The same 41% strike again

Jan 22, 2026 6:23 AM

isthistrue

Views

21377

Likes

396

Dislikes

19

Riddle me this. At this point in time, exactly who in the US is independent?

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just to be clear, that 41% should all receive a bullet. Average IQ immediately jumps 50 points. Everything will improve.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Second poll: Do you understand what "It's not for sale!" means?

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Your president made himself so ridiculous in Davos with his blather and lies.

2 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Yeah, we know (at least most of us). Sorry.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"And they called me Daddy..." you are so right.

2 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

wheres the column for Release the Epstein Files

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i wouldnt support it even if everyone was willing. we are in huge amounts of debt. where are we even gonna get the money to buy this? we just gonna tax people to pull a hundred trillion out of our asses? i like how we have greenland money but not money to pay back social security, medicare, medicaid, the VA, student loans, universal healthcare, feeding kids, the housing crisis, failing infrastructure, or like 50 other problems we have. so fucking retarded

2 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Don't use the R-word šŸ˜’

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bold of you to assume they want to pay more than, say, a 100 dollars ?

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

George never lived in Slough,

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Here’s the thing about polls. It’s data collected from people who have the free time to sit, and answer polling questions. I’ve never been that person. You probably haven’t either. So, fuck these polls.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In fairness, if this were *only* about the purchase as the question states, it's much more reasonable (albeit still pretty stupid) than the takeover by force that Trump has been signaling. Run this poll again with the word "annex" or "conquor"

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, this. If we could just buy it? I'm still against it personally but I can see why others wouldn't be. Going to war over it and taking it by force is an entirely different thing, though.

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Purchasing"

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It only costs a pound of flesh…

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

41% of trump supporters is a very small portion of the population.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

2 months ago (deleted Jan 22, 2026 5:25 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's only if they become a state, which they almost certainly wouldn't.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Puerto Rico and Guam would love some of that representation in Congress...

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Idk why none of the top comments call this out, but unless Im Reading this wrong, it's 41-42% are either opposed or not sure while 58-59% are in support of the acquisition. So it's even less favorable for continued preservation of our current global alliances.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The question say ā€œpurchaseā€ which implies consent. One would hope the outcome would be completely different if it said ā€œinvadeā€

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If Greenland were actually for sale if probably be like fine, ok, whatever.

2 months ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Yeah, this is my thought. Is it up for sale on Facebork Marketplace, then sure, why not. Although I think Canada might want a crack at it too. But it's NOT for sale so "buying" it isn't even a thing. How do people NOT understand that?

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd prefer healthcare.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same here. There is some value to it, so if it was for sale, or we offered a reasonable price and they agreed, sure, I guess. But to be told no and to threaten to break up one of the most important international agreements in history over it? Probably one of the worst blunders in recorded history, up there with invading Russia in winter. Though I guess that depends on perspective, both of those worked out really well for Russia.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought that for a sec, but it falls apart when you think about why we would be purchasing it. Like, you know we would strip mine it for natural resources and fuck all the Greenlanders + the environment. With Denmark, there are EU protections in place.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Strip mining in icy tundra is hell. Who would want this, except they wait for the ice to melt. Which would be stupid, because at that point we will not care.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The technology to mine the resources underneath Greenland doesn't exist yet. It likely won't exist in our lifetimes. Nobody will be strip mining anything. Greenland would just become another Guam and everyone would lose

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it needs to be studied how conservative beliefs and leanings are like directly related to real honest to god mental illnesses and being a dumb mother fucker

2 months ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

I think we need to stop soft pedaling, calling it "conservative" views. Fascist views. If your view point is that any groups of people need subjugated, it's not conservative, it's fascist. If you believe "might is right", it's not conservative, it's fascist. If you believe your leader should be above the law, it's not conservative, it's fascist.

2 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Some of it is trickle-down control. If they can control the men, men will control the women, hence their push for christianity. If they can control business owners, business owners can coerce workers to vote a certain way,,esp in rural areas where your whole life can get ostracized if you vote against your boss and family.

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It has. When people go crazy, they always go conservative, never liberal.

2 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

John Fetterman is a living example.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Wow! That is an extremely shit piece of source material.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a fascinating read. Feels extremely cherry picked.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It has been. Hit up the Google if you're interested in some creepy findings. It's entirely too depressing for me to re-research right now.

2 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

[doctor] "I'm sorry Mr. Johnson, it seems you have a serious case of dumb mother fucker."

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is the US' problem. Trump and his goons are just the symptom, not the actual cause. The problem lies deeper than just him. And as long as nothing is changed about that, the US will continue to spiral into oblivion real fast. Maybe a few will change their minds on the way there. But I doubt that will be enough before everything as gone down the drain already.

2 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Yeah, big crash might be coming, like the great depression.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are *also* the cause, by defunding education and taking money from Billionaires to enact laws in their favor, the same billionairs that own the news companies that tell people everything bad is immigrants/gays/trans/etc's fault. Everywhere and every time they can.
It's corruption.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And who let those things get that far before, step-by-step? It's not like all these prerequisites you make out there were not, yes, you guessed it, caused by previously (re)elected administrations. And it's also not like that happened during 1 or 2 terms. That was long coming and obvious. And make no mistake, the Democrats are just as much part of that particular problem. It's not like the things you reference here went all that better, while they were holding the scepter. The got away with it.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, it takes a while to undo decades of propaganda and shit education, it's been shit since Reagan. But sure, "bOtH sIdEs ArE eQuAlLy bAd!!". How do you propose to fix it?

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's my point: Unless the American people do not get a different attitude, nothing. You cannot solve that by outside intervention or by technicalities. If people are fine to, e.g., vote for people that keep humans in cages without due process, disregarding human rights and so on (key word Guantanamo Bay), what can you do about such a thing? If people do not put up new political parties or join existing parties to change things in them, nothing will change. It's not just »BiG mOnEy« at fault.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

41% of Trump supporters would support a war on heaven or invading Pluto if that's what Trump wanted.

2 months ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

They would applaud him for committing murder on 5th Ave in the middle of the day.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*stabs ocean*

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Great point! Imagine the war trump will call for when he gets flat out rejected from 'the good place'

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 months ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

100% of his supporters think pi should equal 3, and that any other value is a conspiracy of big Negative Curvature.

2 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Here in America we don't do "woke" decimals, and the integer value of Pi is 3.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are not as intelligent as Bloody Stupid Johnson.

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I want an authentic BSJ shower cabinet.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Why even ask a completely fictional thing? Might as well ask if people support mandatory unicorn sterilization

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You don't support mandatory unicorn sterilization?

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think that's a decision between a unicorn and their doctor

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I personally fully support the laws on mandatory Unicorn sterilization, because it allows for authorised breeders to (under regulatory guidance) keep intact Unicorns, and only requires those who do NOT meet those (honestly lax) criteria to sterilise their Unicorns. It's aimed at directly combating the "foal mills" that keep popping up, where the animals are kept in frankly shocking conditions, sometimes with only a speck of glitter per animal in the herd, and all having to share a single rainbow

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Every freaking time with this shithole country:

2 months ago | Likes 278 Dislikes 3

NONE of those pro diarrhea voters believe it will happen to them. They just vote so it happens to others.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd rather shit my pants than see someone I don't like get a puppy. - 1/3 of Americans

2 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

You know what, imma shit myself, at least I don’t have to watch my dog die at some point.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(republicans vote hard for diarrhea for everyone) "how could the Democrats let us do this?!"

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would vote for puppy.. easy.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't give Noem a puppy

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but not quite everyone wants a puppy, and not constantly suffering (if not 1%) is woke /s

2 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

A puppy is a lot of work, while diarrhea is less work, I don't have to push anymore. /s

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What if they're just chronically constipated and allergic to dogs but not Republicans? :-D

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even when the dems win it’s one quarter puppy and three quarters diarreah.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Hurr durr both sidez!!!

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's what the polls show and then, somehow, diarrhea wins the election anyway.

2 months ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 2

Gotta make use of all that COVID toilet paper

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because people are afraid to admit their actual opinions because they know they are shitty. Like the people who said they wouldn't vote for trump in 2024, then wound up doing it because they didn't want to vote for Harris.

2 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Diamandering

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No ā€˜somehow’ about it.

Polling is broken in the disinformation age. People holding conspiratorial or regressive beliefs are less likely to either talk to pollsters to begin with or to give them real answers (either to intentionally skew them or because they know their beliefs are seen as repugnant when spoken out loud, so they claim other beliefs to pollsters but then vote on their real ones). Couple this with liberals being more likely to blow off an election if they think they’ll win anyway.

2 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We can thank the electoral college for that

2 months ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

No, we can’t. Polling problems are an entirely separate issue.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The EC is for ONE goddamn elected position. Stop fkn blaming it for all of our ills. This also goes for gerrymandering, which only happens AFTER the GOP/whomever wins a clear majority in their legislature.

Want to know who to blame? VOTERS! Voters are to blame for the condition of our country. Learn to win elecitons, and stop throwing your hands in the air in stupid desperation.

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Republicans are fucking stupid and contrarian. They don’t care if something will help them. If it hurts someone they don’t like, they’ll actively support it 1000%. They are spineless, heartless, evil people.

2 months ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 3

2 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This shows a fundamental lack of understanding of Republican Values. It shows that you don't understand their religious views, visit an evangelical/conservative catholic church to learn them. You don't understand their economic values, read more about capitalism. You don't understand their social values, read about nationalism and traditionalism.

Yes, in my view they are disgusting and vile in their values. But they are the hero of their own worldview.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

They can think whatever they want about themselves but to the rest of the rational world, Republicans have been heartless, greedy, stupid monsters

2 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

While I agree that they are heartless and greedy, I was mostly responding to all the other parts of your comment. They aren't simply contrarian, nor do they act solely to hurt people they don't like. These ideas come from a fundamental misunderstanding of who they are. Why does this matter, you might ask. Because until you understand why someone does something, then you'll never know how to fight them. Because y'alls ignorance is why they control virtually all of America.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The lies they tell themselves about "who they are" are irrelevant to the facts.

And they have power only because lies are easy to sell to people who don't care enough to actually learn those facts about reality. You can't have 24/7 news whitewashing every unhinged malicious action perpetrated by these fuckers without that having severe consequences for society. It's not just Fox anymore, either, now that conservative propagandists are in charge of basically every media company.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

/Think of it like you are trying to stop crime in society. You will never solve the issue if your only solution is to throw everyone that breaks the law into jail. Only when you finally focus on understanding why people act the way they do, and you form strategies based on that understanding, will you ever be effective. Otherwise you're just an idiot who spends eternity shooting criminals and throwing them in jail.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

George carlin said it best: an average IQ is the mix of everyone. So imagine everyone you know. HALF of people are dumber than that.

2 months ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 8

*median my dude.

Averages take into account the outliers, which throws the whole thing off. The average NEVER lands in the middle. The median does.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it goes more like "Think about how stupid the average person is, then remember half of them are dumber than that!"

2 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

interestingly an IQ of 85 and 115 is 68% of the human population. So moving to either side you're getting increasingly rare. The average IQ of a college grad is, by the way: ~115+ and the average IQ of someone graduating from trade school is ~98

2 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Cool. Now do it by country.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Well, it's population earth. that's how G is actually calculated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That quickly becomes ammo for white supremacists, because the lowest IQ test scores all come from Africa, where they frequently dip into the 80s.

Which, any *actual* intelligent person will tell you is a reflection on our testing and education rather than actual intelligence, since an IQ in the 80s is essentially a disabled person and a society of those would obviously not survive.

2 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Or fare very poorly. Poor education is widespread around the world and there is certainly a correlation between the level of education and the level of development.

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But someone graduating from a trade school who was a QB in high school is ~115+; and the average of an MBA is ~150 (turns out high IQ often leads towards b schools)

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Ph.Ds are frequently in the 130's; and MDs are also there.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

recall that 130 is considered the top 2ish% of humans.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I once paid to take an IQ test. "The result was 132, but I felt like a 60." -myself after.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The average of an MBA is ~150? Is that self-reported or what, I don't believe that for a second. Most of the MBAs I've ever seen are the dumbest motherfuckers in the room, and there ain't enough truly bright people to dig that average out of the graves those idiots are digging for it.

2 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well it's skewed because the most high IQ statistically get MBAs. there's a school at Columbia running the 200+IQ folks and nearly 95% do MBAs, the remainders exit the school and basically do patients for a living. It's been running since the 70's. https://business.columbia.edu/insights/chazen-global-insights/when-smart-isnt-enough-broadening-definition-intelligence

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

You can also look at the papers for the school for the extreme intelligent (there are very few btw); Enstein was ~170, these people would be squared factors greater in IQ. Anywho, the TLDR is that most do MBAs.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I like the way you get quotes wrong and make up stats about IQ.

2 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

It's also ironic to bring up low IQ when referring to Trump supporters, as IQ testing is a pseudoscience that was widely adopted early on by eugenicists who used it to "prove" immigrants were too stupid to be granted entry to the country.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

IQ testing is not a pseudoscience. Yes, early testing was extremely bias but that's been mostly fixed. The problems with IQ tests are (1) they measure a specific area of intelligence but people treat them like so much more and (2) people, especially Internet advertisers, endlessly make up shit about them. Also, to a lesser degree, (3) limited validity range meets obnoxious outliers.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I really love everything that is happening here. Keep it up you all.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Remember that the way averages ACTUALLY work means it might be WELL MORE than half are dumber than that since the average can be skewed to the higher end by a relatively small number of absolute genius outliers.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

No. you just never learned any other mathematical defining of average than "mean".
For mean you are correct as its the "middle of the value"S but for median the avarage is the middle of the sample points. so you are always halfway below and above.
Mod would be the mathematical term for when you say average joe. aka the most common one.

This is middle school math

2 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Mean and average are two ways of saying the same thing. Median is not the average, and neither is mode. Stop getting your knowledge from chat gpt.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Nah, they're technically correct. Median and mode are definitely types of averages. But of course, colloquially, average without specifier always refers to mean, so it's a bit of a moot point here.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

When looked up, mean had the word "average" appear in its definition. Median and mode do not. So sure, maybe for mathematicians they're types of "average". In the same way that all wolves are foxes.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/average
How about the Flipping dictinary ?

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not in a normal distribution. In bell curves, the median and mean are about the same.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In bell curves. However, populations and especially measures of education have no obligation to neatly fit into a bell curve.

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In the case of IQ, test designers literally take the raw score and then linearly transform them so the distribution has a mean of 100 and SD of 15. So yes it does. That's by definition.

2 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's one of the biggest misconceptions about IQ - that its a measure against peer groups not some arbitrary unit of intelligence. Also why having high IQ as a child doesn't translate to high IQ as an adult (sometimes that's causal I'd wager, a gifted child who doesn't continue learning and performs worse in the next peer group).

2 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah right I had the actual Carlin quote in my head. Carlin never mentioned IQ in that line so it wasn't in my mind.

2 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0