92 pts ยท March 25, 2017
reminds me of the website Genius, and how a single line reference to Lord of the Flies led to people trying to read symbolism in every line.
Indeed. these people think that food and medicine and shelter and all the things we rely upon just came into existence on a shelf somewhere.
that would only possibly be true if being an asshole was inherently without merit, which is an obviously absurd claim.
comical amounts of murder.
well, the art design is rubbish, and they look very little like the original characters, but the dialogue was well executed.
even if you're making fun of something, as long as it's not malicious it's not bad. like making fun of the British for drinking so much tea.
time is no obstacle to the truth.
you're right, it isn't the axe that killed him. but not because it isn't the same axe.
a hatchet is a small axe. but he is wrong, and not for the reasons most of these comments believe.
close. the answer is right, the reason isn't. the axe may or may not be the same. either way, it didn't kill him, the bullets did.
it isn't actually. it's trying to trick you into pondering this paradox, but if you pay attention to the parameters, the answer is obvious.
wayback machine, for posterity: https://web.archive.org/web/20141126084325/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TdUieDIXe0
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/724/242/836.jpg
the webcomic oglaf. i'd link you to it, but it's extremely nsfw.
for determining whether or not you're a virgin
several of these are the same story
reminds me of the website Genius, and how a single line reference to Lord of the Flies led to people trying to read symbolism in every line.
Indeed. these people think that food and medicine and shelter and all the things we rely upon just came into existence on a shelf somewhere.
that would only possibly be true if being an asshole was inherently without merit, which is an obviously absurd claim.
comical amounts of murder.
well, the art design is rubbish, and they look very little like the original characters, but the dialogue was well executed.
even if you're making fun of something, as long as it's not malicious it's not bad. like making fun of the British for drinking so much tea.
time is no obstacle to the truth.
you're right, it isn't the axe that killed him. but not because it isn't the same axe.
a hatchet is a small axe. but he is wrong, and not for the reasons most of these comments believe.
close. the answer is right, the reason isn't. the axe may or may not be the same. either way, it didn't kill him, the bullets did.
it isn't actually. it's trying to trick you into pondering this paradox, but if you pay attention to the parameters, the answer is obvious.
wayback machine, for posterity: https://web.archive.org/web/20141126084325/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TdUieDIXe0
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/724/242/836.jpg
the webcomic oglaf. i'd link you to it, but it's extremely nsfw.
for determining whether or not you're a virgin
several of these are the same story