The Dodge Ram experience 2026

Apr 8, 2026 7:15 AM

AdventurousDonut480

Views

326540

Likes

608

Dislikes

17

cars

funny

gas_prices

fuuuck ur gay ass truuuuck . twinkie the kid.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 days ago | Likes 233 Dislikes 1

Driving these in the city is just letting everyone know you've got a small dick and inferiority complex. It's not a real utility vehicle. It really has pretty specific purposes where it's suitable and none of them are in the city because vans do that stuff better

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

About time.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It reminds me of a 6-year-old spoiled child throwing a floor slamming temper tantrum in public, totally unconscious of just how embarrassing it is. But hey, it's a 6-year-old. But when it's anyone over 12 (or a 30-something?), it's just downright shame-ridden & below moronic! To be so fully dominated by your pride & conquered by your ego that you'll behave this way in public, on purpose? Vroom vroom? It makes me ashamed to be a human. Machismo peacocking in public is staggeringly embarrassing.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

About 6 kilometers per US dollar.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But that's Australia!

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Owning Ram ever is a fucking nonsense and insanity. It's "a car" with engine size and consumption of an average bus.

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Fuck every single one of these assholes driving around these massive bro-dozers. These huge trucks should be classified as commercial vehicles. You should need a CDL to drive one. And before anyone says "BuT I nEeD a TrUcK fOr WoRk!" Yes. If it's a WORK TRUCK, it's a COMMERCIAL VEHICLE. And no, you probably actually DON'T need it. Tradies all over the world do just fine with smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Look at it this way 90% of those trucks are owned by a bank and not the driver.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MOstly tradies in Oz, not the ones on the tools, the ones who own the business with tradies sub contracted etc. Seems to be the blue collar equivalent of a the white collar Rolex these days. The business pays for fuel and they use the expense to reduce tax.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Actually the only people I've seen driving RAMs or Silverados around here have been "tradie-wives" who use them as a status symbol. Yes, we get it, your husband runs a concreting business and you "do the books", now get the fuck out of the way and let me park my hatch.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Funny, my little Hyundai doesn't have that problem.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Same. Still $80 to fill up, but I get about 6 weeks out of that so it's not that bad.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The more expensive it is, the longer the receipt?

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know I'm getting old because the car I lust over now isn't a muscle car or hot rod or an exotic, but a Honda Civic hybrid hatchback. 50 MPG and 6.2 second 0-60 baby!

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wasn't it BP that installed the current Iranian regime to begin with?

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here in NorCal, unless it's a white work truck with a rack, 99.99% have NOTHING in the truck bed except a $2k truck bed liner that is pristine. I have never even see a full truck used at Costco ...

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People living in a climate-destroyed future will be saying: “People were living in the past driving a 5,000 pound vehicle to transport every individual 200 pound person, burning fuel for that. We hate them, they were stupider than flat-earthers, humans in the past were destructive selfish morons of colossal stupidity and ignorance. Also they were warned and they didn’t care, they didn’t change anything, they kept doing it.”

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

I mean a lot of us want to change but don't have any control to. If I wanted to commute via bus it would be 7.5 hours of my day and my city has no other public transportation in my area. I do my best by driving a hybrid (not a lot of chargers for EV in my area either and I live in an apartment so can't install a charger at home).

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Feel for you with the apartment. I mean TECHNICALLY you could use a 120v charger but I would worry about people stealing it. But a 120v charger is only going to restore about 40ish miles charging overnight. For most people that is perfectly fine though. But apartments tend to frown on running a cable out your window to the car.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They don't care. People that drive these death machines just want to bully others on the road.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a 100% self-inflicted injury

3 days ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"Unforced error"

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You turned it off, now something dosent work anymore. Also you need brakes RIGHT NOW

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not a RAM in the vid, but also fuck these people. The base model RAM here costs $110,000 with the 'top' model being $185k. If you can afford to buy one of these monstrosities, you can pay for the fuel. Sooner the govt increases the road taxes for heavy non-commercial vehicles the better.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish all the worsts for the owners of such trucks. Get a normal one!

3 days ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 7

Well, in the outback they might have a use for it. Though in 99,9% of the cases they don't. And I agree, they definitely deserve it!

3 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

The "outback" roads are mostly dirt, but you can get away with any 4wd. There are much better cars for this, and if you live somewhere you really need a big ute to deal with boggy roads, get a dual-axle for half the price.

2 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's ofc true. I just wanted to say it's not completely out of the question it will actually be used off-road etc

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's like the dudes that buy harleys or goldwings. They're gonna park the expensive ride and drive some cheap ride. But they'll still be paying insurance on the expensive ride and take it out once in a blue moon to show off

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A Goldwing is faster, much more economical and comfortable than a Harley. Not to speak about reliability, vibrations or service costs. A GW goes for 100000+ km with just basic maintenance, a Harley does not!

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm an old gray haired guy, but I ride a 250cc sport bike for the gas mileage. I took it to a harely dealer one day to get the oil changed and inspection done, b/c closest place to me. They see me walk in, and light up. Big fat old fart gray-haired fish just walked in. Gonna be an easy $20k sale day. Had 3 folks flock to me. I tell them I just need to drop my honda (LOL) sport bike off for an oil change and inspection. The look of defeat on their faces was laughable.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also safer. Are they still offering the optional airbag for the Goldwing?

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the issue with Monsters, they will hurt you in the end.

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Steering wheel on the "right" side of the vehicle?

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There are more things in heaven and Earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's how it is in Australia. They also drive on the left side of the road.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Also the pump units being liters rather than gallons.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*Litres.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

3 days ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 1

freak petrol fight accident

3 days ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

You ever seen the one where a guy was smoking at a table not far from the pumps and his lite sparked the VAPORS?

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Vapors are the only thing that burns. Liquid doesn't.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Problem is the 'boiling'point of gasoline is so damn low that .. if left to the air, it all becomes vapor, and when ignited the temp rapidly rises so fast that all the rest of the 'liquid' that was protected (kept liquid) by the rest of the fluid suddenly is no longer fluid. Massive expansion due to flash-boil then boom.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Flash, boil, boom. Sounds like a slogan.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah, I thought the joke was going to be he filled up at the first pump, paid a crazy amount, and drove to the second one as he had to fill up again.

3 days ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 2

It basically was...?

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The terrible mpg of the vehicle is shown, but not in such a visually apparent gag. A subtle difference, but would have elevated the humour (for me at least)

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The literal last 2 seconds are of him refueling

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I believe they meant they expected him to pull forward 10 feet to the immediate next pump at that same station to fill up again, giving a larger exaggeration and higher humor value (to them) because of it.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only thing missing is the part where he tailgates everyone in front of him, and changes lanes six times without ever signaling.

I hope every Ram driver gets stuck behind a Prius.

3 days ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

And blinds everyone with his headlights

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Im spoiled these days, i power fold my mirrors in when these giant lifted trucks get behind me amd blind me. I appreciate the newer Kia's and Hyundai's where their SUV's have the headlights physically lower on the front compared to older designs

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Litres" was my first clue that this was Australia.

3 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Not the mullet? the right-hand drive?

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Litres" is the first evidence that this isn't just a horizontally flipped video from California, which also has plenty of BPs, eucalypts & rednecks.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The high vis & thongs combo?

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was not aware AUS was right-hand drive.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you learn somethin' new every day

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do they not have a reputation for getting DUI's down under too?

3 days ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

#1 most likely vehicle to be driven by a drunk driver in the US.

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They do. But after they write the ticket, they let it go down under. It's Australia, after all.

3 days ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

The whole island is a prison if I recall.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Was. It was.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ohhhhhhh. :)

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 days ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Almost 1.7 cubic meters of fuel. (a quick Google says a Ram usually has a ~98L tank)

3 days ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

that is a custom rig with custom fuel tank.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A cubic meter contains a 1000 liters.

3 days ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Ooof that's going to hurt the wallet even when prices aren't fucked.

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

What does this mean in American Freedom* Units?

*freedom can be rescinded at any time for any reason, if our king deems it so

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

About 449 gallons for the purchase in the video. It's about the volume of a mid-size home storage propane tank. Like this:

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Burning gas just to carry around your gas, gas is heavy.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I used to have a Dodge 5.9 l Cummins pretty sure the tank was 110 liters. I'd fill with 100 liters at near empty but leave a 10 liter buffer (or it would vapour lock). In summer I'd get 1,000km per tank at 100km/h about 10 l/100km (28mpg Imp).

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, no. one tenth of a cubic meter. A full tank will get you almost 400 miles.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yeah, no. The range in the video is a joke. No one actually believes that a big pickup's tank is just about enough to get you to the next gas/petrol station.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Over 600 KM for sure

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

over 600km with 100 liters? no way. If it was a Pajero/Montero diesel, maybe. On highway, doing steady 80kph.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My Ram has a 121 liter(32 gallon) tank that gets me about 1000km (620 miles.) Though mine is 2wd and has a 6cyl engine. I do have a 2.4m bed (8ft) though. * put in imperial and metric units to appease everyone.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

tbh I did not know they even made 2WD trucks anymore, never seen one on a dealer lot.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a joke. The fact that you felt you needed to defend of the butt of the joke is pretty telling.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Wasn't defending anything, just stating. I'm well aware it's a joke. It's funny. Why did you feel the need to attack me?

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Comrade, either you were saying your truck can go farther than "to the next gas station" which would be defending. Especially considering that 1693L is pretty close to a mid-sized home propane storage tank. Or you were arguing against the ~98L that whatever (presumably) American version of the Ram has for fuel tank volume that Google vomited up when I did a quick and lazy search. In which case: ok, your tank is bigger, good for you.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Real men plug it in.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

In Australia the distances can be a lot greater than the milage of an electric car can get you. And unlike with gas/diesel you can't refill it with something you can put in the trunk.

3 days ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Don't forget that even in cities where it would be best suited, there is insufficient infrastructure to charge them unless you already own a house with a garage. Most apartment blocks don't have any capacity to charge them, and parking stations have so few EV charge spots it's rare to find one. When you do, the greedy bastards charge an arm and a leg so it can cost just as much to run them as a petrol car would.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nawre mate. Maybe if you're deep in the bush. Maybe. But that's a stretch since I assume you've got power at home yeah?

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

How often you driving over 200km in a single day?

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I obviously wasn't clear about that. Around 20x a year. One way. 15x of it 400+ one way. And without having any consistency of the charger infrastructure, that often means having 30-50km detours or 30-45min added wait time for charging. Or both at the same time. With no charger at neither end point, that adds up to 3h for the travel time. And no, that's not feasible.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"No you don't understand country big and I might, one day, for unknown reasons, need to go that far and so the only solution is to constantly use the inefficient vehicle JUST IN CASE that one specific use case actually comes up!"

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I regularly do trips that are 300km+ each way. Sure, there'd be enough charge to get me there but unless I find somewhere to park that has a charge station I'm stuck there overnight which adds another $200-300. Plus regular fast-charging is a great way to ensure your batteries die quicker.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Someone downvoted you, but you're right and that's a major reason they're not being bought in the USA either - the application suits a suburban setting best, while rural areas have longer distances to drive and their infrastructure lacks charging options.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The average US commute is 20 miles one way, with 40 miles round trip. I live in rural NV, I usually put 60mi per day on mine which means I usually charge it every 3 days, and it costs about $5-6 to do that. My last car got 30mpg which would cost me about $25-30 for the same.

Infrastructure wise in rural areas that don't have apartments your home is connected to the grid, you have what you need. I also don't have to drive 2 miles to the gas station.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If you have a washer/dryer 240v plug you have an amazing charging option. If you have 120v you have one that can at least get you through most day to day activities cause even rural places typically you make one or two big trips a week for supplies not daily long distance driving.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

My washing machine is in my apartment, so it's a little difficult to get an EV up there to charge it. The underground parking doesn't have any charging stations or accessible plugs. The strata said they could install some but it would mean fees would go up about $400 a quarter, which is a lot more than I pay in fuel.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is bullshit by your apartments. "$400 a quarter" ITS FUCKIN WIRES! Are their LIGHTS in the parking area? Then there is FUCKIN WIRES and it is not that much to install a few goddamn plugs. We got fuckin wires in like every wall, floor, and ceiling of places we live. Absolute garbage coming from your apartment. Its not MUCH but mine at least put some 120v plugs at the end so that electric cars can at least get 40ish miles of range back overnight.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I downvoted them and you because you're both wrong. I've lived with nothing but an EV for the last 7 years. I've taken it across 2/3 of the country and back. I live in rural New England. Harsh winters. Worst case scenario. Never once had a problem with range. Stop parroting what you hear on social media and go talk with real owners if you care about the truth at all.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Im not on social media and I work for a state legislature that has created bills on this topic.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

All the more reason you should listen to those of us who have been living the truth. Where on earth are you getting your bad information from if not social media? Just making it up for the love of the game? Weird racist facebook uncle? Church?

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

"not on social media" says the imgur account

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How often you driving over 200km in a single day?

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Did I say me?

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Who are you referring to? A made up person who doesn't exist? Actual people are not driving 200km+ in a single day on a regular basis.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Modern USA trucks are just so awfull. theyre bulky and they ride a monster truck just for aesthetic reason. they drink gas like water, and theyre way less usefull than something like a van. its like going ''i want to drive farming equipment around because it looks cool''

3 days ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 16

people who drive non-working trucks esp as family vehicles are doing so because they are safer at the expense of other drivers.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Don't forget about rolling coal. Possibly the most obnoxious modification someone can make.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The trucks are made big so they are allowed to pollute more. It is cheaper than making a smaller truck pass the same law

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I drive a half ton but it'd out of necessity. When it's not hauling my truck camper for camping, it's hauling lumber, furniture, and so much more. I live 2 hours outside the nearest city and I'm transforming empty farmland into a liveable recreational lot and we're currently building a house on it. I don't think my old honda civic could have towed the mini escavator out there.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its not just the big trucks. Most american cars are fucking huge and waste a shit ton of fuel compared to our european models. I have done 20 000 miles in the USA and it was shocking what I saw on the roads. No wonder you people use 16% of the earths annual oil supply but are 4% of the fucking population. Get fuckin wrecked you shit cunts. (Not you personally as you may not be american) But yeah mericans in general. Even the democrats dont give a fuck.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's why I like my '94 Pickup. While it can't tow more than 3500 lbs, it's enough to carry a trailer full of crap and it's a 4 cylinders, so not as thirsty as Kegsbreath.

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I say burn it all. Faster we get rid of fuel the faster we can ditch currencies

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bug trucks are more profitable.

That's the entire reason that they're ubiquitous in the USA.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I just want a little 4banger tacoma like the 90s. I dont need a big truck but having a bed would be helpful, too bad the new "small trucks" are bigger than the old heavy duty ones were

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I have a silverado with the 3 liter duramax. Gets like 30mpg so it isnt too bad. I haul a lot of stuff, though, so I needed a truck.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there is a reason people who NEED trucks don't drive modern ones.
They will buy an older model that was made to do work not be driven daily everywhere. A beat up pre 2000 pickup that is a workhorse is a economic choice compared to a huge truck that is trying to impress.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Every county Gov in US use these trucks with big engines and yet no one complains. 🙄

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yep, I'll continue to drive my 20+ beater forever. At least I can fix it.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Very much agree, but i cant deny large vehicles are fun to drive

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In the USA trucks and SUV's are classified as "none passenger work vehicles" so they don't have to be as efficient and can produce more emissions. Therefore they are cheaper to produce. The American car industry then markets them much more heavily because they make more money per sale on them over a minivan or car.

Even crossovers are classified now as "none passenger work vehicles"

So it's more for profit reasons than anything else.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They also swallow parking lots. Even if they fit in the space, their ass hangs out or they're 10 feet off the ground. Saw an asshole take 4 spaces at a public event with their big ass truck. I wanted to find out who it was so I could break their thumbs.

I have a big beef with big trucks (that have bed covers and NEVER HAUL ANYTHING)

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Imo, the biggest slap in the face is the visual value of idiots driving them. This one has a full back attachment, looks lifted etc which means it actually gets real use off road etc. Anyone buying a Ram to drive their kids to football practice on saturdays just wants to show off or prove they aint got smol dick energy (they do).

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

"which means it actually gets real use off road" — or looks like it does, ie, a pavement princess cosplaying as a rugged offroader

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mall crawler

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Spoken like someone who has no idea what they're talking about. I drive one because it has plenty of interior space for someone like me, is comfortable for long trips, and has the cargo capacity I need for my wood working business which requires hauling materials, delivering furniture, and pulling trailers. Try doing that in a sedan.

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's not aesthetics, they are skirting emissions requirements. People now prefer them because they are scared to drive regular sized cars around them, and become part of the problem

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ok, but clearly the Australian guy in this video actually uses his truck, probably to hunt dinosaurs or something based on the way its outfitted, but he definitely uses iy for more than anesthetic purposes.

3 days ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

With the demise of locally produced Ford and Holden (GM) products here in Australia, these oversized, agricultural POS are everywhere. They dont fit in our lanes and pump out black smoke everywhere. So shit......but the old Toyota Landcruiser still reigns supreme for true farmers and tradies!!!

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plenty of cunts in Australia with big dumb Ute's that they only use for their shopping.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Modern" "US trucks", pick one

3 days ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Toyota Tacoma.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I loved it when it still was the Toyota Hilux. Almost indescribable.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Japanese, sinds 1995. There won't be official stats, but I am willing to bet good money that more Toyota pickups (and sedans, for that matter) are driving around in Africa than anywhere in the world (like, not even close). Most of them pre-owned, of course, and 99% white (yeah, that one doesn't really make sense with dust roads, but hey, a *clean* car is a status symbol there).

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not just an aesthetic reason, they're also like that because being in a larger class meant less stringent emission controls.

3 days ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Wanted to make sure this was said. We dont get small pickups anymore because of fuel economy restrictions. People dont buy light trucks for fuel economy, they buy them for utility. But manufacturers cant get engines with that utulity value that meet emissions rules. So they make the trucks bigger to get into a less restrictive weight class and jack the price way up. Win/win for the maker.

3 days ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Thank you, you explained it a lot better than I did.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except for the part where they also live on this planet and we are almost fucked.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

God I wish I could buy a light pickup truck like my grandad had.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also the car companies in the US specifically lobbied for the light truck classification to be exempt from those sorts of regulations

3 days ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

To be clear they definitely can make those engines, see the popularity of the ford Maverick, they just don't. Actually the maverick couldn't be bought for MSRP for years. Now they jacked up the price so much it kind of lost it's big appeal

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ford Maverick does not have the same engines that f150s have and it's not even close. They're great but different.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not to mention the part where they kill a lot of people. Road deaths in the US have gone up significantly over the last decade while they drop in the rest of the world.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Got a source on that one?

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A simple Google search says, Nope! They’ve dropped since ‘21.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You can't contradict me with a 'nope' and then change the time frame. A simple Google search says that raw numbers, fatalities per distance traveled and fatalities per capita ALL went up over the last decade in the US.

2 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

in the rest of the world, it have been dropping since 1971.

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Even if that is true, and I'm not doubting it, where's the evidence that links it specifically to these stupid ass trucks? Because that could easily be other countries transitioning towards more and more public transit while the US has done the opposite. Or a dozen other things, all equally pointless to discuss without corroborating evidence.

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There's no debating that big consumer trucks cause more damage to the other vehicle in a crash, have longer stopping distances and are easier to roll than a medium sized car, nor that those vehicles are more common in the US than elsewhere. Therefore they logically have to be a contributing factor.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s not just US trucks, even a “small” Tacoma gets like 17-18 mpg.

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My 2017 gets 30+ if i shift into neutral going downhill, thank you very much.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When a tailwind is cause to celebrate

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s shameful. My company owned F-150 gets 20 mpg. And, yes, it is too damned big.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I own a hybrid Ford Maverick (I don’t need BIG truck things to haul mulch from Home Depot or go fishing) that gets nearly 40 with a topper on. America is a big place, it gets a little old being lumped into one worldwide stereotype.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah. But no one’s gonna crap on you for driving a Maverick. That thing can just about fit in the bed of an F-150

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Lol pretty sure it's the same bed size haha

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looks like it's a bit narrower

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm one of the few people that need a heavy pickup, as I actually work on a farm. I have a 3/4 ton Dodge Ram.... and can confirm the gas price. xD

3 days ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

If there's an actual need I'm fine with it. The parking lot princesses that just get driven to some office job though...those people suck ass.

2 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

99% of people don't need a pickup of any kind.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We haul a lot of horse trailers around not just our own but people who suddenly need to transport a horse and theirs are not serviceable, I get it.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Use a 2020 GMC Sierra though.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How many horses? My mate drives his horses around with a (for American standards tiny) C class Mercedes. Weighs ~3500 pounds (so >1000 to 2000 pounds less than a Ram 1500) and can pull almost 4500 pounds.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 and a live in trailer for some pulls, but we tend to have 5-8 at a given time. Down a few to old age (31,29)

2 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, 3 is not gonna work with the average European car.

1 day ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are the minority sir that actually needs such a truck but even then i think there could be more fuel efficient trucks out there.

3 days ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

I would - love - to find a more fuel efficient truck. If you could point one out that can tow 12-15,000 lbs and as much payload as a 2023 Ram 2500, I would greatly appreciate it.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whatever did people do before the raptor, I guess we'll all starve because farming was only brought about because of Ford f150s...

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If I'm not mistaken, pollution emission regulation actually started the "big truck" epidemic. The truck manufacturers were trying to get around some EPA thing and making them bigger was actually cheaper than making them more fuel efficient or something like that. If you recall, trucks used to be WAY smaller. My brother has a really old Ford and he gets asked to sell it every week. A lot of decent people WANT the smaller trucks, they're just not available.

3 days ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It was because trucks were exempted from the EPA regulation. This is why SUVs exploded in popularity too, they're built on a truck base so they're also exempted. I remember when they came out they were derided as being for "soccer moms". Then the manufacturers realized they were cheaper to build than cars because they didn't have to regulate emissions, so they started marketing them like crazy, as a "luxury" option rather than a "I have to tow six kids around" option. And consumers fell for /1

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the marketing and went whole hog buying the most expensive, least efficient, highest-margin product. All it takes is the right marketing campaign, apparently. /2

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When I can afford something better, I'm all for it! :)

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Serious question, how do people in any other country do it?

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With Japanese or german equipment with diesel engines that do 6x the fuel mileage per gallon. Here in northern europe, we use vans for pickup duties. When i visited US and OZ, i was just wondering how fucking ineffective the pickup is.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm in Germany so fuel is much more expensive than in the US so by nature companies had to develop fuel efficient cars or people wouldn't have bought them ( one of the main reasons US cars don't sell well here at all).

Then there's size - our roads are narrower and driving a US made tank equivalent also carriers problems of their own, so our utility trucks are much smaller.

We also don't use oben bed trucks that much (unless it's an actual construction truck) so vans are mostly used.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I work construction. I have to haul trailers full of equipment and tools and materials. I need a big truck that can haul over 2tons. At least the company pays for my gas, but I have to save receipts, it's alot

3 days ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

We have farm trucks that I drive for most things, but since I live in town, I often just use mine for dropping off and picking up tires/parts. I get free maintenance on my pickup, but still have to pay for my own gas. It works out.

3 days ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't pay a penny on the truck, it's 190% owned by the company. Technically, they let me use it how I want, but I don't use it for much other than work anyway. Last time I filled the tank from near empty, it cost them $225. I recently got the pil changed. Cost about $150. Last week I drove 3 trips of roughly 6hours. This week, again. I'll be getting the oil changed again this weekend. Already drove it the 4k miles, lol it's been less than 6weeks.

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

was going to say isn´t there a better veacle for that consider how much dead weight the Ram pickup trucks are.

3 days ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ford 250 diesel. Not that monster on the video, but comparable

3 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

like... a Sprinter van type of a truck... That is basically the main tool of the rest of the world construction. Payload 2700kg and towing capacity of 3500kg, (519 model)

3 days ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The problem is with a van, I have an 8 foot bed, and a crew cab full of tools. That bed still isn't big enough for some of the stuff I have to carry. Sheets of stainless steel to glue to a wall, 10' long. 10 and 12' sheets of drywall. Pallets of tile, glue and grout stacked higher than the cab of the truck. Large pieces of equipment that gets lifted with a crane onto the roof for the ovens, much to big to fit in the work vans my coworkers have. We've tried, lol

3 days ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Basically you are doing exactly the same I previously did. Larger parts gets usually delivered to site here, so only tools in the van. Or a trailer. Also we use real trucks in 7-12 ton class, Like i still do own an Mercedes Atego flatbed truck with covers, like one in the picture. The sides opens and the bed is possible to deattach with hook assy, so I can switch cargohold for example to a gravel, ie convert it to a tipper truck, or flatbed with crane.

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Our sprinter crewcab

2 days ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0