MRW something something title whatever

Feb 25, 2016 9:52 PM

RonSwansonApproves

Views

163749

Likes

7341

Dislikes

187

If you want to win the game then you should play by the rules (imo).

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This will help me in so many situations

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I once had a troll attack my grammar. In that case, my grammar was correct and when I gave him sources/proof he got pretty pissed :)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not 15 mins ago I had someone accuse me of using a logical fallacy... they spelled the logical fallacy wrong. I agree with the meme.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

It usually when someone reduces themselves to name calling and "you are [ignorant/stupid/childish/etc.]" statements that I quit on them

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Haha au contraire, *shoots guy in face with gun* I seem to be the only one standing now!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I get tihs all teh tmie

10 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

You spelled 'egt' wrong...

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I think I may have a use for this tonight, in an argument I'm having RIGHT NOW.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's the image from the You Are Not So Smart podcast. I recommend checking it out if you haven't yet! :D http://youarenotsosmart.com/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fyck these guys

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Fuck*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Good collection !!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

haha all the comments in this thrad are so carefully worded

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't know, seems like if you're correct then you should come correct.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ad hominem + fallacy fallacy

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I am one of these people, it's fun. Especially when the other person starts to doubt themselves over punctuation that is actually correct.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is this Mr. B?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Discounting an argument due to grammar issues is stupid but I'm not against criticizing someone''s delivery if a valid point comes first.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Son of a bitch ...

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I get around this by not being shitty at spelling

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Au contraire: A mere 9 hours ago you said "My buddies little bro" when it should have been "My buddy's little bro".

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nice research. That wasn't in an argument though

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 4

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am going to troll the internet with this and a few other memes from this thread for ages! Mwa ha ha ha

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

you got any more of these?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure if this has any different ones from the links @mirria already provided or not. http://m.imgur.com/a/QDbyt#

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah, I need to save this for later

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Always upvote Ed Hoculi.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I need the rest of these.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If you ever think your argument is profound, then you are probably a blithering idiot.

10 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jul 15, 2016 9:34 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Your joke confuses me. I am but a simple farmer.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you ever think an argument is profound, you haven't heard many

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

+1 for blithering

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Thanks

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who is this directed to? Is every apologist or rhetorician a blithering idiot?

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

It is directed to any person who has the gall to think they are profound.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Steam discussion threads.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If it's only one mistake, it should overlooked. But if you call someone stupid, and make constant errors. You deserve ridicule.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

insulting is not arguing,is just harassment

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Be overlooked*. Sorry, but I had to.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What if someone didn't get the chance to enjoy any education but nevertheless has valuable things to say?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Then they should be humble enough not to call other people stupid.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Every idiot online ever. Not smart enough to pay attention to what your saying and too stubborn to try. FML

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

you're*

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Ah,yet another of the 95% of people on the internet that uses the wrong "your" while calling others idiots. A trend worth thinking about.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

*you're

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

*you're

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Bookmarked for the next time someone claims to win an argument because of spelling. (this happens seriously too fucking often.)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's called "fucking with you." It's what people do when they realize the conversation has become fruitless.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would only accept that if the people weren't so flat faced serious about that being proof that every argument I've made was wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I go into every internet argument with the expectation that it will devolve into a string of ad homs and Hitler comparisons (so uh, ad homs)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

While this may be a decently probable outcome of a discussion that does not mean that every person who's arguments get defeated at every~

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

~~~apposed to a chance to test the metle of their beliefs against scrutiny. Maybe have their opinions changed.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

~~logical fallacies so want a new one to 'win the argument' with. What I hate is how everyone sees a discussion as something to be won. As~

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

~turn then decides to be funny when they notice a spelling error. More often they are out of valid arguments and know the traditional~

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Attacking the spelling behind an argument should be seen as equivalent to an ad hominem attack. If you engage in those tactics, you lose

10 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 10

Argumentum ad grammaticam.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I usually point it out alongside my argument. It should never be mentioned on its own though, unless the statement is incomprehensible

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What if the original argument is about spelling?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fallacies only suggest that the argumentation is wrong, not that the argued point is wrong.

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

I've agreed with an argument while disagreeing with the point, and agreed with the point while disagreeing with the argument.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nah, that's just the fallacy fallacy. Just because the other person added in ad hominem doesn't mean they automatically lose, that's silly.

10 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

They just lose respect and seem less mature, but their argument may still be sound, and should not reflect their stupidity, no?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If their only attack of an argument is ad hominem or spelling, yes it does

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"the person ADDED in"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I see there that the first word of your second sentence isn't capitalized. Your argument is invalid.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

It reflects poorly on their argument if their rebuttals are more focused on the opponent than the subject.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Counter argument though, if you don't care enough to edit your argument for spelling, grammar, etc. I'd discount the argument considerably

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What happens when you deal with people with dyslexia or for whom English isn't their first language?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's no period at the end of your sentence. -1

10 years ago | Likes 454 Dislikes 9

How many times did you check the spelling/grammar on this comment before posting it?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just once. Missing punctuation is easy to notice.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have a bit of an issue with it being all in uppercase. WHY ARE MEMES ALWAYS SHOUTED?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All jokes aside, I've had an issue with that for years. I don't understand why people starting printing everything in all caps.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I read it a few times looking for a spelling error, didn't think to attack the grammar. +1 to you.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I like you.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Your wrong. And you're momma is fat!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're purposely trying to provoke me.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Semantics: the last refuge of the small minded

10 years ago | Likes 304 Dislikes 38

Or the guys who have come to the realization that the argument is going nowhere, so they decide to have a little fun.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Semantics can be super important sometimes. Spelling and grammar less so.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You should have a full stop at the end of your sentence.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The first time I learned that you guys across the pond call them full stops, I was talking to some guy I met in DayZ from the UK. Was cool.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, it can suggest that the person's education isn't too great. And as was said, grammar, not semantics.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Thought that was pedantic?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

As the small minded, can confirm.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The study of meaning? Small minded? I don't get you.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Assholes tend to throw semantic arguments at people when they can't refute the point in question

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anyone who has studied Linguistics knows that spelling and grammar really doesn't matter.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Don't*

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Isn't that a question between prescriptivism and descriptivism, on which there is no universal agreement?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In fact most linguists detest prescriptive grammar; which is the spelling and grammar that schools teach.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Jan 22, 2017 12:00 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Sounds a little ocd

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Sounds a little like you don't know what OCD means :-)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I know what it is, getting all worked up about spelling and unable to ignore it sounds obsessive compulsive.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I actually know what you mean, but it sucks because I feel like I should be able to ignore it, as long as I get the point.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

http://www.gifmambo.com/download/jmg/smart-movies-film-matilda-danny-devito.gif

10 years ago | Likes 290 Dislikes 2

I like how at the end of the gif he just keeps repeating "I'm right, you're wrong."

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually he is only saying that from the beginning

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"I'm big." 5' flat.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Oh, Matilda.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

DeVito is funny telling others he's big... lol

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A live look at Trump and Rubio at tonight's debate

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Only Danny DeVito could make Danny DeVito look tall and menacing. DD was the director of this movie, which blows my mind.

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

THAT WAS DANNY DEVITO???

10 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 0

plot twist: every single actor on every movie is danny devito

10 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Well, when it's not Andy Serkhis.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'd be perfectly fine with this.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Found Danny Devito

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't remember this episode of Always Sunny.

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

He's trying to get into that girls hole

10 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

*Soul

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's what I said

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This makes me so fucking angry.

10 years ago | Likes 1919 Dislikes 20

In a debate then yes, bad grammar will make you lose. A argument is very different.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

But depending on the error... I'm guilty of doing this. :/ That's why I spell check my text arguments like no other!!

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

http://imgur.com/N4Q1KTI You convinced me

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My wife would do this, one fucking slip up and now I'm a total idiot.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

What a cunt eh! Married life is the rocks.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Eh, it just means you were talking to someone who either doesn't want to, or is to dumb to, engage in actual meaningful discourse.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I feel like it's meant to be a joke.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*This make me so fucking angry.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's the point

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So fucking angty.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This makes me so, fucking, angry.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Das macht mich so sauer!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that's precisely why I do it >:)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

Fluck this spit, I'm shout

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Even in heated arguments, when I think the guy I'm talking to is the scum of the earth, I usually ignore typos he makes.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

but than agian........if.....he.....type.......like this...........I........tend.......to........think........of them........less...........

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh I'm not one of those people who never judges anyone. I'll judge the hell out of people. I'd just rather discuss the issue than get petty.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think there's an informal fallacy term for this

10 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 0

Probably. Sounds similar to the Fallacy Fallacy.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I once had a red fallacy..thank God for penicillin

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Could be a fallacy of relevance? Attacking the person (ad hominem) or their argument instead of making a counter argument.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Muphry's law says something along the lines of "any comment upon another's grammar will inevitably contain some error itself."

10 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 3

I was once in a argument with someone, they spelt somethin b wrong and i said "Wow amazing grammer" you can imagine what happend next... 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I tried to save myself by saying "Where i'm from its spelt differently!" Didnt work... 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

MUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRPPPPPPHHHHHHHH

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is an intentional misspelling of Murphy's law

10 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 1

Sure it is.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Lol nice

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And not even the correct representation of Murphy's Law (I see what you did there_

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Crzay how the biran deos taht.

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Dec 16, 2017 8:40 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

ad hominem. Attacking the person's spelling skills and not the argument they are making.

10 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 6

Actually, attacking spelling errors is a red herring fallacy, not ad hominem.

10 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 0

Ahh you are correct, but a fallacy of relevance nonetheless

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why's this?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Red herrings are redirects to an irrelevant topic. If the meme had said "You are an idiot, therefore I win," that would earn an ad hominem.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is it also a red herring fallacy to call out the person on using a fallacy?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, illustrating a fundamental weakness in an argument (it is based on a logical fallacy, for example) is the actual goal here.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you, I always forget about red herring but I still stand by calling this ad hominem.

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Doesnt ad hominem attack the person it self? Like you're fat so your argument is invalid

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0