Horrifying

Feb 27, 2017 10:36 AM

smadge1

Views

195994

Likes

4471

Dislikes

349

I'd like to masturbate in that guy's house while no one's home, then tell him about it, but not say where.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Lazy title.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Douche bag.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'd be scared if my toilet had genitals too.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I hope he didn't find strangers in his own house too.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

v

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

You don't want the government in the bedroom but want it in the bathroom.. Brilliant.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

v

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Wasn't there something about him referring to his wife as "mother"?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's just an old people thing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doesn't make it any better

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Also he's horrified cuz he knows he's going to destroy the United States

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He seems like the type of guy that taps his foot on the floor in the end stall in public men's rooms.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WHAT?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Holy shit is that Chasers War on Everything? I haven't thought about that since 2005.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is it just me or does Pence's face look like it was animated in GTA V in this pic?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 8

just you

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

source?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Grumpy VP

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Does he remind anyone else of John Lithgow as the Trinity Killer?

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 3

I see Clint Eastwoods annoying younger brother that no one liked growing up

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Looks like he's about to push through some anti-mutant legislation in an X-Men film."

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

when he first appeared on Dexter i was like "oh hey its john lithg- wait wat i dont want to his old man ass"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't see past Hank Hill's dad

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Particularly in this picture he looks like a Jeff Dunham puppet...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was a scary fucking season

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

so why the new laws

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fake news

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Sad.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

SAD!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Clearly that is a woman's toilet. The seat is down.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My grandpa has one for him and one for his wife...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

honestly, he seems like the type of guy who would have 2 bathrooms, one for him and one for his wife

9 years ago | Likes 228 Dislikes 11

he calls his wife "mother" like Amy's dad on Everybody Loves Raymond

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I bet they sleep with a broom in between them.

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 2

Actually, that sounds kind of awesome.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I was thinking this same thing.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

And an outhouse for anyone with darker skin.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

I love you. :-)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I love you. :-)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The question isn't which bathroom transgender people should use. It is why still allow segregated bathrooms at all.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've been telling my family & friends this the ENTIRE time. But no one listens to reason.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Two bad, he can use it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a conservative as soon as I heard the bathroom issue my first response was just to go unisex. And lockerooms? Here is your stall, enjoy

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

I think it'd be best if ALL new bathrooms were made unisex because a) we might keep them cleaner and b) it'd get people over this bullshit

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

If you were REALLY a conservative, you'd realize spending on a non-issue is just partisan BS and you'd vote fiscal responsibility: Democrat.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The bathroom issue is the least of what republicans have been pushing for. HB2 in NC was framed as 'the bathroom bill' because that looked

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

They're ramping up the bathroom bills though. Many new bathroom bills require what is on your unamended birth certificate, no exceptions.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

less bad for R's than what was actually in it. From wikipedia - "The act also prevents municipalities in North Carolina from enacting anti-

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

discrimination policies, setting a local minimum wage, regulating child labor, or making certain regulations for city workers. (theres more)

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The legislation initially removed the statutory and common-law private right of action to enforce state anti-discrimination statutes but was

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

later amended to restore that right."

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

OMG I just realized I have one too! Suing the landlord today.

9 years ago | Likes 413 Dislikes 6

Lady*

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 30

Did you just assume the landlord's gender?!

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

I should sue my favorite bar. Their 3 private stalls are just too efficient! I demand pointless lines outside of the toilet based on sex.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Please don't give people ideas

9 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

I laughed too hard! I own a building with unisex bathrooms.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Good Lord. Make sure you don't use it... that's how gays happen.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I have a unisex bathroom, and 0 women in my fap folder!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Did you just assume the number of your own genders?!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

http://imgur.com/pUMliLG

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 10

I always wondered what that 80's sounded like. Mike Pence gave me that insight.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

After investigating, it's not even a quote from him. It's from an article in some journal that he had no part in editing or writing.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

He was president of the org that published it. So he likely supports what the journal said, but didn't write it himself. Source:

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I thought there was no way he could have actually said that....so I looked it up. I have no words. Simply horrifying.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Hate to 'defend' him but if he said that 30 years ago it was probably a lot more in tune with the times. Horrid but reality back then.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Right, because old men get less prejudicial with time. That's why my uncles hate my Asian friends!

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I was thinking about 80s and 90s general ignorance about HIV/AIDS.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh... sorry, it's just I have living evidence that people don't "grow out" of hatred and... sorry

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He's got a pretty solid reputation for homophobia right up to the present day...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And as usual, by gay he means dudes, and by dudes he means butt sex. It's always about the butt sex.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I know right, with homophobes it always seem to boil down to "Ew, but poop comes out of that hole!"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He seems unusually interested in what other guys are doing with their butts

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

I don't get it. Is it okay when blood donation centers cite this as a reason to not accept blood from gays, but not okay when Pence says it?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 13

One is making life and death decisions; one is making far-reaching policy. The average citizen isn't making daily blood to blood contact.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Red Cross along with pretty much every blood donation organization wants the FDA to overturn the ban on gay men.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I and most of my crunchy friends hate the blood donation rule. It promotes stigmatization of homosexuality and creates a double standard.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not to mention lowers the number of people who can donate blood unnecessarily!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I doubt the portion of homosexuals that have a disease that would classify them as not able bodied is significant.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/ Actually, came across some stats. Pretty sure you can't join the military with HIV, not able bodied.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

According to that link, roughly 11% of gay and bisexual men have HIV, which means that the wast majority are able bodied.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

1 in 10. That's kind of a lot.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fact is that gay men, statistically, there are obviously many exceptions, have been known to be more promiscuous and spread more STDs.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Neither means that any significant number are not able bodied.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It doesn't, and I don't agree with it in the way that part of it is used, but the entire sentiment is not made up.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

You absolutely cannot say that something has "statistically" "been known" to be true and not post a source.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's not exactly a secret... https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I doubt there are accurate numbers to prove it either way, the point is, his statement is not based purely in bigotry, as implied.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Unless he knows it to be true, then claiming it is pure bigotry.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If he does not know it to be true, then claiming it is pure bigotry.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

After investigating, it's not even a quote from him. It's from an article in some journal that he had no part in editing or writing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Republicans to Obama: OMG ISIS! ECONOMY! JOBS! Republicans: DON'T PEE THERE!!!

9 years ago | Likes 181 Dislikes 41

Its more a matter of implications of title 9 in sports, gender segregated college, scholarships, small business loans etc.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Nevermind that we've been peeing in the bathroom with cis people for fucking ever and its never been an issue.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Quick back to the outhouse! We'll be safe there!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

On a more serious note social conservatives have literally been using bathroom predators as a scare tactic for over a century. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 sauce: http://politi.co/1YDopbr

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Republicans: Silly decisions like these don't need to be dictated by the Federal government, the state can handle it just fine.

9 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 21

Except those states that are more prone to discrimination.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There WAS NO PROBLEM until republicans (government) decided to make it a problem. Republicans are the government doing the dictating.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

What are you talking about? Republicans reversed it to the way it's been for 7 of the 8 years Obama was in office.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 15

There wasn't a need for protections of transgender people because, before, there were no laws specifically targeted at transgender (1/

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

people. After the first "bathroom bill" went up, there was now a specific group of people being targeted that needed to be protected. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

States are laboratories of backwardness. I would rather renounce my American citizenship than ever visit MS, AL, AR, LA, KY, TN, TX, or OK.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

And it's perfectly okay for you to hold that opinion. You'd get along a lot better than you think with most people in those states.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

As an Arkansas resident, our main two problems are needing to tax the Waltons instead of the middle class and fix the damn roads.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But they can't handle it just fine, that is the whole problem.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Petty issues like these do not need blanket federal laws. State and local government can better adapt laws to their local citizens.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

May sound like a "petty issue" to you but not for the people concerned. Rights and wellbeing of kids are not "petty issues" either way.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

It's definitely an issue that is not black and white. There boundaries that need to be set by state and local government.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

If the state wants to let anyone use any bathroom they want, they can, if they want to make the person get a doctor's note, no problem.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Yes, they literally can. States have the power to pass state legislation. If you don't agree with their decision, contact state officials.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Unless it's abortion, then the federal government should handle it!

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 6

That's a human rights issue. Namely at what point in development does a human have rights and how is the conflict between rights handled.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or marijuana. Then states rights are bad!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Abortion is a much more delicate and complex issue. It really depends on whether or not they consider the fetus a human being with rights.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 35

Why are people down voting this lmao, perfectly reasonable claim

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Because some people legitimately think that anyone who isn't pro-choice is a sexist.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I'm sorry that you got down voted for pointing out exactly what the abortion issue boils down to. Go take an ethics class people. Fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

And the bathroom issue is only trivial if you don't think trans persons are human beings.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 10

That's a ridiculous statement. You can have an opinion on the bathroom issue without thinking trans people aren't human.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 15

Most terminations of pregnancies are done in embryonic stage. No fetuses there.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

And most people are fine with that, the debate usually arises when they get to 14 or 20 weeks and develop a functioning brain and organs.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 14

Like I said, it's not black and white. It's a complex issue. People pretend the only two options are all abortion or no abortion at all.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 15

I would argue the personhood of a foetus is irrelevant. If one can't be forced to donate a kidney to save a life, one can't be forced to

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Debts are owed to family, can't leave a kid to starve after it's out so we ARE obligated to support a developing human.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

This is, of course, my opinion. To me, bodily autonomy is paramount in the argument, the life of the supporter takes precedence over the

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I really don't have time to argue this issue all day,especially not with 140 character limit, but it's really not black and white.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

use their entire body to support a developing one.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Yeah, unless it's Marijuana, because they were looking for something to waste money on while claiming to be fiscally responsible

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I don't and never will support Marijuana being schedule 1. But you have to realize that it's both sides voting to keep it illegal.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ultimately, it's not the president's decision, it's an issue that needs to be dealt with in the legislative and judicial branches.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Obama didn't legalize it, but as far as I know, Trump's stance is to leave it up to individual states' decisions.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And while I agree the schedule needs to be changed, as the head of the executive branch, enforcement is absolutely up to the president

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hopefully he just means people shipping weed out of Colorado to states where it's still illegal. Though the pres does need to enforce law.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"In terms of marijuana and legalization, I think that should be a state issue, state-by-state," he said in Nevada in October 2015.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He's remained staunchly supportive of medical marijuana, telling Fox News host Bill O'Reilly he was "in favor of medical marijuana 100%."

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0