357 pts · February 15, 2019
You're replying to the same guy who said "going to be most likely a weiner party". He knows what he meant 😅
I think by "wiener level" he meant the height of their groin area from the floor, not size
Yeah, as if any business would "prank" their customers in such a destructive and rage-inducing way. Seems like a good way to go out of business
Yeah I felt like that's what they were going for. Bargain bin Stewie
Don't panic, it's staged
"Supposed" by who? Soldiers are _supposed_ to follow orders without question, actually. To respect the chain of command. That's what most of military training is - teaching them to do as they're told instantly, without thought. To quote Metallica, "you will do what I say, with I say"
Well. That sure ruins the joke
Yeah the-llamas-pyjamas definitely doesn't know what "per capita" means. Not sure about the replies, maybe they just didn't bother correcting him
Congrats on posting the most obnoxious reaction gif possible
Why would the register make an error noise if the jar doesn't have a barcode on it? Does it just make error noises constantly the whole time it can't detect a barcode?
What you seem to miss is that comedians make jokes
You mean if you make it funny because you're a comedian?
And this is why context is important for understanding the English language. You can easily tell from the context that that wouldn't make the slightest bit of sense, so it must've been the "me" that made the call
No. There's no reason they would give chatGPT the capability to run console commands, that'd be insane, would serve no purpose, and would just be asking for this kind of thing.
Of course, kudos on the effort put into it, and I wish you success, it's just not up my alley
They don't often do 1x1 stickers. And Ideas sets usually have more printed pieces than stickers, which goes with the higher price per piece those sets usually have. The numbers are reused a lot in this set so I think it would make more sense for them to print them. Personally I've got zero interest because there's nothing visually attractive about the periodic table, and being in Lego doesn't make it any better looking 😅
I think they probably meant Electronic Arts
Marilyn Manson
True... It's just staggering that he can't even recognise the blatant contradictions in what he said. It makes me feel like if I just find the right magic words he'll suddenly realise how absurd he's been. But he's clearly too invested in never admitting he made a mistake for that
It's literally a screenshot of him saying the exact thing he said he didn't say, I can't even begin to comprehend the mind of someone who'd downvote a simple undeniable fact. I have to assume it's just this guy and his alts
The W3C just creates the standards for webpage tech, they don't control top level domains and who can put things on them. But the whole thing would be an administrative, jurisdictional, and enforcement nightmare that there's basically zero chance of anyone ever signing up for. And it certainly wouldn't be worth the effort because there would still be lots of ways to circumnavigate the block (e.g. use a VPN)
A more apt analogy for what actually transpired here would be:You: "I hate poultry"Other: "what have you got against foghorn leghorn?"You: "absolutely nothing, I took a shot at chicken, not foghorn leghorn"Other: "you said 'I hate poultry'"You: "I said I hate chicken"Other: "[screenshot of you saying you hate poultry]"You: "ALL poultry is chicken, and somehow I've convinced myself that you're the moron here"
You're delusional. You're the one who made the distinction between "religious people" and "religious nuts". That was literally you, no one else. You explicitly contradicted the claim that you said "religious people" with "No, I said religious NUTS", and claimed you had nothing against a specific religious person, but then went on to clarify that you do, in fact, have an issue with all religious people, which would logically include Jimmy Carter. You just can't get your story straight.
I was thinking of "ster" being a common suffix on words that refer to a group of people, e.g. hipster, youngster, trickster. But of course it makes sense that Imgur is the dumpster
So my sarcasm went straight over your head 😅Let me spell it out... It is not within the power of the US government to restrict porn to specific domains
So you've flipped from arguing that you said "nuts" not "people" when you absolutely verifiably did say "people" to now saying they're the same thing. So why exactly did you say "No, I said religious NUTS"? Why argue over which thing you said when your position is supposedly that they are the same?
WHO IS DOWNVOTING THIS?!
> Musk has "earned a seat at the table" after his massive donationsThe word you're looking for is "bought." He bought a seat at the table with massive donations.
It's not. The government aren't blocking access to pornhub. It's pornhub themselves detecting the user's location. They're now legally required to do id checks to verify the age of users based in Florida, and they don't want to do that, so they're just blocking traffic from Florida and showing them a page explaining why instead.
There are already a bunch of adult top level domains like "adult", "porn", "sex", and "xxx". Should be pretty easy to enforce a global law that porn can only be on those domains, so your plan sounds flawless to me
You're replying to the same guy who said "going to be most likely a weiner party". He knows what he meant 😅
I think by "wiener level" he meant the height of their groin area from the floor, not size
Yeah, as if any business would "prank" their customers in such a destructive and rage-inducing way. Seems like a good way to go out of business
Yeah I felt like that's what they were going for. Bargain bin Stewie
Don't panic, it's staged
"Supposed" by who? Soldiers are _supposed_ to follow orders without question, actually. To respect the chain of command. That's what most of military training is - teaching them to do as they're told instantly, without thought. To quote Metallica, "you will do what I say, with I say"
Well. That sure ruins the joke
Yeah the-llamas-pyjamas definitely doesn't know what "per capita" means. Not sure about the replies, maybe they just didn't bother correcting him
Congrats on posting the most obnoxious reaction gif possible
Why would the register make an error noise if the jar doesn't have a barcode on it? Does it just make error noises constantly the whole time it can't detect a barcode?
What you seem to miss is that comedians make jokes
You mean if you make it funny because you're a comedian?
And this is why context is important for understanding the English language. You can easily tell from the context that that wouldn't make the slightest bit of sense, so it must've been the "me" that made the call
No. There's no reason they would give chatGPT the capability to run console commands, that'd be insane, would serve no purpose, and would just be asking for this kind of thing.
Of course, kudos on the effort put into it, and I wish you success, it's just not up my alley
They don't often do 1x1 stickers. And Ideas sets usually have more printed pieces than stickers, which goes with the higher price per piece those sets usually have. The numbers are reused a lot in this set so I think it would make more sense for them to print them.
Personally I've got zero interest because there's nothing visually attractive about the periodic table, and being in Lego doesn't make it any better looking 😅
I think they probably meant Electronic Arts
Marilyn Manson
True... It's just staggering that he can't even recognise the blatant contradictions in what he said. It makes me feel like if I just find the right magic words he'll suddenly realise how absurd he's been. But he's clearly too invested in never admitting he made a mistake for that
It's literally a screenshot of him saying the exact thing he said he didn't say, I can't even begin to comprehend the mind of someone who'd downvote a simple undeniable fact. I have to assume it's just this guy and his alts
The W3C just creates the standards for webpage tech, they don't control top level domains and who can put things on them. But the whole thing would be an administrative, jurisdictional, and enforcement nightmare that there's basically zero chance of anyone ever signing up for. And it certainly wouldn't be worth the effort because there would still be lots of ways to circumnavigate the block (e.g. use a VPN)
A more apt analogy for what actually transpired here would be:
You: "I hate poultry"
Other: "what have you got against foghorn leghorn?"
You: "absolutely nothing, I took a shot at chicken, not foghorn leghorn"
Other: "you said 'I hate poultry'"
You: "I said I hate chicken"
Other: "[screenshot of you saying you hate poultry]"
You: "ALL poultry is chicken, and somehow I've convinced myself that you're the moron here"
You're delusional. You're the one who made the distinction between "religious people" and "religious nuts". That was literally you, no one else. You explicitly contradicted the claim that you said "religious people" with "No, I said religious NUTS", and claimed you had nothing against a specific religious person, but then went on to clarify that you do, in fact, have an issue with all religious people, which would logically include Jimmy Carter. You just can't get your story straight.
I was thinking of "ster" being a common suffix on words that refer to a group of people, e.g. hipster, youngster, trickster. But of course it makes sense that Imgur is the dumpster
So my sarcasm went straight over your head 😅
Let me spell it out... It is not within the power of the US government to restrict porn to specific domains
So you've flipped from arguing that you said "nuts" not "people" when you absolutely verifiably did say "people" to now saying they're the same thing. So why exactly did you say "No, I said religious NUTS"? Why argue over which thing you said when your position is supposedly that they are the same?
WHO IS DOWNVOTING THIS?!
> Musk has "earned a seat at the table" after his massive donations
The word you're looking for is "bought." He bought a seat at the table with massive donations.
It's not. The government aren't blocking access to pornhub. It's pornhub themselves detecting the user's location. They're now legally required to do id checks to verify the age of users based in Florida, and they don't want to do that, so they're just blocking traffic from Florida and showing them a page explaining why instead.
There are already a bunch of adult top level domains like "adult", "porn", "sex", and "xxx". Should be pretty easy to enforce a global law that porn can only be on those domains, so your plan sounds flawless to me