2959 pts ยท December 13, 2012
2) Being called a psychopath by someone that's clearly delusional is pretty amusing.
1) I'm not the one justifying killing things I supposedly love and respect. That's not a normal person's thought process.
5) I'm no psychopath. I just have a low tolerance for bullshit. The typical hunter's excuse is brimming with bullshit. Just own it.
4) And yes, I've hunted. Wild boar. I just don't spin some bs tale about love, respect, and crying after the fact when clearly it's untrue.
3) You seem to think that killing the animal is some noble deed that it wanted or deserved? Please.
2) You cannot simultaneously claim to care or respect the animal while BLATANTLY violating its right to life.
1) You care enough to cut the animal's life short. A right you granted yourself to which you are NOT entitled. You do NOT care.
5) I don't care and I own it. You don't care and you tell yourself some silly story about moments of reflection. Own your actions.
4) A simple "I understand that they have just as much right to life as I do but don't give a shit." is far more respectable than that story.
Who disagreed? It IS more ethical. They're both shitty options. Congrats on being the tallest midget.
3) I don't have beef with hunting. Do whatever floats your boat. Just don't be a pussy about justifying it. Own it.
2) You see, I admit that I blatantly ignore that right. Hunters come up some bullshit about respect and necessity as if that makes up for it
1) Please explain to me why that animal has less of a right to live than you do or why you have a right to kill it.
4) If you have a problem with/can't handle hat reality you probably shouldn't be hunting or eating meat.
3) Hunters need to stop telling fairy tales. You kill innocent animals. I cause innocent animals to be tortured/killed. It is what it is.
2) Yeah, it's more ethical in the same way execution via a shot to the back of the head is more ethical than torture.
1) There's nothing moral about hunting. Let's drop the bullshit. I eat meat and I know damn well what it means about how that animal lived.
Here we have the average American voter...offering a poorly thought out opinion on a matter they clearly don't fully understand.
Feel free to fire 5.56 in a weapon chambered for .223...
What if OP was already doing the work of four people? Then it's a step towards fair comp + shedding dead weight.
Bingo. My boss would do well to lay off a bunch of people and re-distribute their salaries to more deserving workers.
I'm Johnny Knoxville and this is inflatable helmet...
Jobs don't grow on trees so "give them a job" is a bit much. However, in America we do tend to throw money at problems.
4) If everyone paid a truly fair (think splitting dinner with friends) share we wouldn't need a progressive tax code. Remember that.
3) There are people that pay more in taxes than your family earns in a year. THEY are doing the paying. When they complain, you can too.
2) If your income is THAT low you're still well into the receiving help side of the curve.
1)America has a progressive tax code. Meaning while you may "feel" like you're paying for them you really aren't.
I don't even notice this stuff because it has zero bearing on my life. You should ask yourself why you can't say the same...
2) But also ignoring the fact that our progressive tax system makes the vast majority takers... so we have takers bitching about takers.
1) Blame Mitt Romney for making the maker vs taker distinction in the last election.
2) Being called a psychopath by someone that's clearly delusional is pretty amusing.
1) I'm not the one justifying killing things I supposedly love and respect. That's not a normal person's thought process.
5) I'm no psychopath. I just have a low tolerance for bullshit. The typical hunter's excuse is brimming with bullshit. Just own it.
4) And yes, I've hunted. Wild boar. I just don't spin some bs tale about love, respect, and crying after the fact when clearly it's untrue.
3) You seem to think that killing the animal is some noble deed that it wanted or deserved? Please.
2) You cannot simultaneously claim to care or respect the animal while BLATANTLY violating its right to life.
1) You care enough to cut the animal's life short. A right you granted yourself to which you are NOT entitled. You do NOT care.
5) I don't care and I own it. You don't care and you tell yourself some silly story about moments of reflection. Own your actions.
4) A simple "I understand that they have just as much right to life as I do but don't give a shit." is far more respectable than that story.
Who disagreed? It IS more ethical. They're both shitty options. Congrats on being the tallest midget.
3) I don't have beef with hunting. Do whatever floats your boat. Just don't be a pussy about justifying it. Own it.
2) You see, I admit that I blatantly ignore that right. Hunters come up some bullshit about respect and necessity as if that makes up for it
1) Please explain to me why that animal has less of a right to live than you do or why you have a right to kill it.
4) If you have a problem with/can't handle hat reality you probably shouldn't be hunting or eating meat.
3) Hunters need to stop telling fairy tales. You kill innocent animals. I cause innocent animals to be tortured/killed. It is what it is.
2) Yeah, it's more ethical in the same way execution via a shot to the back of the head is more ethical than torture.
1) There's nothing moral about hunting. Let's drop the bullshit. I eat meat and I know damn well what it means about how that animal lived.
Here we have the average American voter...offering a poorly thought out opinion on a matter they clearly don't fully understand.
Feel free to fire 5.56 in a weapon chambered for .223...
What if OP was already doing the work of four people? Then it's a step towards fair comp + shedding dead weight.
Bingo. My boss would do well to lay off a bunch of people and re-distribute their salaries to more deserving workers.
I'm Johnny Knoxville and this is inflatable helmet...
Jobs don't grow on trees so "give them a job" is a bit much. However, in America we do tend to throw money at problems.
4) If everyone paid a truly fair (think splitting dinner with friends) share we wouldn't need a progressive tax code. Remember that.
3) There are people that pay more in taxes than your family earns in a year. THEY are doing the paying. When they complain, you can too.
2) If your income is THAT low you're still well into the receiving help side of the curve.
1)America has a progressive tax code. Meaning while you may "feel" like you're paying for them you really aren't.
I don't even notice this stuff because it has zero bearing on my life. You should ask yourself why you can't say the same...
2) But also ignoring the fact that our progressive tax system makes the vast majority takers... so we have takers bitching about takers.
1) Blame Mitt Romney for making the maker vs taker distinction in the last election.