We all know !!!

May 3, 2019 4:39 PM

alpha199512

Views

123292

Likes

2948

Dislikes

160

Laцgнs in Soviet.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

what, the world told us to stop playing around in Africa so we did.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Controversial thought. The region has always been unstable. Just like the rest of the world.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Invading and staying 18 and counting years is dumb. Who likes foreigners running around in your country?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't forget about the Middle East.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 13

I don't think there are many clean hands, the whole situation is a grease fire the west has been trying to put out with gasoline.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Kind of a group effort.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It was a team effort

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The British had a big part in the Middle East instability. Just take a deeper look into the root causes of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

They were either total incompetents or deliberate assholes, but they fucked up Palestine for the Jews and Muslims.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Middle east has been in civil war for over 2000 years. How did any other country cause their problems.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

You revealed your cards too soon, dumbass. You've shown everyone you don't know shit.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Well, USA has been bombing Iraq every year since 91, and now tries to spread it to Iran.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Can we all agree regardless of blame the middle east has been in trouble for decades ( if not centuries) and we should try to help?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I dont mean military intervention either. That doesn't seem to help.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I love when Britain throws shade at other people for being imperialist. When they like literally invented the game.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

yeah its pretty impressive on how they conquered the world

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Italy says Hi, Spain & Portugal would like a few words. And that's just in Europe.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well mother England invaded like all but 10 countries that have ever existed, pretty sure that's the high score.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a really dubious statistic anyway, pretty sure it's in truth way fewer ( no matter how amused us natives are by the inflated one... )

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its funny how T.E. Lawrence aggressively warned England that this would happen and they just shrugged "So what?! Nothing's going to happen!"

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Laugh in Churchillian

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Implying there would be no instability without any intervention.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The suggestion that there is only one imperial power at fault is pretty silly.

7 years ago | Likes 153 Dislikes 5

Agree didn’t mean to do that, will rectify it.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

Still Waiting for the rectified version.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Given how big it'll be we might be waiting a while...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, the Blame Game is still a popular one nations play...

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

This is funny. But come on. It's not like the region has a history of stability. People been killing each other there for a millennium

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Apr 5, 2020 2:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Rite. So is the history of that region

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

If so it’s true, why are you involved in this war?!?! I think ur region is far away from ME. N have you ever read history book of the ME?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I can honestly say I have no idea what you're saying

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Historically Europe has been a bloodfest compared to this region. Crusades, middle-age, Napoleon, WW1, WW2...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I don't remember saying anything about Europe.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

You know who else has quite the history of violence? Literally everyone. But the meme is funny cuz it blames Britian and the US.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

a entire continent compared to a 4-3 middle eastern countries.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Iran is 3-4x the size of Germany, guess who started the most wars?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

most wars? you mean the world wars? xD

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But why did Constantinople get the works?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's nobody's business but the Turks.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Laughs in Russian"

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

It was the British AND French. After WW1 there was an opportunity to fix the Middle East. The Sykes-Picot Agreement between them ruined it.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

It sure didn't help but the ME but solely laying the blame on that is ignorant. The Ottomans had many ethnicities, religions and rebellions

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

And it was stable Empire, the Muslim world do believe in one country and that’s why we got many conflicts right now in the ME.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

How was it stable? There was no shortage of wars & rebellions during the Ottoman Empire

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It was stable while it was under one ruler who was able to control the empire. Once they lost control the fighting started again.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

North Korea is nice and stable under one ruler with no civil war if memory serves me correctly

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup. Exactly why Iraq and Afghanistan got so messy after Saddam and the Taliban were kicked out. Sects started fighting for control.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Suez Canal played the most important role I guess.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Nah, it was the oil. If you look at where the lines were drawn, it pretty much 50/50 splits the major known oil deposits at the time.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Agreed always the oil it’s like default settings

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Also after oil it’s canal how do you take all that oil out btw.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That’s right, those Sunni and Shia had been getting along famously for centuries. And everyone loves the Kurds.

7 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 18

Yeah the kurds suffer a great deal in the middle east, more hated than isis.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Apr 5, 2020 2:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Whilst you just seem to have a weak grasp. If I point out a flaw in a post,which even the OP has now admitted to be garbage, this should not

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

....be your trigger to spout this sort of sneering bitterness.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Apr 5, 2020 2:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Apr 5, 2020 2:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The Kurds were doing fine before WWI. They even ruled arab countries. Google Saladin.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I don’t need Google to know about this stuff. There was centuries of persecution from Ottomans, nonsense to say they were “doing fine”

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Guess who drew those boarders? Get your hands on a history book.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 29

You’re a grade A ass.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Those borders* mean fuck all to ancient adversaries.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

since the fall of ottoman empire, Middle-east was largely at peace. look at old pics of Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and Syria

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 9

Would this peace in Palestine be before or after the Arabs started slaughtering Jews for moving there from Europe in the 20's?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

source for arabs slaughtering jews? arabs were against unchecked mass immigration of jews into their country and rightfully so

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hevron Massacre, 1929. By your logic it's totally ok for a Trump supported to start murdering migrants from Central America seeking asylum

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What are you talking about? Saudi Arabia/Yemen, Egyptian revolutions, Israel vs everyone, Iran/Iraq, Lebanon/Syria, turkey/Kurds/Armenians

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

A lot of this is after WW2 and started with the "help" of UK.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

So your point is it was mostly peaceful for the years between 1923 and 1939?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

More interesting would be the time of ottoman empire 20 years earlier.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

do you even know what you are talking about? Israel vs everyone is due to Israel annexing Golan heights from syria, sinai peninsula from 1/

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Egypt and South of Lebanon from Lebanon. not to mention the continuous weapons and monetary support US provides to Israel. 2/

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Iraq-Iraq War is CIA funded war made by saddam (a known US supported dictator). Saudi and Yemen war is again a proxy war between US and 3/

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You can talk about the reasons all you want, it's still a series of wars. Your terrible points about it being peaceful is just incorrect.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I’m pretty sure it’s been unstable since before the US and GB existed

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 7

Post WW1 was when modern issues started in the middle east. before then it was relatively peaceful.GB and France split control of a 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lot of the countries as colonies.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Better then what it is today.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

It was extremely stable for massive periods of time before they existed. The last century has been the most unstable it's every been.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Ummm maybe you need to read more a lil about the ME. I think Ottoman Empire was stable, isn’t ?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Pretty much all the instability in the ME came from different western empires invading. Greeks, Romans, Crusades, British, French etc.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Pretty sure the Arabs and Jews weren't getting along since way before 1776.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yeah the muslims are the most antisemetic group in the world, coming second to nazis.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

True but we all know about the Jewish diaspora right?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Apr 5, 2020 2:37 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Am I wrong?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I think everyone played a large part in fucking that region up, including those that live there

7 years ago | Likes 1086 Dislikes 34

Taken over by a militant ideology before militant imperialists even got there.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Problem with the Middle East is that almost all the people who live there are a bunch of total cunts

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

problem with you is that you're also a cunt

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah but it's way more satisfying and easy to blame one country.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Even when the country youre blaming didnt do anything until tensions where past no return?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Dude, my comment wasn't serious. You get that, right?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Canada is innocent.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And all the people that used to live there

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I mean not really. The west showed up and took all the oil and left the locals destitute. Frankopan's Silk Roads is a great summary

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 21

I mean, it feels like OPEC is a thing? How long can you roll in your own shit screaming Colonialism before you're to blame?

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

But that's just the thing. There's a great economic interest in keeping the area unstable. Otherwise they'd hold an immeasurable power 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

since we don't want to do the work to evolve past petroleum. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The US has a shit ton of oil.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ahem... As I recall there have been... ehm... some amount... of meddling in Middle East affairs after colonial times.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No man read your history. We've been fucking with the Middle East since the mid 1800s. You have to take a long view if you wanna understand

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yup blaming others for your problems is never a solution.

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 12

Yeah but between the US, USSR, UK, and France, most problems in Arab countries were literally caused by others

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Thanks for that genius geopolitical policy guideline.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unless your problem is needing to blame somebody for your problems

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well, *clearly* it be do Joooos! (\s)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

like how Russia interfering with just one election has caused so much discord in our country now imagine if whole US government was 1/

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

overthrowed and trump is installed as dictator. imagine the chaos USA will be in. USA and west did the same thing in middle east

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Nonsense.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

Not nonsense. Did it in parts of africa/central and south america too.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

France and Britain backed out of a deal to give locals control of the region and instead carved up to support their interest with no care

7 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 3

About the political, cultural, or religious history of the area, and split apart groups that wanted to be together, and forced groups that

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Hated each other together

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

like with pakistan/india

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

look at the pictures of that region before west overthrowed democracy and installed violent dictatorship. for example 1/

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 20

look at Afghanistan prior to Russia and USA engaging in proxy war. look at Iran before CIA overthrowed democracy and installed shah 2/

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 20

look at Palestine before British ruined it by giving it to Zion terrorists. look at Iraq before USA overthrowed democratic communist 3/

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 19

Indeed. Before the British gave it to the Israelis, you just had a bunch of Arabs massacring Jews for fleeing Europe. Totally their fault!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Democratic Communist government?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

democratically elected

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

government and helped saddam ascend to power. look at Libya today, CIA helping their asset ascend to power as dictator. everything is 4/

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 14

right in front of us to see.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

The US was not a colonial power in the Middle East. They didn’t draw the borders on exit.

7 years ago | Likes 137 Dislikes 9

Get the fuck out of here with your historical knowledge!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok yes, but you do keep bombing the place. So maybe you didn't cause the issues, but you're certainly exacerbating and perpetuating them.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

But we did flood it with arms and violent propaganda so the Soviets couldn't take it over which bit us in the aaa

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Take a look at the weapons in the ME and tell me their from the US. They’re all eastern bloc weapons.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The borders there weren't drawn on exit though.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They absolutely were.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, They were drawn as the middleeast was divided up after the fall of the ottoman empire, some were to be independent countries, and 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Others becamr mandates of UK and France, which also had internal administrative borders. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We did help Britain with the coup of 1953 though

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not did they have an exit strategy when they took over Irak to harvest their oil. Powell stood there lying to the UN. The world believed.

7 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 22

Are you aware that we didn't invade Iraq - both times - for oil? Extenuating circumstances you probably wont understand are why we invaded.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Yet we never got a drop off oil. Weird how it all went to French companies.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

I don’t think I can trust someone that spells Iraq with a K.

7 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 9

It's the legit spelling in some languages.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

"In English, Iraq is far more used than Irak, which is the preferred spelling in French" - do with this what you will

7 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

so why is the rest of his comment english then

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well there you go. You proved him right. One should never trust the French they are French!

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

I don't think I can trust the french, either. Even among Canadians, the French-Canadians take a full extra second to apologize.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They just decided which governments they wanted keep and which ones they wanted to topple.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Oh yeah BP just happened to get CIA support for the whole Iran thing.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Why would BRITISH PETROLEUM need CIA support. The British were already in control.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because BP had an agreement with Teddy Roosevelts grandson already? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dont forget about france

7 years ago | Likes 1595 Dislikes 12

The French and the Brits started so much crap.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Really it was started by the Ottomans.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And Russia

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

And Russia

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it was shit before anyone came, still is shit

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or Belgium and Africa

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Don't forget about Dre

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

How could you?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gibberish.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What did he say though?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They also "took care" of Asia

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And the ottomans

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Ottomans ruled the place for 500 mostly tranquil years. If anybody raised his voice about the bakshish, his entire village disappeared.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Jun 11, 2022 11:10 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

learn history before opening you goddamn mouth ~

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2011~

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Italy. Close enough tho.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I meant in 2011. Instability in the Middle East is an ongoing European project, and then they shift the burden on to the U.S.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

True that.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/ Sorry, what? This isn't Africa. France was barely involved in the Middle East. It managed Syria and Lebanon. That's about it.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

2/ The Middle East was mostly the private turf of the UK, and then the US replaced them post WW2, in an entirely different context.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

4/ But invading Iraq w/o any forethought plan for its future and how it would affect the entire region definitely broke everything loose.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Iran was also not well thought out...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The whole region is extremely complex. It's basically the Balkans on steroids. It's worse actually. Going in blind was completely retarded.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Oooh I didn't know that Syria and Lebanon were doing great.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Lol. Hardly any illegal use of phosphorus, cluster bombs or nerve agents in civilian urban environments compared to last year

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What does it has to do with what I'm actually saying here? It's about why the Middle East is a clusterfuck of power struggles.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You said France had almost no implication in the ME. I just underlined the ridiculousness of your comment with some sarcasm.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I said France had almost no implication in the global & underlying issues of the Middle East. It's a factual and historical reality, so?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

3/ The conflicts in the Middle East predates the arrival of the Europeans anyway. The whole area have always been a feuding shitshow.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

False. There were less wars and violents deaths in all the Ottomans tenure of the ME than during the European 19th century

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The history of the Middle East goes way beyond the Ottoman rule over it. You're also leaving out a major historical actor too btw, Iran.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

More chill when the Romans were in charge too. Both are shit comparisons to more recent history

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They had the advantage of the Argeads/Diadochi acclimating the populace to Hellenic rule.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Let's move the goalpost!!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Not only did they control Iraq, but those borders lazily drawn by France and Britain are still impacting the world

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This isn't Africa. The borders have nothing to do with the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. This region has a very complex history.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Oh come on

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that France didn't actively colonize the middle east does not mean that they were not party to its division and the subsequent shitstorm

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've already addressed in other comments why that division has nothing to do with the shitstorm. Again, the ME is an old & complex region.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The Zone of French Influence sure doesn't look like Africa to me

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3/ for a very long time, way before the Sykes-Picot Agreement.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2/ to begin with. France was focused on Africa and Indochina. The UK on the other hand have had longstanding interests in the whole region

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1/ This map shows the *projected* borders. In practice, France was left with Syria and Lebanon, and had little interests with that region

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Who could forget about bacon?

7 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 1

Kevin Bacon, what's he got to do with this?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone is connected to him.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

france is bacon. so they won't forget.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

the middle east.

7 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Notorious bacon-forgetters.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Don’t forget USSR helped

7 years ago | Likes 1301 Dislikes 25

I'm all for blame where blame is due but the root cause of all this nonsense is sykes picot and the death of the Ottoman Empire

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The USSR really didn't have anything to do with it, other than afghanistan in the 80s, but frankly by the 80s shit was already fucked up

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah. Remember the colonial period of the USSR

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Don’t forget that Russia is still doing it now

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Russia is not doing that much to destabilize the middle east, definitely not as much as the "West" historically has. Sure they helped (1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Al Assad's barbaric regime which is fucked up but Syria was a wreck before they showed up. (2/2)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Russia has an interest in destabilising Europe through the worsening the refugee situation. Western intelligence agrees on that

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Downvote but this is well documented

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not downvoting you, this is factual. But let's not forget that the West has an interest in destabilizing Russia also, and that's what

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're thinking WW2, but modern middle east issues started after WW1 and the end of the Ottoman Empire. USSR wasn't founded until 1922.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It takes a village

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Way before that, Afghanistan was a buffer state between the Russian Empire & the British Raj... dunno how many times it's been invaded.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

USSR didnt even exist when this began. One of the crucial points of this whole fiasco was WW1, when to fight the ottomans the British

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

promised Sharif Hussein bin Ali an independant Arab state. After WW1 was over however the British and the French divided the middle east

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

between themselves and said "jk". In fact the Arab leaders at the time werent opposed to a Jewish state as long as that meant independence

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

There are two other things the 'allies' fucked up on after WW1 - the French invading germany, giving us WW2, and giving backing to the

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

whites in Russian Civil War essentially creating Hitler, cold war, and middle east troubles all in one fell swoop.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Afghanistan voted for socialism in the 80's. The USSR was invited by the govt of Afghanistan to intervene when the Mujahideen rebelled.

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 7

Much more complicated than that, the reason the Soviets invaded. One of the few important things I learned in college.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

You didn't learn shit obviously.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

What did you learn? How to weld a brick?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Stalin was just as bad as Hitler.

7 years ago | Likes 136 Dislikes 20

thought that it'd been worked out that Stalin was worth 4 Hitlers.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except Hitler wanted to murder everyone not Aryan in the long run, so Stalin literally SAVED everyone alive today that is not Aryan.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Hitler had rookie numbers compared to Stalin. Probably just because he didn't have as much time.

7 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

He also had a smaller country to work with. Hitler had to go outside germany to kill more, its easier when its at home.

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Do we consider Mao worse than either of those? Based on number dead or based on cruelty?

7 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

As a historian whose focus is Asia... yes, yes we do

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Worse honestly

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

how dare you, go straight to gulag, no trial

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's only because Hitler lost. He was planning to exterminate pr enslave the Russian people

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh, the old right-wing vs. Soviet Communism pissing contest. We should agree that authoritarianism is shit and put it all to bed.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 14

There are still large groups of people who look on Stalin and Mao favorably though. Hitler's big mistake was losing the war.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

it depends of what you mean by bad, if you mean as a person, who the fuck knows, if you mean that he did as much bad as Hitler then no.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 25

Lol

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

As a German, I love Stalin with all my hearth. He literally saved us and the world from fascism. He did what was necessary.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

Right, he stopped world from going fascist, like he stopped Romania, Hungary, Poland, czechoslovakia&other from going democratic.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Oh really? Well did Stalin ever round up people based on genetic defects or sexual orientation and murder them oh shit you’re right.

7 years ago | Likes 148 Dislikes 2

He wasn't as specific; You just had to disagree with him and you got to go on the 'field trip'.

7 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

I don't know if you're joking, but this actually never happened

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 131

That's where you are wrong bucko

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Some nice Jewish doctors that could have helped when Stalin died would like to be known.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

116fucking morons believe that Stalin"round up people based on genetic defects or sex orientation and murder them"let me guess,homeschooled?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

don't get me wrong,I'm not defending Stalin, but "it wAs wOrsE tha nHitleR" it's dumb and makes me worry about people's gullibility.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Except for that time that it actually did

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

Read a book. Literally ANY fucking book.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Okay, geez. *picks up copy of Mein Kampf*

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Estonia lost 9% of its population to the ww2 and 11% to the soviet terror + the people that actually came back after surviving 25+5, so +1

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Except if the Nazis had won, there would be NO Estonian people at all, so he still saved every single one day survived.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

yeah, stalin murdered more people. mao is tho, totally on its own class. all extremes are one, like a buddhist friend said to me.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Read the Gulag Archipelago and shut the fuck up.

7 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 9

As others said, even if GA is not nearly an accurate historical report, in that book itself there's nothing that comes close to what H. did.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Historic BURRRRN

7 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 2

Gulag archipelago is no way near a reputable historical source. By the way, have you read it?

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Were you always this stupid or did you take lessons?

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

I like that insult.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I'm worried this is the learned stupid. That means there are others...

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Ignorant, not necessarily stupid

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Stalin and Hitler were WW2. Middle east issues started post WW1.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“Middle East issues started post WW1.” Do you really believe that’s when issues started there?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

modern ones, yes.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 21

I want a source for that because it's bullshit. If you refering to count dankula, he payed a £800 fine and recieved £200.000 via gofundme.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nobody has been imprisoned for shitposting. Meanwhile, you elected a literal fascist who imprisons babies.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

hahahhahahahahaha you must not have heard, ALL of those pics of kids in cages were from the Obama era but yeah keep thinking that

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

........What? They went out on national TV and defended the policy? What kind of reality distortion bubble are you in?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

who was jailed for shitposting? btw, i don't think incarceration rate is a metric you'd want to compare anyway.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

the guy who taught his dog to nazi salute

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 11

Not his dog, and never seen the inside of a cell.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

he was fined

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

he was arrested first, he was only fined after the trial

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

no shit. You kind of have to be arrested before you can have a trial, no? Doesn't change the fact he didn't get a jail sentence.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0