Basically

Jan 6, 2024 9:32 PM

funny

memes

Same with sugar. And light bulbs

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait until you find out how the sugar is stored !

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I went to a restaurant supply store and got dry goods containers. Worked like charm. I also bake a lot and get 24lb bags of flour

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean I've never had a paper bag rip downwards when I tried to pull it open, and then have that rip widen every time I pour some out. But I have had the plastic bags that pasta came in do exactly that!

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don’t mind it. I have several flour containers at home it goes into. One of the few containers that is recyclable.

2 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 1

You're supposed to put it in your cannister to keep the mice out. Use one of those giant popcorn tins.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bacon and cereal as well.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They learned from Big Sugar

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Dog shit take. Flour needs to breathe, it can't be packaged in plastic. Plastic is also wasteful. Burlap is more expensive. 2 paper bags, which are recyclable and very cheap is basically the most elegant possible solution. Eco friendly, cheap, correct physical properties for the goods contained. Literally it doesn't really get better

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The worst possible container is what pancake mix comes in which is just a leaky cardboard box with loose powder inside. No bag

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"cheapest possible container".

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but salt we buy in these square paper cartons and they ALWAYS leak

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feed_sack_dress#Feed_sack_garments

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Came here for this! My grandmother told stories about making flour sack dresses during the Depression.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Once you buy it, you're free to put it into what ever kind of container you wish. Also, it can't be that bad. You see anyone else bitching? This is a very niche complaint, but hey, you do you.

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 16

Nah, I'm fine with paper bags: You should be putting flour in a dedicated container anyways.

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Absolutely and you need to wash that container each time you empty it. The natural oils in flour will build up otherwise and it gets gross. Also reduces the chances of insect eggs hatching.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never buy flour. I buy my toothpaste with it included and don't need to add it.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bad joke, sorry. "Flour" and "Fluor" are too similar.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Container that usually tears spilling some contents just trying to get the bag in the cart. Recyclable is nice, but it should still first work as a container.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The only real problem that I have with the paper sacks is that they are bleached white. They could easily switch to unbleached paper and soy ink. Definitely better for the environment.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

@OP you'll be happy to know I just spent the last two hours going through all your posts thinking I was browsing usersub. I was entertained the whole time, thank you.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fucking BACON is worser

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What? I LOVE a paper bag that spews powdered flour everywhere every time you try to get some?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Work over the sink. Works great!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I do. Still hate it, LOL.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Open it, pour it into an air tight container. Close it. Rinse the container and the flour residue out of the sink, soak the bag so it won’t lose any more dust when you put it in the trash, wash all your clothes. then mop up the small dry flour spots that mysteriously appear the next day :) j/k

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The paper sack is 100% recyclable and I don't store my flour in it. I have a separate container for flour in my kitchen.

2 years ago | Likes 174 Dislikes 0

.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

yeah, sounds like OP is asking for plastic containers for every flour pack sold bc he cant be bothered to transfer it himself at home in his own container

weak

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honest question: what would you recommend?

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Some guys pockets

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Tightly woven spaghetti

2 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

A rigid cardboard tube would make sense.

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Oatmeal has entered the chat

2 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Rabbit fur

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Fabric, just like the giant ones used to be.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Momma needs a new dress.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A stale loaf of french bread. A bready-to-use container to be used as a baguette.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it can come in paper, just instead of glueing it down to the bag, seal the top with some kind of glue or plastic and either roll it into the top, or fold it down one one of the sides have have is secured with that rubbery shit that was used in magazines to hold paper down, that way you cut the top open, and the glue can never rip a sizeable hole below flower level when opening. but I would also say to only sell larger bags and normalize putting it in a container at home for flour.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A cube of Jell-O

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

A desk of cheez-its

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Look at Quaker Oats. Rigid, resealable

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Odlums sell like that but there's always more shelf space devoted to paper bags so I guess the market is talking

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Paper bags are cheaper, especially when you consider bulk transportation and storage (because tubes don't fit together as tightly). So you'd want to keep both options available. Like how sugar is still available in bags, but also (more expensively) in milk cartons. For flour, I think tubes would work better than rectangular cartons, so much so as to be worth the cost.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep that's my point. The supermarkets are assigning more space to bags because they're selling more. People don't want to spend the extra few cents for the alternative

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where I live, Safeway's shelf space for sugar is roughly evenly split between the waxed-paper milk-like cartons and the plain paper bags. Enough of my neighbors are financially comfortable enough to think a few extra cents for the vastly improved convenience is well worth it; and somewhere-near-equally enough aren't. (or are just sticking with what they're used to, or have their own container they pour it into so it makes no difference. Yet, I've never even seen flour in anything but paper bags.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At least they're not plastic

2 years ago | Likes 459 Dislikes 5

Everything else comes in plastic. Why not use plastic where it actually makes sense (flour, sugar) and stop using it where it doesn't make sense (almost everything else, like produce)

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

And it's thicker paper than Warburton bread bags in the UK which your fingers go through when you pick them up. Which is a damn shame cos it's the nicest bread you can get when not dried up by holes in the bag

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

i got TP the other day and to my dismay the rolls were plastic wrapped INSIDE the main plastic wrap. i hate it.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

100% this. I'd rather have an unruly paper bag than plastic anything.

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Well I mean a reusable plastic sealable container to refill with flour is fine. But fuck one time use plastics.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It used to come in fabric bags and if the milling was fine enough some would come through the fabric

2 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

It still comes in fabric bags if you're buying in bulk 25kg I think

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Our pizza shop buys it in large double layer paper bags.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Why? Just make it a recyclable plastic container. Then I won't have to worry about flour dropping from that horrendous paper bag, and I get to use the container for other things too.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Climate Town has a great video on the subject. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJnJ8mK3Q3g

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because most plastic isn't recyclable, stupidly enough.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

But isn't food grade plastic (like plastic soda bottles and veggie packaging) supposed to be good for recycling?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"Supposed to be" and "is" often have a pretty wide gulf between them.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Somewhere around 10% is recyclable. The petroleum industry was largely behind the push to make it seem like plastic was recyclable. They even pushed to use a three arrows logo that looks similar to, but is legally distinct from the reduce, reuse, recycle logo.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

In theory it's recyclable; in practice only very small % actually gets there. Most recycling programs are a sham but it makes us feel better. :'(

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Turns out paper might be even less healthy because a lot of commercial printing ink contains mineral oil, which soaks through the paper and contaminates the food. If the paper is recycled it likely contains additional hydrocarbons from its previous life as a printed product. Nearly all rolled oats in paper packaging that were tested in Germany were found to contain mineral oil hydrocarbons. Stuff's carcinogenic, teratogenic, generally toxic & definitely worse than anything in food grade plastic

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 14

Newest research shows this link is not as clear as you convey. https://www.foodpackagingforum.org/news/eu-panel-re-examines-health-risks-of-mineral-oil-hydrocarbons-in-food . The animal model they chose was deemed unsuitable. I would choose the risk that an ink might have been swapped with a non food safe version vs. the platisizers offgassing and microplastics from alternative containers.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ooh! Thanks to the Vorkosigan Saga I know what teratogenic means!

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

those paper bags are double lined. the print is on the outer bag but the inner is a plain paper bag. you dont need to worry about the ink

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Correct

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you're sure enough to spread the rumour then why is your comment loaded with uncertain wording instead of a respectable source saying how real the risk is.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Here you go. I suggest next time ask nicely for a source. Trying to sow doubt without fact-checking first isn't better than my use of "uncertain wording", which comes down to the word "might". A word that is difficult to avoid since consumers like myself have no way of telling which inks & paper quality was used for each and every food package. Rule of thumb: Make sure there's an internal PP or PET bag. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-010-1376-6

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Your source looks legitimate as a study into ink migration. But it doesn't try to offer guidance to consumers. 13 years on if I go into a store today, every sugar bag and flour bag is paper with ink and every egg is marked directly with ink. The bakers make bread from a pallet of paper flour sacks also with ink on. It is impossible to know if that study is relevant. Also, what are you touching the ink covered packaging with. It's a grain of fear not true knowledge.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It's about hydrocarbon migration rather than ink migration. Paper sucks as a barrier. You can treat it in various ways, but unless you line the inside with plastic (tetrapack style) or a material like aluminium it will allow all kinds of molecules to pass through. You can easily test this with water, but air passes through as well. There is no un-lined airtight paper or cardboard container. Now think road transport and traffic exhaust. Think mercury, arsenic, formaldehyde, benzene etc.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I’ll remember that the next time the recycling cartel demands I wash jars, dry them, sterilize at 475 for 29 hours in an oven, separate my aluminum and plastic, etc etc. what a crock

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I'm generally very much pro-recycling, or downcycling in case of plastic and paper. Washing seems a bit excessive and a waste of water. Maybe a quick rinse in case of yogurt containers. Anyway, the main problem in this case is mineral oil in inks and lubricants used in the print industry. Even if we ban these products tomorrow the hydrocarbons will remain in recycling paper for some time to come.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Common lore is if you don’t wash everything, put a greasy pizza box in recycling then it’s claimed that all gets thrown for being contaminated. Has the same BS energy as a thrift store demanding everything new in a box and ready for resale

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you have a source on this? These are packaged in virgin paper made from sustainable US forests with zero oil. Safer than paper towels that are literally made out of recycled waste paper.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

By these I mean bags of flour.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Unless the paper is plain white, without anything printed on it, I'm afraid there is no telling how accurate your "zero oil" assessment is. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-010-1376-6

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Flour is in a double thickness paper bag. I’ve worked with printing inks for 38 years, and mostly they use the flexo method with aqueous ink. The inside is not printed. What on earth do you think would be a safer way to package anything if plain white paper seems dangerous to you? I am genuinely curious.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Sorry, you can't dispute scientific evidence with "I've worked with printing". Have you even looked at the study? Tl;dr: Hydrocarbons migrate through paper and cardboard and end up in the package contents in concentrations that exceeds the legal limit (in Germany, that is) by up to factor 100. Within months after production, in products that have a shelf life of several years and will accumulate even more over time.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You haven’t see the inside of a flour bag as sold in the US have you? LOL Paper bags have been used for well over 100 years. There are Federal standards in place for this specific package type. https://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/wf10.pdf

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just opened a new bag today. flour itself was in a plain white bag, then a second paper bag with the printing was around that.

not perfect, but at least better (but then again, who knows what kind of weirdo shit goes into flour processing anyway)

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Correct - the standard is a double layer in the US

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hydrocarbon molecules easily migrate through cardboard or several layers of paper as the above study shows. Unless there is a plastic (PP/PET) or aluminum layer between paper and food... by the way, this does not only apply to ink. Anything that comes in contact with the paper can potentially end up in the food. Think exhaust pollutants during road transport. Benzene, mercury, arsenic from diesel fumes, even more PAHs. Paper/cardboard offers barely any protection from molecule-sized pollutants

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0