1743 pts ยท December 27, 2015
Just give him 75% of the cost of imprisoning someone. Everyone would be better off.
Partly because people keep calling them "manly".
interesting. I wouldn't use the word if it had those connotations here but it is surprisingly non-gendered in its Australian usage.
It is common in informal situations. I'd love to learn about your background as it could be to do with age or where you live.
How is any of that an argument against veganism? Is someone going to take away modern society soon?
And when you come across new evidence change your beliefs.
be terrible not only because it would spread ignorant ideas about genetics and history but also race. Be accurate with your language.
This shit is important. Imagine if people thought black people were better at basketball because white people bred them that way. That would
Even if that is literally true that is not what you meant by your original comment & not what is generally taken to be selective breeding.
breeding is a specific thing and all your sources have pointed out that it did not really occur.
I don't challenge that logic, although it is very hard to parse from your emotive language. I challenged the term "selectively". Selective
large numbers of children is very very different than selectively breeding for physical traits.
not happen. The sources you provided said as much. lmost all "breeding" was simply forcing or encouraging large numbers of children. Forcing
You originally said we "we selectively bred black people" to be plump, meaty and delicious, or some other desirable physical trait. That did
Why can't you guys on the right take a joke?
Perhaps it's a joke and the alt-right shouldn't be so sensitive.
This is very very different to the sort of selective breeding you originally mentioned.
The book you source says there was "little direct breeding for slave trade" but there was "indirect manipulation of birth rate".
This article says there was little to no selection for physical traits and that the goal was simply to get large numbers of children.
Eating meat is as ideological as not eating meat. We just don't notice it because it's so common.
As to your second point, I can't work out what you mean.
I said they didn't try it and if they had it wouldn't have worked.
Fuck your preachy sign glorifying the eating of meat. Both signs are equally preachy. That's what ads are.
I'd be happy for some farm breeds to die out or live on in zoos for a while. I think most vegetarians would.
And that says nothing as to what we should be or need to be eating today.
and because of the number of people, the geographic spread and the short timeframe it could not have caused any significant genetic changes.
That didn't happen. Some slaves were forced to have children but selective breeding like you're talking about was too expensive and slow,
The environment. Meat production is responsible for about 10% of global CO2 emissions. Also bad for land, water & energy use and pollution.
The food chain is irrelevant.
And the stabilisation is need because of old fossil generators and old transmission network.
Just give him 75% of the cost of imprisoning someone. Everyone would be better off.
Partly because people keep calling them "manly".
interesting. I wouldn't use the word if it had those connotations here but it is surprisingly non-gendered in its Australian usage.
It is common in informal situations. I'd love to learn about your background as it could be to do with age or where you live.
How is any of that an argument against veganism? Is someone going to take away modern society soon?
And when you come across new evidence change your beliefs.
be terrible not only because it would spread ignorant ideas about genetics and history but also race. Be accurate with your language.
This shit is important. Imagine if people thought black people were better at basketball because white people bred them that way. That would
Even if that is literally true that is not what you meant by your original comment & not what is generally taken to be selective breeding.
breeding is a specific thing and all your sources have pointed out that it did not really occur.
I don't challenge that logic, although it is very hard to parse from your emotive language. I challenged the term "selectively". Selective
large numbers of children is very very different than selectively breeding for physical traits.
not happen. The sources you provided said as much. lmost all "breeding" was simply forcing or encouraging large numbers of children. Forcing
You originally said we "we selectively bred black people" to be plump, meaty and delicious, or some other desirable physical trait. That did
Why can't you guys on the right take a joke?
Perhaps it's a joke and the alt-right shouldn't be so sensitive.
This is very very different to the sort of selective breeding you originally mentioned.
The book you source says there was "little direct breeding for slave trade" but there was "indirect manipulation of birth rate".
This article says there was little to no selection for physical traits and that the goal was simply to get large numbers of children.
Eating meat is as ideological as not eating meat. We just don't notice it because it's so common.
As to your second point, I can't work out what you mean.
I said they didn't try it and if they had it wouldn't have worked.
Fuck your preachy sign glorifying the eating of meat. Both signs are equally preachy. That's what ads are.
I'd be happy for some farm breeds to die out or live on in zoos for a while. I think most vegetarians would.
And that says nothing as to what we should be or need to be eating today.
and because of the number of people, the geographic spread and the short timeframe it could not have caused any significant genetic changes.
That didn't happen. Some slaves were forced to have children but selective breeding like you're talking about was too expensive and slow,
The environment. Meat production is responsible for about 10% of global CO2 emissions. Also bad for land, water & energy use and pollution.
The food chain is irrelevant.
And the stabilisation is need because of old fossil generators and old transmission network.