strviking

2728 pts ยท March 18, 2014


Yeah have no idea what any of that was but I could feel the sass

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's great because I'm not Canadian but this has come over the border into wny. It's coffee, 2 cream, 2 sugar

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They still need to show it is for a public good. They can't just take it.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

To increase vaccination rate, that and proper education of what vaccines are.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Personally I prefer keeping people from having access to public things as a way to create incentive

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So the arguement then would need to shift to whether or not that risk is something the gov can make people assume.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Allergies can even change over time, so the risk is always there. No a huge one but still there

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow, so everyone knows what they're allergic to when they're born now? I must have missed the memo.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm just commenting that the world is not black and white even when it comes to these things

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Dies from it? I'm pro vax here but there are plenty of things done in the name of the greater good that fucked up a bunch of shit

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

What happens when a kids dies from an allergic reaction? Gov forced him to have it, are they liable for the ensuing fallout. What happens if

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

What about right to privacy? So now they can force to to tell the what procedures you've done. Now roe v wade precedent needs to be revised

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

Not claiming to be an expert her asshole. Just saying there a implication of forcing an entire population to under go a medical procedure

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

No offence but there have been complex legal battle over this for years. This comment just makes you sound like the anti vax group

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 11

This is different. This is technically false representation for a business contact. Hence fraud

8 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 0

Is from a creepy pasta post I believe. just some writers that like to write scary stories etc

8 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 0

I'm going back to school at 27. Can confirm.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well spokes woman came out saying they did not know. But I don't know if there is evidence to the contrary

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That wind looks like it might as well be from the back end of a jet engine.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Make sure it's an "accident"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Be considered an at fault claim and while that can still technically cause an increase its not the same as an at fault

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And your insurance company will go after the other guys coverage if they can recoup losses. If your at least less then 50%at fault it won't

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Worst case just use collision coverage, yeah you have to pay the deductible but that shouldn't be huge any ways,

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I'm supposing if this would be covered by insurance, only because it's and intentional act.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Now I need to do this for every fantasy book I've ever read

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fair enough.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not all military rules need deployment, many support roles can be filled

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Is kind of a compliment. ...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And I can understand the anger. There are some shady companies.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I acknowledge there are better ways to insure, especially health insurance. I never like the idea of someone's health as a business model

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0