Heavily regulated AI, please

Nov 4, 2025 7:10 PM

If you thought misinformation was bad before? It's only gonna get worse and we're so cooked if this stuff isn't brought under control and regulated soon. People are going to only find more dangerous and deceptive ways of using it.

What happens when FUX NEWS finally decides to cross a line and start generating the content themselves that they need to spin a narrative.

politics

As an artist, can we get paid for all the theft of using our content to teach the model?

5 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's a good idea. But to improve, RELEASE THE EPSTEIN LIST

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Never happen, there's big money involved.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh dear... what a good idea. Get a bunch of octogenarians to write a law about something that gets passed around their FaceBook groups like candy. Can we keep Papaw out it this please ?

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You think our politicians actually write/draft legislation themselves?

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No... they'll let Sam Altman do that. This is the point I was trying to make.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or how about heavily taxed. Given the cost to the environment (pollution, water use), people's electricity bills (check for a datacenter near you and your bill), the stolen info being used to train them, and to industries absolutely shedding jobs like crazy. These are a major negative to the world. We're speedrunning climate collapse with the complete abandonment of climate change goals from major companies.

5 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'd take some AI taxes too, for sure. It would be nice if they were just required to use clean energy to power the AI server farms as well... like "you want to build one? first you'll need to build some wind turbines to power it too"

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even with energy being from clean sources, they are quickly outstripping local residential and commercial Non-datacenter use as the major producer. When the those demands rise, that means increased costs on you. They get power at a discount. You don't. Power infrastructure needs more upgrades, more maintenance. Remember PG&E's wildfire disaster because they didn't do maintenance?

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I do... that's a broken system with a broken paid incentive structure for sure. John Oliver did a great segment on it.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's unenforceable. The cat is long out of the bag.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would it be unenforceable? You wouldn't hold the user responsible for adding a watermark... you'd just require the software itself to always add one, making the creator/distributor of the AI generator responsible.

5 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even if you did this to all big tech that's US based (will never, ever happen, guess where the money is - and bribery is legal via lobbyists and PACs) there are plenty that aren't and at this point you can run this shit on your own hardware if you care. You can legislate anything, but that doesn't make it possible or feasible. It would fail harder than any drug war.

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uhh.. the war on drugs is a failure because of the harsh punishments it imposed on the user level, so possession and drug use were heavily criminalized... but nobody thinks that drug dealing and trafficking should legal? That's essentially what you're saying in your comparison 😅

5 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0