Oglogoth

1310 pts ยท June 17, 2013


I think fluffy is a furry who owns dogs

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ let alone impacting with the environment, it'd be impossible not to notice. It's still a solid projectile going ~340m/s, noise regardless

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

It doesn't though, even pretending you could suppress something that well, the concussive force of rounds simply passing by, 1/

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

My dad's Harley has a swinging license plate and hell occasioonally kick it shut through tolls

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trust me that's a lot less painful that punching pu ching quarters into people's knuckles

7 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

Don't make me think critically REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

In the words of Mr. West "tell em gimme 50 million or I'ma quit"

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was 7

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don't need to be read your rights if your arrested, only of you're questioned.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hey Ive never worked in this industry but let me tell you why that guy is doing his job wrong and is stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

If you wanna argue the letter of the law with me, at least use some actual facts and evidence against me instead of two baseless sentences.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

10https://dictionary.thelaw.com/imminent-danger/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7against the assailant at that point would be considered retaliatory and not self-defense."

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6and indicates that there is no longer any threat of violence, then the threat of danger has ended. Any use of force by the victim....

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5generally loses justification once the threat has ended. For example, if an aggressor assaults a victim but then ends the assault...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4of immediate physical harm, however, do not justify the use of force in self-defense. Moreover, the use of force in self-defense...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 verbal, as long as it puts the intended victim in an immediate fear of physical harm. Offensive words without an accompanying threat...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2"As a general rule, self-defense only justifies the use of force when it is used in response to an immediate threat. The threat can be...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 That's where you're wrong, kiddo.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8Also, you still haven't shown me which posts I've misunderstood, surely your great literacy powers can point them out to me?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

7His watch back, he's doing his job.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6The person in this video is drawing his weapon because he IS a cop, and is making an arrest for a crime he witnessed. He isn't just getting

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5Because you are not a cop, and have no right to draw a weapon on a person who isn't an IMMINENT(KEY WORD) threat to your life or livelihood

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 Themselves were drawing THEIR weapon because they felt they were in imminent danger, regardless of their previous crime.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 Believe that your life was in imminent danger. This belief would be false, and instead, the person who you shot could instead argue they

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0