TAX THEM NOW!

Feb 22, 2023 1:53 AM

KareemAbdulJabroni

Views

144922

Likes

2555

Dislikes

76

.015625% of $32B isn’t even a slap on the fucking wrist.

Most Viral Edit: THANK YOU, everyone! Seriously though, if Theists want to legislate from the pulpit, THEY GOTTA GIVE! Mormon church fined over scheme to hide $32 billion investment fund behind shell companies https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/mormon-church-multibillion-investment-fund-sec-settlement-rcna71603

taxchurches

fuckthisshit

religous_grift

How about a percentage versus a fixed fine. These “churches” and other corporate scammers would think twice if it was 25% of everything

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Proportionally, that's like $0.25 to you and me.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NOW DO THE CATHOLIC, SCIENTOLOGY, BAPTISTS, ETC CHURCHES!!??

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

$32 billion, that we know of.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and the church help the poor......... after they line their pockets..

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now go look at the US Congress members

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Next up Scientology please.........

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The SEC is so fucking toothless. Goes after pump and dumpers on twitter but slap the church on the wrist.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

... They hid 32bn so slap them with a 5m fine.. Logical. Because, they clearly won't be able to afford that and keep doing it. Nope.

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

honestly at this point $5 million a year in fines is just the cost of doing business

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The only proper fine for this is the full 32 billion.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

64. The fine should be double the potential profit

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

There is no profit from this they made zero money by what they were doing All they did was hide how much wealth they have That's it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If they are a non-profit, I have no idea what a for-profit is.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The money can't be taken out of the church, but it can be spent with few restrictions, so basically a tax exempt bank account/lobbying firm.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Billionaires do the same, btw. It's ridiculous, and they're even praised for it, as if it's altruistic philanthropy.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I can't recall which comedian said, "If God wanted my money he'd just take it. My wallet would fly out of my pocket straight up to heaven."

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The shell companies were taxed. The fine is for hiding the holding from public view. The investment firm paid 4M, the church paid 1M.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Like making $32,000 and being fined $5. "Oh no...whatever will I do if I get caught?"

3 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 4

They didn't make 32 billion dollars. The total fund was worth 32 billion.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

On $32 billion, you could invest it in a goddamn savings account and make more than $5 million

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Again this is not about making money This is about hiding how much money they had scared of public backlash they made absolutely nothing by.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.. Doing this

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Wow Glad to see my tithing went to good use. What a fucking joke.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

we need to end tax exemption for all churches, no matter what

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

A church with an investment portfolio is no longer a church. It's a business and should be treated as such.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tax them.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The fine is small because the regulations haven’t been updated in decades and that is the max they can do

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They weren't fined $5M. $5M is just what it costs to save themselves $32B

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

What do you think they were fined for?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Most megachurches do this.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Open up the books. Every single Mormon should demand to know where their money is going. But the cult won't

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted May 7, 2023 3:36 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's a step in the right direction. Start with having to file paperwork like other non profs. 501c3? Not a tax expert

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

A little fine is bullshit. They should lose it all.

3 years ago | Likes 346 Dislikes 7

And then some.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If they dont. Labour prison.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

For all those connected to the money. Those that get the money can go to a nicer prison.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's off shore, it can't be taken. That's the point of off shore. Unfortunately fines are not made to hurt the big guys

3 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Bring it on shore, or no longer operate in this country. If you're an organization that breaks thr law, you don't deserve to be here

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fees are punishment for the poor

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They should have been fined the same amount. But you're right, big religious orgs and corps never have any real consequences. Us? Prison.

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Mar 3, 2023 3:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yeah no. Should have thought about that before moving it offshore to hide. Slap on the wrist doesn't work if you haven't noticed.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Mar 3, 2023 3:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

they should be fined the full realized & unrealized capital gains. if a commoner makes10k illegally, then 10x that. they lose the whole 100k

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Private churchs under a certain seating amount should be tax free, mega churches definitely should pay tax.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

*All* pls fix thx -sent from my iphone

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

At first I was like, "they're ALL for profit" but then I thought about how much good some of the churches do for people, I was like, 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"yeah, you're right". Thanks for changing my mind

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Even then if the church helps a ton of ppl and profit 10M$ yearly they afford to pay tax. If they prodit 1000$ they afford to pay tax,

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Latter one is just under the 0% tax bracket so they pay nothing. Taxes would give extra incentive to use the money to help the ppl etc.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm atheist and I give to my wife's small church. I know they help people who need it often.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The ones who have schools and outreach in theory are decent.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have no desire to fund 'schools', that's more indoctrination.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, meant to say daycare. Also I'm agnostic as fuck.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 million is only 0.5% of how much money they made doing this

3 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 13

They didn't make it because they hid it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Off by a few decimals. OP has the right number at 0.016%

3 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

O.03%, actually. So 0.05 is (in terms of exponents or order-of-magnitude) closer.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Egads you’re right! I missed that bit

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

They didn't make any money directly by the scheme, this wasn't a tax issue at all. They concealed the assets to avoid negative publicity,

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

They make billions a year on it. A huge portion of the $32b in 2018, $100b in 2020, $186b in 2022 was in profit shares of major corporations

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The entire reason it's so extensive is that they allow wealthy members to permanently tithe by giving 10% of their profit stakes, giving/

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The church 10% of the income but sometimes retaining voting rights on that 10%

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not to avoid paying taxes on them.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

What does a church need with 32 billion??

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

To do good works!/s

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

32 billion in 2018. 100 billion in 2020. "They didn't make any money" is bullshit because a lot of the amount is explicitly in profit shares

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, that's the point. They didn't want people asking that question and making them look bad.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They make them look bad. Just like every other church.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sounds like being openly fraudulent is a sustainable business model for the rich.

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

being rish is a sustainable business model for the rich

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Now that we see what they did, check all the other churches for similar things and get all those corrupt ppl

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They should lose tax exemption

3 years ago | Likes 754 Dislikes 10

Clearly they are not if they had to hide it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Along with all other churches

3 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 6

3 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

The irony in this comment...."dear god". Lol

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

capital gains, so this wouldn't effect that anyway

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hell this is basically how the Chruch of Scientology gained tax exemption. Or at least how the process started.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nothing should be tax exempt except people receiving disability payments or SSI checks.

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

....and low income people/families.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Maybe direct gov’t employees’ salaries?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

No, it show they are treated like others, and also if you have other entries, it just ads up.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why? Why does working for the government entitle someone to be tax exempt, barring military members deployed outside of US territories?

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Because you're doing a circular operation. Get paid, pay taxes, taxes pay for your wages (in part). Might as well skip the middleman

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Why the fuck would I submit an idea that Marjorie Taylor Greene's toadies get to be untaxed just because they work for the stupidest rep?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Because that money is paid from taxes. It’s inefficient to dole out money to immediately withhold it. You would just adjust salary.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Why the FUCK would I exempt a member of Mitch McConnell's staff from paying taxes and just lower the salary? They work on US soil.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, no. They were fined $5M.

3 years ago | Likes 1025 Dislikes 4

Church was fined $1mil officially, the LLC is dinged for the rest. I call https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2023/34-96951.pdf

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

"...anyway."

3 years ago | Likes 174 Dislikes 1

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

/gallery/pSfeUk4

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Right. Fuck that is so weak that it probably just encouraged them to do it more.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's 0.015%. That's a rounding error.

3 years ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 2

0.0156 rounds to 0.016 (and THAT'S a rounding error) but still.

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Fractional pennies on the dollar to do illegal shit is the kind of crimes only the rich can get away with...

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

0.015625%

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Them: Shucks. Two seconds worth of income, shot to hell.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How have people not burned this shit down yet?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

My calculator literally couldn’t handle the math

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.016%…what horseshit. That’s a fee not a fine

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Anyway...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Gasp that almost 0.2%.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Yeah wasn't expecting the amount to be 0.015% of the amount. It's ridiculous

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't worry their lawyers will get that dropped to 500k

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's like a $500 fine for hiding a $5mil fund. Not even a slap on its wrist.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Far less than a normal tax rate would be

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

$5M is this percentage of $32 billion

3 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 10

Some maths problems there, chief. Looks like you've gone 5m÷32b ÷100, instead of the last being ×100 to make a percentage

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

oh beans. I zigged when I should’ve zagged there. Thanks for pointing it out!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You didn't pass math class did you...

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Club Mormon. 10% and you're in

3 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 2

Grew up in that bullshit and I never saw a penny of mormon money spent on charity or community.

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Well. They are hoarding their wealth. Very saintly. Very Christian.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I did, technically, but for claiming to follow Jesus they certainly horde riches. Glad I got out, better late than never

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Same. I do remember having to clean up the church parking lot when I was in the cub scouts

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Yep, I even remember being dragged into doing "volunteer work" for them by my parents.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

They give around 1 billion in charity annually. Not great for their wealth, but not bad.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's, unfortunately, false. They claim $1 billion over 12 years, but investigation says about 15% of that

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Given that their religion tells them to live in poverty, it's fucking bad. It's really fucking bad.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It doesn't tell them that

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Still cheaper than paying taxes.

3 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 1

They didn't have to pay taxes on it in the first place, nothing about this was a tax issue.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

I think that’s kind of the point

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Isn’t everything about this a tax issue?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No, it was about disclosure. They didn't want people to know the size of their portfolio.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

If they started having to pay taxes, it would include property tax.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0