105922 pts ยท October 7, 2015
Change your passwords regularly, guys. oof.
Classic imgur "Pffff you can't TRAIN animals!! Moron! Idiot! Nobody has ever trained an animal to be obedient in HISTORY!"
how the fuck did it train itself to do this? Did it hurt its paw once and for some reason they gave it whipped cream??? And then now they continue to reinforce it by not ignoring it when it fakes it?
Yeah this seems more likely.
Yeah, I dunno, the whole thing seems like a racebaiting clickbaity staged interaction designed to depict people saying as much inflammatory shit as possible to promote interaction with the post
Believe it or not we can think that the way they both think is bad in different ways
They use both. But yes, also the head on the guinness tends to trap the rest underneath it.
People who drink tequila instead of beer tend to be more fun at parties, yeah
Kill every officer who was there that day. That's the only way they'll learn.
I mean over time it's also not great for the books it's on top of
bro we get it, you're 12
I ain't gay or trans but can I get a hug?
Charles III, the current King of England.
god damnit imgur let me edit comments. *shit
Alright, I'm mad, and I'm gonna hold you down and hit directly into your eyeball, you fucking freak.
No no, bisexual furry tiefling, which is. Even more on point.
I'm telling you what happened, though I got one detail wrong about the guy being HKer. I'm talking about the perspective of the protesters and the reasons protests happened, something you blatantly lied about in your sprint to apologize for the legitimate problems people living in China have with China. And you used a slur, because you're evil. We're done.
You interrupted me before I was finished. Also, no, I'm not lying, I never said the legislation wouldn't have allowed extradition to Taiwan, I was saying that the protests were not fueled by a desire to protect the murderer-- a lie on YOUR part-- but to fight the unnecessary inclusion of extradition to mainland China in the bill, due to concerns that China would use this to imprison and suppress pro-democracy protesters and movements.
HKers protested that part of the law, given that they saw it as an attempt to overreach into Hong-Kong independence and China and Hong-Kong's very recent history of political repression of HK democracy activists vis-a-vis the Umbrella Revolution
Oh, well, what actually happened was that a Hongkonger and his girlfriend visited Taiwan-- not China-- and during the trip, he murdered her. Since China doesn't recognize the sovereignty of Taiwan, there was no extradition to Taiwan, and as such the HK government, which had recently been occupied by loyalists, began to write up laws that would enable his extradition. And nobody had a problem with that except that they snuck in extradition to mainland China in those laws.
And I mean, even the way you're trying to present it as good is still "noble China taking away the rights of those monstrous murderer-protecting Hongkongers", so it's impressive that that's what you think good propaganda is.
Yeah if I simplify and misrepresent facts I can paint shit any way I want, too. I mean, I'm strongly against all the lies Imgur promulgates about China, but you're plainly propagandizing too the way you're talking about it, in China's favor.
Just drove out into the dark-ass desert in Nevada one night and stared at the fucking milky way with my raw-ass eyes.
Elbow deep in a goblin because you just didn't stop pushing the sword in.
I've actually been really frustrated by the response to this on twitter because it's resulted in a lot of democrats attacking trans people for not being "grateful" enough that the democrats are not as bad as the republicans.
No the 2002 remake is the bad one, the original is about corporate rule and has an actual message about corporations and consumerism, the remake is just GOVERNMENT BAD but SPECIFICALLY NOT THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT and really deliberately has no message.
I like how they just put a bolt into the middle of a cardboard thing to demonstrate this because it's only useful in the event that your nut or bolt is on a flat, horizontal plane with tons of room to turn this thing. Won't work at all if, say, the bolt is on the bottom of a machine. Or side.
I mean she didn't have to "justify" it. She didn't vote to aid Israel, she voted against a stupid bill proposed by a stupid person who was engaging in political theater. If she'd voted for the bill, we'd be screaming at her for voting against aid to Ukraine and reproductive healthcare. The whole thing was designed so that shitty online bots and talking heads like Kasparian could denigrate anyone who voted for it, and dumbfucks like @KarateCanine fell for it or are part of the smokescreen.
But you like it when bots lie? Like... yeah, she voted against a bill that would have cut funding to the Iron Dome, but it also would have cut funding for reproductive healthcare and Ukraine aid, among many others. You cannot pretend that that was, in a vacuum, voting for Israeli aid, it was just voting against a bad, publicity stunt bill that happened to have a provision about Israel in it.
Right, and that sort of thing is not something her actual supporters say, it's something bots online say in order to sow confusion and try to make her less popular. Anyone paying attention knows she didn't vote that bill because it was a bad bill. Cutting aid to the Iron Dome was a miniscule part of it.
What's six multiplied by nine?
Classic imgur "Pffff you can't TRAIN animals!! Moron! Idiot! Nobody has ever trained an animal to be obedient in HISTORY!"
how the fuck did it train itself to do this? Did it hurt its paw once and for some reason they gave it whipped cream??? And then now they continue to reinforce it by not ignoring it when it fakes it?
Yeah this seems more likely.
Yeah, I dunno, the whole thing seems like a racebaiting clickbaity staged interaction designed to depict people saying as much inflammatory shit as possible to promote interaction with the post
Believe it or not we can think that the way they both think is bad in different ways
They use both. But yes, also the head on the guinness tends to trap the rest underneath it.
People who drink tequila instead of beer tend to be more fun at parties, yeah
Kill every officer who was there that day. That's the only way they'll learn.
I mean over time it's also not great for the books it's on top of
bro we get it, you're 12
I ain't gay or trans but can I get a hug?
Charles III, the current King of England.
god damnit imgur let me edit comments. *shit
Alright, I'm mad, and I'm gonna hold you down and hit directly into your eyeball, you fucking freak.
No no, bisexual furry tiefling, which is. Even more on point.
I'm telling you what happened, though I got one detail wrong about the guy being HKer. I'm talking about the perspective of the protesters and the reasons protests happened, something you blatantly lied about in your sprint to apologize for the legitimate problems people living in China have with China. And you used a slur, because you're evil. We're done.
You interrupted me before I was finished. Also, no, I'm not lying, I never said the legislation wouldn't have allowed extradition to Taiwan, I was saying that the protests were not fueled by a desire to protect the murderer-- a lie on YOUR part-- but to fight the unnecessary inclusion of extradition to mainland China in the bill, due to concerns that China would use this to imprison and suppress pro-democracy protesters and movements.
HKers protested that part of the law, given that they saw it as an attempt to overreach into Hong-Kong independence and China and Hong-Kong's very recent history of political repression of HK democracy activists vis-a-vis the Umbrella Revolution
Oh, well, what actually happened was that a Hongkonger and his girlfriend visited Taiwan-- not China-- and during the trip, he murdered her. Since China doesn't recognize the sovereignty of Taiwan, there was no extradition to Taiwan, and as such the HK government, which had recently been occupied by loyalists, began to write up laws that would enable his extradition. And nobody had a problem with that except that they snuck in extradition to mainland China in those laws.
And I mean, even the way you're trying to present it as good is still "noble China taking away the rights of those monstrous murderer-protecting Hongkongers", so it's impressive that that's what you think good propaganda is.
Yeah if I simplify and misrepresent facts I can paint shit any way I want, too. I mean, I'm strongly against all the lies Imgur promulgates about China, but you're plainly propagandizing too the way you're talking about it, in China's favor.
Just drove out into the dark-ass desert in Nevada one night and stared at the fucking milky way with my raw-ass eyes.
Elbow deep in a goblin because you just didn't stop pushing the sword in.
I've actually been really frustrated by the response to this on twitter because it's resulted in a lot of democrats attacking trans people for not being "grateful" enough that the democrats are not as bad as the republicans.
No the 2002 remake is the bad one, the original is about corporate rule and has an actual message about corporations and consumerism, the remake is just GOVERNMENT BAD but SPECIFICALLY NOT THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT and really deliberately has no message.
I like how they just put a bolt into the middle of a cardboard thing to demonstrate this because it's only useful in the event that your nut or bolt is on a flat, horizontal plane with tons of room to turn this thing. Won't work at all if, say, the bolt is on the bottom of a machine. Or side.
I mean she didn't have to "justify" it. She didn't vote to aid Israel, she voted against a stupid bill proposed by a stupid person who was engaging in political theater. If she'd voted for the bill, we'd be screaming at her for voting against aid to Ukraine and reproductive healthcare. The whole thing was designed so that shitty online bots and talking heads like Kasparian could denigrate anyone who voted for it, and dumbfucks like @KarateCanine fell for it or are part of the smokescreen.
But you like it when bots lie? Like... yeah, she voted against a bill that would have cut funding to the Iron Dome, but it also would have cut funding for reproductive healthcare and Ukraine aid, among many others. You cannot pretend that that was, in a vacuum, voting for Israeli aid, it was just voting against a bad, publicity stunt bill that happened to have a provision about Israel in it.
Right, and that sort of thing is not something her actual supporters say, it's something bots online say in order to sow confusion and try to make her less popular. Anyone paying attention knows she didn't vote that bill because it was a bad bill. Cutting aid to the Iron Dome was a miniscule part of it.
What's six multiplied by nine?