4136 pts · March 19, 2020
Not at all funerals.
That's why I wouldn't go to a country with a fucked-up justice system and wonder why he did it. He wasn't forced to, he had access to informations about their justice system and choose to go anyway. "A government is supposed to protect its citizens, wherever they go, whatever they do." Where have you read that ?! The "whatever they do" part is insane, are you american by any chance ?
At this point gun control is like protecting children, an excuse for mass-surveillance without any meaningful impact on the original topic. Solving the problem would remove the excuse.
But why go to Iran in the first place ? A french prisoner was executed in China recently and I don't understand why it would be France responsibility to protect those who choose to go into another sovereign territory and break their laws
Yes.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10998078/
I don't know enough about the US split phase setup but that would not happen in France (and most of the EU I think). Anyway having exposed conductor is dumb enough for me, the back-feed would be the cherry on top. It can always be mitigated by an open breaker but if it's not enforced by design user gonna user error
It's a fucked up way to connect a generator to the home circuit during outage
Not For Safe Work language ?
I partially agree, there's always a motive, but when it's an intrinsic reward like in your examples, that still reads as benevolent to me. That's a completely different beast when we're speaking about a country, it never act for the fuzzy feeling of doing good but soft-power, economic or other external strategic rewards.
And even then it wasn't purely benevolent but at least it was mutually beneficial.
This is cultish behavior so I'd bet on indoctrination from a young age and other cult recruitment techniques.
nah, believing in any jesus is proof of a level of gullibility allowing to believe in anything but believing in white jesus adds a level of stupidity over it.Developed countries are secular and your extrapolation from my first message is wild btw
You don't see the problem with the vice-president thinking demons are real ? For a country believing in white jesus I guess it fits
Sometimes it's only for their ressources
Why would you want to replace religion ?
In french it's "sot-l’y-laisse" that would translate to something like "fool leaves it"
It's not a bug but a feature, we still haven't invented a better way to keep people fundamentally divided.
"A person" in french is "une personne" but "nobody" is "personne"I don't think we could find a natural language that's not at least a bit cursed.
For me it's irrelevant, that's the kind of thing that get you on a register you don't want to be in
taking a shit in the planter may be a misdemeanor but doing it without risking indecent exposure charges would be impressive
Good ways to communicate safely for a small group but I don't see how it could organize a large one.But is USPS really safe ? Theoretically mail is protected against unreasonable searches and seizures but in practice I'm doubtful.
You'd have the same subversion risk on a self-hosted platform.Granted you'd control the moderation but being an host would also expose you to litigation.
That's after the "fun stuff" like LRAD, ADS, gas and other crowd control method that would cull the less prepared.I'd bet on small group over large crowd for oligarch hunting
I may be too pessimist about it but large numbers require some form of organisation that become target of subversion and media vilification to deter the rest of the people from joining in a "critical mass" and allow violent repression.If all else fail you can always do like the french and kill the leaders in "accidents"
That's the spirit, the only problem being the system they build to keep us from touching them
And those kids from the 50's made the world a better place for all of us with their perfect penmanship (/s just in case it's not obvious enough)
Is it me or does she look like erin in the last on ?
Officially recognized as a sacrament in 1184, I would not call that modern.
You may have remarked a slight change in society and culture.We invented it, we would not invent it, past, present, what's hard ?
That's why I wouldn't go to a country with a fucked-up justice system and wonder why he did it. He wasn't forced to, he had access to informations about their justice system and choose to go anyway. "A government is supposed to protect its citizens, wherever they go, whatever they do." Where have you read that ?! The "whatever they do" part is insane, are you american by any chance ?
At this point gun control is like protecting children, an excuse for mass-surveillance without any meaningful impact on the original topic. Solving the problem would remove the excuse.
But why go to Iran in the first place ? A french prisoner was executed in China recently and I don't understand why it would be France responsibility to protect those who choose to go into another sovereign territory and break their laws
Yes.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10998078/
I don't know enough about the US split phase setup but that would not happen in France (and most of the EU I think). Anyway having exposed conductor is dumb enough for me, the back-feed would be the cherry on top. It can always be mitigated by an open breaker but if it's not enforced by design user gonna user error
It's a fucked up way to connect a generator to the home circuit during outage
Not For Safe Work language ?
I partially agree, there's always a motive, but when it's an intrinsic reward like in your examples, that still reads as benevolent to me. That's a completely different beast when we're speaking about a country, it never act for the fuzzy feeling of doing good but soft-power, economic or other external strategic rewards.
And even then it wasn't purely benevolent but at least it was mutually beneficial.
This is cultish behavior so I'd bet on indoctrination from a young age and other cult recruitment techniques.
nah, believing in any jesus is proof of a level of gullibility allowing to believe in anything but believing in white jesus adds a level of stupidity over it.
Developed countries are secular and your extrapolation from my first message is wild btw
You don't see the problem with the vice-president thinking demons are real ? For a country believing in white jesus I guess it fits
Sometimes it's only for their ressources
Why would you want to replace religion ?
In french it's "sot-l’y-laisse" that would translate to something like "fool leaves it"
It's not a bug but a feature, we still haven't invented a better way to keep people fundamentally divided.
"A person" in french is "une personne" but "nobody" is "personne"
I don't think we could find a natural language that's not at least a bit cursed.
For me it's irrelevant, that's the kind of thing that get you on a register you don't want to be in
taking a shit in the planter may be a misdemeanor but doing it without risking indecent exposure charges would be impressive
Good ways to communicate safely for a small group but I don't see how it could organize a large one.
But is USPS really safe ? Theoretically mail is protected against unreasonable searches and seizures but in practice I'm doubtful.
You'd have the same subversion risk on a self-hosted platform.
Granted you'd control the moderation but being an host would also expose you to litigation.
That's after the "fun stuff" like LRAD, ADS, gas and other crowd control method that would cull the less prepared.
I'd bet on small group over large crowd for oligarch hunting
I may be too pessimist about it but large numbers require some form of organisation that become target of subversion and media vilification to deter the rest of the people from joining in a "critical mass" and allow violent repression.
If all else fail you can always do like the french and kill the leaders in "accidents"
That's the spirit, the only problem being the system they build to keep us from touching them
And those kids from the 50's made the world a better place for all of us with their perfect penmanship (/s just in case it's not obvious enough)
Is it me or does she look like erin in the last on ?
Officially recognized as a sacrament in 1184, I would not call that modern.
You may have remarked a slight change in society and culture.
We invented it, we would not invent it, past, present, what's hard ?