Legal weed nationwide, as long as Republicans don’t block it

Aug 30, 2020 1:26 PM

wadatahmydamie

Views

148323

Likes

4830

Dislikes

152

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/08/28/marijuana-legalization-house-vote-404455

You can register to vote at vote.gov

In reality, Mitch the bitch will just have the bill sit on desk and not bring it up to vote as long as he is majority leader

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gotta wait until Mitch can turn a profit on it before he lets it get to the floor.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yippee but Mitch is gonna stop it

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Mitch the Bitch incoming

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

They’re gonna try to block it. Guaranteed.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

"As long as republicans don't block it" Ahahahahahahaaaaaahahahaha!!! You're kidding right? They will 100% block it because conservatism.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

This is a smart thing to start the precedent. It gets the ball rolling. When the dems come back in then it is easier to have it passed.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You know they will block it. It will affect the bottom line of their private prison donor-buddies.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

STATE'S RIGHTS! SMALL GOVERNMENT! FED BAD! oh, except keep weed illegal, also abortion should be federally regulated.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

“As long as the Republicans don’t block it.”

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It won't pass.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It may pass the house, but it’s unlikely to come to a vote in the senate.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

McConnell won't ever let it see the floor of the Senate. Remember that when you "vote for the person not the party." The most important 1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

vote your Congressperson casts is for leadership, and so any vote for a Republican is a vote for McConnell. 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v If weed become legal:

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's so groovy up here in Canada that I've got 28g being delivered to my house. From the government. Paid by credit card.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They'll block it, Mitch mcconnell is a bastard like that. Only hope is if Trump forces him for the good pr but I wouldn't hold my breath

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I don't know. Trump has said many times how much he hates drugs since his brother died of an OD in the 80's. I understand the CBD act. But

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For him to allow weed for recreational use is something I won't hold my breath for. I really want to see if legal too

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well it has to be passed by the Senate and signed by the President, so dont hold your bong hit too long.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

President Dipshit said he supported states rights years ago and he’s definitely known to keep every one of his promises so it’s all okay

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

+1 for a strong finish

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I’m all for legalizing it, with provisions... Basically give it most of the same laws as alcohol.

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

I would disagree on technicality. Alcohol laws are a patchwork and are ludicrous in some states. I'd prefer a more uniform approach w this.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As an intense stoner, 100% agreed.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is how it works here. Works very well.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This would just lift the federal ban. Provisions would be decided individually by states. If said state even allows it for recreational.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

would it also allow crossing state lines? (assuming states you go into allow it)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I think so? Not sure, but that would make sense, to me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Next thing I want is an effective field sobriety test.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I could be dead sober but if they test me, I'll test positive af. I just like not being in pain

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some? Why not all?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

People involved in trafficking large amounts through organized crime strictly to amass profit should still be punished.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If I had to guess, I’d say it probably has to do with RICO cases and other larger crimes. I haven’t read it yet though

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ah yes that does make a lot of sense

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What’s the prognosis in the Senate?

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

lol no

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dead.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's good for the poor and bad for the rich, so DOA is the likely prognosis.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

DOA

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Criminalizing certain drugs was used to easily imprison hippies and minorities.

5 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 4

And allow wood pulp-based paper product lobbyists and the massive corporations they represent to thrive over those of hemp.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

It was always about keeping minorities and idealists down.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

However you're forgetting that weed became illegal in the US in 1937, and the first people arrested for buying and dealing were white.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"The Grass is Greener" documentary on netflix explains this perfectly!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When you can’t lock up a first offender for a dimebag any more

5 years ago | Likes 645 Dislikes 29

Obligatory v

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I cant up vote because its at 420. Peace to you, friend.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When you are "denied a denial" for a cancer treatment medicine for a child.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

'I am the senate'

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Which is why Moscow Mitch will never let this bill pass.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'd imagine most police officers would love this, on the other hand private prisons not so much.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Cops in 2020 are mostly ok with this. Most still think pot is a gateway drug

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’ve seen a lot of “but then how will I get probable cause to search the vehicle, if saying I smelled weed doesn’t count?!”

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

About two thirds support relaxing drug laws

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Republicans are not likely to block it. They are doing it now, just before the election, to score some political points and hopefully votes.

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

How many hundreds of bills sit on Mitch’s desk?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Other than the usual weed debate, tobacco states are republican states. Unlikely to support legalization

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hope you're right, but I don't have much faith.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They've already announced they will block it.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Never underestimate the mendacity of McConnell

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Never underestimate the capacity for republican cruelty in support of the private prison industry

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

Not defending republicans, but it's incredibly ironic to put the blame all on them when we have Biden and Harris.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Actually The current administration has done more for criminal justice reform then any other time in recent history

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im surprised it is so difficult to pass considering the tax revenue.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Republicans make money off of prisons and tobacco

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Tobacco is on the decline last I heard.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

War on drugs has been very lucrative for the politicians who care more about their own income than the gov income

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This would take power away from the police to terrorize people with no-knocks raids over a little shake

5 years ago | Likes 508 Dislikes 26

Correct

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Nah. they'll find other excuses. The police are monsters, and the cruelty is the point.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

They'll just change it to another drug. Like suspected meth

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Friend's door got busted in last week and he was held at gunpoint for an hour in a state where it's legal.

5 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

They evidently thought he had a grow op or was a dealer or something. They also got the address wrong and won't pay for his door.

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Or apologize to the family for fuckin' terrifying them. Police gotta change.

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

To apologise admits fault, and that's not good in the land where everyone sues each other for literally everything

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There are states that protect the act of apology from culpability, and they could damn well have a process regardless.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No consequences for them, why should they change or back off at all? :( :(

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

This is why turtle face is ramming judges through the judicial process. To keep things the same

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

this would not result in legal weed nation wide. It would remove a federal barrier to the states legalizing. good luck.

5 years ago | Likes 839 Dislikes 3

Yeah but Republicans are all for states rights... Right? Jk That filth wants those sweet campaign contributions from private prisons.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You’d think the party that is allegedly pro states and anti-big government, ya know, a Republic.... would support this state’s rights issue

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't it erase all felony charges? Anyone charged with distribution or possession of more than half an ounce?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, but it does use the money created from the tax to fund a program to help them get it expunged.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't minimize it too much, if this passes, this is a huge step.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

One of the biggest impacts would be to businesses in states where it's legal. They can't take cards because of federal law.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It will also increase the sale tax on them. And require them to report personal information to the federal gov for a database.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That makes them extremely vulnerable to theft, being forced to be an all cash business.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It would remove the federal barrier but unfortunately would allow states to choose whether or not to legalize

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Funnily enough, it requires all sellers to add the personal information of every user to a federal database. Good bye ability to buy a gun.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What would this mean for government employees still subject to MJ screening in legalized states?

5 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

Currently still illegal. Idk what it would do, but If it goes through there will be another meme stating if it is or not.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In most states it's legal your employer can tell you you can't use it still so i doubt this will change anything besides the legality of it

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Government employees get tested? Hmm I guess Florida doesn't do that.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I work as an aircraft mechanic, until the FAA says otherwise, it will likely still be illegal for mechanics like me.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Nothing; most states are still At Will so they can fire you for just thinking about weed, if the could prove it.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Heck, I got fired for recycling cardboard boxes. Because they didn't have a camera and maybe I stole one.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Look, I'd comment on that but I don't think I should be seen associating with a criminal mastermind of your ilk.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sounds reasonable. Stay out of trouble!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you can't not smoke pot long enough to get a job you don't deserve it. I smoke every day. Never failed a test.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 22

Glad to know you don't think people in chronic pain should be employed. Should I just die because I'm in too much pain to function?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No just find work that suits you. Is that so hard?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ever been in chronic pain before? What job can you do when you can't pick up a phone or type without pain?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem is random testing. You could only smoke on the weekends and still fail

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Then understand that when you get the job and choose a career over smoking pot lol. Some jobs you just shouldn't be high for.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

No one has to choose a career over alcohol and Its no better than pot. You can smoke after work just like booze

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some use it for pain management. It stays in your system for ages, even if you're not high. Employers have too much power. What I do in my

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The downvotes are funny. I quit for 6 months for a job. Didn't get it. Now I'm a local friendly handyman, and smoke when I get off .

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Yeah, while I COULD quit for 6 months, I'd be totally useless because of the chronic pain and inflammation it helps me with

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hope you get feeling better.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not gov't employee but union worker here, we've been told if its legalized it will be handled like alcohol, so if it's in your system it >

5 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 0

Ok so they should fire/random test people just for mentioning or taking about using alcohol like they would weed.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Counts as being high, so basically no change

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 0

yeah that won't hold up in court.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Why not?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It doesn't leave your system for days though. Can't prove you're high from it. I guess you could still be given then fail a sobriety test.

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

It can stay in your system for up to a month, but there is no way to test if someone is high at that point or it's just residual, so they >

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

If it's an at will employment state, they can write that policy and enforce it without any issue. Otherwise I'm not sure.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What we do here is pass test. If you fail piss test they swab the mouth for more recent use. Not perfect but reasonable.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Following weeks headline "the MORE act died in the Senate today."

5 years ago | Likes 2291 Dislikes 13

Booooooooooo bad news :(

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Along with the rest of democracy...

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

It was created by kamala Harris. It’s going to get denied either in the senate or by the president for sure now since she’s vp candidate

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The only real obstical is that the house named kamala harris as the author, in a obvious attempt to make her palatable for the election.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It won't die Moscow Mitch will never even bring it to the senate floor to begin with so it can't be reworked by the house

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, can't imagine a more anti republican idea than letting people have freedom and freedom.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. It's not even worthy of discussion without a dem controlled senate too.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hard to say.There's an increasingly large amount of lobbying cash to be made with this, so the GOP may have a come to Jesus moment and flip.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Suicide is suspected

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly, scumbag Moscow Mitch won't even acknowledge the bulls existence

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I also don’t acknowledge the existence of the Chicago Bulls

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah if the Dems thought it'd pass they'd never have pushed it in the first place. This is just marketing.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Just politics* not much different than the wild ass abortion bills put forward in southern states earlier this year.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MORE like, how much other bullshit are they going to put into this act that will involve oil pipelines or tax breaks.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Blame the Hastert Rule https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hastert_Rule

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MORE ACT was introduced like last year. It died in committees getting shuffled around. I emailed the representative who sponsored it (1/2)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

EDIT: I went to check and it was initially sponsored by Kamala Harris. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/116/s2227

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And got no reply, when I tracked it's progress, it was just drifting across random desks going nowhere. Good to see it found a direction 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the house is voting on it then that means the Senate already drafted and voted to pass it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell blocks consideration of MORE act on Senate floor"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its all optics for the election. Elect Democrats to the Senate/Presidency, get weed! Worked in Canada lol

5 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 11

Everything for months now has been about nothing but this November, this is not new at all. Covid has changed things, but only a little.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is, yes, but lets not complain when party political considerations and the right thing happen to line up.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It'd never happen in the US, still too many anti-weed Dems (inc. Biden himself.) In Canada the PM can get the party to fall in line.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uhh Trudeau got elected because all of his opposition was shit. He was the shiniest turn in the pile.

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

I'm definitely joking and oversimplifying. Marijuana legalization and Election reform were big platforms for him. He delivered one at least.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Yeah, but reneging on election reform when nobody would agree to a version that favored his party again was real bad. We didn't want 1/

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/ reform to help the liberals; we wanted it so nobody would get total majority power off 30-some percent of the population vote ever again.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MORE like "add it on the pile we won't vote on ever"

5 years ago | Likes 541 Dislikes 2

I see what you did there...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like the next stimulus package amirite?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Thats why its called congress and not progress

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How does your government get anything done ever?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well friend you see... The thing is... THEY FUCKING DONT!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think only through self-interest, like if the politicians think taking action or not might influence an election. Or they get bribed.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It doesn't.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Dies on their desks. Then when asked about it they say they're working on it

5 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

The number is around 700 bills that Mitch hasn't brought to vote. Just letting them sit while he sucks cheeto fingers

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Person from a civilised country here: I legit cannot believe that that is a thing.

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Seriously. There are no rules around it because no one ever could imagine the need for them.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Mitch McConnell said earlier Tuesday that the bill "had no chance in hell." Of even being debated on the Senate floor. Proving once again

5 years ago | Likes 290 Dislikes 2

They did the same thing with the hush act.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's those do nothing democrats working their evil again!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Satan knows best I guess

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"No chance in hell" oh wow, so ballsy coming from a guy who takes it up the ass from big business every day.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Typical reefer madness mentality....

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Aug 31, 2020 1:57 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I wonder how long it will take before you're getting a visit from the police over that comment?

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That the Republicans in the Senate refuse to do thier jobs.

5 years ago | Likes 306 Dislikes 9

As a conservative who smokes i can tell you they are idoits the amount of money that would go into circulation legally would be tremendous

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is a good thing for Dems, great way to draw a policy line between parties on a popular issue. Great way to get Dem voters out.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They've been refusing to do their job for at least 6 if not 8 years.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Depends on what you think their jobs are. Pandering to big corporations is where most of their income comes from, so that's the job they >>

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

>> want to do well.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

With the south turning blue, lhe old devil appearing as an elderly turtle-man, will have "no chance in hell" for reelection

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Is that true?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not really. McGrath still prob unlikely to beat him. And I say that having donated to her campaign, so holding out as much hope as possible.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

thats not refusing, thats down right stating like they all already got together and said were not voting for it before even showing up

5 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 1

They didn't need to, it's clear that if they vote for it they will be cast out of the republican party

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

mass cliche corruption

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

See i don't understand this, most of them smoke or do coke. This is power privilege

5 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 1

Spot on. ?

5 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Rules for thee not for me. Don't like it? Get more powerful. It worked for me! /rich white guy voice

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Well, yeah. The biggest reason you have these laws in the first place is to let cops harass the shit out of poor and/or black people.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

You see weed in the house, you get leverage you can use to (say) get them to roll on a friend

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do we drug test in congress?

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

We should.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

?????

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You are onto something

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They don't want to free the slaves... Uhm, I mean release the prison labor force that just happens to be mostly black by coincidence

5 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yup. For profit prisons need prisoners.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0