For every woman that voted for the orange idiot

May 3, 2022 3:13 PM

batteryforeverlow

Views

180430

Likes

3214

Dislikes

180

BECAUSE YOU WERE INDOCTRINATED FOR 2 DECADES BY THE GOP TO HATE HILLARY! She's not likeable but she's certainly no monster.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Democrats have the ability to codify rvw into law through congress, but are instead doing nothing. We voted them in!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They will do it again. Owning the libs is the most important thing in their lives.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yeah I hate Hillary, still voted for her in the general election, but voted against her in the DNC primaries, lesser of 2 evils in 2016

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The US. Where i am forced to vote for candidates i despise in a party i despise because the others are worse

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Notice to all young people who DIDN'T vote for Hilary because she wasn't Bernie. That gave us Trump. Trump screwed SCOTUS. VOTE OK?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

I didn’t like Hillary. So I voted for Bernie in the primary. But I happily voted for her in the general. To hell with trump.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Imagine what the results might have been if people had been able to vote by preference at the general instead of simply ticking one circle.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“There should be no welfare because women should be married.” MTG

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

As if she ever had them in front of her. What she knows of "history" she learned from her church and from her idiot friends/parents.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I believe she was actually referring to the books in the Bible at the time.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wouldn’t it be safe to assume that these same women are against choice?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. So many said that he would never go as far as Roe. Even I, a hardcore leftist, said the same up until ACB’s confirmation.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Had this convo with a GOP voting coworker 20 years ago about the GOP wanting to overturn Roe vs Wade. She said "they wouldn't do that!". yep

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I miss when the front page was memes. I don’t open Imgur for political stuff. Go to Facebook. On here I can’t filter out your bullshit.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or didn’t vote as a form of “protest”

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

The protest vote or how to hold your breath until the other guy passes out.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And everyone that stayed home because "bOtH siDeS bAd".

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

well least you outing yourself i guess, if you gonna use everyone

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

"everyone that stayed home" =/= "everyone". I actually voted. 80 million eligible voters in this country did not.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yes.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

For everyone of voting age.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The democrats have had opportunity after opportunity to fix this. I don't think Hillary would have done shit

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

She would not have nominated justices specifically selected to overturn Roe and Obergefell, as was the stated goal of Trump’s 3 picks.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You got me there. I'll keep that in mind. Thanks.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hillary sucked. I voted for her because I understand politics. But if she was the progressive best then we are really in trouble.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

This was the sentiment among many that ended up still voting for her, Ranked choice would help most that did not vote H went third party

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Confirmed. Back in '17 i was at a muay thai camp and met a Texan. When i asked if she'd voted Trump she said "Absolutely, I wouldn't vote..

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For that lying beeyatch". I found ot staggering that she thought T was honest. She even left a VIP seated muay thai event early to go and..

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Watch Trump's inauguration in the middle of Bangkok. But then she barely had 2 brain cells to rub together.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you wanna play the hindsight blame-game (and you clearly do), just as much fault lies on the centrists who let HRC run unopposed & voted

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

to nominate her despite how widely disliked she was outside the party. FFS, after 30y+ of lecturing leftists about how primaries are about

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

general-election "electability" and not how popular a candidate is in the party, you'd think centrists wouldn't have backed HRC - but of

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

course they never meant that, they just meant "only centrists should be allowed to win primaries". If HRC hadn't faced Trump, it would have

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

been a landslide GOP win instead of a narrow EC win & we'd still be seeing Roe overturned right now b/c any Rep would put up the same judges

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Something I don't get as a European is how you guys need a leak to know that kind of law is about to get passed.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

A law isn't being passed. That's done by the legislature. This is a supreme court opinion.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

An opinion on a case law if I understand correctly, isn't that somehow changing the legal frame?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is most likely. Citizens have no say in supreme court opinions.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Citizens elect the president, who in turn nominates the supreme court members precisely for their opinions. I'd say citizens do have a say.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not in the written opinion. Enough dumb fucks elected a cheeto who appointment three hypocrites.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Supreme Court decides if a law is "legal" under the constitution. This rule will pave the way for each state to enact anti-abortion law

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The overt racist Trump got more black votes than Romney, by far. How can anything but misogyny explain that?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It appears to be a wider trend friend. Republicans have been picking up black votes in higher numbers. Consider that your avg gen y or z >

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Was not around to see any significant social progress from the govt on that front. Hell 1 of the only good things we've seen them do is >

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Legalize gay marriage. But on race...? If you are a young person and you are outraged by racist police brutality so you turn to politics.>

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The conservatives just deny the problem, what do dems do? Well they sure act like they care... but they sure don't seem open to acting on>

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It. This has def caused some disillusionment, they feel used for their vote without actually ever seeing any of the promised change. >

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She was just too qualified. Better to let a rich man without any experience give it a go.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Oct 5, 2025 8:06 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Every fucking politician lies. That seems to be the main part of the job :(

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She definitely would not have packed the Supreme Court with ultra conservatives.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 471 Dislikes 14

2016 platform: drain the swamp. 2020 platform: refusing to denounce white supremacists in a presidential debate. That escalated quickly

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1st time., you are an idiot that got conned. 2nd time you are a literal Nazi. At this point anyone still Republican is a Nazi.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

The damage was done with the first vote though, so not really forgivable.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Forgivable enough to not lynch them on sight. Nazi's on the other hand....

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For some reason I thought he was talking about Obama. I think it's because I can't even imagine voting for Orange Dumpty. ?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Still some progress. Sigh...

3 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 4

Improving yourself isn't good enough for the crazies.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 37

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted May 4, 2022 5:34 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'll take the crazies over the fascist simps any day of the year.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

I never said you shouldn't. I have no idea what people honestly took away from my comment to elicit this reaction.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

my friend said she voted for Trump because she "didn't know there was anyone else"

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The cringe is strong with this one.

3 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 4

Good on him for not voting the second time though. I feel like that was harder for a lot of people than not voting for him the first time.

3 years ago | Likes 162 Dislikes 8

Secret Ballot. No one is ever coerced.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not everyone can just lie to the people they care about either without remorse. Just because they're fucking idiots doesn't mean I don't 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

care about the Trumpers in my family. They've been brainwashed by Fox. 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was. I am shunned by my family because of it. It was the right thing to do and that's what matters

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

While I don’t agree with voting for him in 2016 for a long list of reasons, good for you for changing your mind after 4 years of evidence.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, but I have a hard time with this. Doing the right thing the second time doesn't change how many red flags they ignored the first time

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 7

K

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Don't forget Ruth Bader Ginsburg's selfish decision to not to retire set up this slam dunk for republicans.

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 12

It's very likely we're seeing the broad decision we're seeing now instead of chipping away at Casey precisely b/c it's a 6-3 majority vs 5-4

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's a garbage take. When, exactly, was she supposed to retire? A decade ago?

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

She was supposed to retire under Obama's presidency, people were calling for her to retire then knowing she wouldn't last. Here we are

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yes or at least when Obama brought her into the WH and asked her to because he saw this coming.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The only reason she didn't retire was to try and prevent trump from nominating a new justice. Mitch McConnell blocked Obamas attempt.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yeah she should have retired before that during Obama's term before the end of it. People were calling for it and she refused.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

She couldn't. Obama couldn't get a vote on Garland how was he going to get 2 justices through when the Senate was stalling the vote on 1

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

She could have done it earlier instead they kicked the can down the road so there was 0% chance of a Democrat getting in.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Almost like there is some merit behind "vote blue no matter who". Fight to make sure progressives wins in the primary, but if they lose

3 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 8

If we have to vote like that just to avoid catastrophe, then the core issue is that our voting system is ASS

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

at least you are voting for candidate that wont be likily to take your rights away or appoint judges that will. Its called damage control

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

sucker

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

There's merit for strategic voting, not "vote blue no matter who". As long as there's no consequence for ignoring voters, the party machine

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Spoken like an extremist who will gladly throw our lives away just to prove a point.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Spoken like a straight white male who can't imagine any real harm coming from a fascist administration or evangelical judges.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

has no incentive not to - they'll keep winning primaries & safe districts while driving away & disillusioning voters who drop out bc nothing

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

changes for the better - it just stays the same or gets worse. You can't say every election is an existential threat to the nation but then

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

go back to doing nothing and acting like everything is fine as soon as you're elected. You also can't win elections when you don't run any

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

serious campaigns but that's the DNC SOP. We've been getting spanked since Dean was replaced as DNC chair & we abandoned the 50-state strat.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

When the opponents are fascists - they need to be DESTROYED, no matter what, because them winning means no more voting at all.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Are the opponents fascists, or good-conscious conservatives we can & want to work with?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

The GOP has made their political identity extremely clear, now - they're fascist, not merely conservative.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Okay. So why aren't the Democrats we keep electing acting like it? Their actions don't match their rhetoric. Continuously re-electing them

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You can't act like we're on the brink of losing the republic only up until you win the election. You need to KEEP acting like it or it's all

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

too clear you don't actually believe it and are just saying that to stir up the base while keeping the balance of power unchanged.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Yep - this is the problem with authoritarians, they only need to win ONCE - everyone else has to will EVERY TIME.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's both painful AND hilarious that Hillary lost in her own demography.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

She won the popular vote

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

52% of white women (What Hillary is) voted Trump.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is true, point taken.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To be fair, I feel like fascist tendencies were brewing before Trump, he just bridged the ideas with reality. America sucks atm

3 years ago | Likes 336 Dislikes 28

And people seem to be just posting memes about it non stop instead of doing something meaningful to change that.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Fascist tendencies exist at all points in time. There is always a segment of society that desires fundamentalist rule.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep. He didn't create the corruption, he exposed it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to be faaaaaair

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly. And it worked, which is why we now have MTG and Boebert turning those tendencies up to 11.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump is an extreme of what's been happening for years now. They're the same branch that bush and Palin are from I think

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People so dumb you just don't understand how they don't have like a competency test to become president.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

He made it ok for them to say the quiet part out loud.

3 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 0

If anybody thinks that this is hyperbole... Jan 6th riots. They'll beat a cop to death with a flag pole if Trump tells em it's ok.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Been brewing since Waco and OKC the 9/11 happened and it subdued but then a black man got elected POTUS and all of this is fallout

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yup already packing my bags & trying to figure out where to go

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish I could leave, but I have no degree, no marketable skills, and only speak English. My wife and I are likely to be trapped here

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Every country still needs workers even those without degrees

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most CDL drivers don't have degrees but it's a necessary cog to an economy

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They were. Just look at the militarization of the police, the Patriot Act, the NSA etc. The pieces have been in motion a long time.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This flick (while quite and Im certain if I watched now might cringe ) helped show me : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNNeVu8wUak

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I made this a while ago, use liberally:

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be fair, of all the GOP candidates in the 2016 primary Trump was the one who gave Clinton her best chance of winning. Which is depressing

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, a HUGE part of Trump being elected was the DNC rejecting Sanders. Imo Bernie Sanders would have beat Trump. America is so weird.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

The DNC didn't want to take the chance that Sanders was too far left to get the popular vote. They got the popular vote but lost the fight.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Biden would have beaten Trump. Hell, Kaine at the top of the ticket would probably have beaten Trump. HRC was the best GOP GOTV imaginable.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

2016 was my first presidential election and I didn't understand the game. I protest voted the presidency and instead voted down ballot. >

3 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 11

At least you will never do that again

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Possibly never have the right to vote ever again in a few years.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish people would quit spewing hate for voting 'down ballot'. If all those 'neither of them' voters had voted down ballot, it is possible

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

nobody would've gotten a majority, and we'd learn that a duopoly doesn't represent us properly.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

That's not how it works. You don't need more than 50%, there's always someone with the most electoral votes.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

If no candidate receives an absolute majority of electoral votes, the election is determined by the House of Representatives. It CAN happen.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We could have enough '3rd party' votes to win states, and thus lead to a 3 way no majority draw in the Electoral College.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Lots of "ifs" in that sentence. Pretty privileged to roll those dice, yes? Especially now in hindsight with abortion about to banned.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, at least I didn't vote for Mango Mussolini either time. I went blue so we'd be sure to dump that chump in 2020.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We voted Joe biden and a majority congress into office and they are still sleeping on this. We need stronger leaders.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

we need a real majority. do you even read the papers ?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We need leaders that actually fight for stuff and use the power they have. Keep making excuses for Biden and you will keep losing the issues

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is no dem majority with 2 repubs in disguise

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

We didn't, though. We gave him 48 progressives and 2 conservative Democrats in the Senate.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And with that ge has the power to do something. Anything. Even if he didnt he could at least fight for it politically. Quit making excuses.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

If you ever run into your middle school civics teacher, give them a big fuck you from the rest of us.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Pressure youre politicians instead of shaming your voters loser.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Holy shit of all the elections to learn about the futility of a protest vote. Still, you voted. Better than a majority of the county.

3 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Yeah. I thought I was a know-it-all young college student. I hated both options but I remember crying when it was clear Trump tool the vote.

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

How did you hate both options? The Fuck was wrong with Hillary? Do you know anything about her? Did you care to find out? Pisses me off

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

Rip me for my opinion, fine but I didn't think she was nearly progressive enough & was hiding her religious ideology. I just didn't like her

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Part of me also didn't like the idea of the first female prez being there "just because her husband was there" bullshit line either but >

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

*took

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I still don’t get your system.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'm American and I don't get it either tbh

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Bigger state more important, fuck your population

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Very democratic

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Too democratic ;)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It is very simple. Follow the money.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me either and I live in this shit hole country.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Each state is worth a certain number of points. You win the presidency by having the most points, not the most votes.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Thank you, dear.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For some fucked up reason, largely empty states have too many points, and those states tend to vote for assholes.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The reason is selfish people choose to live far from other people. It helps facilitate their selfishness.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am fucking horrified now. Keep your fucking hands off my uterus.

3 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 8

Well, well, well. If it isn't the consequences of your own actions.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The terrifying news is that this will be voted on soon and they will overturn Roe v Wade.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And Casey. And soon maybe Obergefell

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Kudos to you for having the honor and integrity to realize your mistakes. My first vote was for W in 2002. The shame still motivates me.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Okay. So you have learned. Its important to be informed and stay informed. Voting is so very important, especially in the midterms. These 1/

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Are the people that actually make the laws. You want to be careful who you choose.

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

And local elections. Please don’t forget about local elections.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Thats right!

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep, and that vote had consequences. And you need to accept them. These are the consequences.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I hear you, I did not like Hillary, but I did not like Trump, I figured Hilary had it so I just left the presidency blank...

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Regardless of the unlikely uphill battle, I voted Gary Johnson, because I'd rather vote for somebody than throw my hands up and vote nobody.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

This should be a confession bear

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Why so people can downvote it? I shared my mistake here, lost enough points doing that.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Let the shame of that motivate you to do better in the future. I still hate myself for voting W in 2002, my very first vote at 18.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Motivation has lready done it's job, I voted all blue last round, what you think Georgia flipped out of randomness. :)

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I admit, I wrote in Bernie Sanders bc I was so angry. But now I've been beaten into submission to vote blue... No matter who.. And it sucks

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I want Bernie. I don't want anyone 60+ in office but fuck, I'll take what I can get... and even then we couldn't get him.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yep fuck the dnc

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

She was a terrible candidate. Status Quo corporate Democrat. I fully believe Bernie would have won against Trump.

3 years ago | Likes 254 Dislikes 59

Do you even know what Trump did? Get off your high horse. You are the problem, and proud of it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Would it help to know I voted for both Clinton and Biden against Trump? I recognize how detrimental he is, but Dems need to be better.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Personality aside, purely based on professional positions she's held, she might've been the most qualified candidate of all time

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Bernie couldn't even get a majority of the Democrats to vote for him.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 11

As someone who phone-banked for Bernie, He would have lost as soon as the "breadlines"/"socialist" quotes hit the news cycle.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm still waiting for a time traveller to appear so we all have a memory of trump and Epstein dying in a plane crash in the 80's

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dems definitely deserve their share of thr blame for forcing an unlikable status quo candidate on a country that was demanding change.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

He seems to convert people whenever he goes on fox news. He would have crushed Trump. We need a government full of bernies

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bernie lost to Hillary by millions of votes. The Bernie thing is always going to be a fantasy with little connection to reality.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bernie proved that we need Instant Runoff Voting or else we'll NEVER be able to actually answer this fucking question....

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Most of the primary votes against him weren't because they didn't like his policies over Hillary's. It was merely fear of losing to Trump.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But that's all just gonna live on as speculation BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE INSTANT RUNOFF VOTING.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If Bernie is so different from Hillary why would the people who voted for her have voted for him?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bernie honestly did more as a Senator during that time than I believe Congress would've let him get away with as President.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

By 2020, after 30 years, Sanders had sponsored 422 bills, and only three became law. Two of those three were renaming post offices.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

we know dude, we've always known

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

She was also compromising on abortion before even becoming the nominee and picked an anti abortion running mate.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or how GOP/Russian propaganda affected you too. They would have been just as effective smearing Bernie.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I disagree with your notion of me and your opinion. Democrats should criticize other Dems to make the party better.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Bernie would have been smeared sure, by both GOP and corporate media. But the movement he started is still going.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

He had support of voters both on the left and right. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanders%E2%80%93Trump_voters

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I believe any status quo corporate Democrat who wasn't named Clinton would have won. She was the best GOTV the GOP could have asked for.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

She campaigned poorly, thinking she had won. She ignored several swing states.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And let's be clear, Fair Trade Capitalism isn't the devil. It is OK to make money if you treat workers fairly.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She did win the popular vote by a healthy margin.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah. We know who voted for Trump and who sat home. Bigots and closet bigots.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I wholeheartedly disagree even as someone who agrees with his policies. Florida proved he had no chance.

3 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 19

Good chance he would have taken votes from Trump overall if he was the nominee. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Republicans hate Bernie even more than the Clintons. A lot of Dems would not even vote for him. It was pretty clear to watch.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

A lot of dems didn't vote at all cause Hilary and Trump were undesirable.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump's win was pretty narrow, so it is definitely possible. Unlikely much more than a narrow win but possible.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

tRump did not narrowly win in the 2016 election he lost the popular vote. He wasn't elected by the voters, he was elected by the power base

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ya, that is how Presidential elections work in the US.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a non-zero chance the "Bernie or Bust" movement was pushed via active measures from Moscow. Split and suppress the Dem vote.

3 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 9

Nah, they weren't Russians, just idiots who were so mad about Bernie not being candidate, they'd rather burn the whole place down.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I hadn't thought of that. Thanks. Now I am more sad. (Legit I agree w/ you, I just hadn't thought of this until now.)

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Happened in the 2019 election in the UK. The opposition vote got split so much the Tories won despite dog shit numbers.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's the dumbest thing I've heard all day. Congrats.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Why?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I dunno. Radical left has successfully been demonized, the far right keeps getting normalized, and precarity deters people from getting =>

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 5

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Our "radical left" is European centrist.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And far right American is radical left Middle East. It's almost as if cultures are different around the world...

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

involved into politics. Not a very encouraging trend for moderates if you want my opinion. Nor for any rational person for that matter...

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

To be fair they use the same attacks they do on the "far left" on centrists so worrying abt republicans attacking them on it seems like a>

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lose lose battle.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We haven't had a radical left since the Weather Underground.

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

That's the point. Corporate dems and rebups are funded by the same billionaires. They don't care what the policies are they just want money>

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So they tell the dems to sit down and shut up, because the alternative is giving power to the people and making them pay taxes>

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The elite are willing to watch this world burn if it gives them more money. So if the right wing promises not to do anything to hurt their>

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe, but that also ignores that Bernie just isn't popular enough to actually win the primary. Not in 2016 or 2020.

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 9

Shhh Bernie bros hate that fact

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 14

Such a reductive thing to say

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Considering how negative a reaction I get whenever I point out that he lost by a significant margin, it seems true

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good chance he would have taken votes from Trump overall if he was the nominee. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The difference would have been small if it existed. That may have been enough, but still a narrow election.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The DNC rigged the primary against bernie in 2016. It was a pretty big story.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 6

Yes, if memory serves Tulsi Gabbard even stepped down as chair from it out of protest.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Tulsi Gabbard cares about what is best for Tulsi Gabbard. Her actions are proof of nothing.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was fooled by her for a year or 2. I agree she is opportunistic.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not even feasible on a national scale. It's far past time to grow up about that.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Members of the dnc conspiring to run negative stories? Their actions were inexcusable and anti democratic.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aside from the fact that it didn't actually happen, that's not remotely an example of a "rigged primary."

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good god, it wasn't rigged. Jesus Christ. Dems allowed him to run in their primary, he accepted the rules, and then proceeded to lose 1/

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

high turnout/high vote primaries, and largely won low turnout/low vote primary/caucuses. He lost by millions of votes. And super- 2/

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

delegates have NEVER gone against the person who won the most votes. He blew off the super-delegates. So he knew the rules, accepted 3/

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1