littlemachete
90929
1382
74
Jun 4, 2017 4:32 AM
littlemachete
90929
1382
74
Crispyock
I like it. The logic is sound
CmPunksReturn
The numbers don't lie -Steiner Math-
papercuttedtears
but im a GENETIC FREAK, and im NOT NORMAL
snapcastermeme
Reminds me of Rumsfeld's "known unknowns" in how they make sense but kinda sound retarded
SeanTabasco
It almost makes too much sense
FelixionAl
nameisunavailable
But if lesbian porn is 100% gay and a girl with a dick is 25% by itself, that would make watching it futa on girl 125% gay
WhysonoobmatE
Actually it would be 75% lesbian, thus 75% gay.
qarlific
Their preference is women, as such a non-issue. However missing either gender from the equation equates to being 100% gay by definition.
abgemacht
The math checks out
DangerouslyMoist
1+1=dick
angeryrai
THE NUMBERS DONT LIE
papercuttedtears
and they spell DISASTER FOR YOU
bca360
SMO JOE
hiredhobbs
I just wanna why the guy is wearing chainmail
poopoobrain
nah thats how i see it
faptasticvoyage
+1 For Scott Steiner
ByDownvotingMeYoureAgreeingThatYoureWrong
Man Guy Fieri got buff
WhiteGlas
The math checks out.
VestaRuffina
It's difficult to argue with the numbers
Knightrouz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WFoC3TR5rzI
dalaiyoda
This is true. Ask a straight bloke whether he'd prefer a hard cock or a flaccid cock in his porn. Hilarity ensues! Or face punches.
endo357
Lol
ShesMyWomanNordStyle
@RepostStatistics
Turtleproof
FromTheTwistedMindOfABrotha
Yeah that sounds about right.
GaurieBanner
Wouldnt it be 75% gay since its 2 girls, even if one has a dick, still a girl and a girl
Dexterming
Dude since when fucking a girl or 2 girls is gay...??
Acaru
OBJECTION! If futa is a girl with a half girl, it in fact does not equal 25%, but 75% gay.
levyathyn
Foolproof reasoning.
thegayestunicorn
tfw bisexual
methisahellofadrug
Turtleproof
Piss jugs are an essential component to any goon lair.![]()
TheBurritoConfederacy
Mmmmmm, Yolplait.
TheBurritoConfederacy
Spelling is for suckers.
Turtleproof
Oh, no. Out of all the disgusting trash in the photo I didn't notice the yogurt containers, now I can almost smell the photo.
BlastTheStrongestHero
I don't like it, but that logic seems sound.
Scottchr
It was deep. Balls deep.
sprinckletitties
Just watch a 100-some. That seems like the easier solution.
bumwithguns
I mean... you're giving up 25% gay, but don't forget the 50% gain in beastiality
blenn
The sound of logic.
raskolnikov0
It isn't. If woman+woman is 100% gay as it says in the end, then man+woman is 100% straight and not 50% gay. Either one way or the other.
Billywonderful
No. It would put m+f into a superstate of being 100% straight and 100% gay.
HenryPicklecopter
schrodingers fag
raskolnikov0
Better explained: if you consider w+w gay because the act is homosexual, then you have to consider w+m straight. 1/2
raskolnikov0
Or if you consider w+m half gay because one of the participants is male, then you must consider w+w straight. You can't apply both 2/3
raskolnikov0
criteria without messing up with the validity of the logic used. Either one or the other. 3/3
Trikk
M+W is 0% gay sex, 50% gay visually. W+W is 100% gay sex, 0% gay visually. You always count the higher percentage. It's basic math really.
raskolnikov0
Then m+w is 100% straight sex so that is the higher percentage. And it doesn't work like that anyway, you must use the same criteria in both
Trikk
Nobody cares if it's straight or not, it's only gayness that matters in this earthly domain.
raskolnikov0
Gay and straight are values, not criteria, and they are the two end values in the same meter. Criteria here are visually and sexually
IceAndMoreIce
Yes but we're not talking about how straight it is we're talking about how gay it is so although as you said m+ w is 100% straight it is 1/2
IceAndMoreIce
50% gay 2/2