Disney put EA’s ass in line

Nov 18, 2017 8:32 PM

dmoral25

Views

134226

Likes

2237

Dislikes

94

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2017/11/18/how-a-star-wars-video-game-faced-charges-that-it-was-promoting-gambling/?utm_term=.23761954b54c

So reaching out to Disney wasn’t an entirely bad idea. Also, this hitting mainstream media. First team I’ve seen this dilemma mentioned on WP.

Maybe... people could call their senators about it... and maybe... also hit them up on net neutrality... anything to get them to call...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

this “is not expected to have a material impact on EA’s fiscal year 2018 financial guidance.“ they need to be shown who pays their income

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

CAN WE TAKE THIS POWER AND FOCUS IT ON NET NEUTRALITY NOW!? PLEASE!?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I love that they quoted Sterling and tastefully removed his expletives

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stop buying games with loot boxes. It’s not hard.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They were probably trying to make buying dlcs more worth while (not so stale and obvious pricing) but clearly didn't think it through

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

DONT GIVE DISNEY CREDIT!!! they litterally called them being displeased about THEIR OWN IMAGE!!

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Uh, that was kind of the plan? To get disney butthurt over their image and make them put EA in their place?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I don't accept their statement that a AAA game needs post release $ given the upfront cost is sometimes 5x more than a movie ticket.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Tbf, people often go to re-watch movies more than once.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

They're all a bunch of assholes, fuck em and their motives.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Palpatine always thinks his Death Star is invincible until they blow it up. Electronic Arts and its insidious ilk aren’t much diffent.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's the last line on the article. It's great!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can't wait till they realize that SWTOR and so many other games do the same thing....

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This isn't a new thing EA is doing, I'm just annoyed it took this long for this level of revolt to happen.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you suppose WB will have to get that crap out of shadow of war too? it's literally the only thing keeping me from buying it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can someone explain how this is a gambling issue?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You are paying real money for the random chance at getting something fancy, but 99 out of 100 times you get nothing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, you do get "something"...just that "something" is practically worthless.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I personally really like cosmetic loot boxes, but as soon as abilities, weapons, and characters that effect gamplay are involved, I'm out.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I don't really see the connection of loot crates from Overwatch being compared here. True they are a MT but nothing alters game play

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Perhaps, in time, even EA will come regret that Disney owns the franchise now. They can still eat shit and die afaic, however.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't game but I follow imgur shit--EA now my mortal enemy for reasons I don't need to know.Fuck them.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

For a long time, EA has kept buying out other game studios, ruining the franchises for short term gains, and throwing away the carcass.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Call of Duty has done this shit and worse for 4 years now. Where is the outrage?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The word "charges" is mighty misleading, zero charges filed or successful, they just caught internet ire and pulled it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Cool, now if someone would only fix madden ultimate team.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I honestly think overwatch's lootbox system is good. you can purchase everything with ingame currency not expensive and it's all 4 looks

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Very different type of game, but yep, it's all cosmetic. Skills/tools are there from the start. Plus, you get loot as you play anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ok, question: can I buy and enjoy this game, without feeding the EA monster? Because some fgt will have paid $$ to git gud, but that's ass.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Simply by buying the game you are feeding the EA monster, aside from that you could always just play the campaign.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's my dilemma. The hype machine got me, ugh. But I'm strong enough to resist until a 2nd hand copy pops up. That'll fuck em ;)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't worry when/ if they bring back the loot crates and they aren't just for cosmetics. I'll invest however much it costs for everything

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And enlist hackers to troll and grief hard in game. I will pay someone to make a script if they don't exist yet and I will get sketch 3rd

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Part copies of the game, and I will give them to shit bags on sites like mpgh to use for free on the agreement they go full retard with

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cheats. I will make this shit like apb where at hackers peak it seemed like every other person was a hacker.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Disney okayed MTs in the first place, they're just shitty that EA got caught doing it so blatantly that it comes back and bites them.

8 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 10

Hey, if two people are robbing you and run away then one decides to trip his partner I'm not going to complain that I didn't get both

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What the fuck are you talking about. EA is an independent company and doesn't need being "okayed". In fact, Disney wouldn't EVER okay such

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 36

thing, because that's just inconceivable. Do you okay your neighbour's decision to switch positions while fucking his wife? No. Do you call

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 36

911 if he starts beating her? Yes.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 32

lol, are you for real

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can you sauce Disney specifically requesting or green lighting she's specific types of microtransactions, as in the loot boxes?

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

Yes, Disney just let one of their premiere money printing franchises release a game without any oversight.

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 8

They sold the exclusive rights to their long-time partner that has entire business model built around using licensed games. That process

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

does not involve oversight. It involves terms and conditions and that's it. Those are 2 separate companies. Nobody expected this fuckup.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

IDK. If you read about the death of Visceral games you will find out that Disney is very heavily involved in what is done with their IP.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They'll add it back in after this blows over though if we don't keep causing a ruckus.

8 years ago | Likes 312 Dislikes 6

Keep ruckusing until someone gets fired

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm so sure that the new microtransactions will just be skins and not in-game advantages. We shall see.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You just summed up American politics very well. Take this lesson and pass it on!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They actually are now legally binded to fix the issues they promised to consumers that they will. "Unfair advantages" was one.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just dont buy it

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

For real. People seem not to get this.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

They never said they removed it. The statement they released said they'd add it back in when they felt it was appropriate

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Which in PR means "when this blows over"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They’ll take it so lightly. At least, not if they’re brought back in such a way that we’re dealing with the same problem again. /2

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

Also true! Who knows! Maybe they'll've learned their lesson or maybe they'll get even sneakier.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What I love is part of EA’s power comes from never having to respond to anyone but their shareholders. So this is a whole new dynamic for /1

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, its good to see they are getting a slap on the wrisr from someone higher up. Bormally thee fckers always get away with this shit

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sheez, hope you can read that, lol sorry

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The shit already and listen.” /3

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Them to have to respond to someone higher up. I feel like if this happens again, Disney will say, “C’mon you guys are fucking adults. Cut /2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I feel like that’s risky now. If micro transactions are brought back, we get pissed again, and Disney catches wind of it, I’m not sure /1

8 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 4

It says in the statement they’ll be re-added at a later date. So Disney know.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Risky even in legal basis. They are now legally binded to fix the issues they promised to consumers that they will.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

They can bring them back as they said they will. They just have to fix issues they said they will.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But if they bring it back after you bought the game they made money

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But you have already bought the game by then and they couldn’t care less how mad you are. Only way to stop this is not buying this game at

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No, they will keep trying till it is so familiar with us that we get used to seeing them and eventually accept them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its called "sticking to your guns". Remain pissed off until its gone for good. no "we will bring it back later" shit.

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 1

EA has to do something about it. The whole game was designed around MTs so without them, Battlefront 2 is just a grind fest. One reviewer /1

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Put it the best way, that is, that the whole game is haunted by the ghosts of its design around MTs. They literally have to redesign it. /2

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

La times exposes Disney's political corruption, disney bans la times, disney has legionaires outbreak, disney promotes gambling.. bad month

8 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 8

Bans like that happen ALL the time. The only thing Disney did different was that they gave a reason. Apple banned one paper for 7 years for

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

publishing iPhone 2 leak. Everyone does that. Don't get excited.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

A leak is different to what disney did. They banned the la times because they "thought" they published a slanderous artical.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The article I saw wasnt even that bad and Disney freaked

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The CEO of Disney is getting ready to run for office in 2020 as a democrat. This is the last thing he wants to hear.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Holy shit you’re right! I didn’t think about that. Their patience is running thin.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

On the eve of their biggest film of the year no less

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Which?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Fuckin’ hell, really?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Honest question. I haven't followed any of the hype for The Last Jedi and don't know it's release date.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 375 Dislikes 20

I find it hard to believe that Disney/Lucasfilms had no clue this was in the game.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Double dippin

8 years ago | Likes 84 Dislikes 6

“Temporary” Woooooooooowwww

8 years ago | Likes 201 Dislikes 1

Give the masses a few weeks to calm down, then "remake" the whole thing without changing anyrhing

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

What is a "temporary decision to end"?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bullshit to appease the masses

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They’re completely removing it forever until they change their minds.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

*until everyone instantly forgives them and buys the game for the holiday season, then EA'll put it all back once they have everyone's money

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wonder how it feels to have a mouse chew off a major portion of your ass while the Imperial March (Vader's theme) plays in the background?

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Except it says temporary so it was more a slap on the wrist and a pretend chastisement

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I doubt there was anything pretend about it. But, you're probably right that the message was to wait until The Last Jedi's been out a month.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hehe, listen here fucko. (Dun dun dun dah dah dah) Cut that shit out, you're fucking up my (dun dun dun dah dah dah) shit down here

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I like this one, but I'm still hoping someone puts mouse ears on Vader in the Rogue One hallway scene.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

He-he!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Shouldn't this be part of the post?

8 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 6

If you check the link, it's there. That's a clip from the article.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I completely fucked that up. That’s why I included it here.

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 10

I thought you did good by including the source. That was extra information one could find by reading the article. Thanks for sharing @OP!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They've made it easy to edit posts and fix these kind of mistakes! Even on mobile now!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Huh, whaddya know you’re right

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You don't need to edit your post. People can check the source, or check the comments. You good brah

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

... Well?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No mistakes aloud on imgur ever

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Extrapolated that message loud and clear

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Allowed

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

WHAT?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Maybe I’m in the minority here but I stopped buying EA shit when Origin was released. Ea has been a shitshow for years

8 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 2

Considering they are continuing business practices because people keep buying into their shit. Yes, you are a fraction of a minority.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I see people saying this every once in a while. That's good and all, but you know that99% of their customers don't even knowthere'saproblem?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I stopped buying when they used Origin to region lock me out of English language versions.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yep, that's when the games became harder to access than their fun was worth

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah they have been shit and always disappoint. I try not to buy their games, but I keep getting them for free when I upgrade PC hardware.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ditto. I really want to pick up the Mass Effect games on PC, but ME3 is only through Origin. uPlay, too, except Farcry 3 and Blood Dragon.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I played all 4 mass effects on Origin, it works fine.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I bought ME3, then downloaded a pirated copy. It's still in it's wrapper to this day. Origin isn't great now, but fuck it was terrible then.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nothing wrong with Origin IMO. Works just as well as Steam. That being said, I would've preferred it if I could have all my games on Steam.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

See, you can say that now - but when origin came out (and a LONG time after) it was a total shitshow. They didn't put the effort into /1

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Making a compelling reason for origin to exist, so it seemed like another corporate power play and offered nothing to existing players.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1/2 It had growing pains I suppose, though I never had issues. When it launched I got way better DL speed than on Steam. Competition is good

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 DL speed increased on Steam after that. Many people saying "Origin is shit" are doing it out of habit. Detracts from the real issues.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

EA ruined Spore. I’m still upset about that.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Literally the last game I bought from EA. Never forget

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I was hoping for a real sequel. And Space Age that scaled with the power of your Civ, so you personally didnt have to do everything.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

i have no problem with paying for loot boxes. but only in FTP games. if you purchase a AAA title, you get the whole game. no exceptions.

8 years ago | Likes 1117 Dislikes 22

Since when is this game a AAA tittle? Lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Halo 5 is just as guilty.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think Shadow of War is probably an acceptable compromise. Loot boxes dont unbalance multiplayer.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I just don't want anything in any game that I can't get by a reasonable grind. I would gladly pay for the FTP games if they were fun enough

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me too, only cosmetics would be alright with me too.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Warframe was free, a great game, and just happened to have microtransactions. It's probably the least offensive I've ever seen.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Loot boxes have worked for a number of games and prolonged the length of support the receive tremendously by limiting them to cosmetic items

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Capitalize your sentences, foo!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That seems like a self serving line to draw in the sand. For the love of god people, just don’t buy it! That’s what they’ll listen to!

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

They know that you’re going to buy it anyway! That’s how they sold you lando in a dlc last time. Vote with you wallet, not your tears.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah! ::cough:: GamblingofWar4 ::cough::

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As much as I hate blizzard sometimes. They were right to ban people for selling services for money. They gave in a little though

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As long as you expect zero additions that's fine. But if you want free DLCs etc you gotta expect lootboxes (not talking SW:bf2 here)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Don't like it. = Don't buy it. Capitalism ????

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Titanfall 2 did cosmetic "pay for what you want pack." EA know how to do microtransactions, they just dont.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Can somebody explain those acronyms?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

FreeToPlay, and AAA just means its from a well established publisher

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Then I presume you're willing to pay a lot more for those AAA games, is are you ignoring the fact that process haven't gone up in 15 years?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Developers may need to make more money in AAA games, and there are right and won't ways to do that. P2W is obvi bad, but there are others.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The star cards are the real issue. You can grind for 6 months to max out your potential or you can pay $300 for loot crates instead

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

For those who don't know, or don't want to google. FTP = Free To Play

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

I would like to extend a warm welcome to the Internet for those people as well.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 11

Don't be a cunt

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Too late!

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

Ah, I know that life!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What about aaa

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

First to pay?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly I still have a problem with lootboxes in f2p. Lootboxes are a form of gambling where you might or might not win

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

It doesn't belong in video games where children (and adults) without impulse control can reign free and bankrupt themselves.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I dunno, I compare it to if you played an MMO and each enemy has different drop rates on items. Each kill is equivalent to opening a lootbox

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You don't lose cash killing enemies in MMOs, though. Except that one where it's a registered bank so you can make withdrawals.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah but they sometimes sell attack scrolls, (faster kills more loot rolls), pack mounts (less time between rolls) or increased chance items

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While both works on the Skinners box technique, you don't pay for every mob you defeat.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should children be able to buy Pokemon cards?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think tcg have some of many of the same problems. One major difference is however that you get something tangible and with actual worth.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But there is no doubt that a lot of people have used a rather ridiculous amount of money on games like magic the gathering. It's not ok.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Waframe is the only game where I've seen a ftp model done right

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

I dont want to start a war, but id say League if Legends is doung great at it too.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Path of Exile does it pretty well too.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I still have my Pay to Win fireworks

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Warframe is a great F2P model, but it wouldn't work for everything, especially primarily PvP games.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

You can grind stuff and sell it for the premium currency to players. Awesome system.... Minus the players. Seriously trading in that game...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wts rhino helm, idr stat helm names, 200 plat. W: "deal" go to trade he puts in 50 plat. "That's all I have plz." Or he puts in shitty mods.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Half the time I never get a reply, and when I do it's like 'I don't want, do you have this?' and it's like...no. That's why I'm selling THIS

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes omg I wish we were getting trolled, but sadly that's not the case. Alot of ppl ignore the wtt, wts,wtb and only see what they wanna see.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which, half the time, I ain't even selling! Believe me, I would love to sell you that item, but I DON'T HAVE IT! AUUUUUUUUUGH!!! ...sorry.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a long time vet of Warframe, it's ftp model is good but not perfect. Unless you spend plat, your inventory is very small.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think it's the best "ftp" can be to be honest. Nothing is free. It's a product it has to make money

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Part of the benefit though is that you can get Plat without actually spending money. getting the Plat for slots isn't hard at all

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everything that's "necessary" (slots, taters) is also quite cheap as well. Not to mention the occasional login discount too.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'll allow vanity-only items in loot boxes. How Overwatch does it.

8 years ago | Likes 555 Dislikes 28

Kinda agree.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Exactly. Overwatch and Rocket League have the best loot box systems.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I agree with you, +1. Let's sink together

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Agreed. A loot box should never give you an advantage over others if you have the option to buy them. If buying them wasn't an option, then

8 years ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 4

I say let the stuff be in them, but that stuff a low probablility compared to cosmetic stuff.

8 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 8

I'm fine w/ buying power ups, so long as they're available in free play in a reasonable amount of play, guaranteed 100-200h maybe?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 19

1 or 2 hundred hours is more than the normal person plays the game. Try removing your head from your ass.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Overwatch also gives you loot boxes often for free, with no key to open said box [fuck csgop]

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Team fortress 2's unusual system would make boxes/crates for more exiting. You can't trade it anywho so it has no value other than rarity

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Far more*

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm fine with those also. Pay to win is when I draw the line.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

no, fuck that. give them a finger and they'll take your whole gand

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

They don't have creative freedoms with skins. Everything has to be approved by lucasfilm and Disney. Blizzard can literally make anything

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Rocket League is the same with it's crates and DLCs. It's all just aesthetic.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Agreed. Cosmetics only, no gameplay elements. I don't like the random chance though, if I spend $ I want a guaranteed item.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Easy: Pay-to-win == bad. Pay-to-fashion == okay.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Overwatch over does it. Between skins/voice/pose/tags their loot pool is so diluted that if you want anything at all you need to pay for i

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Overwatch is also being investigated for illegal gambling. Same people who are investigating EA

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It’s a terrible system that should be removed all together

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Blizzard handled it correctly. Plus they also hand them out as milestone rewards and all new characters,maps and modes are free.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Titan fall was a good example of this. Even though its EA. Pay a few bucks for a cool paintjob on yer bot but everything else you had earn.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Fuck no. Let me unlock shit from achievements, like old games used to do. Mortal Kombat Deadly Alliance had like a THOUSAND unlocks.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They could have even copied bf1 loot boxes where they were just skins and you unlocked stuff by just playing the game

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's permissible, but still shitty in a paid for game.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I won't pay for cosmetic items in Overwatch. Because I can't. I have to buy Gambleboxes in hopes of getting what I want.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and counterstrike

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was gonna make a joke about how that's a funny way to spell Team Fortress 2, but every comment after yours also only references Overwatch.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dilly Dilly

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But the stupid thing is because people allowed it in overwatch it made more money which gave other developers the idea so fuck overwatch

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

With overwatch the non-game changing look crates allow flr the free conte t that's frequently released

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

It's sold 35 million copies. That's $1.4 billion at $40 each. The life cycle of the game can run on that. Fuck lootboxes in paid games.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The items you get in Overwatch do not help you win. They are just skins, emotes, voices and stickers.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except OW wasn't the first. CSGO and TF2 both had lootboxes before OW

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Loot boxes are a thing in over watch because they are skins and nothing more. If you needed them to unlock characters it would not fly.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes but it started loot boxes in none F2P games which led to other developers doing it because it made more money over a longer period

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still don't agree with them even at cosmetic only changes as it still promotesgambling. If they are after 1 item in particular then it...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

May take several tries to get the one you want. One person could by 1 and get it, someone else could buy 10 and stop have it. ...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The only microtransactions I agree with are those for single player (if the game isn't deliberately designed to push the player to buy)...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And cosmetic only in multiplayer. In both cases you should be able to see exactly what you are paying for. Random rewards should be earned..

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Battle.net actually has a lot of parental controls if parents bother to monitor the accounts.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Then don't fucking buy it. Unlike battlefront there is literally no reason to purchase loot boxes in overwatch unless you like costumes.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Found the overwatch fanboy. Why get so defensive of a company that's trying to exploit people that are willing to put more money into it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I don't buy loot boxes. They are just a Shitty thing to do to loyal customers. Let people buy what they want, not random shit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Even that's iffy for me. "Give an inch, they take a mile". That's how we got here. EA saw that people didn't care about Overwatch and (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 11

EA has had pay to win loot crates since Mass Effect 3 at least. It all depends on the company.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can see here who is a Jimquisition subscriber. Overwatch does not use the same tactics as FTP gambling strategies. Bad scapegoat.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 24

Overwatch was fine until they started pulling the limited time event bull crap. You could either play frantically for 2 weeks or pay money

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Yeah it would be fine if they didn't shift the whole focus of the game to limited event items you have to gamble for if you really want them

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Multiple people can have the exact same opinion

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Also, it does. It's not a pay to win, sure, but it still creates a haves/have nots environment. It uses the same maybe you'll get it (1/

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

But the key factor is having an advantage, not having a thing. That's how I look at it, anyways. Skins, tags, and icons give zero advantage

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

this time. Oh, bad luck, try again" mentality as slot machines. It's a perfect example and the example that while, not as bad, started it (2

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

said, "what if we did that, but pushed it even further". It's only a matter of time before people get apathetic and stop fighting. (2/2)

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 5

Because EA didn't understand/care why it was acceptable when Overwatch and others did it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm ok with overwatch doing it because they don't have a season pass for their game and will continue to make free content for their game.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's why you fight here. Show them that some are acceptable but not all. Define the grey area.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

EA did it in Battlefield with crates that gave you weapon attachments. This was only taking it further.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0