8623 pts · October 20, 2016
How so?
She’d be automatically guilty
It’s the concept of, well how do you like being treated this way? I still think she deserves due process, but under a lot of feminist ideas>
Nope. It’s just ironic
Themselves, then why should feminists? You want to have your cake, and eat it too.
An opposition to feminism, and didn’t bring any, let’s focus on the can’t define themselves part. If MRA’s can’t be trusted to define>>>
Same way that we can’t trust a Nazi to define himself correctly. Ignoring the fact that you said that you had MRA’s defining themselves as>>
Give me feminism’s interpretation of The Men’s Rights Movement, under the assumption that we can’t trust an MRA to define himself, in the>>>
Definition of The Men’s Rights Movement, and you tell me they define themselves as an opposition to feminism. I ask you to show me. You>>>
I am trying. You tell everyone that feminism is about equality, and that’s most feminists definition. And that’s fine. I ask for a credible>
Either taken your definition from people who vehemently hate them, or gone to r/neckbeards or something.
But feminists are different? They should be trusted to describe themselves accurately?
Exist is because they hate feminism.
To yet is another feminist telling people what MRA’s are, I would like you to find me a credible MRA saying that the only reason they>>>
MGTOW’s interpretations of what feminism means. It’s biased and not likely how feminism defines itself. If the source I haven’t replied>>>
I haven’t read the last one yet, but your showing me feminist interpretations of the Men’s Rights Movement. It’s like me showing you >>>
Is not MRA’s defining themselves as you have said. I will look at your other source as soon as I have the time.
This one seems to be made by feminists who hate MRA’s. And the Susan is here too. Wether or not this paper is factual is irrelevant. It
Explaining why some people don’t like feminism. No mention of MRA’s. So they aren’t defined there.
The Susan one seems to be a paid for book, which I neither have the money nor time to read. But based on the abstract, it seems to be>>>
Calling them made up?
Sorry I took so long to answer. Do you mind giving me some links?
The Men’s rights movement. I don’t know where I lost you.
As I said. That was the closest thing to a definition I could find. If you can find a credible definition for it, please give me the source.
Source please.
Where?
I mean, legally, sure.
It actually seems to be Very hard to find a specific definition for it. Wikipedia seems to have one though.
And the definition of MRA’s is the same thing except from the men’s side. Does that mean everyone who wants equality is also an MRA?
How so?
She’d be automatically guilty
It’s the concept of, well how do you like being treated this way? I still think she deserves due process, but under a lot of feminist ideas>
Nope. It’s just ironic
Themselves, then why should feminists? You want to have your cake, and eat it too.
An opposition to feminism, and didn’t bring any, let’s focus on the can’t define themselves part. If MRA’s can’t be trusted to define>>>
Same way that we can’t trust a Nazi to define himself correctly. Ignoring the fact that you said that you had MRA’s defining themselves as>>
Give me feminism’s interpretation of The Men’s Rights Movement, under the assumption that we can’t trust an MRA to define himself, in the>>>
Definition of The Men’s Rights Movement, and you tell me they define themselves as an opposition to feminism. I ask you to show me. You>>>
I am trying. You tell everyone that feminism is about equality, and that’s most feminists definition. And that’s fine. I ask for a credible>
Either taken your definition from people who vehemently hate them, or gone to r/neckbeards or something.
But feminists are different? They should be trusted to describe themselves accurately?
Exist is because they hate feminism.
To yet is another feminist telling people what MRA’s are, I would like you to find me a credible MRA saying that the only reason they>>>
MGTOW’s interpretations of what feminism means. It’s biased and not likely how feminism defines itself. If the source I haven’t replied>>>
I haven’t read the last one yet, but your showing me feminist interpretations of the Men’s Rights Movement. It’s like me showing you >>>
Is not MRA’s defining themselves as you have said. I will look at your other source as soon as I have the time.
This one seems to be made by feminists who hate MRA’s. And the Susan is here too. Wether or not this paper is factual is irrelevant. It
Explaining why some people don’t like feminism. No mention of MRA’s. So they aren’t defined there.
The Susan one seems to be a paid for book, which I neither have the money nor time to read. But based on the abstract, it seems to be>>>
Calling them made up?
Sorry I took so long to answer. Do you mind giving me some links?
The Men’s rights movement. I don’t know where I lost you.
As I said. That was the closest thing to a definition I could find. If you can find a credible definition for it, please give me the source.
Source please.
Where?
I mean, legally, sure.
And the definition of MRA’s is the same thing except from the men’s side. Does that mean everyone who wants equality is also an MRA?