2146 pts ยท October 10, 2014
First you open up the 'giant book of every situation ever' and scroll down until you never have to 'interpret' a situation ever again
unlawful and immoral do not mean the same thing
There's only 48 characters (including spaces) in the first text box
I will very literally fucking kill any friend that says "ambrosial" or "nectarous" to describe something tasty.
"a IKEA"
Hold on a second while I tell Canada to use the technical term "the Indigenous peoples of North America" to avoid being 'wrong'
Unless its from his perspective of how every dollar gets her closer to sleeping with him
'up to this point', a person who's still indecisive has lost the benefit of the doubt.
"I used to be an adventurer like you....then I took a dart to the head"
When you're well trained in classical anatomy but still feel like you need an excuse to draw naked people.
It's "obfuscation," and judges/inspectors will fuck your shit up if pull the 'technicality' card to justify deception of this nature
felt the same way, so i watched the video. I can confirm the finished product looks EXACTLY like the final frame of the gif. Just abstract.
agreed, but wtf kind of measurement is "bits per square meter" in terms of a useful or meaningful information-storage expression.
of 4 outcomes (2 guesses, 2 outcomes), if the croc is going to eat the child, both guesses result in the child dying, it doesn't have to lie
the paradox relies on the linguistic problem of the croc's "intention for the child" vs "the child's state of being" at the end
if he cant eat the child, it means "you will eat him" did not correctly guess his fate. It's an illusion of choice based on relative truth
the only way to get the child back is if the croc was going to give him back--if the croc *never* intends to give em back, you always lose
I take no issue with observations that allude criminality. My issue is with *abusing* erroneous ones, to validate a righteous purpose.
I'm not talking about behavioural profiling or any of the indicators of crime--I'm talking about wrongful actions we justify "end vs means"
mitigating unreasonable risks beyond whats actually reasonable for the situation does not justify disproportionate action--is what Im saying
You said *specifically* you'd make the mistake 100 times to stop it once. That speaks to poor training, or the active choice to disregard it
of course, but 'proactive action with good (or bad) intention' still defines the wrong of racial profiling
how 'potential' the risk is key. Letting your child walk home from school has the potential to get them kidnapped too. reductio ad absurdum.
"i'd pull over 100 black people to catch the one criminal" - profiling 101
That's the same excuse cops use when they racially profile people though
I'd like to believe that when I go, if I've done good, people will make goofy, even lewd puns with me in mind. spread the humor
right? it's amazing how easily self-righteous can become respectful when you just take out the better-than-thou element.
I think you may have missed the humor in the specificity of 20 years--Rome took longer to 'fall' than the US has even existed.
I dont see that as weird. If two people feel they've helped each other, it makes for sense for both to be grateful.
yea but aren't all sex whales from Tokyo? I dont see the problem.
First you open up the 'giant book of every situation ever' and scroll down until you never have to 'interpret' a situation ever again
unlawful and immoral do not mean the same thing
There's only 48 characters (including spaces) in the first text box
I will very literally fucking kill any friend that says "ambrosial" or "nectarous" to describe something tasty.
"a IKEA"
Hold on a second while I tell Canada to use the technical term "the Indigenous peoples of North America" to avoid being 'wrong'
Unless its from his perspective of how every dollar gets her closer to sleeping with him
'up to this point', a person who's still indecisive has lost the benefit of the doubt.
"I used to be an adventurer like you....then I took a dart to the head"
When you're well trained in classical anatomy but still feel like you need an excuse to draw naked people.
It's "obfuscation," and judges/inspectors will fuck your shit up if pull the 'technicality' card to justify deception of this nature
felt the same way, so i watched the video. I can confirm the finished product looks EXACTLY like the final frame of the gif. Just abstract.
agreed, but wtf kind of measurement is "bits per square meter" in terms of a useful or meaningful information-storage expression.
of 4 outcomes (2 guesses, 2 outcomes), if the croc is going to eat the child, both guesses result in the child dying, it doesn't have to lie
the paradox relies on the linguistic problem of the croc's "intention for the child" vs "the child's state of being" at the end
if he cant eat the child, it means "you will eat him" did not correctly guess his fate. It's an illusion of choice based on relative truth
the only way to get the child back is if the croc was going to give him back--if the croc *never* intends to give em back, you always lose
I take no issue with observations that allude criminality. My issue is with *abusing* erroneous ones, to validate a righteous purpose.
I'm not talking about behavioural profiling or any of the indicators of crime--I'm talking about wrongful actions we justify "end vs means"
mitigating unreasonable risks beyond whats actually reasonable for the situation does not justify disproportionate action--is what Im saying
You said *specifically* you'd make the mistake 100 times to stop it once. That speaks to poor training, or the active choice to disregard it
of course, but 'proactive action with good (or bad) intention' still defines the wrong of racial profiling
how 'potential' the risk is key. Letting your child walk home from school has the potential to get them kidnapped too. reductio ad absurdum.
"i'd pull over 100 black people to catch the one criminal" - profiling 101
That's the same excuse cops use when they racially profile people though
I'd like to believe that when I go, if I've done good, people will make goofy, even lewd puns with me in mind. spread the humor
right? it's amazing how easily self-righteous can become respectful when you just take out the better-than-thou element.
I think you may have missed the humor in the specificity of 20 years--Rome took longer to 'fall' than the US has even existed.
I dont see that as weird. If two people feel they've helped each other, it makes for sense for both to be grateful.
yea but aren't all sex whales from Tokyo? I dont see the problem.