Politics Girl (@iampoliticsgirl): Don't be startin' something you aren't ready to finish. We are not winning.

Mar 7, 2026 7:22 PM

OceansRust

Views

42173

Likes

1632

Dislikes

50

I just am rooting for many buses, and many cancers.
Many

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I believe the last time the US fought a war that was on its own land, was the civil war. The US doesn't seem to understand that the citizens of foreign nations will fight for their own land beyond all reason. They didn't learn that in Kenya or Vietnam, though the CIA understood it to arm the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan. There is no win condition in Iran. None

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh and we ran out of tomahawk missiles like, 2 days ago. Lol

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I don't want to hear we can't afford universal healthcare ever again.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Plus we are all out of allies.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

republicans have fucked the republic

1 month ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

I have been saying this since he became president the first time: everything he does is to weaken and destroy the USA.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Iranian leadership was not ready, that's why half of them got killed. They didn't expect the US to get this stupid. Anyway, the war is unsustainable for Iran too. The ones who really benefit are Russia (who can now sell their oil) and China (whose odds of taking Taiwan are looking better every day).

1 month ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

And Trump, who is gonna get a huge cut from all those ppl except China.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its hilarious how they were all complaining how with Kamala there would be this war in Iran and ridiculous corruption and spending...umm......

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

25th amendment before it’s too late

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry to say, it's been too late since Amy Coney Barrett's confirmation in 2020, or maybe since Brett Kavanaugh's in 2018. The entire administration could be replace with lefties and the SCOTUS impact will live on for at least 30 years.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

11k a second means that while you were watching this video, 1.85 million dollars were spent on the war.
I'm sorry, I meant the Super Duper Special Military Operation Electric Boogaloo.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do you know who’s happy about this? Everyone in the military industrial complex that gets the profit off the rebuilding once again…

1 month ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Putin, Xi, Kim Jong are all enjoying their popcorn too.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A basic misunderstanding of American adventurism. A military base is destroyed? Well, I guess we're gonna have to SPEND millions rebuilding.

1 month ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Billions*

1 month ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

A billion dollars a day MINIMUM for this war, but not a dime for social services right here at home. So much for "america first"

1 month ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

That 1000 million dollars a day. Imagine every day a thousand schools across the country getting a million dollars.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Of course there’s no money for social security. Funding that doesn’t let bigots torture and murder undersireables. Giving out multibillion a year handout to corporations, the military and the local nazi gangs that the government call police forces does enable that.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Everybody should be screaming that last line.

1 month ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 6

"Well here it is!" /s

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"THAT LAST LINE!!!" /s

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Hrm sounds like it plays right into Putin's hands to sweep in and take the middle east into their sphere of influence.

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Putin has lost influence : unable to protect Syria, Venezuela, Iran, unable to help the African countries it help owrththrow gvts to replace by military dictators Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger or puppets (CenterAfrican Republic) solve the jihadists insurgents problems.

The challenging power setback of all this turmoil is CHINA : they already benefir of all Trumps blatant errors (withdrawn from W.H.O., replaced by China, etc)

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

His ultimate goal is probably for Russian to own all of the Americas and Greenland.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Iran was a major ally for Russia (and China). This HURT Putin. Badly.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So destroying America's military bases, Radar systems, forcing us to expend resources for a losing fight? This didn't hurt Putin. It means that the US is losing its grip on Middle Eastern affairs, it also means that even if the US wanted to send aid to Ukraine, it's less likely to happen because of this bullshit illegal war.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They have not destroyed our military bases, they have not destroyed our radar systems, and it is hardly a losing fight.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

One week in and the US has lost hundreds of billions in military assets and is already begging its congress for more money for a war that supposedly isn’t even a war. Have a nice bankruptcy America. Stupidest country on earth.

1 month ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

"hundreds of billions"? More like ~8billion: https://iran-cost-ticker.com/

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Where do you think those hundreds of billions went? The production of those assets is (mostly) done in American factories by workers. The money doesn't just vaporize. The American military-industrial complex requires assets to be used so we can make more.

America didn't go bankrupt after WW2. The economy boomed from all the government spending on military stuff. It's a fucked up system, but it won't bankrupt us.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

No, it just vaporizes from the pockets of the middle and lower class and goes straight to military contractors for their fifth yacht and private islands.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You think the contractors build all those systems without any help? Raytheon employs 185,000 people. Of course the profits are obscene, but it's not like all the money goes directly to the ceo

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sauce ?

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Yeah, a destroying components of a single THAAD radar system isn't a huge blow to the US military. In fact of the 900bllion dollar annual budget it represents 1/4% of a _single years_ expenditure.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just to be clear, this invasion was massively stupid.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah, it's extra dumb when we could be spending that money on things to make life better instead of more efficient ways to blow up brown people.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She is wrong about the Iranian Missles. They are not deep underground. They are dispersed in Warehouses. Only have 2-3 Trucks in one Warehouse drive them out, launch the missiles and then park them in the Warehouse. If they are one Day later still there, load them somewhere else up and launch missles. One big underground Warehouse is a target to destroy the entrance. 400-600 smaller storage sides are a big problem. As you need to get every storage. Russian learned it and passed the lesson.

1 month ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

This war will be the American equivalent of russia's three days long "special military operation" that lasted over 4 years, destroyed much of their war machine, and exposed a once-feared world power as a crumbling, hopelessly corrupt banana republic ruled by a mafia boss who has surrounded himself with incompetent Yes Men. While the US has more toys to throw at Iran, it's not exactly next door and the logistics will be getting trickier after the loss of important bases (and soon regional allies)

1 month ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

Waiting to see long lines at the borders as young men and women look to flee the coming draft, much like Russians rushed to cross the border into Kazakhstan, Serbia and Georgia soon after Pukin invaded Ukraine.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That can't be right, I was reliably informed you destroyed all their missiles?

1 month ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 7

Yes, with our radar installations, those missiles are gone

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, you see, that's actually because, um... Biden! Her emails! Hunter's laptop!

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Obliterated. It's not the same. You're mistaken. Fake news. Checkmate.

1 month ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

A conservative gets in power, trashes the domestic economy for billionaires, starts a foreign war to distract the citizens, repeat.

1 month ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

At this point, the only way for America to even mildly recover any international respect is to literally pull every single Rep out of government and tar and feather them. If they are just voted out or even arrested, they are still part of the system...

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The mistake was assuming America was some shining beacon on a hill to begin with. We aren't the first nor will we be the last country to fall into this kind of bullshit. Idk how you're supposed to just write off an entire country. You really can't. Just like we don't look at Germany and go "Hitler therefore they bad until end of time.". The population doesn't just go away. If they destabilize you just have loose nukes. No one actually wins.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Tbf, the idea of loose nukes is literally only slightly scarier than the idea of Trump having nukes. And the gap is closing by the day. There is literally no check on his power that he hasn't challenged and subverted. Even as the tariff thing eventually got reduced, monumental damage has already been done, rich ppl have been enriched. Give him enough time and Trump WILL make it so his word is the only one needed to launch a nuke. Literally everyone who's said 'Trump can't do that' has been wrong

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like, the big fear of loose nukes is that some madman with delusional beliefs, a dictator with a an ego the size of Mars, or a crook with intent of starting a war for profit got the nukes. Trump is literally all three and every appointment he makes, every competent person he replaces with a toady, brings him one step closer to actually becoming king of the USA. And even if he doesn't succeed, the Reps will consider this great practice.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You also get the clownshoes who believe conservative lies. 'huh, nothing's in my pocket even though my town in Bumbleweed has now gotten stoplights and proper parking spaces. I guess I'm voting for the GOP, again!'. :/

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Minimum wage? That's socialism!

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm in favor of a MAXIMUM Net Worth.

Too much money in ONE person's pockets makes LOTS of persons needing it to survive !

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck trump. But we haven't lost any bases thats also misrepresentation of whats occurring. The concern right now is our burn rate of missile interceptors versus Iranian missiles and drones. The good news? Is that Iran has lost most of their launchers. The number of attacks launched is decreasing. Bad news. They still have cheap easy to launch drones

1 month ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

It's a DPS race to see which runs out first: Iran's missiles and drones or American radars and interceptors. Neither belligerent will say if or when this happens, but both belligerents can be expected to claim their opponent is destroyed.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not exactly losing bases, but losing some really expensive and hard to replace equipment: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/03/05/middleeast/radar-bases-us-missile-defense-iran-war-intl-invs

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Im aware. But im just calling out the bullshit that lady is saying too. The radar in Jordon is basically irreplaceable. There are only 9 total THAAD systems total and we deployed 2 to Israel and a few across the region and just lost one of the critical radar systems (and maybe a second in the UAE j think)

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If the government spends 1 billion to buy a radar, then the radar gets blown up by Iran, the radar is gone. THE 1 BILLION IS NOT GONE. The 1 billion just moved from place A (US treasury or wherever they keep the money) to place B (the pockets of a few CEO's and stockholders). What Americans are witnessing is a gigantic transfer of community money (your tax dollars) going from A to B.

1 month ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 8

Actually that’s not totally still in America, it’s going to have a lot of it transferred to China and other places because you need factories to build things, and America does not have many of those anymore today. And China uses that money to help Iran maybe. So trump is fight a war and paying somebody to help the opponent.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The added implication is that the DoD will then buy ANOTHER, replacement, radar.

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Soooo much of that money is right now being hoarded waiting for a stock market and housing market collapse. Then all that money is going to flow back into those markets where it will grow more money for the already rich.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also murder. We're also witnessing a lot of murder.

1 month ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 0

And i can guarantee you, if Trump survives till 2028 he'll win again because concervatives will go "yeah ok he crashed the economy and he fukced some kids and kill a few million people... BUT.... Gavin Newsom is even worse" (and Democrats will stay home because they dont like Newsom either)

1 month ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

We aren't even at the midterms. Stop resigning yourself to Gavin Newsom. He can still be primaried. There is time for a better option still

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's still time to come up with a better candidate...They don't have to hit an iceberg that's 3 years out. I don't get how people act like this path is set in stone. Like the dems need to close ranks already.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Someone needs to kick the DNC's door down - with force, actual literal force - and tell them that if they push a "presumptive nominee" instead of being COMPLETELY FUCKING HANDS OFF AND LETTING THIS PLAY OUT, and PREVENTING ANY KIND OF BACKDOOR DEALING, they will fucking lose their lives in the next administration because they aren't going to be as nice as Trump.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You are trying to tell me that if I take a dollar and pay it to someone then the dollar is not gone. Of course it is. I don’t have it anymore, so it is gone. I cannot get it back.

If I take a dollar and set it on fire, do you believe that it went to god? What twisted logic do you follow?

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You literally said 'pay it to someone'. So the dollar still exists. Just not in your pocket, but in the pocket of 'someone'. Same with the tax dollar. That dollar you paid in taxes still exists. But it's not in your pocket anymore. Its not in the government pocket anymore. It's in the pocket of the CEO of the weapons factory. It's in the pockets of the stockholders. When Uncle Sam buys a 1 billion dollar radar, the rich get a LOT more rich. That is where the money goes.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes and no. Money spent on expensive equipment destroyed IS money lost, because we COULD have spent a billion dollars on a radar, OR a billion dollars on anything else. In both scenarios, the money itself would circulate in the economy, but with the radar the thing the money was spent on is gone, making the value we were supposed to get from the money transfer also gone.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

When we're talking about money lost, we don't mean the actual literal currency, we are talking about the value generated from the man-hours that the exchange of currency represented and in turn the opportunity-cost of the man-hours being spent on the thing we then lose instead of on another thing.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes so the man-hours generated buying healthcare is a LOT more than the man-hours generated buying radars, because almost 100% of the money from health care gets re-circulated, but when buying a radar, a large portion of the money goes to millionaires and billionaires and then it;s gone. It gets hoarded. Its taken out of the lower 'normal people' economy and stashed into the higher economy where it;s only being used as leverage, never spend.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also yes and no. If the billion is spend to in the Affordable Health Care Act, the money goes to poor people who will spend that money immediately. Then that money comes back into circulation. If the billion is spend on a radar, a large part of that money will vanish into the pockets of millionaires and billionaires, who do not spend. They only hoard. It doesnt come back into circulation and destroys thee economy for lower wages.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That ignores the Americans employed making, deploying, and using said radar system. The 1 billion didn't just go straight into a CEO's pocket and it didn't burn up. I'm not defending overpaid CEOs or the merits of this war - only pointing out the fallacy that the money is 'gone' when in reality most of it fed back into the American economy that produced it.

The fucked up reality is that war can boost the economy. Eisenhower tried to warn us not to depend on it but we haven't learned.

1 month ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

Yeah it can boost a nations economy, temporarily.

Germany was riding a wave of that during world war 2, though IIRC that wave died out somewhere halfway through the war.

Russias numbers look pretty hot for a while too, but there are cracks in the seams there as well now.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you really think that money wouldn't be spent if it wasn't spent on that radar? Also, where do you think the money goes when you build things in the middle east, most of it is to whoever actually built it in the middle east, you don't ship anything but the bits that can't be fabricated out there across the world in a more expensive country to fabricate things.

1 month ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Most of it that doesn't go to said greedy CEO I should say.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're absolutely correct about building stuff overseas. But this example cited a hypothetical billion-dollar radar system that would almost certainly be designed and manufactured by American workers. I was responding to that.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

designed yes, built, no, it's in the middle east, probably only the things too difficult to fab out there were made here, and that one piece the CEO charged 200 million dollars for is not even a fraction of that to make.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Also, it's not a hypothetical radar, it's the actual radar station that got knocked out in Qatar. This is a real 1.1 billion dollar station that the states paid for in the middle east that got blown up already.

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

This is it, we're watching the collapse of American power in general, no longer just soft power.

1 month ago | Likes 294 Dislikes 5

Seeing how much shit American dominance brings for democracies in Europe and South America... yay?

At least finally there are (rapid) steps taken in the EU to dethrone Mastercard and Visa from payment methods to stop both leakage of personal data and their mentally disturbed puritan ideals, As well as rapidly progressing steps to replace Teams and Zoom for security reasons (France has released a government backed Teams called La Suite looks awesome),

4 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Correct. The american dollar will not be replaced by krypto. The rest of the world has finally caught on to the money printing scam that the US has been doing since 1950. American hedgemony is already over. Its done.

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Good riddance. The collapse of the United States would be the single most beneficial event in the history of human civilization.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sorry, but that is nonsense. US (or some nation) Hegemony was a necessary bridge between post WW2 and what we hope will be a Global Roundtable that comes next. That said, I'm not convinced we (humans, Earthicans) are quite ready for that next step. MAGA shot its wad early, to the shock of no one.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well... kinda... I suspect Taiwan is going to have a very bad time at some point in the not so distant future.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I feel bad for them. Genuinely. But currently? We’ve got our own shit to swim through. No longer proud to be an American here.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I had heard that they have all their chip factories wired to blow as a failsafe against invasion. But I haven't actually confirmed that.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Given any other foundaries are years from being up and running... Seems a good idea

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'mma guess its gonna get even worse. Not as in losing power kind of way. I'm gonna call it. Trump doesn't give a shit about the losses cos he legits wants to use a nuke. Don't anyone dare tell me he isn't stupid enough. Tiny pp man wants to commit the greatest act of overcompensation in history, and thinks billions of losses and untold death will get him the approval to launch it.

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

While nothing is ever totally off the table with this administration, the odds of even a tactical nuke, much less a strategic nuke being used in Iran is vanishingly small, and it's not because Trump or his cronies aren't stupid enough to do it; it's because military leadership won't sign off on it. It's no secret that Hegseth and Trump are loathed by the Pentagon, and despite popular perception, it takes more than just the president and secretary to sanction a nuke.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Launch orders from this White House will not make it through the command-and-control systems. No boomer skipper is keying that with his XO.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

'Ok Boomer Skipper, you'll be placed on temporary leave and this is nodick rubberneck, your replacement'

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They're not able to replace a boomer driver in the middle of the ocean (AND his XO!). :) And they can't just slot any asshole into running the most devastating weapon man has ever devised. Submariners are a different breed of men, and boomer skippers? Fuck me. Think those crews would cooperate with anything but the best of the best?

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't a US Base Commander just give a speech to his troops how Jesus was acting through Trump to start the apocolypse?
Wanna bet your life on there not being a *SINGLE* Evangelical and his friend in the ENTIRE USA military with ability to launch something nuclear (if given permission by command)?

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The biggest, dumbesr asshole runs the most devastating weapon man has ever devised:)
For all the rest: very good point

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just like Russia in Ukraine, the world is learning that with this administration’s prioritization of hiring supremely unqualified people in all positions, the actual effectiveness of the US military has become a shadow of what it projects to the world.

Any country that was previously avoiding military action based on fear of a US response is now reevaluating that stance.

1 month ago | Likes 80 Dislikes 0

As is any country that was depending on US military protection, which is where much of the US soft power came from.

1 month ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

The issue has always existed in the sense of overextended military. You can't fight parallel wars and Russia's air campaign is draining the same resources dry as Israel currently needs and Taiwan potentially.
Patriot missiles don't grow on trees, they replenish in very low numbers and stockpile is low.

1 month ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Shahed drone costs $30k. Patriot missile is $3-4m and take much longer to manufacture. They cant come up with the $166b to refund tariffs let alone let this drag out. This is worst case scenario.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The gulf states stupidly blasted off more patriots in the opening days of this shitstorm than Ukraine has had for the entirety of the Russian invasion.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We USED to have a doctrine that we could support two major fronts and a skirmish in a third location. No longer.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

B-but Trump told us he has unlimited ammunition. /S

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Holy shit. You made me realize why Trump, out of the blue, was saying we have sufficient materiel. Hint: It's because we don't.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Trump projects. Everything he thinks is either said outright, or projected through accusations and denials.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This shit is almost as bad as Fox News. The US is not suffering losses on the scale she's claiming. Yes people were killed and yes some facilities got hit but like 95% of US based are intact.

Iran is not winning, nor can it "win" this war. The best they can do is make it hurt and they are doing that certainly. The reality is US will exhaust it's arsenal before Iran could ever do any meaningful damage.

That said, the US cannot "win" this war either. They're running out of ammo and even if /1

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Even 5% damage sounds like a gross exaggeration. For embassies, the damage might be bigger though. And the part of "not having a plan" is true.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They had all the ammo in the world, it's impossible for them to bomb Iran into submission. No war has ever been won by air strikes alone.

They have to put boots on the ground, which will turn into a quagmire worse than Iraq most likely. /2

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Basically what every prediction says will or would happen. I remember I asked Kimi AI this weeks before the attack and this was exactly what was predicted. The US will burn out on this. Iran is not a small country and they will not be conquered by the US.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We have SANDALS on the ground! Seriously, the Kurds have joined in the fighting. They've been getting kicked around by Iran and Iraq for decades, and they're eager to change things for the better for themselves.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

The Kurds have been treated poorly by the US in several occasions.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No arguments there. Especially when we gave chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein, and he used them on the Kurds.

People tend to forget that U.S. behavior in the middle east in particular is so horrible that Trump's current actions can be summed up as "hard factory reset." Iran is like a festering pustule that WE helped create, and now the cleanup is inevitably... messy.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Kurds have not joined the fighting

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Kurds have indeed joined the fighting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UN3eaXeuDoc

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Any source that isn't Israeli propaganda?

https://www.axios.com/2026/03/07/iran-kurds-iraq-israel-trump-cia-mossad

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We can afford to lose all that, but can't pay off student debt, give medical care, food stamps, etc.

1 month ago | Likes 422 Dislikes 5

you got it right, but backwards... we can't pay for those things because we need to spend it on targets for Iran.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's the republican way. Spend all the money on wars and giving tax breaks to the rich, then cry poverty when people need food, shelter, etc

1 month ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 2

Yup, and rebuilding those bases will be an excuse to funnel more and more money to contractors

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Now you know why.

4 weeks ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not American, but it's a very capitalist and csuite mentality to scoff at tangible individual benefits that better everyone's lives and then sink 10x that into AI, management training, "capabilities" regardless of effectiveness, and so on.

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

In a month of this war the US could have funded universal healthcare and cancelled student debt. A billion bucks a day

1 month ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Not the socialism!!!1!!

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well, yeah. That money would go to the poors. The money on defense goes to the pigs feeding at the slop trought

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Losing it actually saves money, as long as they are not built back. But, after this operation, there will be peace in the Middle East, so no need for them any more! /s

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Welcome to the k shaped economy.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(Perceived) Freedom isn’t free… Because to be fair over the last 3 decades, and in the last 3y, it shrank by a lot.

You’re more of a contributor to the big corporations than a citizen at this point. Either as a consumer or a tax payer.

This time the American Military-Industrial Complex and big oils companies thanks you..

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They get some good kickbacks on military spending.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But helping people is socialism....

1 month ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Helping POOR people is socialism.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As Jesus commanded.

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Jesus is woke and weak .... I'm a Christian!!! /s

1 month ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I hate to say the reason I stopped going to church and became a communist pinko was because my parents did a better job raising me as a Christian than they think.

1 month ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Honestly church just seems like a way to extract money out of people that for the large part don't really have it to give in the first place. Plus you said we ever needed these stupid buildings in the first place didn't Jesus himself say a church was anywhere you gathered in his name.

1 month ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Saaaaaame

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I think the question that answers the justification here is:
Is it likely that Iran smuggles a nuke into a big US city and detonates it a likely scenario or not?
And of course the US can pay for all the stuff you mentioned, but neither Democrats nor Republicans want to... because their rich donors don't want it. Everyone should understand this.

1 month ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'm sure MAGAts would see that as a win. After all, population centers are very blue.

1 month ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I mean, if Iran's intelligence is as good as I've heard... they would blow up the deep south, the place that put the shittiest president in office and keeps feeding his ego.

1 month ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Likely? No, impossible? Also no.

The chances go up exponentially if Iran goes the way of Libya and there's essentially a free for all with the nations vast arsenal of horrible tools of death and destruction.

Let me put it to you this way, very early on in my career I went into Central asia as security and liaison between certain western intelligence agents and local post soviet governments.

This is a region of the world where the concept of borders is theoretical at best and we found local 1/

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Here we differ. I think it is a possibility, a looming threat. They gave all of Iran's wealth away to pay for radical proxy groups. They attacked everyone around them, even Oman, who wanted to mediate. How can we let these people develop a nuke?

Look at Pakistan. There is enough evidence that the massacre in India was orchestrated by the Pakistani government and India can't really do something about it because of the nukes. The fewer countries have them, the better.

1 month ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tribal leaders willing to sell us a shed full of enriched uranium for $500 thousand. We found local town councils who had warehouses with rooms the Soviets had warned them not to open. We found fucking bunkers where the local garrison had gone into business for themselves and was selling what was inside.

Over the course of a decade we got a lot of stuff out of there, but do I think we got it all? With Iran on the doorstep? Willing to pay an awful lot more than $500k. Fuck no.

Dreams of a 2/

1 month ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Terrorist nuke are probably wide of the mark, but a terrorist dirty bomb able to render downtown New York uninhabitable for 150 years? Totally.

Terrorist sarin gas? Absolutely, the hardest part of that stuff isnt even getting your hands on it its keeping it stable long enough to not melt yourself.

And thats just the big ticket items, the US navy has already run the numbers on a cargo ship full of suicide drones doing a pearl harbour rerun and it didn't end well for the navy. 3

1 month ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0