4889 pts ยท November 7, 2025
Some double, as you can clearly see. They were bouncing (and de-escalating like a champ)
It was always crystal clear what that meant, because it always went hand-in-hand with "deep-state" dog-whistles.
Also known as, not having morals nor principle
Snap judgement. If you have no people sense or situational awareness, that job isn't for you anyways
What if she has learned the price of (proximity) to wealth
It might turn out to be quite a bit harder than unfucking the Hormuz Strait.
Uh. I didn't see that. I just didn't assume the person putting down a camera was her. But thanks, that does make heaps more sense.
Wait. There are people who think "destroying an intruder" is an easier choice? In any circumstance?
I'm assuming the "threatened my life" part happened somewhere else then, because, surely you wouldn't gaslight us about that, right.
The part where "somebody help!" doesn't sway the camera man
Hopefully teacher had the reassuring answer ("No, I failed the eye test for pilot certification")
Hey, affordability is relative.
"Step 1: Be the most attractive guy in the room" (victim mentality) or even "be attractive, you get replies" is not anywhere close to "women are more open to being approached by a good looking guy". Also, note how you chose to make it gendered. I wonder why. (inb4 you say that the OP was gendered, but you're the one generalizing to "common sense truths" which would be true regardless of gender)
Yeah. Some of these are beautiful. I can't cope with all the glorified depression though
I'm not ignoring it. I'm - optimistically - of the belief that we help them better by untangling things than by re-affirming the confusion. All these things can be true at the same time.
This tells you something. Things are missing from both those sources.
Yes, but it's probably about as easy to give yourself UTI with solo sex, which is not the context where we talk about STDs
Yep. Now I see it.
Oh. I was searching for such an explanation but it doesn't work for my brain. I'm a fan of Escher and e.g. Monument Valley games (which I completed) so I did know what to look for...
I hope that wasn't too much nuance administered in one capsule, from one bloodthirsty savage to another. Please reflect a bit on *who* is radicalized/radicalizing here.
Commenters include you, bloodthirsty savage! (?) "You people" by definition doesn't include me, because, you know, generalizations fail. And no, you're not either good or bad. Also, saying some manifesto doesn't make you a good person. Reporters don't even need to quote the manifesto (see Breivik, Christ-Church) but sure need to *mention* that one was used.
My friend thinks he's me. And he doesn't get it. Is the "joke" that they used the flag pole to whack the ladder down?
#7 I'm curious, of course I'd like to no
Well, what do you know. Apparently you are capable of more nuance. How come you didn't note the absense of any from the subject message?
Your mind, your therapy, as well.
Very informative, but the first interaction seemed toxic af, I'm not sure the sympathy was warranted. The responsible thing is to get tested.
with me? on me?
Wait what. UTI was never an STD to begin with. Full stop. Lumping it in here is unnecessary confusion
FF? Fascism Friday? I honestly don't know, but I know the look only reminded me of that Greg Bovino photoshoot.
This is not about justification, it's about reporting.
Some double, as you can clearly see. They were bouncing (and de-escalating like a champ)
It was always crystal clear what that meant, because it always went hand-in-hand with "deep-state" dog-whistles.
Also known as, not having morals nor principle
Snap judgement. If you have no people sense or situational awareness, that job isn't for you anyways
What if she has learned the price of (proximity) to wealth
It might turn out to be quite a bit harder than unfucking the Hormuz Strait.
Uh. I didn't see that. I just didn't assume the person putting down a camera was her. But thanks, that does make heaps more sense.
Wait. There are people who think "destroying an intruder" is an easier choice? In any circumstance?
I'm assuming the "threatened my life" part happened somewhere else then, because, surely you wouldn't gaslight us about that, right.
The part where "somebody help!" doesn't sway the camera man
Hopefully teacher had the reassuring answer ("No, I failed the eye test for pilot certification")
Hey, affordability is relative.
"Step 1: Be the most attractive guy in the room" (victim mentality) or even "be attractive, you get replies" is not anywhere close to "women are more open to being approached by a good looking guy". Also, note how you chose to make it gendered. I wonder why. (inb4 you say that the OP was gendered, but you're the one generalizing to "common sense truths" which would be true regardless of gender)
Yeah. Some of these are beautiful. I can't cope with all the glorified depression though
I'm not ignoring it. I'm - optimistically - of the belief that we help them better by untangling things than by re-affirming the confusion. All these things can be true at the same time.
This tells you something. Things are missing from both those sources.
Yes, but it's probably about as easy to give yourself UTI with solo sex, which is not the context where we talk about STDs
Yep. Now I see it.
Oh. I was searching for such an explanation but it doesn't work for my brain. I'm a fan of Escher and e.g. Monument Valley games (which I completed) so I did know what to look for...
I hope that wasn't too much nuance administered in one capsule, from one bloodthirsty savage to another. Please reflect a bit on *who* is radicalized/radicalizing here.
Commenters include you, bloodthirsty savage! (?) "You people" by definition doesn't include me, because, you know, generalizations fail. And no, you're not either good or bad. Also, saying some manifesto doesn't make you a good person. Reporters don't even need to quote the manifesto (see Breivik, Christ-Church) but sure need to *mention* that one was used.
My friend thinks he's me. And he doesn't get it. Is the "joke" that they used the flag pole to whack the ladder down?
#7 I'm curious, of course I'd like to no
Well, what do you know. Apparently you are capable of more nuance. How come you didn't note the absense of any from the subject message?
Your mind, your therapy, as well.
Very informative, but the first interaction seemed toxic af, I'm not sure the sympathy was warranted. The responsible thing is to get tested.
with me? on me?
Wait what. UTI was never an STD to begin with. Full stop. Lumping it in here is unnecessary confusion
FF? Fascism Friday? I honestly don't know, but I know the look only reminded me of that Greg Bovino photoshoot.
This is not about justification, it's about reporting.