Nationalism doesn’t always work out for the nationalists

Jun 21, 2019 5:12 PM

SisterMidnight

Views

58215

Likes

1180

Dislikes

72

Almost perfect - just missing a big pile of....

It's even worse than that... We dont get a dog.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Love the optimisim...

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

FAKE NEWS! This is not a Reliant Robin! If Top Gear taught me anything than that it has to be a Reliant Robin!

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not even delivered yet

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

When the "Nationalists" have all their money invested offshore.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Brexit. Like electing Trump, but dumber.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Eh, like the upvotes to downvotes, they're both pretty even in terms of the detriment to their own countries respectively.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The "Brexit Delivered" picture should be blank because the UK is still a member of the EU. We had EU parliament elections last month!

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Incorrect. This should be a drawing of the car since there's still no Brexit. Parliament is against every type of Brexit.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Brexit isn't inherently nationalist. Painting the side you don't like with a nasty color is a slimy tactic.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Well I am a dog person anyways

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I really hope Scotland goes through with their independence voting this time. I planned to go there for my semester abroad...

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Slight issue there: Brexit hasn't been delivered.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Thankfully.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

id rather have the second one. cuz cute doggo

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Isn't that italian breed car with belgian breed dog on it?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it NEVER works for the nation. Once youve stolen from all the "UN"nationalists.. its Over.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

United states of Europe

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Rip Northern Ireland. Let’s see if we get a repeat of the PM saying they don’t negotiate with terrorists while the IRA kill hundreds.

6 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

Nah, they'll just hold a referendum and fuck off like Scotland.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Much overlooked issue.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

Depends on whether they only kill irish people or if they start blowing up London again. About the latter the PM might actually care.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If it's bojo, I doubt might will come into it unless they blow up his house.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or the loyalists could just move to London and let ireland be ireland again

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Dude ffs, get over that ridiculous closed minded bull mccabe nonsense, its the 21st century, we've got more imoortant problems to deal with.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do a clean break. Like when Norway left Europe. v

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I wonder how the UK managed before the EU?

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

It wasn't much.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

The world of international trade and relations has changed. It is irrelevant how the UK did before the EU, because the EU is a factor now

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

whether the UK is a part of it or not.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not very well.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

i have read so much on this and its such a cluster fuck. Basically comes down to we played by your rules and won, now you want to change 1/

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

them cause you lost.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can't wait for Britain to become the 51st state

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Make more sense for them to become a province of Canada

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not as daft as it sounds. Cultural more in common and no different to you moving your parents into a granny annex.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It was tongue in cheek my dude. Just messing around.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You spelled never wrong

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 10

Vietnamese have done well, but it took 40 years.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

those guys got beat in 1975

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Not the Nationalists, only the Patriots.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Nationalism is fine if it is coupled with a firm resolve to work together with other countries to the benefit of all nations involved

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Yes. For good current examples look at Norway and Switzerland.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe in theory. But in reality nationalism has atendency to turn things into a zero-sum game. For you to win, others have to lose.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Brexit will cost UK initially. But in the end they will be better off without the EU-federalists.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Without foreign investments and trade deals with all their major trading partners? And without Scotland or Northern Ireland?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which trade deals will they be without? America is a big one and already promised a good deal. You think you can't trade without EU?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The 27 EU-countries plus the 36 trade deals EU has. UK is far too weak alone to get any kind of fair deal out of US.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nationalism is merely liking your nation. There will always be groups that ruin every subset of people. Example: PETA, Seahawks fans.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

No it ain't. That's called patriotism. Brexit is not pro-British, it's anti-foreign.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's patriotism what you're describing, nationalism is thinking your nation is superior to others

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nationaliam is thinking your country is better than others and the interest in the detriment if others...

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think the US is awesome (not perfect) and I would put its interests first. Is it wrong to want to put your own nation’s interests first?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No its not, the line has to be drawn at some point e.g. lamborghinis for all the people in your country vs charitable aid to a country

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Devastated by famine and dusease has a pretty easy moral answer and all these questions have to be asked for each decision...

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Interests are OK, but the 20th C is strewn with idiots claiming only to being for their own country. Like every war in history. Brexit too.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 4

Rick changed the value of post brexit british pound from 1 to 0 rendering the country in a state of anarchy

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Subtitles or audio would help.

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

He's changing the value of a dollar from one to zero.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So how does the Brexit negotiations in UK Parliament go?

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Every realistic option is voted down and crazy unicorn options are still treated seriously. Literally no progress in 3 years.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They hate the deal. They hate no deal. They won't cancel Brexit. The EU will not negotiate a different deal. Schrödinger's Brexit.

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

They will exit on october 31st. Them not wanting a no-deal doesn't overrule the timer on article 50.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

As of this moment, are EU immigration and trade rules still effective while they sort out the deal?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As far as I know, yes. Until the November deadline when no-deal full brexit kicks in unless they agree on something by then.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Shit. That would be the worst case, wouldn't it? I hope they decide to cancel Brexit, or somehow give them a soft deal.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It would, it means the UK loses all trade regulation with the EU. Forced border checks on all imports including food.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In theory the UK could stay in this state of leavibg the EU but not actually doing it forever.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The EU has to accept that too. The Article 50 (exiting EU) had 2 year limit on the length of the process and it can only be extended by all

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

memberstates approving the extension. It was approved only until Oct 31st. If UK parliament still sits on its thumb there is no gurantee on

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Of course but none of them actually want the UK to leave, so they'll go quite far to extend the deadline until they run out of excuses.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

EU agreening on continuation of this charade. Then it is no deal brexit and EU has all the cards on the EU - UK trade negotiations.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The car is Italian ?

6 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 4

That's kind of the point

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

so a brexit organized by itallians? they certainly couldnt do worse...

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

And the dog is belgian.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes but Ferrari, Lamborghini, Bugatti, Maserati, Pagani are also Italian.. so fuck you and that Fiat runs 100km with 1 liter!

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

How much gas does the tow truck use though?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Bugatti was a French company before VW bought it.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Founded by the Italian Ettore Bugatti

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

In France.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

By an Italian..

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And 3 of Them owned by wv

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2 of them, but born and produced in Italy by Italians.. Germans are too cold to create passion...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Bugatti was French, and is designed in Germany by VW; Lamborghini is also mainly designed in Germany.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you saying that Lamborghini became famous thanks to Germans? Come on please be serious..

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, Bugatti is a traditionally French make.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Haters gonna hate..

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Founded by Italian Ettore Bugatti

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If Boris prorogues parliament to force a no-deal things will get real interesting.

6 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 2

Spitting Image was meant to be ironic not reality

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I say let the "no deal" people have it. It'll either work out fine or be a trainwreck and they'll get fucked in the next election.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

If I've learned anything about the hard Brexit crowd, nothing is EVER their fault.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

But it'll be a trainwreck for the public, the tories will be sweet with their money already out of the country.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

One fairly likely outcome is Scotland and Northern Ireland (and maybe even Wales) leaving the Union. That helps the Tories.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

“We threw out the baby with the bathwater and the economy is now fucked for a generation”. Yay.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Maybe 52% of the Brits will finally learn a lesson and their massive error can be a lesson for the World at large.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would foresee significant disruption, but at the same time I don't think it'll somehow be as damaging as "literally fighting WWII" either.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s the kind of thinking that gets right wingers, Farage or Trump elected. IMO bad idea.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I'd discourage anyone from adopting a parochial "don't vote for these people because change is scary" attitude, it generally only goes in->

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the other direction you want it to. Worked for Obama in 2008 and worked for Trump in 2016.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He doesn't have to force anything. They voted against a no-deal Brexit, but they also voted against every single possible deal. All he (1)

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

has to do is let the clock run out and and let article 50 take effect. (2)

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I think (hope) after the drubbing Labour got for their wishy-washy position in the EU elections, they will take a stand and demand that a

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

referendum clause be attached to whatever deal or lack thereof is decided upon.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It runs out on Halloween of all days. 3spoopy5me

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Unless parliament decides backing out is better than No Deal, and revoke Article 50.

6 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

We can always hope.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Despite my own beliefs on the subject. Backing out would be a betrayal of the public

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The EU expecting the UK to pay billions to leave is just hilarious to me.

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 38

That's not really the consequences of either a deal or no-deal Brexit

6 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Isn't the main cost to relocate the EU medicine agency? They should pay the cost if they're the ones leaving ?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Main cost is pensions for UK staff, commitments to projects we agreed on in the past, etc. The EU medicine agency move isn't even part of it

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's hillarious that they force them to fulfill commitments they made long before Brexit, including pensions of british EU officials?

6 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

UK expecting to have favorable deals when showing that they don’t hold up their end of the bargain (i.e. EU bills ) is just hilarious to me.

6 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

It's not a bill. It's longterm financial commitments completely unrelated to Brexit.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Bills. Plural. In the sense of bills such as a utility bill or electricity bill, not a law.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ah. Thanks.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The UK has a massive trade deficit with the EU, a trade war will be far more damaging for the EU, simple maths

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 16

What they get instead is all the companies moving to remain within the EU. And it is mostly done, no matter what type of deal they manage.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The trade deficit is 95billion in goods with a surplus of 41billion in services. Guess who will be hurting with London no longer being the

6 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

European center for financial transactions? All major banks need to move to Europe to keep access to the EU market.

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

And why is the deficit? Because UK doesn’t produce shit and has to import everything. Apart from that, there is a difference between

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Thanks for proving my point and agreeing with me there is a massive deficit that will damage the EU more than the UK if there is a trade war

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

A trade war and not having a trade agreement.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

No one ever expected it to be easy but we seem to be making it harder than necessary.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Leavers and parliament have an impossible set of demands. It's not that it wouldn't be easy- it's that the EU will never agree to the things

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

the leavers said they wanted.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remainer politicians attempting to drag it out to reverse the vote.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Because the whole premise was unrealistic. It's like cancelling your gym membership but thinking you'll still be allowed to use the (1)

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

equipment. And hoping the gym owner is okay with that because one time you bought a smoothie and also you used to be a global empire! (2)

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

More like the gym owner wants to make changes you don’t like but when you try to cancel he tries to bill you for three more years dues...

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

Because he was counting on your money to pay for it all.

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

The money is what you have already agreed to pay years ago on projects benefiting also UK.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

UK will be able to participate to those projects as long as they are operational. One example would be scientific research.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Agreed

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, the bill is for the retirement cake for the janitor which you agreed to contribute to years ago.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

So without the UK they can’t afford a cake?

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Changes and compromises are part of development.The premise of that UK was hard done by is tabloid victimisation delivered by BJ et al.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So you agree that the EU should be prepared to change and compromise on the withdrawal agreement or only the UK?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

EU guy said today, their deal is their deal & won't be changing. It was always that deal or no deal. That won't change with a new PM.

6 years ago | Likes 212 Dislikes 9

The EU have been super consistent and rational the whole way through. Tories have been consistently unrealistic because they're in too deep.

6 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

THE EU IS A DICTATORSHIP

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

Although I am already convinced of the premise by your use off all caps, who is the dictator?

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Jean Claude

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

You mean the president whom all 28 heads of states and EU Parliament agreed upon? Who could be kicked out by the Parliament? That dictator?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He is not elected by the People and his Jean Claude his own Words he will make the EU like China

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No deal Brexit is best Brexit. Force the EU to renegotiate deals.

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 35

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Jun 25, 2019 7:54 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure no deal would be far superior to being a vassal state with no say.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 24

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Jun 25, 2019 7:54 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I think he's talking about a Theresa May's plan from earlier in the year. I was shut down twice with the phrase "vassal state" being used.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you can't force the eu because britain has more to lose

6 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Renegotiate with a post-Brexit UK that is desperate to make new trade deals and will be in an even worse negotiating position? Brilliant!

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thing is, EU is already negotiating the best deals the UK could hope for. No deal means UK gets the same status as Korea. Not bad, but worse

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really it's 3 years of "not really gonna happen like that tho psh come on" and the alarmists going "yes it will!" and now it finally has.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Which was obvious from the start. EU can't let UK leave without it hurting them. Would send a terrible message.

6 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 15

[deleted]

[deleted]

6 years ago (deleted Jun 22, 2019 8:31 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Can't really blame them

6 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

It is not about hurting them - It is about U.K wanting to have everything, and pay nothing. There is more to it, but that is the essence.

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

This is such BS, EU doesn't want to hurt UK, they just wont do a deal that would break up four freedoms or violate other agreements and laws

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean, the thing is being part of the EU is a massive benefit to the UK, so simply leaving *would* hurt them.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

The EU can't make non-membership more beneficial than membership. For some reason London refuses to understand that.

6 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 3

I'd object to that.. London itself knows, Westminster is the bit of London that doesn't.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You get that here "London" means the British government, right? Not the geographical location. Same as "Brussels" refering to EU government

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"But it's Britain! They must comply!" -Brexiteers LOL

6 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

"We used to be an empire! That's gotta count for something, right? RIGHT?"

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

That and an Euro will get you a cup of coffee...

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Jesus sounds like abusive boyfriend level behavior.. Like i get it but that doesnt seem morally sound.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

It's really not. It's more like Britain is the boyfriend who says "There are tons of women on the internet who want to fuck me, so I'm (1)

6 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

breaking up with you. But I still want to come over and bang you whenever I want.". And when she says no, HE feels wronged. (2)

6 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Sounds like you don't actually get it at all.

6 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Prev commenter made it sound like it's out of spite or a warning bug I guess it's more like you just don't get the benefits if not member

6 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I agree with that i was commenting on the wording more than the sentiment :)

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hardly. You leave a relationship - even amicably - and you don’t still get to save by sharing rent, a bed and meals with your ex, do you.

6 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Would be like if California was allowed to leave the US. Washington would say, "Fine, but here's your bill." California would owe a bit.

6 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

That this is considered an acceptable comparison is evidence in favor of Brexit. The EU is not a nation.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 18

Got that right.

6 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The ultimate end goal should be to make it one, though. Same with all of earth. Glory to the Emperor.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

You say this like the EU wouldn't ban criticism of chaos worshippers and deny Tyranid infestations are a threat.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

The EU has spent two and a half years negotiating that deal, most of which the Brits wasted by continually asking "can we have all the (1)

6 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 5

benefits but none of the drawbacks?". I don't bame them for wanting no more of that. The Brexit promises were never realistic. (2)

6 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 5

What benefits are being asked for?

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

being part of the EU domestic market

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Control trade & people at borders to UK, but also free trade & movement into EU. Lower standards on goods, but compete on same terms in EU

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So they want others to keep borders open to them, but close their own?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What originally agreed after the war which was a free trading bloc. No one voted to have laws made by the EU or to open our island borders.

6 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

That's because Theresa May has reportedly time and time again been useless. It's time to get ride of her and see comes from the ashes

6 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 58

"From the asses" maybe. Because it looks like the next PM will be Boris Johnson and we already know he's completely full of shit.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Theresa May was tasked with building the equivalent of a submarine made of cheese. Of course she was going to fail, just like anyone else.

6 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

It looks like Boris "Piccanninies and watermelon smiles" Johnson comes from the ashes

6 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Don't forget it's Boris "we don't need businesses" johnson...

6 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or Boris "One Affair too many" Johnson...

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Um, you do realize she announced her resignation last month, right? And will soon be replaced by someone else

6 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 0

When exactly? The end of May?

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Almost, lol

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That "someone" being likely Boris Johnson, the very Discount-Trump of the BrExit-campaign. Finally a BrExiter having to take responsibility.

6 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The same Boris who dodged the position last time it opened.

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right, but the Conservative Party is taking it's sweet time officially choosing him, even though he wins every round of their voting process

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If there's an established rule on how to choose the new leader, then procedures must be followed. Bypassing rules is bad, hmkay?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Boris? Responsibility? The multi-time adulterer? The guy who was fired for making up quotes from his grandfather?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the guy will just blame it on labor, or his predecessor.

6 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0