Gene Editing MADNESS (OCish)

Nov 25, 2016 9:57 AM

makieru

Views

121637

Likes

2471

Dislikes

40

Molecular Biologist's Porn

This is the crispr/cas9 enzyme in action. It has bound to a molecule of DNA at a specific site that can be dictated by us! Once bound it can cleave the DNA molecule at that site. Many people describe this thing as “molecular scissors”.

Big Blue

What is this thing? The molecule labelled “guide sequence” is just that. It is a snippet of RNA that can bind to DNA. The guide sequence is the "gps" of the whole shebang. The molecule labeled “other thing” is another snippet of RNA that is required for the guide sequence to associate with the big blue blob. The big blue blob that is labeled “CAS9” is the enzyme that does the cutting here. It’s the molecular scissors of the system. So we have our GPS (guide sequence) and our scissors (CAS9)

Viral Poop

Where did it come from? The system was first identified in archaea and bacteria and were thought to be a way for these organisms to defend themselves from viral infection: the CAS enzymes cut up the viral DNA and save pieces of it to the bacterial genome for easier detection in future attacks. Above I mentioned the “guide sequence” and the “other thing”. In nature the “guide sequence” and the “other thing” comes from the bacteria’s genome. They guide the scissors to specific spots on the viral genome and cut the DNA rendering the virus harmless.

IT'S ALIVE!

the “guide sequence” can be made so that you can target any sequence you want. Additionally, the “other thing” that helps the “guide sequence” work with the big blue blob can be turned into one molecule. Guide sequence + other thing = one big RNA molecule that acts as the guide and binds to the big blue blob. Notice here that there is one large RNA molecule cuddling with big blue blob as opposed to what we saw earlier with two RNA molecules in a ménage à trois with big blue blob.

Ok all together now

Our big blue blob that's cuddling with our RNA guide sequence will bind to a DNA molecule. It'll unzip the DNA and test if the guide sequence matches the DNA. If there is no match, nothing happens and it falls off and continues its quest. If there is a match between the guide sequence and the the target DNA the enzyme will "cut" the DNA on both strands. (insert george takei oh my meme)

Who cares?

Glad you asked. The implications and potential applications are waaaaaaaay out there! With this tool one can literally edit genomes to delete genes, inactivate genes, mutate genes, introduce new genes and more. Scientists have used it to delete HIV virus (active AND latent) from cells in culture. They've used it to stop genes from working in mice brains. It's a work in progress but it's already doing friggin awesome things.

Sauces

Delicious Sauces:
HIV viral load reduced in human cell culture: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep22555
mice genes turned on/off: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep20611
Video source of gifs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pp17E4E-O8

A cool, more detailed infographic on here about CRISPR from @Portis403 : http://imgur.com/gallery/WpgWFsO

called it ocish cause I didn't make any of the content beyond using imgur to create gifs and gifntext (http://www.gifntext.com/) to add captions to gifs.

--------------shitty fp edit---------------

do people want more stuff like this? cause upvoting this is how you get me to make more stuff like this.

I say CRISPR like 7 time per day. Imma be adding "viral poop" to my lingo.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a molecular biologist, I can confirm. This is porn to us. I mean, look at it unzipping those genes...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#3 ...Sigh, *unzips*

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lobster DNA for eternal youth!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As I molecular biologist, I cannot control my own erection

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The only thing stopping us creating amazing and horrible things is ethics.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Username finally relevant

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

So pretty

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The mitochondria is the power house of the cell

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually totally checks out - currently taking high level micro-bio courses, really interesting, accurate, good quality, +1 for you sir!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone can weaponize this with scary implications.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

"Crispr Cas-9, Bring me a geeeeene. You wondrous ribonucleoprotein' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k99bMtg4zRk

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

CRISPR is so cool!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you want splicers? Because this is how you get splicers.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I have a cancer research lab and we use crispr every day. It is truly revolutionary.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

What models are you using?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hear it's a bitch to get to work though. I know several people that are using it and they all ended up hating it :D

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It depends on how good you are at cell sorting :) ......

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You have a cancer research lab as in you're a PI?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

das so cool.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Am I the only one who thinks this might go pretty bad?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No. Some scientists are calling for legislation or at least thinking about potential negative consequences of such technology

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you have any examples from the smarticians?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would highly recommend watching the in a nut shell video for this. Explains it all and the benefits of it but also the possible cons

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

https://youtu.be/jAhjPd4uNFY

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

oh nice video!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except TALENs were around for years before CRISPR

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are other toolkits too. This just happens to be one I dug into

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Motor protein: http://imgur.com/3syZ5kB

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GATTICA!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Gattaca- the reason why the spelling is important is because the letters g c t a represent DNA bases

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

hey, thanks

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

fucking love molecular biology. miss learning this stuff. makes me wanna go back to school.

9 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 0

I'm 31 and just went back to Uni to do a Masters and now I'm using CRISPR to make yeast my bitch

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

im going to apply next fall. cant wait actually. hopefully i can get my masters paid for.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm 24. I applied to med school last year. Best decision in my entire life.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm 25! I'm a D2! The two years I took off between undergrad and dental school were awesome. I feel bad for kids who didn't take a break.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't take a break T.T

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Where are you studying/ what degree are you pursuing if you don't mind me askin?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

phd in school of med in washington state

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

what's stopping ya?

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

myself..... of course. nah but i plan on applying next fall. just took some time to work industry. too routine tho. too boring.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

did you go into industry right from undergrad?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

ya i did. graduated and got a job really fast. but two years is enough and i cant wait to go back.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

phd or masters?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you imgur for explaining a concept more clearly than my genetics prof does

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's quite high praise!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you for sharing this. The public debate is way behind CRISPR's crucial technology. Ps: first comment!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

CRISPR is still a pain in the ass though. The embryonic implants can have a low yield. There are programs to offset costs (NIH funded).

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Compared to all previous gene editing systems it's like the discovery of electricity.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Lol. No it isn't dude. Conditional KO/KI using loxP-Cre can do quite a bit. And RNAi still has multiple advantages given focus on message

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I get the impression that you've never actually done anything with Cas9...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

LOL. your point of linking that paper? How does that paper show superiority over TALONs, promoter-specific or AAV-Cre vectors, or RNAi?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You mean aside from explaining how it's superior?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

When I first found out about this 9 months ago I said evolution is dead. Slow random changes can never compete with deliberate fast changes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yea but bacteria evolve in real time. E.coli has 100 generations every day. Those bastards evolve like mofos.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That may be true for microbes, but Homo Superior will be arrived at via intentional gene editing and not evolution.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless superbugs kill us all before that :)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Huntington's Disease runs in my family. Could this technology help us adults before we start presenting symptoms?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes. Source I work with crispr

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You would need a crispr that targets the polyglutamine repeat of huntingtin protein. It would cut the bad end of the protein off.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

is there a specific tissue that would need to be treated in this case or would it need to be universal delivery to all cells?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great question. Probably just neurons would be enough

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How difficult would it be to get the viral vector past the blood/brain barrier?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@makieru I LOVE YOU TOO BOO! I love your post, it reminds me of our college days

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm thinking about making a pcr one and one about mitochondria

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You were so preoccupied with whether or not you could, you didn't think about whether you should. For the record, you should. Definitely.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

Dinosaurs baby

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But we have no way of knowing so I say we go for it. Will find the youtube link also

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You should watch the youtube video done by "In a nut shell" on crispr. Towards the end it explains pros and cons for it. The cons could suck

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

First line, "Imagine you were alive back in the eighties." Also Rick at 3:36.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We already live in a world where people are discriminated against for imperfections.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The cost of not trying will be greater than trying and failing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Kurzgesagt*

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nope. They changed the name.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, they're called Kurzgesagt - In a Nutshell.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can this be used to give my biological immortality, super strength and personality editing?

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

No, but it'll give you the ability to create dank memes

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not quite biological immortality, but it can definitely add more genes of strength in your body

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

According to Ray kurzweil we'll have biological immortality in like 30 years.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but this process isn't quite FOR biological immortality so much as immunity

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pretty much. In fact, those three fields are all being studied on (albeit no active clinical trial in any of the three yet.)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

God they really need to get a move on on the first one. Being the last person in history to die of old age is going to suck for someone.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes no possibly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure, but you better double-check for typos. You dont want nipples on your forehead, do you?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Technically it can let you edit personality, but it's much easier to do it embryonically. What you're talking about requires lac operons

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hopefully active genetic modification for 'living' people will take off sometime soon.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hope so too! It's the field I'm going into, so I hope it takes off

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ironically, @OP and I always have talks about this

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And switching genes coding for certain traits on and off

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you really wanted an inpact, it has to be done on an embryo. It's really difficult to apply in adults

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

This sounds very promising, at least in tissues with enough regenerative potential. There has been success with SCID and LAD too

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

More difficult than turning an adult back into an Embryo? I'm all for it, but I kinda want the benefits too.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You can clone yourself, but the resulting individual won't be you

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Boo. I'll keep my fingers crossed for nano-tech to hopefully do this level of gene editing for living people.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gene editing is one thing, but many expressed traits can't just be reversed or changed by editing a gene, e.g. aging, alzheimers

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't that increases the risk of cancer

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Are you asking if using this tool in an organism would increase the risk for cancer?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't downvote this guy-he is technically correct due to off target effects of crispr

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Thanks but I don't care about fake internet points.and I forgot to add a question mark at the end.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Ugh as someone working with siRNAs currently, off target effects can suck it!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

also don't downvote him because he asked a legitamate question,

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Currently in clinical trial in the US and China to cure two different types of cancer. Also, no, why?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was just thinking altering the cell could accidentally damage it in a way it would form a cancer cell. I'm a truck driver not a doctor jim

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You don't need to be a doctor to understand that this can turn out to be highly cancerous! So good call!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Cancer happens when a cell's normal mechanism for self-termination doesn't work. So no, there's basically zero chance of it causing cancer.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Don't be ridiculous. Human science has never gone wrong or had unintended consequences or been misused in an way!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm crossing my phalanges for super zombies some 28 days later shit

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0