76577 pts ยท April 11, 2016
Dude that is just advertising masquerading as journalism. It names not one pollster, executive, or consultant using prediction markets as a gauge of sentiment; fails to report the rate at which the markets are "right" and baselessly asserts that somehow only sampling the segment of the population which is willing to gamble on an event is somehow more accurate and less prone to bias and error. It's a vapid cloud of bullshit
Oh yeah, which ones?
I can't recall anything similar making the headlines in the major Canadian outlets, though I admit that outside of politics I don't follow the news as closely as I used too; nor have I ever followed foreign press too closely. Got any examples?
Or we see a lot of it coming out of america because american stuff dominates the anglophone sections of the internet. Even if it is a product of US society, that's the result of being socialized in a certain way, not a mental health problem.
Maybe if we knew there was a pattern of stuff like this happening, but otherwise I think we ought to balk at pathologizing people's shit behaviour.
Because I think you shouldn't risk burning people to death?
2/2 workers as the fire would be. Systems like those found in aircraft hangers or chemical plants.My point is that he endangered *at best* the lives of everyone else in that warehouse. On the balance, I don't think that risk is worth destroying any amount of product. If he had just triggered the sprinklers, a lot of that product would be destroyed anyways. He could've ventilated an executive. Or something else that doesn't carry a high risk of killing those in the same situation as he is in
TIL a burning building being a danger to those inside is a hypothetical. Thank you lifting the scales from my eyes.If the company was neglecting fire safety I would absolutely agree they share in the blame of any deaths, however a) suggesting the one who lit the fires is not responsible is wild, and b) arson is a rather different affair than regular workplace health and safety. A fire suppression system sufficient to contain any conceivable arson attack is also probably as dangerous to the1/2
If the other commenter is to be believed, it's mandatory for any business that involves children, so, any doctors office that treats children would apparently be required to have it.
Yeah, it's a tremendous risk for what is, ultimately, an act of personal vengeance. Not one of these people would be praising this if people had died, otherwise they'd be willing to admit it. Ventilate another CEO or something if you wanna violently protest, don't endanger the lives of other members of the working class
ThE wHiPs ArE iN mY hEaD. People still die in fires in buildings built to code. If you start a building on fire, you are endangering the lives of everyone in said building. So, answer my yes or no question: is burning a bunch of insured product worth the lives of workers? That is the immediate risk involved here.
Oooh you're big man, so surely you're not afraid to say whether or not you'd laude this if there was a death toll - right?
Oh, I see. If nobody dies it's good protest, but if somebody does it's bad. So just go gamble with the lives of your fellow workers. Does that sum it up about right? Or is it still good if they burn along with the product? You'll have to forgive my confusion, for some reason nobody seems to want to commit to saying whether they believe it's okay to endager others lives or not.
Would you lionoze this if his coworkers burned to death?
Would you lionize this if he also burned a bunch of his coworkers to death? That warehouse wasn't empty.
The lighter
Causing a massive fire in California is not a good way to protest. Even if you don't kill anyone in the building, it could easily spread beyond and endanger others or start a wildfire.
It's to be paid in RMB, the currency of china
Commodities exchange, not stock. But even if the records are public financial instruments can also be traded by companies, so you just need a bunch of shells if you wanna hide your identity.
Suggests, but they're currently not known.
If a poor person did this they would be making inconsequential amounts of money, to the point nobody would notice.
I would imagine stuff like this goes through real brokers, not robinhood or whatever
~350% return, so if you could only put up a $57 short, yeah. Good I wish I had insider information, life would be so much simpler if all I had to do was have 'friends' tell me about shit and I could trade the market on that
Then why does both Ukraine and Russia use so many tanks? Why do they up-armour every vehicle with even the slightest risk of drone attack? Why does Ukraine advise observers that armouring vehicles is necessary?
Ukraine uses drones similar to the shaheed as well, and frequently uses them to attack Russian military and industrial sites, so most likely this would be a video of Russians shooting down a Ukrainian drone. Can't say for sure, of course, because there isn't exactly any flags or insignias visible
There's no way that these guys aren't breaking at least 1 law.
Probably not, writing an alien society that doesn't just read as a caricature of a some facet of modern society or historical cultures would require both hiring good writers and taking the risk of doing something different. Going for "these guys are greedy businessmen!/violent thugs!/basically space romans!/etc" is safe, cheaper and easier to build a franchise on.
I'm pretty sure they have been demanding fees for passage, and even then very few have been going through, last I read it was mainly ships destined for china.
Most places a job as a librarian (not an assistant) at a public library is very hard to get. However outside of those there are librarian positions for any organization that keeps lots of records and needs them to be usable, whether it's large corporations, museums, universities, or pretty much every single government agency and body from municipal on up. They're still very competitive, just more numerous than library jobs.
I'm pretty sure the changing rooms ain't for passing, bro
Dude that is just advertising masquerading as journalism. It names not one pollster, executive, or consultant using prediction markets as a gauge of sentiment; fails to report the rate at which the markets are "right" and baselessly asserts that somehow only sampling the segment of the population which is willing to gamble on an event is somehow more accurate and less prone to bias and error. It's a vapid cloud of bullshit
Oh yeah, which ones?
I can't recall anything similar making the headlines in the major Canadian outlets, though I admit that outside of politics I don't follow the news as closely as I used too; nor have I ever followed foreign press too closely. Got any examples?
Or we see a lot of it coming out of america because american stuff dominates the anglophone sections of the internet. Even if it is a product of US society, that's the result of being socialized in a certain way, not a mental health problem.
Maybe if we knew there was a pattern of stuff like this happening, but otherwise I think we ought to balk at pathologizing people's shit behaviour.
Because I think you shouldn't risk burning people to death?
2/2 workers as the fire would be. Systems like those found in aircraft hangers or chemical plants.
My point is that he endangered *at best* the lives of everyone else in that warehouse. On the balance, I don't think that risk is worth destroying any amount of product. If he had just triggered the sprinklers, a lot of that product would be destroyed anyways. He could've ventilated an executive. Or something else that doesn't carry a high risk of killing those in the same situation as he is in
TIL a burning building being a danger to those inside is a hypothetical. Thank you lifting the scales from my eyes.
If the company was neglecting fire safety I would absolutely agree they share in the blame of any deaths, however a) suggesting the one who lit the fires is not responsible is wild, and b) arson is a rather different affair than regular workplace health and safety. A fire suppression system sufficient to contain any conceivable arson attack is also probably as dangerous to the1/2
If the other commenter is to be believed, it's mandatory for any business that involves children, so, any doctors office that treats children would apparently be required to have it.
Yeah, it's a tremendous risk for what is, ultimately, an act of personal vengeance. Not one of these people would be praising this if people had died, otherwise they'd be willing to admit it. Ventilate another CEO or something if you wanna violently protest, don't endanger the lives of other members of the working class
ThE wHiPs ArE iN mY hEaD. People still die in fires in buildings built to code. If you start a building on fire, you are endangering the lives of everyone in said building. So, answer my yes or no question: is burning a bunch of insured product worth the lives of workers? That is the immediate risk involved here.
Oooh you're big man, so surely you're not afraid to say whether or not you'd laude this if there was a death toll - right?
Oh, I see. If nobody dies it's good protest, but if somebody does it's bad. So just go gamble with the lives of your fellow workers. Does that sum it up about right? Or is it still good if they burn along with the product?
You'll have to forgive my confusion, for some reason nobody seems to want to commit to saying whether they believe it's okay to endager others lives or not.
Would you lionoze this if his coworkers burned to death?
Would you lionize this if he also burned a bunch of his coworkers to death? That warehouse wasn't empty.
The lighter
Causing a massive fire in California is not a good way to protest. Even if you don't kill anyone in the building, it could easily spread beyond and endanger others or start a wildfire.
It's to be paid in RMB, the currency of china
Commodities exchange, not stock. But even if the records are public financial instruments can also be traded by companies, so you just need a bunch of shells if you wanna hide your identity.
Suggests, but they're currently not known.
If a poor person did this they would be making inconsequential amounts of money, to the point nobody would notice.
I would imagine stuff like this goes through real brokers, not robinhood or whatever
~350% return, so if you could only put up a $57 short, yeah. Good I wish I had insider information, life would be so much simpler if all I had to do was have 'friends' tell me about shit and I could trade the market on that
Then why does both Ukraine and Russia use so many tanks? Why do they up-armour every vehicle with even the slightest risk of drone attack? Why does Ukraine advise observers that armouring vehicles is necessary?
Ukraine uses drones similar to the shaheed as well, and frequently uses them to attack Russian military and industrial sites, so most likely this would be a video of Russians shooting down a Ukrainian drone. Can't say for sure, of course, because there isn't exactly any flags or insignias visible
There's no way that these guys aren't breaking at least 1 law.
Probably not, writing an alien society that doesn't just read as a caricature of a some facet of modern society or historical cultures would require both hiring good writers and taking the risk of doing something different. Going for "these guys are greedy businessmen!/violent thugs!/basically space romans!/etc" is safe, cheaper and easier to build a franchise on.
I'm pretty sure they have been demanding fees for passage, and even then very few have been going through, last I read it was mainly ships destined for china.
Most places a job as a librarian (not an assistant) at a public library is very hard to get. However outside of those there are librarian positions for any organization that keeps lots of records and needs them to be usable, whether it's large corporations, museums, universities, or pretty much every single government agency and body from municipal on up. They're still very competitive, just more numerous than library jobs.
I'm pretty sure the changing rooms ain't for passing, bro