the simple-breakdown method doesn't that make 'em smarter?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not if getting past the method is memorising the answers. If the kid "solves" 8+5, but then has no clue how to do 1008+5, it is a problem.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why only teach 1 way to come up with the answer.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Regular person checking in. Understanding the "why" used to be simple and we all got by just fine. (1)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You have 5 apples, Scott takes 3, Scott = a dick.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You may have, but many didn't and it was not their fault. While other kids' minds filled in the gap between memorization and understanding1/

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

some kids' minds just didn't and they never understood why. They gave up an came to the conclusion that they simply didn't get math. And 2/

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

all their parents and teachers came to the conclusion that the student simply wasnt trying hard enough. The reality is math should be 3/

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Some things, like facts, don't have a WHY. They just are. I understand they are teaching a method here. (So, a HOW, not a WHY.)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Perfect SAT Math Score chiming in here. Learned math the asian way. Memorization is faster. Conceptually, I understand this, but it's slower

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Exactly. I was never taught this as a child. My mind is boggled at being able to understand simple math equations for the first time.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

A lot of people are very stubborn and can't handle the realization that they don't know something. Last time I posted this I got flamed.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Seriously my kid's 2nd grade teacher helped me understand math and I cried in a tiny chair that day.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's sad. The memorization method never worked for me. This foundation makes it so simple and I'm learning it at age 30 on imgur, wtf.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Never too late. I was great at math but never took grammar/spelling seriously. The internet fixed me.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

A lot of your posts are in the negative, despite being accurate. Some people just want to hate on "Common Core".

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So ... Trying to build a basic understanding that 8+5 = 8+ (2+3), ya?

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You're on the right track, that IS the function of math that is exploited here but the kids won't appreciate for many more years.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Won't appreciate for years? This isn't remotely extensible so in years they'll have memorised the results and use better methods to add

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The wording is strange in OP, but I'm guessing this is an exercise they're taught in class. Nothing I learned in this manner.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like I mentioned earlier, the brain of someone who truly understands math DOES learn this way. Just not explicitly.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Try this exercise: 7 + a = 11 (hexadecimal). If you're not extremely comfortable with hexadecimal, you'll have to split with a + 6 +1 = 10+1

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

... BRILLIANT. That's actually really good. Thank you. I might steal that ;)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So ... the basic principle is that our normal counting is base 10, so make a pit-stop at 10 (along the 8+5 path), ya?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the idea, using a base you're not familiar with just expose the process as something non-obvious

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'd rather let the kids find their own techniques though. I'd say "you can try this" not "do this". They still get the same answer anyway.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes and no. There are objectively better and worse ways of doing things. A lot of kids, when left to their own devices, will just count.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

That will forever tether them to a lower level of thinking.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I guess. But a guy learned to perform complex forumlas on his own. You might end up trampling on some genius by forcing techniques.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A kid learning how to count using math? We can't have that now. /s

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You're either deliberately missing the point, or you yourself are not a very mathematically inclined person.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ok so you know that 1+1=2. But you need to understand WHY. See how stupid that sounds?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This is why I had hard time understanding numbers without any context. Make 10 out of 8+5. How the fuck do I do that. 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Using real world examples. You have 8" piece of lumber and 5" piece of lumber. How do you make 10" piece out of them. This makes sense 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is more like "Add 8 eggs and 5 eggs. Show when and how you filled the 10 slot egg box.", the answer being 8+2 or 5+5.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why? why 8+5=13? because when you add 5 to 8 you get 13, fuck.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

+1 for logic and reason over fear of something they don't understand

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 6

That's just dumb. Trying to make a third grader (understand?) this is just ridiculous. Not the way math should be taught. Ever. To anyone.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

My many years of experience, trial and error, and many MANY success stories say otherwise. But go ahead and do your own research.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Also, I'm lead to believe you're probably not mathematically inclined... correct me if I'm wrong. This is 1st or 2nd grade math.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You're wrong. Never learned this. Because this is bogus.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

...I'm wrong because.... you never learned this, and its bogus. Alright

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

DSP engineer here-- Fast? Yes. Intuitive? Not at all.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

At least not the way it is phrased here...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The question is poorly phrased. And there isn't a difference between memorizing 8+5 and 8+2+3. At the end of the day it's just lots of 1s

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you have eight cookes and i gove you five more how many will you have ...Thirteen... Yep good job son now go get me a beer. Thats the WHY

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like how math was taught back then. With adding sticks together and counting them. None of this common core bs to be honest.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Have you been to an elementary school or only seen internet stuff about it? My kids are taught core math with sticks and blocks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I cannot stress enough that his has nothing to do with core.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Have you been to an elementary school or only seen internet stuff about it? My kids are taught core math with sticks and blocks.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was taught core math with sticks and blocks around the 1st grade back in 1995. Never with a question as bad as the one on the pic.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm not a teacher of basic mathematics but is it truly neccessary to teach this explicitly? Do you yourself calculate 8+5 in that manner?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I'm not a math teacher either, but that's how I do it. 46 + 28 = 50 + 24 = 74. Or 12 * 18 = 12 * 2 = 24 * 9 = 180 + 36 = 200 + 16 = 216

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I do 46 + 28 as 60 + 14. Is that the same thing?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is the same concept which is asked in the question. For 46+28 you can as well go 44+30. Or however you like to make the addition simpler.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/2 Everyone who understands math does this already and don't realize it. If you even for a moment hesitate and have to "Remember" what it

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

2/2 is, then I have bad news for you... you don't understand math the right way.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Of course, I'm only saying that if you calculate 8+5 by changing it to 10+3 then that is no indication of understanding. As for larger 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do you use an abacus to teach this method?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

On rare occasions. Its a last ditch effort. Abacus can become a crutch just like a calculator or finger counting.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well, you know your students, so if you teach this method and you find some that can't grasp the concept right away(like myself) (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

an abacus might help to get them started since it is a more visual approach. (2/3)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fine, but the question is get 10 from 8+5. You don't. 8+2+3 is 13. You might hit 10 in the middle, but adding 3 makes 13. You CANNOT get 10.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

"make 10" is probably the name of the method. You make 10, then add the remainder. So 8+2 makes 10, 3 is the remainder, 13 is the answer.

10 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 1

The question is not proof 8+5=10, but rather to show WHEN you get 10 while performing 8+5.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"Never because I'm not an idiot." Might as well ask "Show how your face hits the ground when you walk 10 meters."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's telling you to show how you can get a result of 10 when adding 8 + 5. That's what "make" means in the context of addition.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You can't get a result of 10 from 8+5. The problem is that 8+5 doesn't "make" 10. It "makes" 13.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The point is to find the 10 and the remainder. Further, we don't know if there was a fuller explanation in class or on the sheet.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I think we all get that now, but nowhere in the original question is that made clear

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless, higher in the worksheet, there's a definition of what "Make Ten" means.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is no remainder in addition. This isn't modulus division.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is still how I add 8+5. I don't trust myself to just remember that it's 13.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As you shouldn't. Memory is not infallible, logic is.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I understood the question only after I looked at the answer. And I still dont think kind of math lessons is necessarily. Yes in order to 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Learn math you need to the every part of the elements (grouping, partition, etc.), but this one in particular is ridiculous. 2/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The main beauty of the math is in the freedom of your choise, but this task makes you to think in the way teacher wants you to. 3/4

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also it is equal 10 in the field of module Z/30Z if you replace + with an *. Yeah, abstract algebra FTW!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could you explain that a bit more? Why does 8+5=13? From what I understand/was taught, it equals 13 because 8+5=13..like 8, add 5, get 13..

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Feb 3, 2016 7:45 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

1) How? 2) No it isn't.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's what your mind automatically does. When adding large sums, you start either the highest e.g. 100 and then add the rest from there.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Re-read the question. It doesn't ask for the result of 8+5, but rather how to get 10 when performing the addition. The answer is 8+2 or 5+5.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Great insight there. It could also be 6+4. Or 3+7. Or 2+2+2+2+2. Or 1+2+3+4. Or 1+2+1+2+1+2+1. Yeah real superior method.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Its a little tough with only 140 characters but I'll try. Basically instead of memorizing the FACT that 8+5=13, which even a parrot can do..

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

you teach a student to reason that 8 is 2 digits away from 10, so when you're adding something to 8, say its 3, you'd go 1 stop past 10..

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

and youd get 11. If you add 4 to 8, you'd go 2 stops past 10 and get 12. If you add 5 to eight youd go 3 past 10 to 13. And so on.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 7

On a larger level, it's kind of the idea behind taking 67+42. Most people see 60+40 to get 100 first, then adding 7+12 to get 112.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

*cough*109*cough*

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

My original problem was 60+52 but I liked the other one better and I didn't change the answer... Fuck

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am getting my PhD in partial differential equations this summer, and I don't understand any of this.

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

When you add two hard numbers together, do you ever break them down into chunks that are easier to work with? This is exactly that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good luck on thesis defense. Actually ... Use this. If you can adequately BS an explanation for OP, you can defense your thesis, no prob.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thanks! Im pretty smart but not that smart.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tell how to make 10 when adding 1+1

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sounds more like you don't want to understand it. I'm sure you could get it if you tried.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well _clearly_, to quote a math teacher, "you never realy understood math"

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Right, haha, I know exactly who you're talking about. They like to sniff their own farts I think.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can live with that :). To quote Shaw: He who can, does, he who cannot, teaches.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

oh nice burn

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was still phrased in an unclear way.

10 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 6

how do you know the directions didnt explain it? this is one conveniently cropped problem on a whole worksheet.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can see that. But I'd bet the students did this in the classroom and one poorly worded problem does not invalidate the entire lesson.

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 11

It actually does. Either incorrect terminology was introduced earlier, or incorrect terminology makes testing what was learned invalid.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I cannot stress this enough, this has nothing to do with "Core" or the problems schools have had rolling it out.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

It doesn't invalidate the lesson but makes it even harder for students to appreciate/understand. Teachers are supposed to make learning easy

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

You need to see the bigger picture. A student that knows how to add sums over 10 will never need to memorize a thing in their lives.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 8

Honestly, I completely understand the concept. I just don't remember learning it. What grade math is the above problem?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You likely were never explicitly told this but deduced this on your own. This is late 1st or early 2nd grade math.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That makes sense. Has teaching this "trick" if you will, shown an increase in understanding?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously it will, I'm just curious if its taught as a trick or if the focus has bled more into "this is how its done."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Obviously it will, I'm just curious if its taught as a trick or if the focus has bled more into "this is how its done."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't get this, given the provided information. The closest thing to a correct answer I could think of is http://imgur.com/p2NqHeI

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're over thinking this. Imagine you have two piles of coins, in one pile is 8 coins, in another is 5. Pretend you DONT already know that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're over thinking this. Imagine you have two piles of coins, in one pile is 8 coins, in another is 5. Pretend you DONT already know that

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, I assume this is a lesson on place value, but that is only an assumption due to the lack of information provided.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its not. There is indeed a wealth of context a small picture on the internet is not showing you.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 and 5 is 13. What you can do is move two coins from the pile of 5 to the pile of 8. Now you have two piles of 10 and 3. Now thats easy to

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

rationalize that 10 and 3 is 13. Much easier than 8 and 5 is 13. I'm speaking from a developmental psych standpoint.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0