11 pts ยท September 30, 2016
Exactly. The world is gonna end in 2012. Gosh why won't sheeple wake up already!
And the other is the Left :^)
2/2Then the cop got what he deserved. Doesn't change the fact that this brute also got what he deserved for pushing an officer in riot gear.
1/2 Yes, hostile, as in an unstable area filled with hostility that could result in a brick being thrown at your face at any moment.
Democrats: "You want a small government and the freedom to live your life as you see fit so long as it doesn't hurt others? Nazi!"
Orange man bad! Orange man bad!
No it isn't. Americans call it "socialism" when in polite company and "eurofags" when around friends.
I gotchu http://www.fox9.com/news/fridley-police-squad-car-flipped-on-roof-in-crash
Watch that edge, bro, it could cut someone.
Beanbag round. Hurts like a bitch and makes people think twice about further confrontation. One of the better LTL weapons imo
When "someone" is an officer in full riot gear walking alone in hostile territory, yes.
There's always one...
I don't know what your dysfunction is but thinking the solution to a riot is for cops to bend over and grab their knees? P H E W L A D
I agree on a conceptual level. But practically- there are many issues. Who will cover the costs to keep them alive, happy, played with, etc?
The main issue is honestly overbreeding by some terrible people. Euthanasia seems horrible but what other option is there in this situation?
So would Starbucks be like Park Place?
2/2 I was merely trying to encourage you to further your independent study of the matter. Even to an atheist, studying religion canbe useful
1/2 The point of that response was praise, not condemnation. I'm not saying that you need to shut up until you have a PhD in theology.
2/2 have misconceptions & apply certain views too broadly across "religion" as a whole. 'You're hitting the target, but not the mark' kinda
1/2 You understand religion as a whole better than most people I've met, so I honestly do commend you for that. However, I think you still
Then perhaps you could explain the "hypocrisy" you found? My criteria is a stipulation- obviously- but the concept is simply "proof, please"
3/3 Or, perhaps, do you talk about clinical trials that the drug has undergone and those relevant results?
2/3 Do you start by discussing why herbal remedies only use natural ingredients and don't pollute the body with toxins?
1/? To better explain the situation. Say you're trying to convince that some new drug is bad for you b/c of side-effects.
I wonder how much easier it would be with more than 140 characters to work with :^)
2/2 which I agreed I would do- if given evidence. Simply because it *comes* from my faith doesn't mean it *conforms* to my view of faith.
It doesn't have to conform to my beliefs? The very premise of this argument is that it would be antithetical to my beliefs.
(To avoid increasing your hostility I mean no offense when saying this): a random person on the internet =/= 1,000yr of church tradition.
Why would I change my mind without sufficient evidence to do so?
(I should probably specify Orthodox saint, ascetic, etc. because I'm sure you'll find anything in the 2,000+ protestant sects)
Exactly. The world is gonna end in 2012. Gosh why won't sheeple wake up already!
And the other is the Left :^)
2/2Then the cop got what he deserved. Doesn't change the fact that this brute also got what he deserved for pushing an officer in riot gear.
1/2 Yes, hostile, as in an unstable area filled with hostility that could result in a brick being thrown at your face at any moment.
Democrats: "You want a small government and the freedom to live your life as you see fit so long as it doesn't hurt others? Nazi!"
Orange man bad! Orange man bad!
No it isn't. Americans call it "socialism" when in polite company and "eurofags" when around friends.
I gotchu http://www.fox9.com/news/fridley-police-squad-car-flipped-on-roof-in-crash
Watch that edge, bro, it could cut someone.
Beanbag round. Hurts like a bitch and makes people think twice about further confrontation. One of the better LTL weapons imo
When "someone" is an officer in full riot gear walking alone in hostile territory, yes.
There's always one...
I don't know what your dysfunction is but thinking the solution to a riot is for cops to bend over and grab their knees? P H E W L A D
I agree on a conceptual level. But practically- there are many issues. Who will cover the costs to keep them alive, happy, played with, etc?
The main issue is honestly overbreeding by some terrible people. Euthanasia seems horrible but what other option is there in this situation?
So would Starbucks be like Park Place?
2/2 I was merely trying to encourage you to further your independent study of the matter. Even to an atheist, studying religion canbe useful
1/2 The point of that response was praise, not condemnation. I'm not saying that you need to shut up until you have a PhD in theology.
2/2 have misconceptions & apply certain views too broadly across "religion" as a whole. 'You're hitting the target, but not the mark' kinda
1/2 You understand religion as a whole better than most people I've met, so I honestly do commend you for that. However, I think you still
Then perhaps you could explain the "hypocrisy" you found? My criteria is a stipulation- obviously- but the concept is simply "proof, please"
3/3 Or, perhaps, do you talk about clinical trials that the drug has undergone and those relevant results?
2/3 Do you start by discussing why herbal remedies only use natural ingredients and don't pollute the body with toxins?
1/? To better explain the situation. Say you're trying to convince that some new drug is bad for you b/c of side-effects.
I wonder how much easier it would be with more than 140 characters to work with :^)
2/2 which I agreed I would do- if given evidence. Simply because it *comes* from my faith doesn't mean it *conforms* to my view of faith.
It doesn't have to conform to my beliefs? The very premise of this argument is that it would be antithetical to my beliefs.
(To avoid increasing your hostility I mean no offense when saying this): a random person on the internet =/= 1,000yr of church tradition.
Why would I change my mind without sufficient evidence to do so?
(I should probably specify Orthodox saint, ascetic, etc. because I'm sure you'll find anything in the 2,000+ protestant sects)